Re: Re more Clinton era scandals: ROBO SIGNING by Clinton era (illegal seizure of property by Judges), made illegal by Bush cleaning up after the party, DISGUISED INVOICES MAIL HAD TO BE MADE ILLEGAL TOO
Posted by:
associated pressings
()
Date: November 16, 2019 07:35PM
Seizure of auto mobiles apparently in loan failure were being "signed by the hundreds" by county judges without consideration or contact of PART OWNER of the vehicles - always awarding the government friend - the bank who owned the other part (obviously conflict of interest)
THE SAME WAS DONE FOR WHOLE HOMES, it was not just automobiles: faulting of mortages without remorse without extra time without investigating
A PERFECT AND VERY RELEVANT EXAMPLE IS A PERSON WHO HAD THE MONEY TO PAY A CAR PAYMENT AND SIMPLY GOT CONFUSING PAYMENT LETTERS AND WHO BELIEVED THEY HAD MADE ALL PAYMENTS (and who would make payment immediately had they the opportunity before the judge robo signed): happened all the time, and with robo signing during CLinton - bank staffers made SURE the spam mail was thoroughly confusing and even in disguise
however - even one who was "legitimately late" should be before a judge and argue their (poverty) case of why they were late (perhaps of disability or in need to keep job the (tax, payment) would be legally deferred for the good of the community in general: why is because that is the law - proper utilization of property within reason is the law. payment delay is not the beginning and end of law in all cases, yet it is necessary to prevent theft or abuse of lenders in others). the judge would have to consider what if any welfare would be given: and couldn't do so by robo signing and "allowing a lawsuit later" (that's illegal: property cannot legally be forced to change hands until AFTER a case is heard in favor - why is because "the posser is 9/10 of the law", and that has been the law for 2000 years, if a judge gives property it becomes legal for it to "evaporate" and become impossible to litigate later)