Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 10:38PM
With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How did the rightarded Republicans not figure out Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email account?
I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to have figured that one out. What have they been wasting all those resources on with this non scandal?
Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons emails should have been the first thing they should have done right?
Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name is, is on the case.
I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to have figured that one out. What have they been wasting all those resources on with this non scandal?
Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons emails should have been the first thing they should have done right?
Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name is, is on the case.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
dickchaney
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:11PM
She E-mailed Obama at the Whitehouse. He didn't seem to notice or care.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
answering answerer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:14PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
They knew that she used a personal account based on the Guccifer hack of Blumenthal. They and others, including AP and various other journalists, did go after her emails at different times. The requests were rejected in most cases because no pertinent records meeting the criteria of the requests were found.
What nobody knew until the recent admission was that she ONLY used a personal account in lieu of any official email. The latter of which would have preserved official records and would be subject to FOIA, Congressional, an other records requests. Which was why nothing ever turned up when requests were made. And why she hid it. That only came out as a result of a judges order in another suit which forced the State Department to produce some related records. That's why she turned over the 55,000 or whatever emails to them. And why multiple groups like AP now are talking about filing suit.
I know... I know... It's complicated and they don't tell you these things on MSNBC.
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
They knew that she used a personal account based on the Guccifer hack of Blumenthal. They and others, including AP and various other journalists, did go after her emails at different times. The requests were rejected in most cases because no pertinent records meeting the criteria of the requests were found.
What nobody knew until the recent admission was that she ONLY used a personal account in lieu of any official email. The latter of which would have preserved official records and would be subject to FOIA, Congressional, an other records requests. Which was why nothing ever turned up when requests were made. And why she hid it. That only came out as a result of a judges order in another suit which forced the State Department to produce some related records. That's why she turned over the 55,000 or whatever emails to them. And why multiple groups like AP now are talking about filing suit.
I know... I know... It's complicated and they don't tell you these things on MSNBC.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:23PM
Thanks for the answer rightard.
But one thing thats still puzzling is its reported that she didnt have an official email account whatsoever. What did they turn over if she didnt have an account? And didnt the rightards making the request notice the obvious fact that there was no account dedicated to her?
I mean its not rocket science to realize that. It makes no sense unless the rightards are complete rightards.
But one thing thats still puzzling is its reported that she didnt have an official email account whatsoever. What did they turn over if she didnt have an account? And didnt the rightards making the request notice the obvious fact that there was no account dedicated to her?
I mean its not rocket science to realize that. It makes no sense unless the rightards are complete rightards.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:27PM
If they request her emails and there are non. Shouldnt a rightard wonder why that is?
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
answering answerer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:28PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the answer rightard.
>
> But one thing thats still puzzling is its reported
> that she didnt have an official email account
> whatsoever. What did they turn over if she didnt
> have an account? And didnt the rightards making
> the request notice the obvious fact that there was
> no account dedicated to her?
>
> I mean its not rocket science to realize that. It
> makes no sense unless the rightards are complete
> rightards.
They turned over nothing. Yes, they did notice. They were told nothing relevant existed.
That applies to 'rightards,' 'leftards,' 'journaltards,' and various other outside attorneys and private groups.
Which is why this is a big deal and why even the 'leftards' and 'journaltards' are pissed.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for the answer rightard.
>
> But one thing thats still puzzling is its reported
> that she didnt have an official email account
> whatsoever. What did they turn over if she didnt
> have an account? And didnt the rightards making
> the request notice the obvious fact that there was
> no account dedicated to her?
>
> I mean its not rocket science to realize that. It
> makes no sense unless the rightards are complete
> rightards.
They turned over nothing. Yes, they did notice. They were told nothing relevant existed.
That applies to 'rightards,' 'leftards,' 'journaltards,' and various other outside attorneys and private groups.
Which is why this is a big deal and why even the 'leftards' and 'journaltards' are pissed.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:31PM
I dont think its a big deal. Pretty sure Colin Powell did the same thing and his emails lost forever are where the real dirt is rightard.
You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us into Iraq.
You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us into Iraq.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
answering answerer
()
Date: March 05, 2015 11:39PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont think its a big deal. Pretty sure Colin
> Powell did the same thing and his emails lost
> forever are where the real dirt is rightard.
>
> You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us
> into Iraq.
Yeah, but then you're a dumbfuck so...
You'll have to talk to the NYT, WaPo, Politico, CNN, CBS, etc., and let them all know that it's no big deal. Actually, even MSNBC is on her case about it. Drop them a note too.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont think its a big deal. Pretty sure Colin
> Powell did the same thing and his emails lost
> forever are where the real dirt is rightard.
>
> You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us
> into Iraq.
Yeah, but then you're a dumbfuck so...
You'll have to talk to the NYT, WaPo, Politico, CNN, CBS, etc., and let them all know that it's no big deal. Actually, even MSNBC is on her case about it. Drop them a note too.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 06, 2015 12:00AM
Thats just the media trying to bait her into the limelight for their own reporting.
Once she starts running it wont matter. You're just too dumb to recognize those dynamics.
Once she starts running it wont matter. You're just too dumb to recognize those dynamics.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
answering answerer
()
Date: March 06, 2015 02:07AM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thats just the media trying to bait her into the
> limelight for their own reporting.
>
> Once she starts running it wont matter. You're
> just too dumb to recognize those dynamics.
Rrrigggtttt The AP files lots of lawsuits just to bait people into the limelight. lol
I've noticed something about you - the more you post, the more dumb you get.
Hillary has lots of baggage. Not a lot of people who are going to carry it for her like they have Obama. It just gets worse from here monkey boy.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thats just the media trying to bait her into the
> limelight for their own reporting.
>
> Once she starts running it wont matter. You're
> just too dumb to recognize those dynamics.
Rrrigggtttt The AP files lots of lawsuits just to bait people into the limelight. lol
I've noticed something about you - the more you post, the more dumb you get.
Hillary has lots of baggage. Not a lot of people who are going to carry it for her like they have Obama. It just gets worse from here monkey boy.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
4k36J
()
Date: March 06, 2015 02:15AM
Apparently Hillary's private network served a dual purpose as data center for The Clinton Foundation. The Daily Beast reported on Feb 26 that the Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in donations from foreign governments, including Kuwait and Qatar, while presidential contender Hillary Clinton was still secretary of state
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wondering wonderer
()
Date: March 06, 2015 06:47AM
4k36J Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently Hillary's private network served a dual
> purpose as data center for The Clinton Foundation.
> The Daily Beast reported on Feb 26 that the
> Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in
> donations from foreign governments, including
> Kuwait and Qatar, while presidential contender
> Hillary Clinton was still secretary of state
And? You rightards are so cute. I'm gonna enjoy this election.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Apparently Hillary's private network served a dual
> purpose as data center for The Clinton Foundation.
> The Daily Beast reported on Feb 26 that the
> Clinton Foundation received millions of dollars in
> donations from foreign governments, including
> Kuwait and Qatar, while presidential contender
> Hillary Clinton was still secretary of state
And? You rightards are so cute. I'm gonna enjoy this election.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
Hillary On the Ropes
()
Date: March 06, 2015 09:57AM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 4k36J Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> And? You rightards are so cute. I'm gonna enjoy
> this election.
Doubtful
-------------------------------------------------------
> 4k36J Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> And? You rightards are so cute. I'm gonna enjoy
> this election.
Doubtful
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wrongg
()
Date: March 06, 2015 10:56AM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
You libiots are simple stupid people.
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
You libiots are simple stupid people.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
libs hate America.
()
Date: March 06, 2015 12:32PM
wrongg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wondering wonderer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings.
> How
> > did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> > Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> > account?
> >
> > I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> > have figured that one out. What have they been
> > wasting all those resources on with this non
> > scandal?
> >
> > Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> > emails should have been the first thing they
> > should have done right?
> >
> > Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his
> name
> > is, is on the case.
>
>
> You libiots are simple stupid people.
I spent a lot of time on a farm while I was growing up, one that had wild animals roaming the property.
-------------------------------------------------------
> wondering wonderer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings.
> How
> > did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> > Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> > account?
> >
> > I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> > have figured that one out. What have they been
> > wasting all those resources on with this non
> > scandal?
> >
> > Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> > emails should have been the first thing they
> > should have done right?
> >
> > Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his
> name
> > is, is on the case.
>
>
> You libiots are simple stupid people.
I spent a lot of time on a farm while I was growing up, one that had wild animals roaming the property.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
Traitors
()
Date: March 06, 2015 03:33PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont think its a big deal. Pretty sure Colin
> Powell did the same thing and his emails lost
> forever are where the real dirt is rightard.
>
> You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us
> into Iraq.
u are a stupid man
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont think its a big deal. Pretty sure Colin
> Powell did the same thing and his emails lost
> forever are where the real dirt is rightard.
>
> You know, the guy that lied to the U.N. to get us
> into Iraq.
u are a stupid man
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
trembl9
()
Date: March 07, 2015 06:35PM
Ihave a question....WTF cares?
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
Mittens has kittens
()
Date: March 15, 2015 05:00PM
Remember how fuckin sure this retard was about Mittens? And then about Gillespie? He never gets tired of being wrong. There isn't a single candidate who can make it out of the primary in the republican party and win a general election. The only reason the GOP is relevant is because in 2000 they hit the grand slam of political victories, gerrymandered the fuck out of states, continued to do so at local state election levels as well, so that they can have the house despite losing the popular vote in the house, senate, and presidency.
They think because they won an off year election people have forgotten what a bunch of douche curmudgeons they are. Or that they haven't legislated shit in a decade, other than DOMA of course, which went well for them.
Good luck electing Ted Cruz you dumb shit, is he going to read Doctor Seuss to Hillary at the debates, or talk about how he's a cuban canadian presidential candidate who was a birther about Obama.
I can't wait to rub it in your dumb face again, and I can't wait for you to blame illegals or whatever the fuck you continue to think is losing you elections.
They think because they won an off year election people have forgotten what a bunch of douche curmudgeons they are. Or that they haven't legislated shit in a decade, other than DOMA of course, which went well for them.
Good luck electing Ted Cruz you dumb shit, is he going to read Doctor Seuss to Hillary at the debates, or talk about how he's a cuban canadian presidential candidate who was a birther about Obama.
I can't wait to rub it in your dumb face again, and I can't wait for you to blame illegals or whatever the fuck you continue to think is losing you elections.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
I Luv Bacon
()
Date: March 15, 2015 05:39PM
Bow to your queen
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
on point
()
Date: March 15, 2015 06:23PM
Mittens has kittens Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember how fuckin sure this retard was about
> Mittens? And then about Gillespie? He never gets
> tired of being wrong. There isn't a single
> candidate who can make it out of the primary in
> the republican party and win a general election.
> The only reason the GOP is relevant is because in
> 2000 they hit the grand slam of political
> victories, gerrymandered the fuck out of states,
> continued to do so at local state election levels
> as well, so that they can have the house despite
> losing the popular vote in the house, senate, and
> presidency.
>
> They think because they won an off year election
> people have forgotten what a bunch of douche
> curmudgeons they are. Or that they haven't
> legislated shit in a decade, other than DOMA of
> course, which went well for them.
>
> Good luck electing Ted Cruz you dumb shit, is he
> going to read Doctor Seuss to Hillary at the
> debates, or talk about how he's a cuban canadian
> presidential candidate who was a birther about
> Obama.
>
> I can't wait to rub it in your dumb face again,
> and I can't wait for you to blame illegals or
> whatever the fuck you continue to think is losing
> you elections.
+1 you're 100 % on point. Thats why I'm looking forward to epeic proportions of their butt hurt in 2016.
Keep at it until they learn to respect the will of the American people.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember how fuckin sure this retard was about
> Mittens? And then about Gillespie? He never gets
> tired of being wrong. There isn't a single
> candidate who can make it out of the primary in
> the republican party and win a general election.
> The only reason the GOP is relevant is because in
> 2000 they hit the grand slam of political
> victories, gerrymandered the fuck out of states,
> continued to do so at local state election levels
> as well, so that they can have the house despite
> losing the popular vote in the house, senate, and
> presidency.
>
> They think because they won an off year election
> people have forgotten what a bunch of douche
> curmudgeons they are. Or that they haven't
> legislated shit in a decade, other than DOMA of
> course, which went well for them.
>
> Good luck electing Ted Cruz you dumb shit, is he
> going to read Doctor Seuss to Hillary at the
> debates, or talk about how he's a cuban canadian
> presidential candidate who was a birther about
> Obama.
>
> I can't wait to rub it in your dumb face again,
> and I can't wait for you to blame illegals or
> whatever the fuck you continue to think is losing
> you elections.
+1 you're 100 % on point. Thats why I'm looking forward to epeic proportions of their butt hurt in 2016.
Keep at it until they learn to respect the will of the American people.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wrongg
()
Date: March 15, 2015 08:58PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
Hey dippy dipshit, you think the sec state ever sent an email to the prez or wh staff? how did they miss the source? dems are lying liars.
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
Hey dippy dipshit, you think the sec state ever sent an email to the prez or wh staff? how did they miss the source? dems are lying liars.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
FYI Guy
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:15PM
The 9 Benghazi Investigations have had Hillary's emails and all electronic records for well over a year and now they've got a problem with the Hillary's email address?
Seriously?!
The real story is that 9 Republican investigations have been funded by the tax payers, haven't produced jack shit worth writing about, and it proves Republicans can't read their own reports let alone an email message header.
I'd say fire the Republican investigators for incompetence and tax payer fraud and then promote Hillary to run our stealth CyberWar on morons.
For the love of Pete, the 47 Republican Traitor Senators sent an open letter on paper by snail mail and couldn't even do it digitally.
That's a fiducial crime of passionate stupidity if there ever was one.
Seriously?!
The real story is that 9 Republican investigations have been funded by the tax payers, haven't produced jack shit worth writing about, and it proves Republicans can't read their own reports let alone an email message header.
I'd say fire the Republican investigators for incompetence and tax payer fraud and then promote Hillary to run our stealth CyberWar on morons.
For the love of Pete, the 47 Republican Traitor Senators sent an open letter on paper by snail mail and couldn't even do it digitally.
That's a fiducial crime of passionate stupidity if there ever was one.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
POP goes the secret server
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:17PM
FYI Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 9 Benghazi Investigations have had Hillary's
> emails and all electronic records for well over a
> year and now they've got a problem with the
> Hillary's email address?
>
No, they didn't. That's why she has a problem.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 9 Benghazi Investigations have had Hillary's
> emails and all electronic records for well over a
> year and now they've got a problem with the
> Hillary's email address?
>
No, they didn't. That's why she has a problem.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wrongg
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:22PM
FYI Guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 9 Benghazi Investigations have had Hillary's
> emails and all electronic records for well over a
> year and now they've got a problem with the
> Hillary's email address?
>
> Seriously?!
>
> The real story is that 9 Republican investigations
> have been funded by the tax payers, haven't
> produced jack shit worth writing about, and it
> proves Republicans can't read their own reports
> let alone an email message header.
>
> I'd say fire the Republican investigators for
> incompetence and tax payer fraud and then promote
> Hillary to run our stealth CyberWar on morons.
>
> For the love of Pete, the 47 Republican Traitor
> Senators sent an open letter on paper by snail
> mail and couldn't even do it digitally.
>
> That's a fiducial crime of passionate stupidity if
> there ever was one.
You are so stupid. fiducial? State didn't have her emails? i feel very sorry for your future.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The 9 Benghazi Investigations have had Hillary's
> emails and all electronic records for well over a
> year and now they've got a problem with the
> Hillary's email address?
>
> Seriously?!
>
> The real story is that 9 Republican investigations
> have been funded by the tax payers, haven't
> produced jack shit worth writing about, and it
> proves Republicans can't read their own reports
> let alone an email message header.
>
> I'd say fire the Republican investigators for
> incompetence and tax payer fraud and then promote
> Hillary to run our stealth CyberWar on morons.
>
> For the love of Pete, the 47 Republican Traitor
> Senators sent an open letter on paper by snail
> mail and couldn't even do it digitally.
>
> That's a fiducial crime of passionate stupidity if
> there ever was one.
You are so stupid. fiducial? State didn't have her emails? i feel very sorry for your future.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
FPKhw
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:26PM
answering answerer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wondering wonderer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings.
> How
> > did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> > Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> > account?
> >
> > I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> > have figured that one out. What have they been
> > wasting all those resources on with this non
> > scandal?
> >
> > Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> > emails should have been the first thing they
> > should have done right?
> >
> > Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his
> name
> > is, is on the case.
>
>
> They knew that she used a personal account based
> on the Guccifer hack of Blumenthal. They and
> others, including AP and various other
> journalists, did go after her emails at different
> times. The requests were rejected in most cases
> because no pertinent records meeting the criteria
> of the requests were found.
>
> What nobody knew until the recent admission was
> that she ONLY used a personal account in lieu of
> any official email. The latter of which would
> have preserved official records and would be
> subject to FOIA, Congressional, an other records
> requests. Which was why nothing ever turned up
> when requests were made. And why she hid it.
> That only came out as a result of a judges order
> in another suit which forced the State Department
> to produce some related records. That's why she
> turned over the 55,000 or whatever emails to them.
> And why multiple groups like AP now are talking
> about filing suit.
>
> I know... I know... It's complicated and they
> don't tell you these things on MSNBC.
Wait if she ONLY used the personal account that means that after 2 or is it 3 Benghazi hearings they have never seen any emails from her? Would that not have been a remarkable fact in and of itself or were they thinking she was just like Lindsey Grham? Seriously though what were they looking at in the investigations?
-------------------------------------------------------
> wondering wonderer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings.
> How
> > did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> > Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> > account?
> >
> > I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> > have figured that one out. What have they been
> > wasting all those resources on with this non
> > scandal?
> >
> > Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> > emails should have been the first thing they
> > should have done right?
> >
> > Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his
> name
> > is, is on the case.
>
>
> They knew that she used a personal account based
> on the Guccifer hack of Blumenthal. They and
> others, including AP and various other
> journalists, did go after her emails at different
> times. The requests were rejected in most cases
> because no pertinent records meeting the criteria
> of the requests were found.
>
> What nobody knew until the recent admission was
> that she ONLY used a personal account in lieu of
> any official email. The latter of which would
> have preserved official records and would be
> subject to FOIA, Congressional, an other records
> requests. Which was why nothing ever turned up
> when requests were made. And why she hid it.
> That only came out as a result of a judges order
> in another suit which forced the State Department
> to produce some related records. That's why she
> turned over the 55,000 or whatever emails to them.
> And why multiple groups like AP now are talking
> about filing suit.
>
> I know... I know... It's complicated and they
> don't tell you these things on MSNBC.
Wait if she ONLY used the personal account that means that after 2 or is it 3 Benghazi hearings they have never seen any emails from her? Would that not have been a remarkable fact in and of itself or were they thinking she was just like Lindsey Grham? Seriously though what were they looking at in the investigations?
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
POP goes the secret server
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:34PM
FPKhw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Wait if she ONLY used the personal account that
> means that after 2 or is it 3 Benghazi hearings
> they have never seen any emails from her? Would
> that not have been a remarkable fact in and of
> itself or were they thinking she was just like
> Lindsey Grham? Seriously though what were they
> looking at in the investigations?
They, and many others including AP and Judicial Watch which now are suing, continued to ask for them and were repeatedly told by State that there was nothing responsive to their requests found. Now we know why.
Might try reading the paper or something now and then. NYT is good. They're the ones who broke the email server story.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Wait if she ONLY used the personal account that
> means that after 2 or is it 3 Benghazi hearings
> they have never seen any emails from her? Would
> that not have been a remarkable fact in and of
> itself or were they thinking she was just like
> Lindsey Grham? Seriously though what were they
> looking at in the investigations?
They, and many others including AP and Judicial Watch which now are suing, continued to ask for them and were repeatedly told by State that there was nothing responsive to their requests found. Now we know why.
Might try reading the paper or something now and then. NYT is good. They're the ones who broke the email server story.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
wrongg
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:35PM
^^^^^^
Great question! How did the President miss it all those years? Figure he ever got an email from his Secretary of State? How does that happen?
Great question! How did the President miss it all those years? Figure he ever got an email from his Secretary of State? How does that happen?
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
Republicans Waste Money
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:40PM
wrongg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are so stupid. fiducial? State didn't have her
> emails? i feel very sorry for your future.
A total of 9 Benghazi investigations paid for by the US Tax Payers didn't produce shit.
A total of 55 votes against Obamacare paid for by the US Tax Payers didn't produce shit.
Maybe you're hoping for a change by repeating a series of US Tax Payer funded failures but all they have done so far is increase our deficit and debt, and produced no Return on Investment.
Maybe our tax dollars would be better spent on actual National Security Matters like keeping the Department of Homeland Security funded or giving our Troops a pay raise or not wasting our money sending letters to support Iran.
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are so stupid. fiducial? State didn't have her
> emails? i feel very sorry for your future.
A total of 9 Benghazi investigations paid for by the US Tax Payers didn't produce shit.
A total of 55 votes against Obamacare paid for by the US Tax Payers didn't produce shit.
Maybe you're hoping for a change by repeating a series of US Tax Payer funded failures but all they have done so far is increase our deficit and debt, and produced no Return on Investment.
Maybe our tax dollars would be better spent on actual National Security Matters like keeping the Department of Homeland Security funded or giving our Troops a pay raise or not wasting our money sending letters to support Iran.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
vEvYb
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:41PM
wondering wonderer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
Hillary is going to jail fuckface. Deal with it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> With the endless rightarded Benghazi hearings. How
> did the rightarded Republicans not figure out
> Hillary Clinton didnt have an official email
> account?
>
> I mean you have to be pretty rightarded not to
> have figured that one out. What have they been
> wasting all those resources on with this non
> scandal?
>
> Think about it. Going after Hillary Clintons
> emails should have been the first thing they
> should have done right?
>
> Now this rightard trey rightardy whatever his name
> is, is on the case.
Hillary is going to jail fuckface. Deal with it.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
sonow
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:47PM
So all this time and the Benghazi crowd never saw an email from Clinton? Damn what a bunch of idiots for not mentioning that. Seriously. Now they have 55000 of them so I guess that is good.
The truth is that the GOP cry wolf at every possible chance and now they maybe have something no one cares. If the GOP actually did anything except want to have wars and cut taxes for huge multinational corps and the rich maybe they would have some influence.
The truth is that the GOP cry wolf at every possible chance and now they maybe have something no one cares. If the GOP actually did anything except want to have wars and cut taxes for huge multinational corps and the rich maybe they would have some influence.
Re: Benghazi question
Posted by:
POP goes the secret server
()
Date: March 15, 2015 09:53PM
sonow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So all this time and the Benghazi crowd never saw
> an email from Clinton? Damn what a bunch of
> idiots for not mentioning that. Seriously. Now
> they have 55000 of them so I guess that is good.
>
>
They did mention it idiot. They submitted numerous requests to State. As did others via FOIA requests. State didn't have them because she intentionally kept her email off of their system in order to avoid such requests.
They still don't have them. They're now being reviewed by State. They have only a small subset of around 300 at this point.
Facts suck huh?
-------------------------------------------------------
> So all this time and the Benghazi crowd never saw
> an email from Clinton? Damn what a bunch of
> idiots for not mentioning that. Seriously. Now
> they have 55000 of them so I guess that is good.
>
>
They did mention it idiot. They submitted numerous requests to State. As did others via FOIA requests. State didn't have them because she intentionally kept her email off of their system in order to avoid such requests.
They still don't have them. They're now being reviewed by State. They have only a small subset of around 300 at this point.
Facts suck huh?