ILoveTrump Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This issue is the fault of the dishonest media. I
> saw the story play over and over of the 400
> million dollar ransom paid by Obama. As the media
> said $400 million was delivered to Iran in an
> unmarked plane, they ran video of an unmarked
> plane sitting on the tarmac. Never did the
> anchors, commentators or captions say the plane
> was the one carrying the kidnapped Americans.
> Logical people would believe the plane being shown
> was delivering cash. Guaranteed that 99.9% of
> people seeing the plane thought the same thing as
> Donald Trump.
You described the situation very well. Exactly what happened. Trump confused one plane for a related plane.
Then, it turned out that Trump might be right about a video of the cash plane existing, even though Trump made the trivial mistake of confusing the hostage plane with the cash plane. (See
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3725770/Could-Trump-right-Propaganda-film-suggests-Iran-DID-videotape-cash-drop-plane-photograph-shipment-cash-January-prisoner-swap.html Could Trump have been right? Propaganda film suggests Iran DID videotape cash-drop plane and photograph shipment of cash during January prisoner swap)
Meanwhile, Hillary claims that she is going to follow in Obama's footsteps. At her convention, Hillary took a victory lap based on her actions in early negotiations for the Iran deal.
Obama has now admitted to paying $400 million in cash to Iran as a down payment toward a $1 and 7/10 billion settlement of a highly dubious claim of the Iranian govt against the US govt.
The key here is that Obama paid the world's leading sponsor of state terrorism with untraceable cash. If he had paid them with a wire transfer, through a middle man, our spies and financial people would have had a much better chance to follow the flow of the money.
The $400 million was converted into unmarked European currency, then loaded onto an unmarked plane and flown to Iran. Upon receiving the money, the Iranians then released 4 American hostages who they were holding.
Obama denies that the payment was ransom, but one of the hostages was on TV saying the opposite. He said that the Iranians were holding him and the other hostages in a plane at the airport.
Hostage asked why the plane wasn't taking off. The Iranian guard told him that they had to wait for another plane to land, and, if that plane didn't land, then the hostage plane would not be allowed to take off. So when the plane (apparently with the money) landed, the hostage plane was allowed to take off.
Yet, Obama claims that it was only coincidental that the money was sent on the same day that Iran released the hostages.
That untraceable money will be used for terrorism. Obama was asked if he could assure that Iran would not use the money for terrorism, Obama gave a 7 plus minute answer not addressing the concern that Obama had given Iran more money that will be used to murder Americans and American allies.
The untraceable money will go to Iranian subsidiaries Hezbollah and Hamas and to fund more covert terrorist operations.
More Americans, Israelis, Europeans, and others will die when Iran uses the money supplied by Obama.
Iran has seized 2 more Americans since they got paid for those last ones.
So which is more important,
the Obama-Clinton foreign policy disasters such as cash payment to Iran and related paving the Iranian path to nukes, the failed Russian reset, the crazy invasion of Libya (without Congressional approval and without UN approval, where are the liberals complaining about no Cong or UN approval?), the premature withdrawal from Iraq leading to Isis and a new war there,
or
Trump saying he saw video of the cash plane when he really saw video of the hostage plane?
==========
==========
It's nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice. - John Cassis on manners
Ignoring juvenile attacks and remarks on the internet for over two decades.
Arguing by deflection or name-calling is an admission that you don't have a rational argument.