Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
JewTard2, The Beginning!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 06:03PM
Rolling Stone says Tea Partiers are Stupid, proceeds to step in shit:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/rolling-stone-julia-louis-dreyfus-cover-features-flawed-u-s-constitution-article-1.1750804
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/rolling-stone-julia-louis-dreyfus-cover-features-flawed-u-s-constitution-article-1.1750804
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
GerryTard
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:01PM
JewTard2, The Beginning! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rolling Stone says Tea Partiers are Stupid,
> proceeds to step in shit:
1) they're too stupid to realize it
2) they don't care, as long as they can communicate their message of hate
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rolling Stone says Tea Partiers are Stupid,
> proceeds to step in shit:
1) they're too stupid to realize it
2) they don't care, as long as they can communicate their message of hate
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Rockhound
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:03PM
It's the glasses.
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Rockhound
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:05PM
And the fact that they roam in packs. I love going on ultra left wing sites and shitting on their comments section. They don't like it when you poke inside their little artificial bubble.
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:09PM
Rolling Stone's Julia Louis-Dreyfus cover features flawed US Constitution
The latest issue's cover features a naked Louis-Dreyfus with the historical document inked on her back, including the signature of John Hancock. There's only one problem with that: John Hancock signed the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
You clowns are kidding with this BS, right?
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
The latest issue's cover features a naked Louis-Dreyfus with the historical document inked on her back, including the signature of John Hancock. There's only one problem with that: John Hancock signed the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.
You clowns are kidding with this BS, right?
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Rockhound
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:15PM
Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rolling Stone's Julia Louis-Dreyfus cover features
> flawed US Constitution
>
> The latest issue's cover features a naked
> Louis-Dreyfus with the historical document inked
> on her back, including the signature of John
> Hancock. There's only one problem with that:
> John Hancock signed the Declaration of
> Independence, not the Constitution.
>
> You clowns are kidding with this BS, right?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag and Dreyfus is as left as they come.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rolling Stone's Julia Louis-Dreyfus cover features
> flawed US Constitution
>
> The latest issue's cover features a naked
> Louis-Dreyfus with the historical document inked
> on her back, including the signature of John
> Hancock. There's only one problem with that:
> John Hancock signed the Declaration of
> Independence, not the Constitution.
>
> You clowns are kidding with this BS, right?
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag and Dreyfus is as left as they come.
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:27PM
Rockhound Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag and
> Dreyfus is as left as they come.
It's a pop magazine cover, Cockhound, not a high school text book.
No one, save right-wing nutjobs like you, gives a rat's ass.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag and
> Dreyfus is as left as they come.
It's a pop magazine cover, Cockhound, not a high school text book.
No one, save right-wing nutjobs like you, gives a rat's ass.
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Rockhound
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:31PM
Conserva-tards! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rockhound Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag
> and
> > Dreyfus is as left as they come.
>
> It's a pop magazine cover, Cockhound, not a high
> school text book.
>
> No one, save right-wing nutjobs like you, gives a
> rat's ass.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Hey prick,
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/greghengler/2012/01/31/infamous_rolling_stone_journalist_admits_all_journalists_are_liberal
Doesn't take an admission to know that. All modern mainstream music and music related media these days are liberal agenda pushing fucksticks...
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rockhound Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Joke's on you, Rolling Stone is a liberal rag
> and
> > Dreyfus is as left as they come.
>
> It's a pop magazine cover, Cockhound, not a high
> school text book.
>
> No one, save right-wing nutjobs like you, gives a
> rat's ass.
>
> Conserva-tards!
>
> LoLz!
Hey prick,
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/greghengler/2012/01/31/infamous_rolling_stone_journalist_admits_all_journalists_are_liberal
Doesn't take an admission to know that. All modern mainstream music and music related media these days are liberal agenda pushing fucksticks...
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:41PM
^ Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Attachments:
LoLz!
Attachments:
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Jewa-tards!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:42PM
Yet it's the first to post comedy central or other bull...
Wait. G2 thinks that JH did sign the constitution?
That's some funny shit there - and proof of how stupid our local leftist is...
Wait. G2 thinks that JH did sign the constitution?
That's some funny shit there - and proof of how stupid our local leftist is...
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Jewhater2
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:43PM
Why the the butthurt?
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Jewhater2
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:46PM
Jewhater2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why the the butthurt?
Cockhound?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why the the butthurt?
Cockhound?
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Rockhound
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:46PM
Who would have known Rolling Stone had a sizable left-wing online political section.
Full of faggots:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obamacare-its-working-20140409
Full of faggots:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obamacare-its-working-20140409
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Jewhater2
()
Date: April 09, 2014 09:48PM
Rockhound Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who would have known Rolling Stone had a sizable
> left-wing online political section.
>
> Full of faggots:
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obamacar
> e-its-working-20140409
Attachments:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Who would have known Rolling Stone had a sizable
> left-wing online political section.
>
> Full of faggots:
>
> http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/obamacar
> e-its-working-20140409
Attachments:
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
notjohncwright
()
Date: April 09, 2014 10:07PM
Do not be deceived: Leftism is an enigma. We need a theorem that explains not one or two aspects of Leftism, but all their traits.
The theory must explain, first, the honest decency of the modern liberals combined with their astonishing indifference, nay, hostility to facts, common sense, and evidence;
second, it must explain their high self-esteem (or, to be blunt, their pathological narcissism) combined not merely with an utter lack of accomplishment, but with their utter devotion to destructiveness, a yearning to ruin everything they touch;
third, it must explain their sanctimoniousness combined with their applause, praise, support, and tireless efforts to spread all perversions (especially sexual), moral decay, vulgarity, and every form of desecration;
fourth, their pretense of intellectual superiority combined with their notorious mental fecklessness;
fifth, it must explain both their violence and their pacifism;
sixth, the theory must explain why they hate the very things they should love most;
seventh, the theory must explain why they are incapable of comprehending an honest disagreement or any honorable foe.
http://www.scifiwright.com/2014/03/the-unified-field-theory-of-madness/
The theory must explain, first, the honest decency of the modern liberals combined with their astonishing indifference, nay, hostility to facts, common sense, and evidence;
second, it must explain their high self-esteem (or, to be blunt, their pathological narcissism) combined not merely with an utter lack of accomplishment, but with their utter devotion to destructiveness, a yearning to ruin everything they touch;
third, it must explain their sanctimoniousness combined with their applause, praise, support, and tireless efforts to spread all perversions (especially sexual), moral decay, vulgarity, and every form of desecration;
fourth, their pretense of intellectual superiority combined with their notorious mental fecklessness;
fifth, it must explain both their violence and their pacifism;
sixth, the theory must explain why they hate the very things they should love most;
seventh, the theory must explain why they are incapable of comprehending an honest disagreement or any honorable foe.
http://www.scifiwright.com/2014/03/the-unified-field-theory-of-madness/
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
True The Vote !
()
Date: April 09, 2014 10:10PM
See what happens when you make boys play with dolls, Most normal boys like to play army and games like King of the mountain. Gerry never played this game, He prefered to play with his Barbies and host tea parties, and learn the skills of tea baggin'.
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Conserva-tards!
()
Date: April 09, 2014 10:31PM
notjohncwright Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do not be deceived: Leftism is an enigma. We
> need a theorem that explains not one or two
> aspects of Leftism, but all their traits.
>
> The theory must explain, first, the honest
> decency of the modern liberals combined with their
> astonishing indifference, nay, hostility to facts,
> common sense, and evidence;
>
> second, it must explain their high self-esteem
> (or, to be blunt, their pathological narcissism)
> combined not merely with an utter lack of
> accomplishment, but with their utter devotion to
> destructiveness, a yearning to ruin everything
> they touch;
>
> third, it must explain their sanctimoniousness
> combined with their applause, praise, support, and
> tireless efforts to spread all perversions
> (especially sexual), moral decay, vulgarity, and
> every form of desecration;
>
> fourth, their pretense of intellectual superiority
> combined with their notorious mental fecklessness;
>
>
> fifth, it must explain both their violence and
> their pacifism;
>
> sixth, the theory must explain why they hate the
> very things they should love most;
>
> seventh, the theory must explain why they are
> incapable of comprehending an honest disagreement
> or any honorable foe.
>
> http://www.scifiwright.com/2014/03/the-unified-fie
> ld-theory-of-madness/
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Do not be deceived: Leftism is an enigma. We
> need a theorem that explains not one or two
> aspects of Leftism, but all their traits.
>
> The theory must explain, first, the honest
> decency of the modern liberals combined with their
> astonishing indifference, nay, hostility to facts,
> common sense, and evidence;
>
> second, it must explain their high self-esteem
> (or, to be blunt, their pathological narcissism)
> combined not merely with an utter lack of
> accomplishment, but with their utter devotion to
> destructiveness, a yearning to ruin everything
> they touch;
>
> third, it must explain their sanctimoniousness
> combined with their applause, praise, support, and
> tireless efforts to spread all perversions
> (especially sexual), moral decay, vulgarity, and
> every form of desecration;
>
> fourth, their pretense of intellectual superiority
> combined with their notorious mental fecklessness;
>
>
> fifth, it must explain both their violence and
> their pacifism;
>
> sixth, the theory must explain why they hate the
> very things they should love most;
>
> seventh, the theory must explain why they are
> incapable of comprehending an honest disagreement
> or any honorable foe.
>
> http://www.scifiwright.com/2014/03/the-unified-fie
> ld-theory-of-madness/
Conserva-tards!
LoLz!
Re: Why are liberals so publicly stupid but think they're so "smart"?
Posted by:
Really?
()
Date: April 18, 2014 05:17PM
Amazing...I still can't get over the fact that the majority of people believe that the political party they support is 'better' than the opposition.
They got you right where they want you,liberals and conservatives alike.
They got you right where they want you,liberals and conservatives alike.