Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
questions to liberals
Posted by:
questions to
()
Date: May 23, 2020 11:01AM
If women are equal to men why aren't they paying for the dates????????????????////
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
UTFME
()
Date: May 23, 2020 11:13AM
questions to Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If women are equal to men why aren't they paying
> for the dates????????????????////
Dumbass question. And dates are something you never go on anyway so why do you care?
-------------------------------------------------------
> If women are equal to men why aren't they paying
> for the dates????????????????////
Dumbass question. And dates are something you never go on anyway so why do you care?
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
Where have you been?
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:01PM
questions to Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If women are equal to men why aren't they paying
> for the dates????????????????////
Actually, real women do.
-------------------------------------------------------
> If women are equal to men why aren't they paying
> for the dates????????????????////
Actually, real women do.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
just sayin..
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:24PM
Where have you been? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> questions to Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> paying
> > for the dates????????????????////
>
> Actually, real women do.
only if they date a loser like the OP
I have women that offer to pay for dates, if you go out with the same person
long enough she will end up paying for something, but early on they do like to
know they aren't dating someone that's broke and living in their moms basement
-------------------------------------------------------
> questions to Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> paying
> > for the dates????????????????////
>
> Actually, real women do.
only if they date a loser like the OP
I have women that offer to pay for dates, if you go out with the same person
long enough she will end up paying for something, but early on they do like to
know they aren't dating someone that's broke and living in their moms basement
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
J93M3
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:28PM
Where have you been? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> questions to Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> paying
> > for the dates????????????????////
>
> Actually, real women do.
The man pays on the first date, maybe the first 2-3 dates. That's the way it is. If the casual dating turns into a relationship that's going somewhere, you take turns paying, or split checks, or offer to buy the movie tickets, whatever, with some consideration for what each person is making. I've never had an issue with this in any serious relationship. If you can't talk about this stuff and work this out pretty easily you're either fucked up or your potential partner is. And if you're dating someone and you're still paying for everything after a couple of dates, you're being used and go find someone else who knows how to share finances and is serious about the relationship.
-------------------------------------------------------
> questions to Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> paying
> > for the dates????????????????////
>
> Actually, real women do.
The man pays on the first date, maybe the first 2-3 dates. That's the way it is. If the casual dating turns into a relationship that's going somewhere, you take turns paying, or split checks, or offer to buy the movie tickets, whatever, with some consideration for what each person is making. I've never had an issue with this in any serious relationship. If you can't talk about this stuff and work this out pretty easily you're either fucked up or your potential partner is. And if you're dating someone and you're still paying for everything after a couple of dates, you're being used and go find someone else who knows how to share finances and is serious about the relationship.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
6XX3M
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:29PM
The reason why people like the OP don't get this is that they never get close to a serious relationship.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
WT3EN
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:35PM
And it shouldn't matter if one of the couple has limited funds. You do what you can do. If you can't afford to go out to a restaurant, cook him or her a nice dinner at home. If you can't afford concert tickets, go to a nice park and have a picnic. Go to museums. Watch a movie at home together, with homemade popcorn.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
beute
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:36PM
5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple question. Nice.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
observerer of things
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:38PM
beute Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> question. Nice.
you are either new here or a troll
-------------------------------------------------------
> 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> question. Nice.
you are either new here or a troll
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
GPBNK
()
Date: May 23, 2020 12:46PM
beute Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> question. Nice.
It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid question, and the fact that he addressed it to "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He wanted to make a stupid point about liberals and women, and try to point out that liberals are hypocrites. Get it?
Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much credit. It was just a dumbass question.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> question. Nice.
It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid question, and the fact that he addressed it to "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He wanted to make a stupid point about liberals and women, and try to point out that liberals are hypocrites. Get it?
Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much credit. It was just a dumbass question.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
so emotional
()
Date: May 23, 2020 01:31PM
GPBNK Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> beute Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> > question. Nice.
>
>
> It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid
> question, and the fact that he addressed it to
> "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an
> agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He
> wanted to make a stupid point about liberals and
> women, and try to point out that liberals are
> hypocrites. Get it?
>
> Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much
> credit. It was just a dumbass question.
He wasn't asking for "dating advice". He was asking those who profess a certain belief (and one that I actually believe) to reconcile the dichotomy at the root of his question.
The correct answer is that the mantra, "women are equal to men" has nothing to do with social norms such as who pays for dates. It is, rather, a statement that all rights and societal benefits (legal, civil and human) are equally applied to both women and men.
Your anger is irrational. Seriously.
-------------------------------------------------------
> beute Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a simple
> > question. Nice.
>
>
> It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid
> question, and the fact that he addressed it to
> "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an
> agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He
> wanted to make a stupid point about liberals and
> women, and try to point out that liberals are
> hypocrites. Get it?
>
> Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much
> credit. It was just a dumbass question.
He wasn't asking for "dating advice". He was asking those who profess a certain belief (and one that I actually believe) to reconcile the dichotomy at the root of his question.
The correct answer is that the mantra, "women are equal to men" has nothing to do with social norms such as who pays for dates. It is, rather, a statement that all rights and societal benefits (legal, civil and human) are equally applied to both women and men.
Your anger is irrational. Seriously.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
PGNJW
()
Date: May 23, 2020 01:50PM
so emotional Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GPBNK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > beute Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a
> simple
> > > question. Nice.
> >
> >
> > It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid
> > question, and the fact that he addressed it to
> > "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an
> > agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He
> > wanted to make a stupid point about liberals
> and
> > women, and try to point out that liberals are
> > hypocrites. Get it?
> >
> > Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much
> > credit. It was just a dumbass question.
>
>
> He wasn't asking for "dating advice". He was
> asking those who profess a certain belief (and one
> that I actually believe) to reconcile the
> dichotomy at the root of his question.
>
> The correct answer is that the mantra, "women are
> equal to men" has nothing to do with social norms
> such as who pays for dates. It is, rather, a
> statement that all rights and societal benefits
> (legal, civil and human) are equally applied to
> both women and men.
>
> Your anger is irrational. Seriously.
Point taken. I think emotions seem amplified in posts so that it looks like there's more intensity than there really is. I liked your response anyway.
-------------------------------------------------------
> GPBNK Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > beute Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 5 replies. 4 attack the OP for asking a
> simple
> > > question. Nice.
> >
> >
> > It wasn't a simple question, it was a stupid
> > question, and the fact that he addressed it to
> > "liberals" shows that he was an idiot with an
> > agenda. He didn't want real dating advice. He
> > wanted to make a stupid point about liberals
> and
> > women, and try to point out that liberals are
> > hypocrites. Get it?
> >
> > Actually, I'm probably giving the OP too much
> > credit. It was just a dumbass question.
>
>
> He wasn't asking for "dating advice". He was
> asking those who profess a certain belief (and one
> that I actually believe) to reconcile the
> dichotomy at the root of his question.
>
> The correct answer is that the mantra, "women are
> equal to men" has nothing to do with social norms
> such as who pays for dates. It is, rather, a
> statement that all rights and societal benefits
> (legal, civil and human) are equally applied to
> both women and men.
>
> Your anger is irrational. Seriously.
Point taken. I think emotions seem amplified in posts so that it looks like there's more intensity than there really is. I liked your response anyway.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
Antiasshat.
()
Date: May 23, 2020 02:56PM
Fuck women. They’re are dirty and smelly. And worse, must are liberal.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
proass
()
Date: May 23, 2020 03:31PM
I agree with antiasshat. Woman were O.K. when I was younger. But over time I found if I wasn't having sex with one, what good are they. If they don't cook, clean or fuck, too hell with them. I got a fuck buddy friend. He gives blow jobs on demand and then leaves. It doesn't get much better then that! Women have koodies.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
proved op correct
()
Date: May 23, 2020 04:04PM
J93M3 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where have you been? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > questions to Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> > paying
> > > for the dates????????????????////
> >
> > Actually, real women do.
>
> The man pays on the first date, maybe the first
> 2-3 dates.
so, women are not equal, got it
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where have you been? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > questions to Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> > paying
> > > for the dates????????????????////
> >
> > Actually, real women do.
>
> The man pays on the first date, maybe the first
> 2-3 dates.
so, women are not equal, got it
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
GPKJ3
()
Date: May 23, 2020 04:44PM
proved op correct Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> J93M3 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where have you been? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > questions to Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> > > paying
> > > > for the dates????????????????////
> > >
> > > Actually, real women do.
> >
> > The man pays on the first date, maybe the first
> > 2-3 dates.
>
> so, women are not equal, got it
Right, so because the custom is that men pay for the first dates, women should accept that they're not equal and they have no claim for equal pay, discrimination, harassment at work, glass ceilings, etc. I mean, we're talking about dating here. That overrides everything.
-------------------------------------------------------
> J93M3 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Where have you been? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > questions to Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > If women are equal to men why aren't they
> > > paying
> > > > for the dates????????????????////
> > >
> > > Actually, real women do.
> >
> > The man pays on the first date, maybe the first
> > 2-3 dates.
>
> so, women are not equal, got it
Right, so because the custom is that men pay for the first dates, women should accept that they're not equal and they have no claim for equal pay, discrimination, harassment at work, glass ceilings, etc. I mean, we're talking about dating here. That overrides everything.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
Libs are inferior
()
Date: May 23, 2020 04:50PM
For one thing, libs deny science. For second, libs deny science.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
3CUWG
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:06PM
Libs are inferior Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For one thing, libs deny science. For second, libs
> deny science.
Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is effective against coronavirus, global warming is a Chinese hoax, the virus will magically disappear when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to hit Alabama, let's try injecting disinfectants....
-------------------------------------------------------
> For one thing, libs deny science. For second, libs
> deny science.
Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is effective against coronavirus, global warming is a Chinese hoax, the virus will magically disappear when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to hit Alabama, let's try injecting disinfectants....
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
Libs are inferior
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:15PM
3CUWG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs are inferior Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> libs
> > deny science.
>
>
> Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is
> effective against coronavirus, global warming is a
> Chinese hoax, the virus will magically disappear
> when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to
> hit Alabama, let's try injecting disinfectants....
Thank you for proving my point and adding to it. Not only do libs deny. science, they deny facts and reality. Where do you come up with this shit? You don't actually watch and believe CNN do you? LOL That shit is like SNL but worse.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs are inferior Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> libs
> > deny science.
>
>
> Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is
> effective against coronavirus, global warming is a
> Chinese hoax, the virus will magically disappear
> when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to
> hit Alabama, let's try injecting disinfectants....
Thank you for proving my point and adding to it. Not only do libs deny. science, they deny facts and reality. Where do you come up with this shit? You don't actually watch and believe CNN do you? LOL That shit is like SNL but worse.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
VPPVN
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:19PM
Libs are inferior Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3CUWG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> > libs
> > > deny science.
> >
> >
> > Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is
> > effective against coronavirus, global warming is
> a
> > Chinese hoax, the virus will magically
> disappear
> > when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to
> > hit Alabama, let's try injecting
> disinfectants....
>
> Thank you for proving my point and adding to it.
> Not only do libs deny. science, they deny facts
> and reality. Where do you come up with this shit?
> You don't actually watch and believe CNN do you?
> LOL That shit is like SNL but worse.
hahahahahaha. You live in a trumptard bubble. You actually think those things are true. Amazing.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3CUWG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> > libs
> > > deny science.
> >
> >
> > Trumptard science: hydroxychloroquine is
> > effective against coronavirus, global warming is
> a
> > Chinese hoax, the virus will magically
> disappear
> > when it gets warm, Hurricane Dorian is going to
> > hit Alabama, let's try injecting
> disinfectants....
>
> Thank you for proving my point and adding to it.
> Not only do libs deny. science, they deny facts
> and reality. Where do you come up with this shit?
> You don't actually watch and believe CNN do you?
> LOL That shit is like SNL but worse.
hahahahahaha. You live in a trumptard bubble. You actually think those things are true. Amazing.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
fixererofthings
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:35PM
just sayin.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> but early on they do like to
> know they aren't dating an unemployed trumptard who is broke and
> living in his moms basement
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> but early on they do like to
> know they aren't dating an unemployed trumptard who is broke and
> living in his moms basement
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
pathetic fail
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:36PM
3CUWG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs are inferior Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> libs
> > deny science.
>
>
> Trumptard science:
> hydroxychloroquine is effective against coronavirus
yes, it's been proven so, that's why other countries are doing it as well
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-changer/12266398
the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs are inferior Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> libs
> > deny science.
>
>
> Trumptard science:
> hydroxychloroquine is effective against coronavirus
yes, it's been proven so, that's why other countries are doing it as well
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-changer/12266398
the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
7JPDG
()
Date: May 23, 2020 05:57PM
pathetic fail Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3CUWG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> > libs
> > > deny science.
> >
> >
> > Trumptard science:
>
> > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> coronavirus
>
> yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> countries are doing it as well
>
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
> r/12266398
>
>
> the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug. Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For your information, every trial so far of the drug has shown that either it's ineffective, or it increases mortality. And sorry about a couple of those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure what they mean.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 3CUWG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > For one thing, libs deny science. For second,
> > libs
> > > deny science.
> >
> >
> > Trumptard science:
>
> > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> coronavirus
>
> yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> countries are doing it as well
>
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
> r/12266398
>
>
> the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug. Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For your information, every trial so far of the drug has shown that either it's ineffective, or it increases mortality. And sorry about a couple of those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure what they mean.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
CDMJX
()
Date: May 23, 2020 06:00PM
There will still be trials for a while. But unless trial start coming up with positive results, they'll stop. So far it's a big zero, or a negative in that mortality increases, so no it's not proven trumptard.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
HMKJB
()
Date: May 23, 2020 06:37PM
7JPDG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> pathetic fail Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 3CUWG Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> second,
> > > libs
> > > > deny science.
> > >
> > >
> > > Trumptard science:
> >
> > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > coronavirus
> >
> > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > countries are doing it as well
> >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> > r/12266398
> >
> >
> > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
>
> Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he
> linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug.
> Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For
> your information, every trial so far of the drug
> has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> increases mortality. And sorry about a couple of
> those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure
> what they mean.
yet another liberal retard(redundant) that doesn't understand how things work
so how many trials does that make now? why do they keep having trials in different jurisdictions if the drug doesn't work? you do know this drug is NOT the same chemical that the woman in Arizona murderd her husband with? you know how we keep proving you liberal retards(redundant) wrong? hint, it's not from watching cnn and msnbc
-------------------------------------------------------
> pathetic fail Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 3CUWG Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> second,
> > > libs
> > > > deny science.
> > >
> > >
> > > Trumptard science:
> >
> > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > coronavirus
> >
> > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > countries are doing it as well
> >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> > r/12266398
> >
> >
> > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
>
> Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he
> linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug.
> Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For
> your information, every trial so far of the drug
> has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> increases mortality. And sorry about a couple of
> those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure
> what they mean.
yet another liberal retard(redundant) that doesn't understand how things work
so how many trials does that make now? why do they keep having trials in different jurisdictions if the drug doesn't work? you do know this drug is NOT the same chemical that the woman in Arizona murderd her husband with? you know how we keep proving you liberal retards(redundant) wrong? hint, it's not from watching cnn and msnbc
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
FEPPU
()
Date: May 23, 2020 06:51PM
HMKJB Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 7JPDG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > pathetic fail Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > second,
> > > > libs
> > > > > deny science.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Trumptard science:
> > >
> > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > coronavirus
> > >
> > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > > countries are doing it as well
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > > r/12266398
> > >
> > >
> > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> >
> > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he
> > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug.
>
> > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For
> > your information, every trial so far of the
> drug
> > has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> > increases mortality. And sorry about a couple
> of
> > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure
> > what they mean.
>
>
> yet another liberal retard(redundant) that doesn't
> understand how things work
>
> so how many trials does that make now? why do they
> keep having trials in different jurisdictions if
> the drug doesn't work?
You have to be kidding me. They are doing trials to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so far are all coming back negative, or worse. And you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
-------------------------------------------------------
> 7JPDG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > pathetic fail Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > second,
> > > > libs
> > > > > deny science.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Trumptard science:
> > >
> > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > coronavirus
> > >
> > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > > countries are doing it as well
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > > r/12266398
> > >
> > >
> > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> >
> > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what he
> > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the drug.
>
> > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not. For
> > your information, every trial so far of the
> drug
> > has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> > increases mortality. And sorry about a couple
> of
> > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not sure
> > what they mean.
>
>
> yet another liberal retard(redundant) that doesn't
> understand how things work
>
> so how many trials does that make now? why do they
> keep having trials in different jurisdictions if
> the drug doesn't work?
You have to be kidding me. They are doing trials to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so far are all coming back negative, or worse. And you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
kncjh
()
Date: May 23, 2020 06:54PM
Maybe this will help you, trumptard. You don't do trials on drugs that have been proven to work. You do trials on drugs that have NOT been proven to work.
Somehow, I still don't think you'll get it. You're a trumptard. Trumptards don't understand anything, except that the Dear Leader is alway right.
Somehow, I still don't think you'll get it. You're a trumptard. Trumptards don't understand anything, except that the Dear Leader is alway right.
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
patheticly fucking stupid
()
Date: May 23, 2020 08:04PM
FEPPU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HMKJB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 7JPDG Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > > second,
> > > > > libs
> > > > > > deny science.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > >
> > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > > coronavirus
> > > >
> > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > > r/12266398
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > >
> > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what
> he
> > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the
> drug.
> >
> > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
> For
> > > your information, every trial so far of the
> > drug
> > > has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> couple
> > of
> > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not
> sure
> > > what they mean.
> >
> >
> > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> doesn't
> > understand how things work
> >
> > so how many trials does that make now? why do
> they
> > keep having trials in different jurisdictions
> if
> > the drug doesn't work?
>
> You have to be kidding me. They are doing trials
> to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so
> far are all coming back negative, or worse. And
> you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
>
> Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking stupid?
when a drug comes to market for use it takes YEARS of
trials to make sure there are no bad side effects, not
three months. The fact that people are STILL putting it
through trials means it shows promise for this new use
which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine shows promise",
he was right
-------------------------------------------------------
> HMKJB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 7JPDG Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > > second,
> > > > > libs
> > > > > > deny science.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > >
> > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > > coronavirus
> > > >
> > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why other
> > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > > r/12266398
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > >
> > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what
> he
> > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the
> drug.
> >
> > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
> For
> > > your information, every trial so far of the
> > drug
> > > has shown that either it's ineffective, or it
> > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> couple
> > of
> > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not
> sure
> > > what they mean.
> >
> >
> > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> doesn't
> > understand how things work
> >
> > so how many trials does that make now? why do
> they
> > keep having trials in different jurisdictions
> if
> > the drug doesn't work?
>
> You have to be kidding me. They are doing trials
> to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so
> far are all coming back negative, or worse. And
> you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
>
> Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking stupid?
when a drug comes to market for use it takes YEARS of
trials to make sure there are no bad side effects, not
three months. The fact that people are STILL putting it
through trials means it shows promise for this new use
which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine shows promise",
he was right
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
6MHHU
()
Date: May 23, 2020 08:11PM
patheticly fucking stupid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FEPPU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HMKJB Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 7JPDG Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > > > second,
> > > > > > libs
> > > > > > > deny science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > > > coronavirus
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why
> other
> > > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > r/12266398
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > > >
> > > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what
> > he
> > > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the
> > drug.
> > >
> > > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
> > For
> > > > your information, every trial so far of the
> > > drug
> > > > has shown that either it's ineffective, or
> it
> > > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not
> > sure
> > > > what they mean.
> > >
> > >
> > > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> > doesn't
> > > understand how things work
> > >
> > > so how many trials does that make now? why do
> > they
> > > keep having trials in different jurisdictions
> > if
> > > the drug doesn't work?
> >
> > You have to be kidding me. They are doing
> trials
> > to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so
> > far are all coming back negative, or worse.
> And
> > you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
> >
> > Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
>
> why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking
> stupid?
>
>
> when a drug comes to market for use it takes YEARS
> of
> trials to make sure there are no bad side effects,
> not
> three months. The fact that people are STILL
> putting it
> through trials means it shows promise for this new
> use
>
> which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine
> shows promise",
> he was right
The trumptard in this thread said that it was proven to be effective. Look up in the thread if you don't believe me. It has not been proven. That's what I was trying to explain to the trumptard.
All the trials so far have shown that the drug is ineffective, or worse that it increases mortality. No one with a brain, which excludes you, would say that the drug is still promising.
Is it possible that it will work? Yes. But it gets less likely with every trial,
-------------------------------------------------------
> FEPPU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > HMKJB Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > 7JPDG Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science. For
> > > > second,
> > > > > > libs
> > > > > > > deny science.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > > >
> > > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective against
> > > > > coronavirus
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why
> other
> > > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > r/12266398
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > > >
> > > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read what
> > he
> > > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of the
> > drug.
> > >
> > > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
> > For
> > > > your information, every trial so far of the
> > > drug
> > > > has shown that either it's ineffective, or
> it
> > > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> > couple
> > > of
> > > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're not
> > sure
> > > > what they mean.
> > >
> > >
> > > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> > doesn't
> > > understand how things work
> > >
> > > so how many trials does that make now? why do
> > they
> > > keep having trials in different jurisdictions
> > if
> > > the drug doesn't work?
> >
> > You have to be kidding me. They are doing
> trials
> > to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials so
> > far are all coming back negative, or worse.
> And
> > you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
> >
> > Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
>
> why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking
> stupid?
>
>
> when a drug comes to market for use it takes YEARS
> of
> trials to make sure there are no bad side effects,
> not
> three months. The fact that people are STILL
> putting it
> through trials means it shows promise for this new
> use
>
> which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine
> shows promise",
> he was right
The trumptard in this thread said that it was proven to be effective. Look up in the thread if you don't believe me. It has not been proven. That's what I was trying to explain to the trumptard.
All the trials so far have shown that the drug is ineffective, or worse that it increases mortality. No one with a brain, which excludes you, would say that the drug is still promising.
Is it possible that it will work? Yes. But it gets less likely with every trial,
Re: questions to liberals
Posted by:
pathetic fucking fail, again
()
Date: May 23, 2020 08:28PM
6MHHU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> patheticly fucking stupid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FEPPU Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > HMKJB Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 7JPDG Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science.
> For
> > > > > second,
> > > > > > > libs
> > > > > > > > deny science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective
> against
> > > > > > coronavirus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why
> > other
> > > > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > r/12266398
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read
> what
> > > he
> > > > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of
> the
> > > drug.
> > > >
> > > > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
>
> > > For
> > > > > your information, every trial so far of
> the
> > > > drug
> > > > > has shown that either it's ineffective,
> or
> > it
> > > > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're
> not
> > > sure
> > > > > what they mean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> > > doesn't
> > > > understand how things work
> > > >
> > > > so how many trials does that make now? why
> do
> > > they
> > > > keep having trials in different
> jurisdictions
> > > if
> > > > the drug doesn't work?
> > >
> > > You have to be kidding me. They are doing
> > trials
> > > to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials
> so
> > > far are all coming back negative, or worse.
> > And
> > > you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
> > >
> > > Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
> >
> > why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking
> > stupid?
> >
> >
> > when a drug comes to market for use it takes
> YEARS
> > of
> > trials to make sure there are no bad side
> effects,
> > not
> > three months. The fact that people are STILL
> > putting it
> > through trials means it shows promise for this
> new
> > use
> >
> > which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine
> > shows promise",
> > he was right
>
> The trumptard in this thread said that it was
> proven to be effective. Look up in the thread if
> you don't believe me. It has not been proven.
> That's what I was trying to explain to the
> trumptard.
>
> All the trials so far have shown that the drug is
> ineffective, or worse that it increases mortality.
> No one with a brain, which excludes you, would
> say that the drug is still promising.
>
> Is it possible that it will work? Yes. But it
> gets less likely with every trial,
why do liberal retards(redundant) feel the need to continuously prove
their stupidity??
and why do liberal retards(redundant) refuse to use google when it's
going to prove them wrong??
-------------------------------------------------------
> patheticly fucking stupid Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > FEPPU Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > HMKJB Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > 7JPDG Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > pathetic fail Wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----
> > > > > > 3CUWG Wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > Libs are inferior Wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----
> > > > > > > > For one thing, libs deny science.
> For
> > > > > second,
> > > > > > > libs
> > > > > > > > deny science.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Trumptard science:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > hydroxychloroquine is effective
> against
> > > > > > coronavirus
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, it's been proven so, that's why
> > other
> > > > > > countries are doing it as well
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-20/coronavirus
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> -hydroxychloroquine-trial-donald-trump-game-change
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > r/12266398
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > the rest of your tripe is wrong as well
> > > > >
> > > > > Yet another trumptard who doesn't read
> what
> > > he
> > > > > linked to. Your link is to a trial of
> the
> > > drug.
> > > >
> > > > > Do you know what a trial is? I guess not.
>
> > > For
> > > > > your information, every trial so far of
> the
> > > > drug
> > > > > has shown that either it's ineffective,
> or
> > it
> > > > > increases mortality. And sorry about a
> > > couple
> > > > of
> > > > > those big words. Look 'em up if you're
> not
> > > sure
> > > > > what they mean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > yet another liberal retard(redundant) that
> > > doesn't
> > > > understand how things work
> > > >
> > > > so how many trials does that make now? why
> do
> > > they
> > > > keep having trials in different
> jurisdictions
> > > if
> > > > the drug doesn't work?
> > >
> > > You have to be kidding me. They are doing
> > trials
> > > to SEE if it works, dumbass. And the trials
> so
> > > far are all coming back negative, or worse.
> > And
> > > you think that means it's proven. Fuck.
> > >
> > > Sorry, no hope for you. You're a trumptard.
> >
> > why are liberal retards(redundant) so fucking
> > stupid?
> >
> >
> > when a drug comes to market for use it takes
> YEARS
> > of
> > trials to make sure there are no bad side
> effects,
> > not
> > three months. The fact that people are STILL
> > putting it
> > through trials means it shows promise for this
> new
> > use
> >
> > which means when trump said "hydroxycloroquine
> > shows promise",
> > he was right
>
> The trumptard in this thread said that it was
> proven to be effective. Look up in the thread if
> you don't believe me. It has not been proven.
> That's what I was trying to explain to the
> trumptard.
>
> All the trials so far have shown that the drug is
> ineffective, or worse that it increases mortality.
> No one with a brain, which excludes you, would
> say that the drug is still promising.
>
> Is it possible that it will work? Yes. But it
> gets less likely with every trial,
why do liberal retards(redundant) feel the need to continuously prove
their stupidity??
and why do liberal retards(redundant) refuse to use google when it's
going to prove them wrong??