HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Uncle Dave ()
Date: May 26, 2009 04:35PM

I like this idea!

From NumbersUSA:

http://www.numbersusa.com/content/news/may-26-2009/reps-phil-gingrey-and-kevin-brady-sponsor-birthright-citizenship-act.html

Reps. Phil Gingrey and Kevin Brady Sponsor Birthright Citizenship Act
By Springbok85
Created 05/26/2009 - 11:42am

Homepage Teaser:

Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 - 12:37
Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey and Texas Rep. Kevin Brady were among the 40 original cosponsors when Rep. Nathan Deal introduced the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) last month.

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under the bill, a person born in the United States gains citizenship if one of the person's parents is:

* a citizen or national of the United States;
* an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States whose residence is in the United States; or
* an alien performing active service in the armed forces.

Rep. Phil Gingrey has been in Congress since 2003, earning a recent grade of an A from NumbersUSA. Rep. Kevin Brady was elected to the House in 1997 and has earned a career grade of an B+.

The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 is one of five immigration reform bills endorsed by NumbersUSA during the 111th Congress. You can see a full list of the bills and its sponsors on our comparative chart located on the Proposed Bills page.
Rep. Gingrey & Rep. Brady

* congress
* Birthright Citizenship

© 2009 NumbersUSA Action, 1601 N Kent St, Suite 1100, Arlington, VA 22209, All

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Melissa ()
Date: May 26, 2009 04:37PM

*STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS*

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Uncle Dave ()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:06PM

Melissa Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> *STANDS UP AND APPLAUDS*

Sounds good, but will Connolly vote for it?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: notachance ()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:11PM

Hell no, he won't vote for this. Creepy jerk.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Predator Obama ()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:33PM

we shall see if it passes. could just make things murkier for immigration.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: May 26, 2009 05:38PM

i was under the impression this issue was already addressed.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Junes ()
Date: May 26, 2009 06:41PM

Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify nationwide and solve the problem without spending billions of tax payers dollars.

As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise if the little pawns are abandoned.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Uncle Dave ()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:08PM

Junes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.

You got that right!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Vince(1) ()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:22PM

Junes Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> nationwide and solve the problem without spending
> billions of tax payers dollars.
>
> As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the other
> side of the border, it shouldn't come as a suprise
> if the little pawns are abandoned.


dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of them

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Vince(1) ()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:22PM

This bill will never pass....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: graymoose1 ()
Date: May 26, 2009 07:56PM

It should pass, and by the way Vince(1) why don't you go back to hispanicland with them. What a bleeding heart s o b you are.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Junes ()
Date: May 26, 2009 08:18PM

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them

There you go Vince - getting all delusional again.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Melissa ()
Date: May 26, 2009 10:56PM

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Junes Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Or, Congress can just implement E-Verify
> > nationwide and solve the problem without
> spending
> > billions of tax payers dollars.
> >
> > As the wee ones aren't jackpot babies on the
> other
> > side of the border, it shouldn't come as a
> suprise
> > if the little pawns are abandoned.
>
>
> dehumanizing...what a joke that you dont
> dehumanize hispanics....yes, hispanics..all of
> them


Vicente, why must you lump all hispanic people together? I know a number of hispanic people that one, do not support illegals; and two, get frustrated by low rent cholos perpetuating the stereotype. Just because YOU don't mind being lumped in with criminals doesn't mean EVERYONE who shares the same heritage wants to.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Being vague is almost as fun as that other thing.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: No More Anchor Babies?
Posted by: Stinkfist ()
Date: May 27, 2009 01:56AM

One child rule for the USA! I wonder how many babies I'll see bobbing down the Potomac...

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **  **     **  **    **  **     **        ** 
 ***   ***  **     **  **   **   ***   ***        ** 
 **** ****  **     **  **  **    **** ****        ** 
 ** *** **  **     **  *****     ** *** **        ** 
 **     **   **   **   **  **    **     **  **    ** 
 **     **    ** **    **   **   **     **  **    ** 
 **     **     ***     **    **  **     **   ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.