After the trillions you spent building "infrastructure" democrats claimed was essential ...

They now want to keep the money, cut, and run - and be paid to flatulate non-Universe education online.

how ambivalent can one be?

Big News, not just Big Fonts (tm)

IT'S BIG NEWS BECAUSE WE WERE "TOLD" THAT CLOSING OUR QUADRILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF DEMOCRAT CONTRACT SCHOOLS WAS HIGHLY TEMPORARY. we were told from Clinton to Trump that spending a quadrillion was worth it and that online learning failed - and even paid to have bad online learning created so that democrat could claim it didn't work.

now - temporary has been extended

now some democrats are claiming "we need more - more stay at home contracts - to create a whole QUADRILLION DOLLAR infrastructure for learning from home"

(MEANWHILE - MANY INDUSTRIES HAVE ONLINE LEARNING FOR FREE, there are even free books - although google and amazon are deep in the book fraud industry as you might guess - and democrats are paying hindus to submit books that are copies of USA books to our librares ... democrat assholes ... just as you guessed ... it's a "global system" of fucking america hard, a global library system that has reared it's head: GOOGLE AND AMAZON are the top inheritors of it all, of course - including federal contracts to SCAN BOOKS they do not own WHICH BYE THE WAY IS ILLEGAL (to scan a book that is copyrighted - funny - google has all the books scanned but it's illegal))

This all gets fixed if Uncle Sugar stops subsidizing edumacation. Students need to "feel" the cost. No more federal loans.

They'll walk away and pricing will get a lot more realistic quickly.

"Oh gee... I'm paying $350 an hour for online class. Maybe I should tell the professors (teaching ASSistants) to go eat a bag of dicks".

how could you POSSIBLY be claiming a quadrillion dollars down the road that "a mistake was made" ? but they are. and then say you need to do it again "online" - which is highly more likely to fail and be totally fraud?

who is going to insure that "work from home" school system isn't just allot of illegal aliens and chinese who've never been to usa getting federal money?

who will insure there is no CHEATING, since preventing plaguerism and showing a students worth is ALL A SCHOOL NAME IS WORTH, supposedly

(it was Bill Clinton who signed "open checkbook" for schools laws, AND Bill Clinton who signed laws legally mandating all federal state local gov workers and many private business be educated according to THE STANDARDS DEMOCRATS MADE - democrats who were getting a quadrillion dollars to build a commie school system. big problem: the systems have no legitimacy they are allowing illegal aliens to get degrees without ever doing any school work. what employer pays for THAT? and what democrat needs a degree when their state hires democrats and don't need to compete with republicans that have honest degrees)

THE QUESTIONS GO ON AND ON

THEY ARE VERY GOOD QUESTIONS

HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY PRIVATE BUSINESS "buying employees by degree" if your degrees are non-universal and non-transferrable (not university) and CHEATING WAS ALLOWED and the business had to pay taxes to overpaid gov workers?

HOW DO YOU JUSTIFY HUGE NUMBERS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS in local government in democrat areas with huge numbers of educated white people who applied still unemployed ?

THE QUESTIONS GO ON AND ON

THEY ARE VERY GOOD QUESTIONS

THEY ALL POINT TO THE FACT THAT THE PEOPLE WHO CALLED BILL CLINTON A SCAMMER: WERE DEAD TO RIGHTS

Before Clinton many businesses had begun free education for those hired (even paying for public school classes before those blew out the window)

Bill Clinton made certificates offered by businesses illegal.

Bill Clinton made private schools impossible: none could compete with government funded schools nor could any meet the scorn of "your not federally regulated by democrat standards". All private schools INCLUDING HARVARD became a bitch of government

BILL CLINTON ALSO MADE APPRENTICESHIP, on the job learning, certification night classes offered by companies (usually taught by old workers biding time before retiring or injured workers while recovering). he made them "illegal" and named scammer government workers as "legal". such a thing in law had never been heard of. why republicans didn't protest ... well many were across the isle republicans who only cared about the cash cow coming their way not the destruction

AND HOW DID IT ALL TURN OUT? Businesses in Democrat states hire only democrat insiders - perhaps with fake papers. Even doctors practicing in California may not have ANY degeree (their degree is only from mexico - who cheats and steals in the school system worse then democrats in the usa do)

SO YOUR DEGREE - if you worked for it - worth nothing.

BUT THAT WAS THE CASE BEFORE BILL CLIINTON. BUSINESES AND GOVERNMENT hired not according to degrees.

it was a huge lie by Bill Clinton that government run schools would "be more efficient" and that the degrees would be "trusted" and the only criteria for employment

BILL CLINTON KNEW THAT this would be a COMMUNIST RUN SYSTEM, that cheating and bad education would be the result, and that hiring would be by politics not degrees. Infact: it was Bill who began political firings on the Hill - lawsuits tried to block him and failed.

So who can you trust? A well respected school that "would never tarnish their name for any individual". Businesses often preffered "work experience" to education - education was for the rich, and people didn't really trust the rich much - that all depended.

THAT WAS THE PAST. A past that is no longer. All schools are filled with quota hired illegal aliens (another bill clinton law), books written/printed to increase college profits not to teach, the school are hugely priced (despite being built with federal money), it's one lie after another from that sector.

You can bet that degree might be fake (online, or cheated, politically motivated). That the books were filled with irrelevant crap.

some people have become "doctors" of basketweaving and got government jobs in areas of study no one has ever heard of (simple subjects)

AND THAT'S A BIG PROBLEM

AND THE QUESTIONS CONTINUE

AND THE QUESTIONS CONTINUE

and when did answering questions become a lifestyle ?

i mean, you spend your life answering questions that don't need to be answered (that big industry already has a solution for which isn't even in the book)?

what kind of life is it answering fake questions?

it's not the life for most: but its' the life Bill Clinton sold to America

you could spend a life paying democrats to demand you answer question after question in books that aren't very relevant

ONLY to find industry has patens that cover things the book doesn't even know about - and that industy doesn't wish to share it's secrets with the schools, and that every question you answered was for NAUGHT

that - that isn't good

the Clinton's knew that. they got into book store theft / publisher deals, using government over-reach to demand students used MICROSOFT NOT APPLE, construction fraud, stealing apple computers (late 1990's) from schools that already went digital, scams to make students re-take classes they should have had to re-take, one scam after another of "trick the students, get the money, use the Hill in DC to pay for living large". demanding teachers pay niggers in DC (the "teacher's union"). demanding kids take irrelevant classes that are non-university / non-transferrable as part of their curriculum. inventing courses and naming them as "required" - even inventing subjects that were total contrivances and just re-wordings of a different subject. everything was scammed.

Millenials can't remember - but schools in the past were not so heavily based on "answering book questions that are keyed to a particular book"

they allowed a person to "pass out of a subject" (persons who were educated outside of the school) by taking an oral exam. BILL CLINTON INSURED THAT WAS NO LONGER POSSIBLE - remember governemnt schooling was required

schools got federal money to "assess out of school system learning credits" - BUT THEY STOLE ALL THAT MONEY - they prevented students from getting any credit for anything unless they PAID FOR THE FULL COURSE SCHEDULE, depaite getting federal money to NOT DO THAT

AGAIN - one democrat gov worker scam after another

the "objective" in the past of schools was ...

A person with a degree was a person who showed they could learn allot and think for themselves - that they didn't "need a book" to tell them things, they knew how to figure out the world for themselves.

but it became the Clinton objective that "the government had a guide for everything, would sell the guide, and everyone must buy services from the government to read the guide to them to be "qualified" for employment"

THAT WASN'T THE ORIGINAL GOAL OF EDUCATION BEFORE CLINTON

the original thought was few could afford and or pass the classes - and the ones that did obviously would continue learning on their own (with honors) - that they didn't need more and more schooling to do so (that they would school themselves).

Doctorates were preserved for Medicine and such fields where higher learning required a professor to explain "extremely complicated matters" to those still learning - or for non-medical - as a test of who could offer others degrees (back then, a doctor could give a degree to ANYONE, and that power was reserved to respected persons who'd met all the criteria of someone already with a degree)

today - if you can be a doctor "of anything" and the test was open book (any many might cheat) ...

who knows if your a damn idiot. "book smarts" is a term referring to the fact that you can read and copy a book and be completely un-able to solve real world problems


but again - the doctorates of yesterday were about the power to give degrees - not about "the ability to be a master of a subject" (master's)

very few needed "a doctorate" to work before Clinton: only Surgeons I believe i can claim and back with evidence. i dont' think even a bridge designed was required to be "a professor and doctor" back then.

I would bet even nuclear reactor workers were not "bound to have a doctorate" although you'd likely find mostly that - before clinton - not "required".

there were no "doctors of psychology" back in the day

the subject wasn't even considered "worthy" of much scholastic attention (psychiatry)

(the only people that did it were chemists who believed there might be chemical cures - AND THEY WERE WRONG)

TODAY - THE HALLS OF GOVERNMENT ARE PACKED WITH PEOPLE THAT HAVE PSYCH DEGREES

------------------------
did i forget Judges don't they have to be doctors?

NO, THEY ARE LIARS, in the clinton days if not present - they are Bachelor's degrees

the doctorate title is a lie - because only 2 years of study beyond the bachelors is required - and of that: allot of drivel. classical reasoning is not required. the history of law (which THE CONSTITUTION IS BASED ON AND PINNED TO) - BY THE CLINTONS - NOT REQUIRED. latin not required.

so they say they are doctors and they aren't required to even know the laws that back the Constitution

they get paid allot and bow to threats from DOJ, and towns become corrupt democrat havens where democrats prosecute, no one ever gets to prosecute a democrat, and no federal laws ever need be furnished

THAT IS NOT A DOCTOR - THAT'S A LIAR

Republicans first warned "this isn't going to be a quick re-opening

- the Democrat news saying closures are very temporary only to respect the ill", they are not telling the truth. Shutting down the economy had consequences. You cannot simply "re-open it"

NOW WE ARE SEEIGN THE SAME DEMOCRATS WHO TOLD YOU NOT TO WORRY?

THEY ARE SAYING "OH THAT QUADRILLION ON SCHOOSL? I HAVE ANOTHER QUADIRLLION IDEA, HOME SCHOOL"

(btw, my democrats will be requiring you be evicted so my children, did i say i fuck allot - really more than i work i fuck allot, will be requiring YOUR HOME, and your job? in order to "facilitate" making these classes online. we'll try to make a cash cow out of colleges ... later ... and you'll be forced over the barrel on the Great Re-Opening costs on that too. if your still alive.)

DEMOCRATS HAVE CONTINUALLY BEEN:

* BASHING TRUMP

* DOING FAKE STOCK NEWS, telling people to sell when it's low, telling people to buy after prices have gone up substancially

* HIDING THE FACT DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN BUYING STOCKS LOW USING 0% INTEREST RATE LOANS, while charging credit card holders 18% for the same money - and that some of these businesses are actually just - DRESSING UP CHINESE IMPORTS

* FAKE CORONOVIRUS DATA - all of the worst reports came from areas heavily controlled by democrats who use illegal alien doctors that are card holding DNC memebers

* BASHING TRUMP

* ASSURING AMERICA THAT THE TRILLIONS (constituting a new annual budget just months after the first) ARE TEMPORARY, and that after a wait that everyone will be back at work again

but it's not true

on one hand they say it's "temporary and that those who are unwilling to belived it are killing the ill"

ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY'VE ALREADY STATED INTENTION TO NOT RE-OPEN GOVERNMENT SERVICES, and instead, issue fake papers from home - education papers

* they say Fall Classes now

* but you have no idea if this will apply to spring classes

* you have no idea if you are paying a double price

* ONLINE CLASSES COST THE SAME AS CAMPUS CLASSES, even though the costs are completely different

you can than Clinton for that - that's another clinton scam that came about during Clinton

Clinton even tried charging $2,000 a piece for DIGital copies of FEDERAL LAW - the law they said you have no right in court to not be familiar with ... which has grown to epic sizes

yes federal law became free online BUT NOT DURING CLINTON

TL;DR

* dems will say their infrastructure was meant for a few students and they need more servers

* dems will say they need new software to cover huwaei phones (and attempt to sell google phones made by huwaei to studens AS REQUIRED FOR COMPATIBILITY with their "california" courses. apple will have to send out a squad to prevent it is my guess.)

* after all the new rampages on budget - they will THEN RE-OPEN THE SCHOOLS

this is all about completely fucking over (old white people) until they are dead

(meaning old white people that worked a whole career and SAVED MONEY in an economy in which there were NO FREE RIDES ... money democrats have absolutely no right to touch)