Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Democrats are screwed
()
Date: March 25, 2019 12:41PM
They will be revealed and possibly prosecuted for liable. Does not look good for Hillary and Schiff. The tide has turned. There is a justice in this country.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
The Anti-Rudy
()
Date: March 25, 2019 01:19PM
A) The investigation was only frivolous if you consider foreign hacking of our elections to be frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses to do anything about it. Do you consider it frivolous? You won't when the rest of the world (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures out how easy it is.
B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel, but the discovery process opens up a can of worms that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he is a pathologically narcissistic con man who either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems in Congress.
"Total exoneration"? We'll see.
B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel, but the discovery process opens up a can of worms that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he is a pathologically narcissistic con man who either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems in Congress.
"Total exoneration"? We'll see.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
SDNY Is Federal
()
Date: March 25, 2019 01:21PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses to
> do anything about it. Do you consider it
> frivolous? You won't when the rest of the world
> (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures out
> how easy it is.
>
> B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
> but the discovery process opens up a can of worms
> that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
>
> Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will
> seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set
> in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he
> is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And
> neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems
> in Congress.
>
> "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP himself.
How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses to
> do anything about it. Do you consider it
> frivolous? You won't when the rest of the world
> (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures out
> how easy it is.
>
> B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
> but the discovery process opens up a can of worms
> that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
>
> Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will
> seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set
> in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he
> is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And
> neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems
> in Congress.
>
> "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP himself.
How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Required Reading for Libtards
()
Date: March 25, 2019 01:23PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous blah blah blah
Read the truth stupid.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
You got punked.
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous blah blah blah
Read the truth stupid.
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
You got punked.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
The Anti-Rudy
()
Date: March 25, 2019 01:31PM
SDNY Is Federal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
> SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP
> himself.
>
> How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
SDNY is actually more free to go after Trumpland than Mueller was. The scope of the Mueller investigation was by law quite limited. In fact, I would not be at all surprised if Mueller did not hand off most of the important stuff he found (for example, Trump organization finances) to the SDNY. It may not get Trump himself, but those close to him should still be very worried.
Hate to tell you, but Trump's legal problems are far from over. But by all means, enjoy the next few days. They will be good days, while they last. Do not get used to it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
> SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP
> himself.
>
> How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
SDNY is actually more free to go after Trumpland than Mueller was. The scope of the Mueller investigation was by law quite limited. In fact, I would not be at all surprised if Mueller did not hand off most of the important stuff he found (for example, Trump organization finances) to the SDNY. It may not get Trump himself, but those close to him should still be very worried.
Hate to tell you, but Trump's legal problems are far from over. But by all means, enjoy the next few days. They will be good days, while they last. Do not get used to it.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
I doubt it
()
Date: March 25, 2019 01:59PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SDNY Is Federal Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > A) The investigation was only frivolous if
> you
> > > consider foreign hacking of our elections to
> be
> > > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> > to
> > > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> > world
> > > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> > out
> > > how easy it is.
> > >
> > > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for
> one
> > > would love to see Trump sue somebody for
> libel,
> >
> > > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> > worms
> > > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> > will
> > > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality
> will
> > set
> > > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking,
> that
> > he
> > > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> > And
> > > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> > Dems
> > > in Congress.
> > >
> > > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
> >
> > SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately
> TRUMP
> > himself.
> >
> > How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
>
> SDNY is actually more free to go after Trumpland
> than Mueller was. The scope of the Mueller
> investigation was by law quite limited. In fact, I
> would not be at all surprised if Mueller did not
> hand off most of the important stuff he found (for
> example, Trump organization finances) to the SDNY.
> It may not get Trump himself, but those close to
> him should still be very worried.
>
> Hate to tell you, but Trump's legal problems are
> far from over. But by all means, enjoy the next
> few days. They will be good days, while they
> last. Do not get used to it.
You been saying the same stuff for years! Bring it on! The only losers are the Democrats. As the polls indicated, people (voters) are losing patience with the Democrats. Keep taking credit for a disaster, lolol, that's AOK with us.
-------------------------------------------------------
> SDNY Is Federal Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > A) The investigation was only frivolous if
> you
> > > consider foreign hacking of our elections to
> be
> > > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> > to
> > > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> > world
> > > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> > out
> > > how easy it is.
> > >
> > > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for
> one
> > > would love to see Trump sue somebody for
> libel,
> >
> > > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> > worms
> > > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> > will
> > > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality
> will
> > set
> > > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking,
> that
> > he
> > > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> > And
> > > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> > Dems
> > > in Congress.
> > >
> > > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
> >
> > SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately
> TRUMP
> > himself.
> >
> > How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
>
> SDNY is actually more free to go after Trumpland
> than Mueller was. The scope of the Mueller
> investigation was by law quite limited. In fact, I
> would not be at all surprised if Mueller did not
> hand off most of the important stuff he found (for
> example, Trump organization finances) to the SDNY.
> It may not get Trump himself, but those close to
> him should still be very worried.
>
> Hate to tell you, but Trump's legal problems are
> far from over. But by all means, enjoy the next
> few days. They will be good days, while they
> last. Do not get used to it.
You been saying the same stuff for years! Bring it on! The only losers are the Democrats. As the polls indicated, people (voters) are losing patience with the Democrats. Keep taking credit for a disaster, lolol, that's AOK with us.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
flinging poo
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:08PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses to
> do anything about it. Do you consider it
> frivolous? You won't when the rest of the world
> (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures out
> how easy it is.
>
> B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
> but the discovery process opens up a can of worms
> that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
>
> Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will
> seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set
> in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he
> is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And
> neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems
> in Congress.
>
> "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
A) that jugeared mulatto Obama was president when the foreign hacking occurred. Trump was the target, not the guy in charge. FAIL.
B) Trump's not going to sue anyone.
SDNY is busy alright. They just dragged that pathologically narcissistic con man, and leftard proclaimed Trump-slayer, Avenatti into jail for lots of nasty things. And the dems will never have the power that the special counsel had and they will never have the credibility that Mueller had.
It's over chump. You lost. Badly.
-------------------------------------------------------
> A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses to
> do anything about it. Do you consider it
> frivolous? You won't when the rest of the world
> (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures out
> how easy it is.
>
> B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
> but the discovery process opens up a can of worms
> that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
>
> Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all will
> seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will set
> in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that he
> is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> either got lucky or had help) won't go away. And
> neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the Dems
> in Congress.
>
> "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
A) that jugeared mulatto Obama was president when the foreign hacking occurred. Trump was the target, not the guy in charge. FAIL.
B) Trump's not going to sue anyone.
SDNY is busy alright. They just dragged that pathologically narcissistic con man, and leftard proclaimed Trump-slayer, Avenatti into jail for lots of nasty things. And the dems will never have the power that the special counsel had and they will never have the credibility that Mueller had.
It's over chump. You lost. Badly.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Al Sharpton says:
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:14PM
Why did so many people lie in this investigation? It is a debacle! While Britt Hume says this investigation is a black eye on media, and now they are making excuses. Yes. I agree,,bring on further investigations; Democrats will soon run out of excuses.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
NBC swallows the red pill
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:21PM
NBC News has an article on their website that Mueller just gave Trump the 2020 election. Sweet!
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
The Anti-Rudy
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:27PM
flinging poo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
>
> A) that jugeared mulatto Obama was president when
> the foreign hacking occurred. Trump was the
> target, not the guy in charge. FAIL.
>
> B) Trump's not going to sue anyone.
>
> SDNY is busy alright. They just dragged that
> pathologically narcissistic con man, and leftard
> proclaimed Trump-slayer, Avenatti into jail for
> lots of nasty things. And the dems will never
> have the power that the special counsel had and
> they will never have the credibility that Mueller
> had.
>
> It's over chump. You lost. Badly.
A. Foreigners are dicking with our elections. That's fucked up, and apparently it takes a libtard to point that out to a Trumptard. But like I say, there are a lot of people in the world who would not shed any tears to see Trump gone. And no matter how bone-tickling funny it would be for Trump to get beat by foreign hackers in 2020, I do not want it to happen (that way) because I am a patriotic American. It is already pretty clear where Trump and his Trumpkins stand.
B. Yeah, Avenatti was kind of sleazy. Trump seems to attract that kind of thing, sort of like flies being attracted to shit. Good riddance. But keep in mind, SDNY is quite capable of doing multiple things at the same time. You can do whatever you want, but I would not get too comfortable just yet
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
>
> A) that jugeared mulatto Obama was president when
> the foreign hacking occurred. Trump was the
> target, not the guy in charge. FAIL.
>
> B) Trump's not going to sue anyone.
>
> SDNY is busy alright. They just dragged that
> pathologically narcissistic con man, and leftard
> proclaimed Trump-slayer, Avenatti into jail for
> lots of nasty things. And the dems will never
> have the power that the special counsel had and
> they will never have the credibility that Mueller
> had.
>
> It's over chump. You lost. Badly.
A. Foreigners are dicking with our elections. That's fucked up, and apparently it takes a libtard to point that out to a Trumptard. But like I say, there are a lot of people in the world who would not shed any tears to see Trump gone. And no matter how bone-tickling funny it would be for Trump to get beat by foreign hackers in 2020, I do not want it to happen (that way) because I am a patriotic American. It is already pretty clear where Trump and his Trumpkins stand.
B. Yeah, Avenatti was kind of sleazy. Trump seems to attract that kind of thing, sort of like flies being attracted to shit. Good riddance. But keep in mind, SDNY is quite capable of doing multiple things at the same time. You can do whatever you want, but I would not get too comfortable just yet
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
I sleep great at night
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:38PM
A. commies have been trying to fuck with our elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K in facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you wanted Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice. You wanted an specific outcome. You are not only anti-American, you're also anti-common decency. You are disgusting.
B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the Cohen stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high school and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago. Nobody's perfect.
B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the Cohen stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high school and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago. Nobody's perfect.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
The Anti-Rudy
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:47PM
I sleep great at night Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K in
> facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you wanted
> Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice. You
> wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
> You are disgusting.
>
> B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the Cohen
> stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high school
> and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> Nobody's perfect.
Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be surprised.
Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of the world a say in our elections. You know, sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
-------------------------------------------------------
> A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K in
> facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you wanted
> Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice. You
> wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
> You are disgusting.
>
> B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the Cohen
> stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high school
> and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> Nobody's perfect.
Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be surprised.
Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of the world a say in our elections. You know, sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
you're great lolol
()
Date: March 25, 2019 02:53PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I sleep great at night Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> > elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> > far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K
> in
> > facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> > trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you
> wanted
> > Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice.
> You
> > wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> > anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
>
> > You are disgusting.
> >
> > B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> > pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the
> Cohen
> > stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> > cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high
> school
> > and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> > Nobody's perfect.
>
> Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be
> surprised.
>
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
The only thing that will surprise me is Adam Schiff NOT resigning from Congress. He is under a lot of pressure to do so.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I sleep great at night Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> > elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> > far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K
> in
> > facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> > trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you
> wanted
> > Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice.
> You
> > wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> > anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
>
> > You are disgusting.
> >
> > B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> > pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the
> Cohen
> > stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> > cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high
> school
> > and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> > Nobody's perfect.
>
> Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be
> surprised.
>
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
The only thing that will surprise me is Adam Schiff NOT resigning from Congress. He is under a lot of pressure to do so.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
The Anti-anti-Rudy
()
Date: March 25, 2019 03:09PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
^^^^ writes the un-American asshole who supports an invasion of 3rd world shiteaters flooding into our country and then giving them citizenship so they can vote. You sure have a funny way of showing hwo much you support our sovereignty and self determination, etc Sparky.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
^^^^ writes the un-American asshole who supports an invasion of 3rd world shiteaters flooding into our country and then giving them citizenship so they can vote. You sure have a funny way of showing hwo much you support our sovereignty and self determination, etc Sparky.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
3:14
()
Date: March 25, 2019 03:14PM
Word out of the West Wing is that Trump is pissed and looking for a reckoning. That NY state AG better watch her fat nigger ass.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
ned
()
Date: March 25, 2019 03:24PM
The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I sleep great at night Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> > elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> > far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K
> in
> > facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> > trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you
> wanted
> > Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice.
> You
> > wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> > anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
>
> > You are disgusting.
> >
> > B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> > pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the
> Cohen
> > stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> > cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high
> school
> > and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> > Nobody's perfect.
>
> Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be
> surprised.
>
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
Nobody hacked our election. Not one single vote was tampered with by the Russians. But I'm glad you take concern with foreigners attacking our sovereignty and meddling in our elections because there is one party in this country that is fine with letting illegal aliens invade our country and vote in our elections. California already lets them do it. They just put any "questionable" ballots in the provisional box and if they are behind on election day they go to the provisionals, which are some 90% democrat.
Sorry if that upsets you.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I sleep great at night Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A. commies have been trying to fuck with our
> > elections for over 70 years. Nothing new. So
> > far, all you've been able to uncover is $450K
> in
> > facebook ads that the rooskies bought and some
> > trolls spinning up fools on facebook. you
> wanted
> > Trump to be guilty. You didn't want justice.
> You
> > wanted an specific outcome. You are not only
> > anti-American, you're also anti-common decency.
>
> > You are disgusting.
> >
> > B. If Mueller had anything on Trump, he's have
> > pulled the trigger on it. He gave SDNY the
> Cohen
> > stuff because it was centered in Cohen's sleazy
> > cons in New York. Obama sold crack in high
> school
> > and hung out with known terrorists in Chicago.
> > Nobody's perfect.
>
> Glad your getting your rest. Just don't be
> surprised.
>
> Any other Trumpkins out there feel different about
> hacking? Or are you OK with giving the rest of
> the world a say in our elections. You know,
> sovereignty, self determination, etc. Anybody?
Nobody hacked our election. Not one single vote was tampered with by the Russians. But I'm glad you take concern with foreigners attacking our sovereignty and meddling in our elections because there is one party in this country that is fine with letting illegal aliens invade our country and vote in our elections. California already lets them do it. They just put any "questionable" ballots in the provisional box and if they are behind on election day they go to the provisionals, which are some 90% democrat.
Sorry if that upsets you.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
of course he'spissed
()
Date: March 25, 2019 03:28PM
3:14 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Word out of the West Wing is that Trump is pissed
> and looking for a reckoning. That NY state AG
> better watch her fat nigger ass.
Wouldn't you be? The democrats put his family through hell and all undeserved, I just hope say they go for the paymaster Hillary and lock her flabby ass up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Word out of the West Wing is that Trump is pissed
> and looking for a reckoning. That NY state AG
> better watch her fat nigger ass.
Wouldn't you be? The democrats put his family through hell and all undeserved, I just hope say they go for the paymaster Hillary and lock her flabby ass up.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Asking the Experts
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:10PM
SDNY Is Federal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
> SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP
> himself.
>
> How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
Like an impotent Trumptard? Will Viagra fix the problem?
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Anti-Rudy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A) The investigation was only frivolous if you
> > consider foreign hacking of our elections to be
> > frivolous. Trump apparently does, he refuses
> to
> > do anything about it. Do you consider it
> > frivolous? You won't when the rest of the
> world
> > (most of whom have no love for Trump) figures
> out
> > how easy it is.
> >
> > B) Libel is not a crime for which you can be
> > "prosecuted". It is a civil claim. I for one
> > would love to see Trump sue somebody for libel,
>
> > but the discovery process opens up a can of
> worms
> > that Trump does not have the balls to pursue.
> >
> > Otherwise, enjoy. For a couple of days all
> will
> > seem fine in Trumpland. Then the reality will
> set
> > in. Trump's problem (generally speaking, that
> he
> > is a pathologically narcissistic con man who
> > either got lucky or had help) won't go away.
> And
> > neither will the SDNY, the New York AG or the
> Dems
> > in Congress.
> >
> > "Total exoneration"? We'll see.
>
> SDNY answers to DOJ, Bob Barr and ultimately TRUMP
> himself.
>
> How's it a feel to be an impotent zero?
Like an impotent Trumptard? Will Viagra fix the problem?
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:21PM
First we need to see the fucking thing. How the fuck does he know its frivolous.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:23PM
I swear rightards are idiots. They're trying to attack and give credibility to a report at the same time. Investigate but cover up at the same time. These people operate like an entire party of criminals now and its chaotic.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
says the man who
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:33PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I swear rightards are idiots. They're trying to
> attack and give credibility to a report at the
> same time. Investigate but cover up at the same
> time. These people operate like an entire party of
> criminals now and its chaotic.
said Avonatti would make a great president, possibly the finest in history, lolol, gerry you are some piece of work!
-------------------------------------------------------
> I swear rightards are idiots. They're trying to
> attack and give credibility to a report at the
> same time. Investigate but cover up at the same
> time. These people operate like an entire party of
> criminals now and its chaotic.
said Avonatti would make a great president, possibly the finest in history, lolol, gerry you are some piece of work!
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:35PM
In today's America we need a president like Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than so can Democrats. And we should.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Gerry the Joke Man
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:37PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In today's America we need a president like
> Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than so
> can Democrats. And we should.
You reputation here is in worse shape than Avenatti.
LMAO!
-------------------------------------------------------
> In today's America we need a president like
> Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than so
> can Democrats. And we should.
You reputation here is in worse shape than Avenatti.
LMAO!
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
should read
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:39PM
Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In today's America we need a president like
> Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than so
> can Democrats. And we should.
If Democrats can and do break the law, it is imperative that Republicans follow suit. When dealing with skunks, one must think like a skunk
-------------------------------------------------------
> In today's America we need a president like
> Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than so
> can Democrats. And we should.
If Democrats can and do break the law, it is imperative that Republicans follow suit. When dealing with skunks, one must think like a skunk
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Cellar Dwellers
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:48PM
Gerry the Joke Man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In today's America we need a president like
> > Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than
> so
> > can Democrats. And we should.
>
>
> You reputation here is in worse shape than
> Avenatti.
>
> LMAO!
I hope you don’t wight 250+. You’ll have to laugh a lot. A whole lot.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In today's America we need a president like
> > Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than
> so
> > can Democrats. And we should.
>
>
> You reputation here is in worse shape than
> Avenatti.
>
> LMAO!
I hope you don’t wight 250+. You’ll have to laugh a lot. A whole lot.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Gerrymanderer2
()
Date: March 25, 2019 04:50PM
should read Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In today's America we need a president like
> > Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than
> so
> > can Democrats. And we should.
>
>
> If Democrats can and do break the law, it is
> imperative that Republicans follow suit. When
> dealing with skunks, one must think like a skunk
Exactly! Skunk it up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In today's America we need a president like
> > Avenatti. If Republicans can break the law than
> so
> > can Democrats. And we should.
>
>
> If Democrats can and do break the law, it is
> imperative that Republicans follow suit. When
> dealing with skunks, one must think like a skunk
Exactly! Skunk it up.
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
Lol@libtardsallday
()
Date: March 25, 2019 05:05PM
WINNING
Attachments:
Attachments:
Re: Guiliani says on "Fox and Friends" that we will reveal the people who initiated this frivolous investigation
Posted by:
so now what!!!??
()
Date: March 25, 2019 05:23PM
All the Democrats will jump ship and claim or re -register as Independent or Republican? Well, let me tell you we don't want you in our party!! No ship jumping rats need register!! Suck it in! You made a very big, gigantic perhaps, take it like a man and own it,,,you sissy men! Don't even want you as a dishwasher or toilet attendant or a dog poop picker upper! SCat!!