http://potomaclocal.com/2015/06/08/family-troubles-surround-disappearance-of-nokesville-teen/
Attachments:

No I wasn't. I contacted them.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I wasn't. I contacted them.


Like you contact everyone else first when you're guilty of something.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I wasn't. I contacted them.


that is even more suspicious and everyone here knows you're a liar so no one is buying that

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I wasn't. I contacted them.

But you were still questioned whether they contacted you or you contacted them. Semantics be damned.

DmHDH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No I wasn't. I contacted them.
>
> But you were still questioned whether they
> contacted you or you contacted them. Semantics be damned.



+1

They were already going to question him. Someone called the other day and said his name had been given to the police by several people.

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I wasn't. I contacted them.


did you tell them how you had stalked him, drove over 100 miles and took pictures of his house but then later removed them? or that you had been sending him nasty private messages calling him a fucked up kid or all of the other bullying you've done to him since you outed him?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1743626.html

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1745379.html

Or that?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1790232.html

Or that too?

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1861985/1862725.html#msg-1862725

Or about how you were just arrested for this?

https://twitter.com/CyberSafeAdvice/status/560410494213689344

Or sued for that?

Are you ready to see your face and hear you name on the news tonight?

Channel 9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Are you ready to see your face and hear you name
> on the news tonight?


Nope! Not tonight but WTOP will be running a story!

I'm going to assume from your lack of a response that you did not include your stalking nor harassment of this boy to them...

The comments section of both Potomac news stories tells a lot more about eesh's actions. A little more of a revelation to the Potomac news readers. All 12 of them

Michael Josef Basl, 34 years old, from Richmond, VA, openly stalked, harassed, and taunted TJ Sadler about his mental illnesses. Law enforcement needs to be questioning this man. The evidence substantiating the above and therefore the reasonable belief that Basl ought to be considered a person of interest in this matter can be found in the following link:

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/1880929.html

Basl is being sued for nearly a million dollars for stalking, harassing, and cyberbullying; also, for impersonating an individual and his entire family, with the intent to draw an armed response by law enforcement to the impersonated individual’s home, vandalism, defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass to land and chattels, and breaking and entering, among other claims based on reasonable information and belief.

He is also set to stand trial on June 24th for harassment by computer and illegal dissemination of nude photographs of another Prince William County individual; this, after having the plaintiff in the lawsuit falsely arrested and maliciously prosecuted over forged death threats supposedly sent by said plaintiff. This was in retaliation for being served with the civil lawsuit.

Basl now faces the same charge of harassment by computer he falsely brought against the man who initiated the civil lawsuit. The substantiating information used to draw reasonable belief of the aforementioned can be found by following the link above and others on the Fairfax Underground website, and is also soon to be a matter of public record.

Basl is also under suspicion, upon information and belief, of (allegedly) conspiring with another individual in order to silence a witness from testifying against him in said lawsuit, as well as in the upcoming June 24th computer harassment and dissemination case in Henrico, and at least one other upcoming case in which said witness is set to testify.

The witness Basl has allegedly (though based in reasonable circumstantial and hard evidence) been conspiring to also have falsely arrested and jailed has testified under oath. Her testimony indicted Basl of admitting to intentionally inciting the armed police response upon the plaintiff in the civil case, in hopes of having him shot dead by the police.

The same witness also testified under oath that Basl had admitted to sending himself the death threats that resulted in the plaintiff in the civil suit being arrested and prosecuted; the witness who has since been falsely arrested and jailed herself (upon review of accumulating evidence and reasonable belief) in retaliation for this testimony was found credible by the Henrico General District Court–thereby impeaching Basl’s testimony regarding the supposed death threats from the civil suit plaintiff and resulting in a not guilty verdict. This was all in retaliation for a civil action brought against Basl for the above causes of action relating to the lawsuit.

Now, Basl is on trial for the same charge of harassment by computer, with talk of perjury charges to follow in connection to the false death threat case he brought against the civil suit plaintiff. He is further being sued for malicious prosecution in the same Henrico General District Court he is now set to stand trial in for computer harassment. The lawsuit is a matter of public record, as is the lawsuit for malicious prosecution which is soon to be filed. The court transcript for the death threat case is available upon request of the court reporting service hired to make record of the proceedings.

In light of these disturbing facts and developments, and of his relentless online and offline harassment of Sadler, Mr. Basl ought to be looked into as a person of interest in his disappearance.

Although it appears to be a runaway, the fact remains Mr. Basl had bullied, harassed, and physically stalked Sadler for months; his suspect behavior in matters relating to three other individuals also connected to Sadler by way of the Fairfax Underground website should be taken into serious consideration in light of the aforementioned.

Sadler was an equal target of Basl, both online and off, as much as the civil suit plaintiff he had falsely arrested and prosecuted, as much as the witness who testified to the aforementioned and to the admission by Basl he intended for the plaintiff to be killed via manipulation of police (by inciting an armed response based on violent and threatening online posts in which he impersonated the individual); and as much as the Prince William woman who has brought the same charges of computer harassment against him.

Michael Josef Basl is a person of interest in the disappearance of this boy. Officers in the appropriate jurisdiction should be looking into this 34 year old man’s bullying and stalking of Sadler (a minor), regardless; and especially now that he has gone missing.

Basl took photographs while stalking Sadler and subsequently removed them after being sued by the plaintiff in the civil suit (which is going forward in Fairfax County). The photographs were found and restored to the Fairfax Underground website where they were first posted by Basl himself and are found in the link above.

These incidents are all connected and the situation has been escalating.

To any authorized local authority, question this individual in the event he has any information on Sadler’s whereabouts or had any contact via the internet or otherwise before his disappearance. Any information regarding Sadler’s last communication should be looked at; and, as Basl (34 years old) had often bullied Sadler (a 14 year old boy) online, both in public postings and in private messages, it is reasonable to find serious concern in this matter.

Though Sadler appears at this point to be a runaway, the months-long harassment and physical stalking of him by Mr. Basl seems to be concerning enough in itself to warrant a simple questioning by the authorities, if nothing else.

Michael Basl has bullied, taunted, stalked, and exploited TJ Sadler’s mental issues quite knowingly, and quite obviously out of pure malice, and *based on the testimony of another of his victims*, he has already attempted murder by proxy, with the police as his weapon. This is a serious matter.

potomak newz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The comments section of both Potomac news stories
> tells a lot more about eesh's actions. A little
> more of a revelation to the Potomac news readers.
> All 12 of them

One of the authors of those posts is obvious based on the poor grammar and misspelling

This sounds like the ranting of Toohey!

I am glad to hear that Eesh, wether by choice or force, was questioned,

Megan gladly talked to a reporter, but still has not been investigated?

Re: What do you say to your partner after sex?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 23, 2011 02:06AM

Yeah, but you don't know who you are talking to on the internet and there is a good chance real sex offenders use this site waiting for a naive girl like you.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before you hit post message, ask yourself, "Does this post benefit the website?"

http://arrestlistings.com/virginia/henrico-county/misdemeanors/michael-basl/diseminate-images-of-another

V Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> http://arrestlistings.com/virginia/henrico-county/
> misdemeanors/michael-basl/diseminate-images-of-another


when is enough enough with this guy?

damn i was really hoping for the mugshot :(

Without eesh I wouldn't bother browsing this forum. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Place is boring without him and the recent influx of new trolls trying to fill his shoes just can't do it.

Support eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Without eesh I wouldn't bother browsing this
> forum. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Place is
> boring without him and the recent influx of new
> trolls trying to fill his shoes just can't do it.

That's stupid.

This is all very entertaining. However I do wish that Monique or Megan or whoever is creating all these multiple eesh topics could confine it all to a single thread, similar to the one a single thread that exists for "Megan the Cray lady".

That would make it much easier for those who wish to bash eesh and as well as others who enjoy reading all the antics and accusations about and by all the crazy people.

Support eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Without eesh I wouldn't bother browsing this
> forum. I'm not the only one. Place is
> boring without him and the recent influx of new
> trolls trying to fill his shoes just can't do it.


I would browse here less too without him. Its better than a soap opera. Watching his demise after all his years of bullying on here and physically stalking people is awfully enjoyable. His life will be forever altered.

The people against Eesh are the ones stupid enough to reveal personal histories to a stranger online. Now, they rant and rave to avoid taking responsibility for their actions.

No, I am Not Eesh and I have no dog in this fight.

It's good a real reporter will be doing a real story

plop plop Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Support eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Without eesh I wouldn't bother browsing this
> > forum. I'm not the only one. Place is
> > boring without him and the recent influx of new
> > trolls trying to fill his shoes just can't do
> it.
>
>
> I would browse here less too without him. Its
> better than a soap opera. Watching his demise
> after all his years of bullying on here and
> physically stalking people is awfully enjoyable.
> His life will be forever altered.


It's going to be really tough for him to get a job that's not at a fast food joint. Everyone does a quick google search these days before hiring an employee.

Ying Ko Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The people against Eesh are the ones stupid enough
> to reveal personal histories to a stranger
> online. Now, they rant and rave to avoid taking
> responsibility for their actions.
>
> No, I am Not Eesh and I have no dog in this
> fight.


So true

True Dat Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ying Ko Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The people against Eesh are the ones stupid
> enough
> > to reveal personal histories to a stranger
> > online. Now, they rant and rave to avoid taking
> > responsibility for their actions.
> >
> > No, I am Not Eesh and I have no dog in this
> > fight.
>
>
> So true

Was that how this all started? Lizzie dared eesh to find out who she was? And how did that work out? She's still here crying about it.

He did Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> True Dat Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Ying Ko Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The people against Eesh are the ones stupid
> > enough
> > > to reveal personal histories to a stranger
> > > online. Now, they rant and rave to avoid
> taking
> > > responsibility for their actions.
> > >
> > > No, I am Not Eesh and I have no dog in this
> > > fight.
> >
> >
> > So true
>
> Was that how this all started? Lizzie dared eesh
> to find out who she was? And how did that work
> out? She's still here crying about it.


Uh really? How so? Where? No ones crying about shit. The only person crying is the faggot who had lizzie falsely arrested three times that amounted to nothing but only getting him into more legal trouble after finding out she was testifying against him and ended up with a guilty conviction himself.

good golly

gohtst Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No I wasn't. I contacted them.
>
>
> did you tell them how you had stalked him, drove
> over 100 miles and took pictures of his house but
> then later removed them? or that you had been
> sending him nasty private messages calling him a
> fucked up kid or all of the other bullying you've
> done to him since you outed him?

Megan was trying to blame eesh for the kid running away. She was hoping to detract attention from the fact she herself had an illicit relationship with the underage boy.

a 34 year old man drove over 100 miles to stalk and harass a 14 year-old boy. is that not illicit? if the mother ever comes to her senses and realizes what she's holding in the palm of her hand, she could press charges and they would be aggravated charges due to him being underage.

Eesh didn't stalk the kid. On the other hand, Megan was exchanging text messages and had long phone conversations with him. Megan contributed to the delinquency of a minor.

charge Megan Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh didn't stalk the kid. On the other hand,
> Megan was exchanging text messages and had long
> phone conversations with him. Megan contributed
> to the delinquency of a minor.

Bullshit. He posted photos of Nokesville and the Sadler's house. Maybe you consider this behavior just foreplay.

Taking photos of towns and houses from public roads is not stalking. On the other hand William Moreno stalked Monique, and sat outside her house despite being repeatedly asked to leave. Then Moreno came back later and lurked around her house again.

stalkers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taking photos of towns and houses from public
> roads is not stalking. On the other hand William
> Moreno stalked Monique, and sat outside her house
> despite being repeatedly asked to leave. Then
> Moreno came back later and lurked around her house
> again.


Professional or personal opinion?

Professional, based on statute and case law. Photos of a town and house don't constitute stalking, at least not in VA. If you know somethî to the contrary, otherwise, please feel free to share the reference. I'm open to hearing it.

stalkers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taking photos of towns and houses from public
> roads is not stalking. On the other hand William
> Moreno stalked Monique, and sat outside her house
> despite being repeatedly asked to leave. Then
> Moreno came back later and lurked around her house
> again.


not stalking at all
i can go out front of anyones house and sit there as long as i like
as long as i am on public property it is not stalking
you can ask me to leave 1000 times and it does not matter

nicw try tho

JJ9e4 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> stalkers Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Taking photos of towns and houses from public
> > roads is not stalking. On the other hand
> William
> > Moreno stalked Monique, and sat outside her
> house
> > despite being repeatedly asked to leave. Then
> > Moreno came back later and lurked around her
> house
> > again.
>
>
> not stalking at all
> i can go out front of anyones house and sit there
> as long as i like
> as long as i am on public property it is not
> stalking
> you can ask me to leave 1000 times and it does not
> matter
>
> nicw try tho


If skulking about for over an hour, sitting on the curb in front of someone's house is not stalking, then driving down the road definitely is not. The bottom line is that the Morenos were guilty of even greater "stalkerish" activity than eesh. It's the pot is calling the kettle black.
Attachments:

After all this time, we still don't know what is between her legs as she sits on the curb......and William is dressed like The Crow. I guess he's stuck in that Goth look.

They were trying to get back items that Monique stole from them.

And eesh did stalk. He has followed many posters in his car. There have been scores of stories about him doing it through the years. He is one disturbed faggot

As far as I remember, the Loudoun Commonwealth's Attorney and the Loudoun Sheriff's Department both agreed that lizzie was the owner of the laptop, as it was a gift to her from William.

If they, the Morenos wanted it so badly, they would have shown up to court when Sharon filed the detinue.

stalking on Strath rd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> They were trying to get back items that Monique
> stole from them.
>
> And eesh did stalk. He has followed many posters
> in his car. There have been scores of stories
> about him doing it through the years. He is one
> disturbed faggot


Oh really? Why did they need to go (unannounced) to Monique's house for that? And why did they remain lingering around when they knew she was not at home?

In such a situation there are a number of correct legal ways to resolve a dispute over custody of personal items. Going to the other person's home when they are not there, lurking around, sitting on the curb, leaving, and returning later are not among those options -- especially when the other party has indicated that she does not intend to return the items.

Moreover the police determined that the items were not "stolen" at all and had been given to her willingly.

The evil fat mother and her retarded/autistic/molested pedophile son were waaay off base there...

There are many stories about William Moreno molesting babies and children through the years. He is another seriously disturbed (probably closet) faggot.

It's a fucking Coke bottle, twit.

Evidently down Richmond way they put other things between their legs in public but around here, normal people do normal things.

And for the idiot(s) in this thread, driving over to someone's house that you once lived with no matter what the capacity has to do with emotional state.

Not stalking.

Driving a hundred miles to take pictures of someones property and an eatery that someone is known to frequent IS stalking.

Throw in the fact that Cain was underage and what do you know? It becomes very questionable behavior.

Vexxxed is so angry. It's almost comical.

Vexxxed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's a fucking Coke bottle, twit.
>
> Evidently down Richmond way they put other things
> between their legs in public but around here,
> normal people do normal things.
>
> And for the idiot(s) in this thread, driving over
> to someone's house that you once lived with no
> matter what the capacity has to do with emotional
> state.
>
> Not stalking.
>
> Driving a hundred miles to take pictures of
> someones property and an eatery that someone is
> known to frequent IS stalking.
>
> Throw in the fact that Cain was underage and what
> do you know? It becomes very questionable
> behavior.


Sorry Vexxed it's already been established that driving on public roads and taking photos of buildings and houses in public view is NOT stalking.

Driving 20 or 30 miles to show up unannounced at someone's house "attempting to get an item", when you have been informed by that person that they do not intend to give you the item, and that they are not even home, skulking around for over an hour, leaving, returning, etc. -- may not be stalking either, but it is definitely questionable and very creepy behavior verging on stalking.

William Moreno has tried to attribute his misdeeds on his disabilities, autism, Assbergers, childhood abuse, and now you want to add his "emotional state". Thanks for that, but we already know that Moreno is fucked in the head. What is the excuse for his mother and partner in stalking?

Stalking is unwanted or obsessive attention by an individual or group toward another person. Stalking behaviors are related to harassment and intimidation and may include following the victim in person or monitoring them. The word stalking is used, with some differing meanings, in psychology and psychiatry and also in some legal jurisdictions as a term for a criminal offense.

According to a 2002 report by the U.S. National Center for Victims of Crime, "virtually any unwanted contact between two people that directly or indirectly communicates a threat or places the victim in fear can be considered stalking,"[1] although in practice the legal standard is usually somewhat stricter.


There you go eesh. You posted pics of your forays with the intent to harass and intimidate. Thus you are a stalker.

I will smile when one of your stalking victims seriously fucks you up. It will happen because you won't stop until it happens.

Vexxxed Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's a fucking Coke bottle, twit.
>
> Evidently down Richmond way they put other things
> between their legs in public but around here,
> normal people do normal things.
>
Fucking a coke bottle sin't really normal, except for maybe Megan.

defined Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stalking is unwanted or obsessive attention by an
> individual or group toward another person.
> Stalking behaviors are related to harassment and
> intimidation and may include following the victim
> in person or monitoring them. The word stalking is
> used, with some differing meanings, in psychology
> and psychiatry and also in some legal
> jurisdictions as a term for a criminal offense.
>
> According to a 2002 report by the U.S. National
> Center for Victims of Crime, "virtually any
> unwanted contact between two people that directly
> or indirectly communicates a threat or places the
> victim in fear can be considered stalking,"[1]
> although in practice the legal standard is usually
> somewhat stricter.
>
>
> There you go eesh. You posted pics of your forays
> with the intent to harass and intimidate. Thus you
> are a stalker.
>
> I will smile when one of your stalking victims
> seriously fucks you up. It will happen because you
> won't stop until it happens.


The legal standard and definition of stalking is what matters. To reiterate, simply driving on public roads and taking photos of houses and businesses does not meet the legal definition or standard for stalking, in Virginia.

Again, if you have knowledge to the contrary, please do cite it--I'm serious.

Much of what Moreno has done is also stalking by your definition, but he is actually closer to the legal standard because he lingered for an extended period at Monique's residence, and sat and stared at her house. He did not leave despite being asked to do so and informed he would not be given the items he purported came for.

Parents beware.
Attachments:

Oh, its going to happen soon ;)

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No I wasn't. I contacted them.
Attachments:

so the above post shows Meghan lied

ok

and?

kojpib

.