Since her father took office in January, first daughter Ivanka Trump has made a habit of “dropping by” high profile meetings involving President Trump and other senior officials, as well as media appearances, a report from CNN has detailed.

The most recent example of Ivanka’s ‘drop-by’ was on Wednesday evening, during a meeting between Trump and Congressional leaders from both sides of the house, where she “entered the Oval Office to ‘say hello’ and the meeting careened off-topic.”

The report claims that Republican leaders, such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, were “visibly annoyed by Ivanka’s presence,” although Ryan’s spokeswoman AshLee Strong later refuted that claim.

She brightens every room she walks into.

Ryan and McConnell are both pussies, but not as pretty as Ivanka. She's hot!

Ivanka will be the first female president of the United States!

It is not clear whether the Ivanka’s ‘drop-bys’ are instigated by her in order to help push her own agenda, or choreographed by Trump himself in order to help close deals with his associates or soften his image towards reporters.

She often drops in at daddy's bed time.....

And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the media (same thing) would all be praising her.

People are saying Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She often drops in at daddy's bed time.....


worth noting

And she brings them big ole tities with her.

Bitches gonna bitch Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the media
> (same thing) would all be praising her.

Why do you assume this is a negative story about Ivanka from liberals? They are just reporting facts.

my little angel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> were “visibly annoyed by Ivanka’s presence,”


Hurricane Ivanka

liberals?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bitches gonna bitch Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the media
> > (same thing) would all be praising her.
>
> Why do you assume this is a negative story about
> Ivanka from liberals? They are just reporting
> facts.


Maybe because, as typical, it's a post by a libtard intended to be negative based on selective 'facts' and slanted CNN reporting sourced from an anonymous libtard which leaves out significant facts which completely change the story?

Quote

According to a Democratic aide, the conversation over spending ended when Ivanka Trump entered the room to say hello.

"The meeting careened off topic," the aide said. "Republican leaders were visibly annoyed by Ivanka's presence."

A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., rejected the idea that GOP lawmakers were annoyed by Ivanka Trump's presence.

"This is false," said Ryan spokeswoman AshLee strong.

Marc Short, White House director of legislative affairs, said Ivanka Trump was asked to join the meeting for a short visit on another matter.

"We asked Ivanka to briefly join the meeting for an update on the child care tax credit and how we are working to make tax reform a bi-partisan issue," he said. "It was a quick and productive conversation."

The rest of the story Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> liberals?? Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bitches gonna bitch Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the
> media
> > > (same thing) would all be praising her.
> >
> > Why do you assume this is a negative story
> about
> > Ivanka from liberals? They are just reporting
> > facts.
>
>
> Maybe because, as typical, it's a post by a
> libtard intended to be negative based on selective
> 'facts' and slanted CNN reporting sourced from an
> anonymous libtard which leaves out significant
> facts which completely change the story?
>
>

Quote

> According to a Democratic aide, the conversation
> over spending ended when Ivanka Trump entered the
> room to say hello.
>
> "The meeting careened off topic," the aide said.
> "Republican leaders were visibly annoyed by
> Ivanka's presence."
>
> A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis.,
> rejected the idea that GOP lawmakers were annoyed
> by Ivanka Trump's presence.
>
> "This is false," said Ryan spokeswoman AshLee
> strong.
>
> Marc Short, White House director of legislative
> affairs, said Ivanka Trump was asked to join the
> meeting for a short visit on another matter.
>
> "We asked Ivanka to briefly join the meeting for
> an update on the child care tax credit and how we
> are working to make tax reform a bi-partisan
> issue," he said. "It was a quick and productive
> conversation."
>

I got the report from Breitbart

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/06/report-ivanka-trump-makes-a-habit-of-dropping-by-high-profile-meetings/

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I got the report from Breitbart
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/06
> /report-ivanka-trump-makes-a-habit-of-dropping-by-
> high-profile-meetings/

Steve Bannon is a cuck!

love it the right is so fractured the ignorant trumptards dont know which talking points to barf at whom! EVERYTHING LIBTARD! FAKE NEWS! RINO!

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The rest of the story Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > liberals?? Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Bitches gonna bitch Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the
> > media
> > > > (same thing) would all be praising her.
> > >
> > > Why do you assume this is a negative story
> > about
> > > Ivanka from liberals? They are just
> reporting
> > > facts.
> >
> >
> > Maybe because, as typical, it's a post by a
> > libtard intended to be negative based on
> selective
> > 'facts' and slanted CNN reporting sourced from
> an
> > anonymous libtard which leaves out significant
> > facts which completely change the story?
> >
> >

Quote

> > According to a Democratic aide, the
> conversation
> > over spending ended when Ivanka Trump entered
> the
> > room to say hello.
> >
> > "The meeting careened off topic," the aide
> said.
> > "Republican leaders were visibly annoyed by
> > Ivanka's presence."
> >
> > A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan,
> R-Wis.,
> > rejected the idea that GOP lawmakers were
> annoyed
> > by Ivanka Trump's presence.
> >
> > "This is false," said Ryan spokeswoman AshLee
> > strong.
> >
> > Marc Short, White House director of legislative
> > affairs, said Ivanka Trump was asked to join
> the
> > meeting for a short visit on another matter.
> >
> > "We asked Ivanka to briefly join the meeting
> for
> > an update on the child care tax credit and how
> we
> > are working to make tax reform a bi-partisan
> > issue," he said. "It was a quick and productive
> > conversation."
> >

>
> I got the report from Breitbart
>
> http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/06
> /report-ivanka-trump-makes-a-habit-of-dropping-by-
> high-profile-meetings/


Which as I said is repeating CNN reporting citing an anonymous libtard source.

"...a report from CNN has detailed."

And you selectively left out the part about being asked to attend which does appear in the Breitbart article.

He shoots, he misses Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Bannon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The rest of the story Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > liberals?? Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Bitches gonna bitch Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > And if it were ugly Chelsea, libs and the
> > > media
> > > > > (same thing) would all be praising her.
> > > >
> > > > Why do you assume this is a negative story
> > > about
> > > > Ivanka from liberals? They are just
> > reporting
> > > > facts.
> > >
> > >
> > > Maybe because, as typical, it's a post by a
> > > libtard intended to be negative based on
> > selective
> > > 'facts' and slanted CNN reporting sourced
> from
> > an
> > > anonymous libtard which leaves out
> significant
> > > facts which completely change the story?
> > >
> > >

Quote

> > > According to a Democratic aide, the
> > conversation
> > > over spending ended when Ivanka Trump entered
> > the
> > > room to say hello.
> > >
> > > "The meeting careened off topic," the aide
> > said.
> > > "Republican leaders were visibly annoyed by
> > > Ivanka's presence."
> > >
> > > A spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan,
> > R-Wis.,
> > > rejected the idea that GOP lawmakers were
> > annoyed
> > > by Ivanka Trump's presence.
> > >
> > > "This is false," said Ryan spokeswoman AshLee
> > > strong.
> > >
> > > Marc Short, White House director of
> legislative
> > > affairs, said Ivanka Trump was asked to join
> > the
> > > meeting for a short visit on another matter.
> > >
> > > "We asked Ivanka to briefly join the meeting
> > for
> > > an update on the child care tax credit and
> how
> > we
> > > are working to make tax reform a bi-partisan
> > > issue," he said. "It was a quick and
> productive
> > > conversation."
> > >

> >
> > I got the report from Breitbart
>
> >
> >
> http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/06
>
> >
> /report-ivanka-trump-makes-a-habit-of-dropping-by-
>
> > high-profile-meetings/
>
>
> Which as I said is repeating CNN reporting citing
> an anonymous libtard source.
>
> "...a report from CNN has detailed."
>
> And you selectively left out the part about being
> asked to attend which does appear in the Breitbart
> article.

it was featured by Breitbart not a 'liberal' I read it from Steve Bannon's publication. Is Bannon a liberal to you nut jobs now?

These rightards are short circuiting right now. They don't know what to run with. What did Limbaugh instruct you to think today?

Has Bannon got some of that Ivanka daddy love?

Gerrymanderer2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> These rightards are short circuiting right now.
> They don't know what to run with. What did
> Limbaugh instruct you to think today?

Stop watching hurricane news and buying emergency supplies. Irma is a huge nothingburger.

Any newds?

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> it was featured by Breitbart not a 'liberal' I
> read it from Steve Bannon's publication. Is
> Bannon a liberal to you nut jobs now?


What part about an anonymous libtard source, "...a report from CNN has detailed," and you selectively editing out the part about being asked to attend (which does appear in the Breitbart article), don't you understand?

Sucks when your bs gets called huh.

Bluffed, Got called Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Bannon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > it was featured by Breitbart not a 'liberal' I
> > read it from Steve Bannon's publication. Is
> > Bannon a liberal to you nut jobs now?
>
>
> What part about an anonymous libtard source, "...a
> report from CNN has detailed," and you selectively
> editing out the part about being asked to attend
> (which does appear in the Breitbart article),
> don't you understand?
>
> Sucks when your bs gets called huh.


Who cares if she was asked or not
It seems it was implied

Hvx Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bluffed, Got called Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Steve Bannon Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > >
> > > it was featured by Breitbart not a 'liberal'
> I
> > > read it from Steve Bannon's publication. Is
> > > Bannon a liberal to you nut jobs now?
> >
> >
> > What part about an anonymous libtard source,
> "...a
> > report from CNN has detailed," and you
> selectively
> > editing out the part about being asked to
> attend
> > (which does appear in the Breitbart article),
> > don't you understand?
> >
> > Sucks when your bs gets called huh.
>
>
> Who cares if she was asked or not
> It seems it was implied


You tried.

You failed.

Move on.

This is actually funnier than I had though it would be - I posted a CNN article featured in Breitbart just to see what would happen. Predictably the resident righttard troll took the bait. Personally I dont think the left much gives a damn if Ivanka is in meetings - it's McConnell and Ryan that were pissed not the left. In fact the Left has been expressing hopes Ivanka (and Jared) might be a source of moderation for Donald.

Now our homegrown troll is left babbling about 'selective editing (out the after-the-fact excuse Ivanka was invited to meetings for her views on some children's issue, lol).

Truth is its Steve Bannon pissed off at the 'globalist cucks' Ivanka and Jared that pushed him out of the WH along with Kelly. Dimwitted trolls here and elsewhere need new talking points asap. All they have at the moment is hurricanes are FAKE NEWS!

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is actually funnier than I had though it
> would be - I posted a CNN article featured in
> Breitbart just to see what would happen.
> Predictably the resident righttard troll took the
> bait. Personally I dont think the left much gives
> a damn if Ivanka is in meetings - it's McConnell
> and Ryan that were pissed not the left. In fact
> the Left has been expressing hopes Ivanka (and
> Jared) might be a source of moderation for
> Donald.
>
> Now our homegrown troll is left babbling about
> 'selective editing (out the after-the-fact excuse
> Ivanka was invited to meetings for her views on
> some children's issue, lol).
>
> Truth is its Steve Bannon pissed off at the
> 'globalist cucks' Ivanka and Jared that pushed him
> out of the WH along with Kelly. Dimwitted trolls
> here and elsewhere need new talking points asap.
> All they have at the moment is hurricanes are FAKE
> NEWS!


Sorry, no. You just got bitch smacked again!

Bitch Smacked Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Bannon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is actually funnier than I had though it
> > would be - I posted a CNN article featured in
> > Breitbart just to see what would happen.
> > Predictably the resident righttard troll took
> the
> > bait. Personally I dont think the left much
> gives
> > a damn if Ivanka is in meetings - it's
> McConnell
> > and Ryan that were pissed not the left. In
> fact
> > the Left has been expressing hopes Ivanka (and
> > Jared) might be a source of moderation for
> > Donald.
> >
> > Now our homegrown troll is left babbling about
> > 'selective editing (out the after-the-fact
> excuse
> > Ivanka was invited to meetings for her views on
> > some children's issue, lol).
> >
> > Truth is its Steve Bannon pissed off at the
> > 'globalist cucks' Ivanka and Jared that pushed
> him
> > out of the WH along with Kelly. Dimwitted
> trolls
> > here and elsewhere need new talking points asap.
>
> > All they have at the moment is hurricanes are
> FAKE
> > NEWS!
>
>
> Sorry, no. You just got bitch smacked again!


You are starting to look silly
And I'm not the op

lol the picture Breitbart used has Al Gore in it...

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is actually funnier than I had though it
> would be - I posted a CNN article featured in
> Breitbart just to see what would happen.
> Predictably the resident righttard troll took the
> bait. Personally I dont think the left much gives
> a damn if Ivanka is in meetings - it's McConnell
> and Ryan that were pissed not the left. In fact
> the Left has been expressing hopes Ivanka (and
> Jared) might be a source of moderation for
> Donald.
>
> Now our homegrown troll is left babbling about
> 'selective editing (out the after-the-fact excuse
> Ivanka was invited to meetings for her views on
> some children's issue, lol).
>
> Truth is its Steve Bannon pissed off at the
> 'globalist cucks' Ivanka and Jared that pushed him
> out of the WH along with Kelly. Dimwitted trolls
> here and elsewhere need new talking points asap.
> All they have at the moment is hurricanes are FAKE
> NEWS!


Truth is just as I first said.

You're a libtard who made a selectively edited post based on libtards at CNN citing a libtard source and you intentionally left out significant information which denies what was reported.

You got called on it.

Now you're all butthurt which you make obvious by your long-winded babbling here trying to regroup.

Just give it up.

You tried.

You failed.

Move on.

Walk away from the table.

There will be other bullshit posts that you can try to get away with.

Look friend Im just having a little fun - didnt mean to upset you. BTW you should go to the article and read the comments - its the Right that is blowing up at Ivanka (at least at breitbart). They are pissed.

Personally I could care less what she does. She is the least of our problems at the moment.

Steve Bannon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look friend Im just having a little fun - didnt
> mean to upset you. BTW you should go to the
> article and read the comments - its the Right that
> is blowing up at Ivanka (at least at breitbart).
> They are pissed.
>
> Personally I could care less what she does. She
> is the least of our problems at the moment.


It's all good bro. Sorry for bitch smacking you again!

Bitch Smacked Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Steve Bannon Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Look friend Im just having a little fun - didnt
> > mean to upset you. BTW you should go to the
> > article and read the comments - its the Right
> that
> > is blowing up at Ivanka (at least at breitbart).
>
> > They are pissed.
> >
> > Personally I could care less what she does.
> She
> > is the least of our problems at the moment.
>
>
> It's all good bro. Sorry for bitch smacking you
> again!


Again?
He's not your boyfriend

Nobody elected Ivanka, she isn't on the Government's payroll, she has no administrative, domestic, foreign, economic, military, health and safety, transportation, industrial, or any other policy experience.

What possible value does Ivanka bring to the table for the United States?

Of course you could accurately say the exact same thing about her father Donald.

He certainly isn't bringing any value to the table just major liabilities and scandals.

Fake news, more lies , more hate for America. Just another miserable day in the life of a libtard.

Observer of Things! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What possible value does Ivanka bring to the table
> for the United States?

A solution to the opioid crisis. Peace in the Middle East. Defending America against the threat from North Korea. Restructuring our tax code. Fixing the VA.

Meanwhile, not many people find her very impressive.

Observer of Things! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nobody elected Ivanka, she isn't on the
> Government's payroll, she has no administrative,
> domestic, foreign, economic, military, health and
> safety, transportation, industrial, or any other
> policy experience.
>
> What possible value does Ivanka bring to the table
> for the United States?
>
> Of course you could accurately say the exact same
> thing about her father Donald.
>
> He certainly isn't bringing any value to the table
> just major liabilities and scandals.


True. She's no 1/3rd term junior Senator from IL with no experience who was elected because he was (kinda) black (enough).

To the dumbass righttard arguing that everything is great with Ivanka in meetins - think about it this way: aside from being Donald Trump’s daughter, you can’t have, if the president is sitting down with his national security team, you couldn’t have an aide that was responsible for health care policy say, ‘Oh, I’m just going to drop by and say hello.’ No, there’s a meeting taking place, and it’s on a very specific detailed subject.

ectpv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To the dumbass righttard arguing that everything
> is great with Ivanka in meetins - think about it

It's like inviting Paris Hilton into the meetings. There's literally do difference except one is Trump's relation.

ectpv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> To the dumbass righttard arguing that everything
> is great with Ivanka in meetins - think about it
> this way: aside from being Donald Trump’s
> daughter, you can’t have, if the president is
> sitting down with his national security team, you
> couldn’t have an aide that was responsible for
> health care policy say, ‘Oh, I’m just going to
> drop by and say hello.’ No, there’s a meeting
> taking place, and it’s on a very specific
> detailed subject.


This is a good point

^
hey honey sit down and stay for a while.

No one wanted that ugly Chelsea showing up!
The media talks about how good Michelle looks but puts down the trump women.
Now they will bitch about a good looking classy girl showing up to see her dad...
No one wanted ugly Chelsea around!