Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
tEAPartyGoNNaBpissed
()
Date: November 22, 2014 12:53PM
"An investigation by the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee has concluded that the CIA and U.S. military responded appropriately to the attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya, in 2012, dismissing allegations that the Obama administration blocked rescue attempts during the assault or sought to mislead the public afterward.
After a two-year probe that involved the review of thousands of pages of classified documents, the panel determined that the attack could not be blamed on an intelligence failure, and that CIA security operatives “ably and bravely assisted” State Department officials who were overwhelmed at a nearby but separate diplomatic compound.
The committee also found “no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,” rejecting claims that have fed persistent conspiracy theories that the U.S. military was prevented from rescuing U.S. personnel from a night-time assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans."
After a two-year probe that involved the review of thousands of pages of classified documents, the panel determined that the attack could not be blamed on an intelligence failure, and that CIA security operatives “ably and bravely assisted” State Department officials who were overwhelmed at a nearby but separate diplomatic compound.
The committee also found “no evidence that there was either a stand down order or a denial of available air support,” rejecting claims that have fed persistent conspiracy theories that the U.S. military was prevented from rescuing U.S. personnel from a night-time assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans."
Re: House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
abelard
()
Date: November 22, 2014 08:40PM
One wonders if Fox news is gonna do 2000+ stories on this for the next two years. 'Fair and Balanced', after all.
Re: House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
KkDeJ
()
Date: November 22, 2014 08:49PM
facts are irrelevant to the gop fucks
Re: House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
re: Christopher Stevens
()
Date: November 23, 2014 11:20AM
they play with matches. they get burned. state-sponsored terror.
Re: House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
Trey Gowdy
()
Date: November 23, 2014 11:52AM
What was wrong with the 4 other threads on this? Was it because they shot down your hope that Hillary isn't going to get her fat ass burned by this? Well, let me do it again for you in this yet another feeble attempt to skew the facts. See, the House Intelligence Committee, which released this early draft, didn't talk to Hillary or anyone of her direct reports. This report exonerates the Intel and Military, not the State Dept. Since they didn't talk to the State Department higher-ups, which is where the false story about the video came from, this committee left the biggest potential culprits out of their report.
The House Select Committee will call Hillary and her cronies. If they don't find any there there, then it's settled. Until then, not so much.
The House Select Committee will call Hillary and her cronies. If they don't find any there there, then it's settled. Until then, not so much.
Re: House panel finds no intelligence failure in Benghazi attacks
Posted by:
Sorry you fail...
()
Date: November 23, 2014 01:50PM
Trey Gowdy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What was wrong with the 4 other threads on this?
> Was it because they shot down your hope that
> Hillary isn't going to get her fat ass burned by
> this? Well, let me do it again for you in this
> yet another feeble attempt to skew the facts.
> See, the House Intelligence Committee, which
> released this early draft, didn't talk to Hillary
> or anyone of her direct reports. This report
> exonerates the Intel and Military, not the State
> Dept. Since they didn't talk to the State
> Department higher-ups, which is where the false
> story about the video came from, this committee
> left the biggest potential culprits out of their
> report.
>
> The House Select Committee will call Hillary and
> her cronies. If they don't find any there there,
> then it's settled. Until then, not so much.
Because a Republican led committee wants to let the administration off the hook. Sorry you fail...
-------------------------------------------------------
> What was wrong with the 4 other threads on this?
> Was it because they shot down your hope that
> Hillary isn't going to get her fat ass burned by
> this? Well, let me do it again for you in this
> yet another feeble attempt to skew the facts.
> See, the House Intelligence Committee, which
> released this early draft, didn't talk to Hillary
> or anyone of her direct reports. This report
> exonerates the Intel and Military, not the State
> Dept. Since they didn't talk to the State
> Department higher-ups, which is where the false
> story about the video came from, this committee
> left the biggest potential culprits out of their
> report.
>
> The House Select Committee will call Hillary and
> her cronies. If they don't find any there there,
> then it's settled. Until then, not so much.
Because a Republican led committee wants to let the administration off the hook. Sorry you fail...