Per your invitation for de-anonymization requests that you posted here: http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1898745.html
I hereby request that the following threads be de-anonymized in their entirety:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1631021.html,page=all

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1896492.html

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1772372.html,page=all

Thanks.

de-anonymize this Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Per your invitation for de-anonymization requests
> that you posted here:
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 98745.html
> I hereby request that the following threads be
> de-anonymized in their entirety:
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/16
> 31021.html,page=all
>
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/18
> 96492.html
> http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/17
> 72372.html,page=all
>
> Thanks.

These threads do not qualify for de-anonymization. The vast majority of posts in these threads were posted by unique users, and there was no clear intent of any group of users to "flood" under multiple anonymous names to make it appear they have more support than they do.

The "Megan the cray cray lady" thread has had its fair share of flooding, but it's too unwieldy to de-anonymize now without considerable effort.

Cary Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> The "Megan the cray cray lady" thread has had its
> fair share of flooding, but it's too unwieldy to
> de-anonymize now without considerable effort.


So to clarify, it qualifies as harrasment but you are just too lazy to figure out who done it?

Geezus is Cary all coked up tonight or something?

cary on Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cary Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > The "Megan the cray cray lady" thread has had
> its
> > fair share of flooding, but it's too unwieldy
> to
> > de-anonymize now without considerable effort.
>
>
> So to clarify, it qualifies as harrasment but you
> are just too lazy to figure out who done it?


Lmao

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning

cary on Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So to clarify, it qualifies as harrasment but you
> are just too lazy to figure out who done it?

The thread in question currently has 6,222 individual posts. There are some posts which may qualify as harassment and de-anonymization, but most of those have already been moderated. A thread of that size is sure to have some rabble rousing, so it receives less attention than a more concise thread.

You would be shocked to learn how much content I remove from Fairfax Underground on a daily basis.

It would be interesting to see the 2concerned threads become de-anonymized

de-anonymize this Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It would be interesting to see the 2concerned
> threads become de-anonymized

Older threads do not qualify for de-anonymization. De-anonymization is only tactful when an active discussion is taking place and a few (anonymous) voices are drowning out all others.

I try not to interfere with past events, rather only in actively evolving discussions which are being unfairly manipulated by a few bad actors violating the rules.

- Cary (the admin)

Please deanonymuze this page too

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1775813/1775813.html#msg-1775813

Dear Cary, can you please help us urgently by removing certain photo's and contact that was posted by a very bad person?