HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Biden's 3rd World Shithole ()
Date: June 23, 2021 09:53AM

She was sued for defamation because her show is all lies all the time. The Obama judge covers for her saying her audience already knows everything she says is a lie and her show is not news.

That's the new libtarded defense? Americans can't sue you because you're not news and everything you say is completely manufactured and a lie?

There's no difference between CNN, MSNBC, and SNL.

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT!

LOL!

LIBTARDS!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Travesty of Justice ()
Date: June 23, 2021 10:28AM

Biden's 3rd World Shithole Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She was sued for defamation because her show is
> all lies all the time. The Obama judge covers for
> her saying her audience already knows everything
> she says is a lie and her show is not news.
>
> That's the new libtarded defense? Americans can't
> sue you because you're not news and everything you
> say is completely manufactured and a lie?
>
> There's no difference between CNN, MSNBC, and
> SNL.
>
> EVERYONE KNOWS THAT!
>
> LOL!
>
> LIBTARDS!

I assume you are just as contemptuous of folks like the Kraken woman, or the many other Trumpers who have offered the same defense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Rachel used to be fuckable ()
Date: June 23, 2021 10:30AM

What happened to her? When did she grow a penis?
Attachments:
B7DC9F2A-E072-477F-8305-CEB7BE2F35EC.jpeg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Lol@libtards ()
Date: June 23, 2021 10:40AM

Travesty of Justice Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Biden's 3rd World Shithole Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > She was sued for defamation because her show is
> > all lies all the time. The Obama judge covers
> for
> > her saying her audience already knows
> everything
> > she says is a lie and her show is not news.
> >
> > That's the new libtarded defense? Americans
> can't
> > sue you because you're not news and everything
> you
> > say is completely manufactured and a lie?
> >
> > There's no difference between CNN, MSNBC, and
> > SNL.
> >
> > EVERYONE KNOWS THAT!
> >
> > LOL!
> >
> > LIBTARDS!
>
> I assume you are just as contemptuous of folks
> like the Kraken woman, or the many other Trumpers
> who have offered the same defense.


The libtards are confused by this. The TV actors haven't commanded them what to think yet.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: No wonder so late ()
Date: June 23, 2021 10:40AM

You are behind the times. The preliminary decision was handed down in February, around the same time that Maddow was awarded over $250,000 in attorneys fees. The basis of the ruling was the judge's determination that Maddow's statements were opinions, not facts. You know what Fox News broadcasters do on a daily basis.

The underlying facts are not in dispute. OAN shared a news reporter with Sputnik, a Kremlin backed news site. An Article in the Daily Beast reported this. Maddow in discussing the Daily Beast article said OAN was Russian propaganda.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Biden's 3rd World Shithole ()
Date: June 23, 2021 11:27AM

No wonder so late Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are behind the times. The preliminary
> decision was handed down in February, around the
> same time that Maddow was awarded over $250,000 in
> attorneys fees. The basis of the ruling was the
> judge's determination that Maddow's statements
> were opinions, not facts. You know what Fox News
> broadcasters do on a daily basis.
>
> The underlying facts are not in dispute. OAN
> shared a news reporter with Sputnik, a Kremlin
> backed news site. An Article in the Daily Beast
> reported this. Maddow in discussing the Daily
> Beast article said OAN was Russian propaganda.


Looks like the libtarded MSM that an Obama judge has ruled is not news but fairytale make-believe has issued their talking points for their valueless brownshits to repeat.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: Alex Jones ()
Date: June 23, 2021 11:30AM

Remember, I invented this defense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Obama judge rules Rachel Maddow not news to protect her
Posted by: millerbarrondessllp ()
Date: June 23, 2021 01:33PM

Relying on One America News's own statements about the case and the court's ruling for "talking points". Only a liberal would sink this low.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   ******    ********  ********  ******** 
  **   **   **    **   **           **     **       
   ** **    **         **           **     **       
    ***     **   ****  ******       **     ******   
   ** **    **    **   **           **     **       
  **   **   **    **   **           **     **       
 **     **   ******    ********     **     ******** 
This forum powered by Phorum.