Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Uncle Dave
()
Date: May 26, 2009 04:35PM
I like this idea!
From NumbersUSA:
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/may-26-2009/reps-phil-gingrey-and-kevin-brady-sponsor-birthright-citizenship-act.html
Reps. Phil Gingrey and Kevin Brady Sponsor Birthright Citizenship Act
By Springbok85
Created 05/26/2009 - 11:42am
Homepage Teaser:
Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - 12:37
Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.
The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the bill, a person born in the United States gains citizenship if one of the person's parents is:
* a citizen or national of the United States;
* an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or
* an alien performing active service in the armed forces.
Rep. Phil Gingrey has been in Congress since 2003, earning a recent grade of an A from NumbersUSA. Rep. Kevin Brady was elected to the House in 1997 and has earned a career grade of an B+.
The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 is one of five immigration reform bills endorsed by NumbersUSA during the 111th Congress. You can see a full list of the bills and its sponsors on our comparative chart located on the Proposed Bills page.
Rep. Gingrey & Rep. Brady
* congress
* Birthright Citizenship
© 2009 NumbersUSA Action, 1601 N Kent St, Suite 1100, Arlington, VA 22209, All
From NumbersUSA:
http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/may-26-2009/reps-phil-gingrey-and-kevin-brady-sponsor-birthright-citizenship-act.html
Reps. Phil Gingrey and Kevin Brady Sponsor Birthright Citizenship Act
By Springbok85
Created 05/26/2009 - 11:42am
Homepage Teaser:
Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - 12:37
Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.
The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the bill, a person born in the United States gains citizenship if one of the person's parents is:
* a citizen or national of the United States;
* an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or
* an alien performing active service in the armed forces.
Rep. Phil Gingrey has been in Congress since 2003, earning a recent grade of an A from NumbersUSA. Rep. Kevin Brady was elected to the House in 1997 and has earned a career grade of an B+.
The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 is one of five immigration reform bills endorsed by NumbersUSA during the 111th Congress. You can see a full list of the bills and its sponsors on our comparative chart located on the Proposed Bills page.
Rep. Gingrey & Rep. Brady
* congress
* Birthright Citizenship
© 2009 NumbersUSA Action, 1601 N Kent St, Suite 1100, Arlington, VA 22209, All
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Melissa
()
Date: May 26, 2009 04:37PM
*STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Uncle Dave
()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:06PM
Melissa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> *STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS*
Sounds good, but will Connolly vote for it?
-------------------------------------------------------
> *STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS*
Sounds good, but will Connolly vote for it?
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
notachance
()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:11PM
Hell no, he won't vote for this. Creepy jerk.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Predator Obama
()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:33PM
we shall see if it passes. could just make things murkier for immigration.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Gravis
()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:38PM
i was under the impression this issue was already addressed.
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Junes
()
Date: May 26, 2009 06:41PM
Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify nationwide and solve the problem without spending billions of tax payers dollars.
As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise if the little pawns are abandoned.
As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise if the little pawns are abandoned.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Uncle Dave
()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:08PM
Junes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.
You got that right!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.
You got that right!
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Vince(1)
()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:22PM
Junes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.
dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of them
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.
dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of them
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Vince(1)
()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:22PM
This bill will never pass....
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
graymoose1
()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:56PM
It should pass, and by the way Vince(1) why don't you go back to hispanicland with them. What a bleeding heart s o b you are.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Junes
()
Date: May 26, 2009 08:18PM
Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them
There you go Vince - getting all delusional again.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them
There you go Vince - getting all delusional again.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Melissa
()
Date: May 26, 2009 10:56PM
Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them
Vicente, why must you lump all hispanic people together? I know a number of hispanic people that one, do not support illegals; and two, get frustrated by low rent cholos perpetuating the stereotype. Just because YOU don't mind being lumped in with criminals doesn't mean EVERYONE who shares the same heritage wants to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them
Vicente, why must you lump all hispanic people together? I know a number of hispanic people that one, do not support illegals; and two, get frustrated by low rent cholos perpetuating the stereotype. Just because YOU don't mind being lumped in with criminals doesn't mean EVERYONE who shares the same heritage wants to.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by:
Stinkfist
()
Date: May 27, 2009 01:56AM
One child rule for the USA! I wonder how many babies I'll see bobbing down the Potomac...