If guns don't kill people:

Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound as the cause of death on the Official Death Certificate?

Why don't cops scream put down the person or I'll shoot when facing an armed criminal?
Attachments:

People Person Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If guns don't kill people:
>
> Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound as
> the cause of death on the Official Death
> Certificate?
>
> Why don't cops scream put down the person or I'll
> shoot when facing an armed criminal?


 
Attachments:

exVpp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> People Person Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If guns don't kill people:
> >
> > Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound
> as
> > the cause of death on the Official Death
> > Certificate?
> >
> > Why don't cops scream put down the person or
> I'll
> > shoot when facing an armed criminal?
>
>
>  

So no answer huh.....

So you got nothing Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> exVpp Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > People Person Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If guns don't kill people:
> > >
> > > Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot
> wound
> > as
> > > the cause of death on the Official Death
> > > Certificate?
> > >
> > > Why don't cops scream put down the person or
> > I'll
> > > shoot when facing an armed criminal?
> >
> >
> >  
>
> So no answer huh.....


Yeah, I got that you're a dumbass who's logic is that of a retarded squirrel. But it didn't take a Mensa member to figure that out. Take your anti-Constitution agenda and stick it up your ass. Did you like that answer better?

uk9jX Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So you got nothing Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > exVpp Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > People Person Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > If guns don't kill people:
> > > >
> > > > Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot
> > wound
> > > as
> > > > the cause of death on the Official Death
> > > > Certificate?
> > > >
> > > > Why don't cops scream put down the person
> or
> > > I'll
> > > > shoot when facing an armed criminal?
> > >
> > >
> > >  
> >
> > So no answer huh.....
>
>
> Yeah, I got that you're a dumbass who's logic is
> that of a retarded squirrel. But it didn't take a
> Mensa member to figure that out. Take your
> anti-Constitution agenda and stick it up your ass.
> Did you like that answer better?


So no real answer
Cool

That brave Sgt at Arms in Canada was wrong to shoot the gunman, the real culprit was obviously the gun?

People Person Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If guns don't kill people:
>
> Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound as
> the cause of death on the Official Death
> Certificate?
>
> Why don't cops scream put down the person or I'll
> shoot when facing an armed criminal?


So, when a terrorist blows up a bus, it's not the terrorist that is responsible, it's the bomb? My gosh you are a retard. No offense.

LyNFJ Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> People Person Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If guns don't kill people:
> >
> > Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound
> as
> > the cause of death on the Official Death
> > Certificate?
> >
> > Why don't cops scream put down the person or
> I'll
> > shoot when facing an armed criminal?
>
>
> So, when a terrorist blows up a bus, it's not the
> terrorist that is responsible, it's the bomb? My
> gosh you are a retard. No offense.

No, in a libs mind it is the peoples fault for being on the bus. Oh and it's workplace violence not a terrorism.

Medical examiners determine the cause of death but the cops and courts deal with the individual. I've never heard of charges against a gun working it's way
through the courts system.

It is assumed by any reasonable person that the gunshot wound was caused by a person, just as motor vehicle accident as cause of death does not mean the motor vehicle acted alone.

Fail.

People Person Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If guns don't kill people:
>
> Why does the Medical Examiner put gunshot wound as
> the cause of death on the Official Death
> Certificate?
>
> Why don't cops scream put down the person or I'll
> shoot when facing an armed criminal?


Let's see where your crazy logic takes us:

It isn't the gun, it's the bullet

It isn't the bullet, it's the impact of a copper and lead projectile tearing throught the flesh and organs of a human.

A human's flesh and organs are frail and weak.

Therefore, it is the human who is to blame for being so frail and weak that a copper/lead projectile and kill it.

Conclusion: stupid college dumbasses such as the OP should never be allowed to vote until they can demonstrate some basic abililty to think.

sockrats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Medical examiners determine the cause of death but
> the cops and courts deal with the individual. I've
> never heard of charges against a gun working it's
> way
> through the courts system.


touche

LyNFJ Wrote:
=====================================================
> So, when a terrorist blows up a bus, it's not the
> terrorist that is responsible, it's the bomb? My
> gosh you are a retard. No offense.

No offense taken. I've been called worse by other illiterate inbreds far smarter than you.

I guess since everyone has a 2nd amendment right to their guns and bombs, and screening out who and should not have a gun, or what type of gun any old person with a right to own one doesn't matter, you don't have an issue with Iran or ISIS having all the guns or say nuclear bombs they want.

Okay, I get it. Sounds completely logical to me. That is exactly what the Founding Fathers had in mind and we can run with that.

People Person Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LyNFJ Wrote:
> ==================================================
> ===
> > So, when a terrorist blows up a bus, it's not
> the
> > terrorist that is responsible, it's the bomb?
> My
> > gosh you are a retard. No offense.
>
> No offense taken. I've been called worse by other
> illiterate inbreds far smarter than you.
>
> I guess since everyone has a 2nd amendment right
> to their guns and bombs, and screening out who and
> should not have a gun, or what type of gun any old
> person with a right to own one doesn't matter, you
> don't have an issue with Iran or ISIS having all
> the guns or say nuclear bombs they want.
>
> Okay, I get it. Sounds completely logical to me.
> That is exactly what the Founding Fathers had in
> mind and we can run with that.


No, you don't get it at all. The butthurt you've sustained in your fail thread is approaching Gerry status. Your logic continues to be as lame as your feeble comebacks. Sorry, you've failed though I'm sure you're used to it. Your inability make any kind of intelligent argument but rather, string together incoherent and random points demonstrates some deep pyschological problems. Seek help.

No offense, but you area a dumb-ass. The 2nd amendment is in the US constitution, it is for Americans only, Iran and other countries make there own laws,dummy. We only interfere with nations if they mess with us. We should blow all countries that mess with us off the map!

Lester Maddox Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No offense, but you area a dumb-ass. The 2nd
> amendment is in the US constitution, it is for
> Americans only, Iran and other countries make
> there own laws,dummy. We only interfere with
> nations if they mess with us. We should blow all
> countries that mess with us off the map!

Yeah, like Iraq messed with us on 9/11 - because they didn't really have anything to do with 9/11 and they didn't really have any WMD - but we should disarm them and take away their right to self-defense and blow them off the map.

People Person Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LyNFJ Wrote:
> ==================================================
> ===
> > So, when a terrorist blows up a bus, it's not
> the
> > terrorist that is responsible, it's the bomb?
> My
> > gosh you are a retard. No offense.
>
> No offense taken. I've been called worse by other
> illiterate inbreds far smarter than you.
>
> I guess since everyone has a 2nd amendment right
> to their guns and bombs, and screening out who and
> should not have a gun, or what type of gun any old
> person with a right to own one doesn't matter, you
> don't have an issue with Iran or ISIS having all
> the guns or say nuclear bombs they want.
>
> Okay, I get it. Sounds completely logical to me.
> That is exactly what the Founding Fathers had in
> mind and we can run with that.

"Bombs"? Where in the fuck is your brain?

Stupid fuxxxxxx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is assumed by any reasonable person that the
> gunshot wound was caused by a person, just as
> motor vehicle accident as cause of death does not
> mean the motor vehicle acted alone.
>
> Fail.

Plenty of case law against gun manufacturers in wrongful death suits where they were found guilty/liable.

Guns in the wrong/untrained hands kill people every day.

Plenty of case law against automobile manufacturers in wrongful death suits where they were found guilty/liable.

Cars in the wrong/untrained hands kill people every day.

Training, license, insurance, operation, and maintenance requirements, regulations, and laws for cars make sense. Same for guns.

If street legal requirements for cars make sense, same for guns.

If nobody needs or deserves a car with a 1500HP engine that burns jet fuel without pollution controls, racing slick tires, and no turn signals or seat belts to drive to and from work - logic says nobody really needs or deserves a full auto machine gun with a 30 round clip to drive to and from work either.

All you libtards who compare cars with guns make one big mistake, nowhere in the constitution does it mention a right to a car. The 2nd amendment does guarantee the right to arms! Read the constitution, not the communist manifesto, libtard!

Talk About Stupid Fuxxx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Plenty of case law against automobile
> manufacturers in wrongful death suits where they
> were found guilty/liable...

Sure there is. Why don't you point us to those plenty of successful cases that didn't involve an unsafe manufacturing issue. Fool

OP read your post, you answered your own question. You must be playing hooky from school today.

Never Run Out of Ammo

Guns Don't Kill People. People Kill People

Them or You

The two most important days in your life are the day your were born and and the day you find out why

The root cause of most of the gun deaths in this country is the fact that a large percentage of Americans are cowardly as hell and therefore feel the need to have guns. Remember also that the NRA and guntards in general kill more Americans each year than terrorists have ever killed.

NRA meeting
Attachments:

If cars don't kill people:

Why does the Medical Examiner put blunt force trauma as the cause of death on the Official Death Certificate in DUI fatalities?

Why don't cops scream put down the driver when facing a drunk driver?

Plenty of case law against auto manufacturers in wrongful death suits where they were found guilty/liable.

Motor vehicles kill 43 times more people every day than firearms.

If street legal requirements for cars made sense in the Constitution, then perhaps same for guns.

If nobody needs or deserves a car with a 1500HP engine that burns jet fuel without pollution controls, racing slick tires, and no turn signals or seat belts to drive to and from work - logic says nobody really needs or deserves a full auto machine gun with a 30 round clip to drive to and from work either.

Your logic, but the US Constitution says the right to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed". Didn't say "shall be limited to what some libtard says".

root cause Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Remember also that the NRA
> and guntards in general kill more Americans each
> year than terrorists have ever killed.

Again your stupid is showing. More people died in New York City in the Sept 11 attacks than died that whole year in NEw York City due to homicide by firearm. You can't even get that tired argument correct.

Why argue with someone who uses a gun for penis compensation?
At least Gunlover freely admits to his inadequacies.
If one idiot has a gun you have to arm the other idiots
or it isn't good sport.

^^^^^^^^^^

+ infinity

dummy libtards Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If cars don't kill people:
>
> Why does the Medical Examiner put blunt force
> trauma as the cause of death on the Official Death
> Certificate in DUI fatalities?
>
> Why don't cops scream put down the driver when
> facing a drunk driver?
>
> Plenty of case law against auto manufacturers in
> wrongful death suits where they were found
> guilty/liable.
>
> Motor vehicles kill 43 times more people every day
> than firearms.
>
> If street legal requirements for cars made sense
> in the Constitution, then perhaps same for guns.
>
> If nobody needs or deserves a car with a 1500HP
> engine that burns jet fuel without pollution
> controls, racing slick tires, and no turn signals
> or seat belts to drive to and from work - logic
> says nobody really needs or deserves a full auto
> machine gun with a 30 round clip to drive to and
> from work either.
>
> Your logic, but the US Constitution says the right
> to keep and bear arms "shall not be infringed".
> Didn't say "shall be limited to what some libtard
> says".

It said slaves were 3/5 of a person too. But let's go to the Supreme Court in the Heller case on this topic.

“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited,” Justice Antonin Scalia. In a sentence the NRA and many gun-rights extremists apparently missed, Scalia wrote that the Second Amendment is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”

Let’s say that again: Justice Scalia, hero of the most intransigent conservatives in the country, stated unequivocally that restrictions of Second Amendment rights are constitutional.

Indeed, Scalia’s opinion in Heller warned that “nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt” on a wide range of gun laws, including bars on felons and the mentally ill from possessing guns, restrictions on guns in “sensitive places such as schools and government buildings,” or laws “imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.” These categories capture the vast majority of gun laws in America.

In short, there’s plenty of room under the Second Amendment for gun control.

In recognizing the legitimacy of many gun laws, the Supreme Court did no more than adhere to the text of the Second Amendment. In the part of the amendment that gun-rights absolutists usually ignore, the Founders extolled the importance of a “well regulated Militia.” (For years, the NRA’s headquarters displayed a sign promoting “the right of the people to keep and bear arms,” conveniently omitting the amendment’s opening clause.) Gun advocates are right that this language was not designed to limit the right to people serving in military organizations like the National Guard; the framers repeatedly said the “militia” was composed of we the people, ordinary citizens with our own guns. Yet it’s also clear that the framers thought that the people who make up the militia should be “well regulated”—trained, disciplined, and properly instructed by the government to use arms effectively, safely, and properly.

The Founding Fathers had gun laws so restrictive that today’s NRA leaders would never support them.

In other words, the American right to bear arms has always co-existed with gun regulation.

root cause Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The root cause of most of the gun deaths in this
> country is the fact that a large percentage of
> Americans are cowardly as hell and therefore feel
> the need to have guns. Remember also that the NRA
> and guntards in general kill more Americans each
> year than terrorists have ever killed.


Understanding completely what sort of simpleton troll I am responding to....

Terrorists and foreign armies are not now nor ever have been the reason for the 2nd Amendment.

Your beloved, all powerful, self perpetuating government is.

http://www.developmenteducation.ie/5-50-500/_files/067-murderous-governments.pdf

Autopsy says death by automobile. So let's blame the cars. Yay!!

"Squeezing the trigger is like swallowing a load. A second later you want to do it again."