HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Killa Koppas ()
Date: December 03, 2014 02:53PM

Open season on the negro!

I may even have to tune into Al Sharpton's show tonight and double his ratings. Bobblehead will be going off. lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Shocked ()
Date: December 03, 2014 03:19PM

THIS is the case that should have become the textbook case of police abuse - not Ferguson. Personally, I don't think this stop and the subsequent death were racially motivated, but I can see how other people would.

The cops escalated this incident, not Garner. His obesity and associated health conditions probably played a role in his death, but that's immaterial. This guy was not a threat. Ironically, he actually looked like a gentle giant.

Such a shame that the black community chose Ferguson, not this incident, to represent the valid complaint of police abuse. It will be interesting to see the reaction to the non-indictment.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Dr. Dong ()
Date: December 03, 2014 03:27PM

This smells fishy, way more so than Fergie. That NY pig should have been indicted. This is the case that deserves a riot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Not Welcome ()
Date: December 03, 2014 04:26PM

Dr. Dong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is the case
> that deserves a riot.

You are inciting a riot. Stop it.

I saw the video of this arrest. If these nogs would just not resist, everybody would go home alive. If you've ever watched the show "Cops", 90% of the nogs they arrest put up a fight and usually for stupid charges.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Wrong! ()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:28PM

^ He did not actively resist. He put his hands up and said 'don't touch me'. The cops did not have to escalate this, especially over such a trivial offense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Alexander Smith ()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:40PM

This is a case where police brutality came into play on a black who actually did not resist arrest. What a disgrace the cops have become.


It really makes me angry to see these public servants act like the military towwards ordiary citizens, seeing them as enemy combatants.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: NYC gonna burn ()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:47PM

It's going up tonight.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Libtard slayer ()
Date: December 03, 2014 05:55PM

Not Welcome Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Dong Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This is the case
> > that deserves a riot.
>
> You are inciting a riot. Stop it.


LULZ
Quit being a gov't bootlicker for once and realize the fuckin pigs can basically do what they want now in this country and get away with it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Al Sharpton ()
Date: December 03, 2014 06:00PM

Oh hell yeah!

I'm gonna make more off of this shit than I did Big Mike, Trayvon, and Tawana all put together!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Slobbersaurus ()
Date: December 03, 2014 08:21PM

Wrong! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^ He did not actively resist. He put his hands up
> and said 'don't touch me'. The cops did not have
> to escalate this, especially over such a trivial
> offense.

Not true. Watch the video with your eyes open this time.

First of all, he would not put his hands behind his back. The officer in front of him grabbed his arms and Garner pulled them up to try to break free. I definitely don't agree with what the cops did, but he certainly was not complying with the arrest. If he had calmly put his hands behind his back and let the cops cuff him up he would have gone home that day and would probably weigh 500 lbs by now.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: truth tellerz ()
Date: December 03, 2014 09:18PM

Should have been an indictment on this one.

BUT - no one is bringing up that NYC's exorbitant taxes on cigarettes create a black market for them, which of course everyone predicted. Another liberal victory!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Jhonnythong ()
Date: December 03, 2014 09:40PM

truth tellerz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Should have been an indictment on this one.
>
> BUT - no one is bringing up that NYC's exorbitant
> taxes on cigarettes create a black market for
> them, which of course everyone predicted. Another
> liberal victory!!

Hey that's racist!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Cops = Gestapo ()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:10AM

.
Attachments:
10271608_10204134668279490_7205524823794818194_n.jpg
10394100_10154691730305858_7804722770505654597_n.jpg
10501832_10203144370837838_3874443462637835536_n.jpg
988840_564051450392232_4135303801496210351_n.jpg
10653385_1003424706340408_8946567044086043338_n.jpg
10659168_549754218493220_4872615851033689413_n.jpg
10704139_10203379519354720_8739116946547395906_n.jpg
10268564_10152860200807328_1070494437560131365_n.jpg
10734028_790614334314280_1882604323590091344_n.jpg
Screen-shot-2014-05-29-at-12.45.04-PM.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: fuck the police ()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:32AM

.
Attachments:
10351742_800154883358915_4100595846369345857_n.jpg
1512821_335515943317404_7462918849509953171_n.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Officer Friendly ()
Date: December 04, 2014 12:46PM

Yeah all my brothers in blue are gonna celebrate by beating the shit out of ANY OF YOU AND ALL OF YOU!

Can't wait for the riots to start in the city so we can beat the shit out of all the white guilters and niggers.

It's going to be wonderful!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: iLester ()
Date: December 04, 2014 01:13PM

He did resist arrest. The police officers did nothing to help him after he was just lying there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vT66U_Ftdng

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: blahblah ()
Date: December 05, 2014 10:33AM

NYC cops have been over the top since their beginning. They have a long history of being crooked and covering up shit. You notice that the feds are looking into charges in this one, but not Ferguson. The cop used an illegal chokehold, which is illegal for a reason. Though, I don't believe the pig should be guilty of murder, involuntary manslaughter would sound right. Its what a civilian would have been charged with. At the least. Too many pigs think they are above the law. And their superiors enable those actions by coverups. Just like the pigs covered up the lorton murder by that cop.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: DontCare ()
Date: December 05, 2014 10:56AM

Selling "loosies" and not paying taxes: CRIMINAL

Grazing cattle on public land and not paying taxes: NATIONAL HERO

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Dontcare = dumbfuq ()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:11AM

Thinks that two events are somehow comparable, proves to be butthurt.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: DontCare ()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:26AM

Dontcare = dumbfuq Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Thinks that two events are somehow comparable,
> proves to be butthurt.


They are both tax crimes dumbfuq.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: Slobbersaurus ()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:28AM

blahblah Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You notice that the
> feds are looking into charges in this one, but not
> Ferguson.

Actually I think Eric Holder (the house nigger) IS looking into a civil rights case in Ferguson. I mean, why the fuck did he go down there if he isn't? Just to get some collard greens and some fried chicken?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Grand jury does NOT indict NYC choke-hold cop
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 05, 2014 11:30AM

The question to ask is, how would you have acted if you were that police officer? I think a police officer in New York City has a bit more stress and pressure than the keyboard warriors talking about how horrible this was.

Blessed are the murderous.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   ******   **     **  ********   **      ** 
 **     **  **    **  ***   ***  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **        **** ****  **     **  **  **  ** 
 **     **  **        ** *** **  ********   **  **  ** 
  **   **   **        **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
   ** **    **    **  **     **  **     **  **  **  ** 
    ***      ******   **     **  ********    ***  ***  
This forum powered by Phorum.