None So Blind Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> cheap-ass libs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Whiner Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Here's a link to Trump's official statement,
> > from
> > > a source you will trust...
> > >
> > >
> >
>
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/05/27/trump-n
>
> >
> > > ixes-proposed-debate-with-sanders.html
> > >
> > > That sounds like it was written by a petulant
> > > third grader. And Trump has the gall to say
> > that
> > > IF he had debated Sanders, the money raised
> > would
> > > have gone to women's issues. Unbelievable.
> > Trump
> > > could have turned that debate into a pay per
> > view
> > > and he would have raised millions - for
> women's
> > > issues, of course.
> >
> >
> > He said that before you dumb turd.
>
> He said what before, moron?
>
> > The libtard networks would make Superbowl
> revenues
> > and they wouldn't even cough up $10 million for
> > women?
>
> Bullshit. You actually believed that excuse?
> Here's a statement from the Sanders camp that came
> out just before Trump's statement:
>
>
Trump's statement was released minutes after
> Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver said that the
> Vermont senator was "prepared to accept" a
> proposal from one of two networks to host the
> unorthodox debate between Trump and Sanders, who
> badly trails Hillary Clinton in the delegate
> count.
>
> Weaver suggested in his statement that both
> network offers included "a major contribution to
> charity."
>
> The networks would have LOVED to host (and pay
> for) this debate. Trump's staff clearly talked
> some sense into him; Sanders would savage him.
> Face it - Trump is a coward.
And was "major" = $10 million? You don't know shit about what was proposed.
I'm sure that they would love to. They just don't want to contribute $10 million of their profits.
Sanders can't even savage a sitting duck like Hillary with as many major fuck ups as she has. lol