?uestion Mark Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm wondering what the sources are?
I guess all the film footage taken by Americans and British that liberated the camps aren't good enough for you. Not to mention all the german film footage, eyewitnesses (many are German civilians that were forced to come in and bury the thousands of decaying corpses) and the surviving victims still with tattoos, defects and scars.
Maybe the Nurenburg trials where German officers admitted to taking part of the atrocities but denied responsibility (just following orders) just aren't enough proof for that Iranian cocksucker and people like him that deny.
> How can the 'holocost denying' crowd have any traction if they have no
> facts? What is their deal? Are they just letting
> time fade, and hoping to fool others? It's a weird
> phenomenon.
They make NO effort to look for facts. If they did, they would find more than enough evidence to convince any halfwit. Just take a close look at those that deny the holocaust and draw up your own psychological profile and ask yourself, "Is this someone that seems informed enough to go against 60 years of eyewitnesses, film and physical evidence and all other forms of documented evidence?"
The answer should always be no, but if you choose to believe a complete fool like the asshole below, well have a nice life.
Attachments: