Andrew Breitbart, the noted Internet publisher and author, has died, according to a source at Big Journalism. He was 43.

A statement posted on his website said that Breitbart died "unexpectedly from natural causes" this morning.

The Los Angeles Coroner's Office confirmed to ABC News Radio that Breitbart died shortly after midnight at UCLA Medical Center.

The following statement was posted on Breitbart's website today:

"With a terrible feeling of pain and loss we announce the passing of Andrew Breitbart.

We have lost a husband, a father, a son, a brother, a dear friend, a patriot and a happy warrior.

Brendan Smialowski/Getty ImagesWashington Times commentator and... View Full Size Brendan Smialowski/Getty ImagesWashington Times commentator and Breitbart.com webmaster Andrew Breitbart speaks during the American Conservative Union's Conservative Political Action Conference, Feb. 12, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Andrew lived boldly, so that we more timid souls would dare to live freely and fully, and fight for the fragile liberty he showed us how to love.

Andrew recently wrote a new conclusion to his book, Righteous Indignation:

I love my job. I love fighting for what I believe in. I love having fun while doing it. I love reporting stories that the Complex refuses to report. I love fighting back, I love finding allies, and—famously—I enjoy making enemies.

Three years ago, I was mostly a behind-the-scenes guy who linked to stuff on a very popular website. I always wondered what it would be like to enter the public realm to fight for what I believe in. I've lost friends, perhaps dozens. But I've gained hundreds, thousands—who knows?—of allies. At the end of the day, I can look at myself in the mirror, and I sleep very well at night.

Andrew is at rest, yet the happy warrior lives on, in each of us."


http://abcnews.go.com/US/andrew-breitbart-publisher-author-dead/story?id=15824337

How quickly will the Liberal Media trash him?

Hell just got a little bit fuller.

Is HIV/AIDS "natural causes?"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hell just got a little bit fuller.
>
> Is HIV/AIDS "natural causes?"


Hell is a myth, dumbass. Go pray to your God to keep you out of hell. LOL.

natural cause at 43, WTF?? I would laugh if it turned out to be drug related.

klatu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> natural cause at 43, WTF?? I would laugh if it
> turned out to be drug related.


Breitbart used to be close buddies with Matt Drudge, who is a self-loathing semi-closeted Republican homosexual. While the HIV/AIDS thing is pure speculation, it wouldn't shock me.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

He really looked old for his age.

Blessed are the murderous.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> klatu Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > natural cause at 43, WTF?? I would laugh if it
> > turned out to be drug related.
>
>
> Breitbart used to be close buddies with Matt
> Drudge, who is a self-loathing semi-closeted
> Republican homosexual. While the HIV/AIDS thing is
> pure speculation, it wouldn't shock me.

so being gay is only acceptible if you're a Democrat?

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He really looked old for his age.

I noticed that too. Age did not treat him well (obviously, lol).

Libs love to hate on Breitbart. The do it while listening to the fabrications of Olbermann and Maddow.

Andy had a history of heart problems so I'm not going to jump to conclusions.
However, he was about a release video tapes of Obama during his youth.
Foul play? Time will tell.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=ZkUqJ1XjgT4

Maybe we can now get on with our pimping white girls and election fraud activities. The USDA can pay reparations to 80,000 blacks stemming from the Pigford II class action lawsuit over unfair or racist lending practices by the USDA without Breitbart causing trouble now.

See, Breitbart exposed the fraud that about 33,000 black farms were in existence at the time of Pigford's original filing, yet 80,000 claimants have filed for settlement. That would mean all 33,000 farms at the alleged time of racist lending practices were discriminated against + another 47,000 non existent victims.

With the average claim of $50,000.00 coming straight out of the tax payers pocket that will secure a lot of black votes for Obama and the democrats.

People go to hell for shit like this all the time however I wouldn't put your money on Breitbart.

Hay Zeus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> Democrat?

GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is, for the most part, a party that favors rich, white and straight men. They will occasionally elect or appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and minorities pretty much have to support policies that are pro-rich, white and straight men.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

I do not know who Andrew Brietbart was; this is probably a good thing.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hay Zeus Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> > Democrat?
>
> GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the
> jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> for the most part, a party that favors rich, white
> and straight men. They will occasionally elect or
> appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and
> minorities pretty much have to support policies
> that are pro-rich, white and straight men.


Bringing race and class warfare to a whole new level. Way to go. Straight from the Farrakhan and Sharpton playbook. It is good the Democrats have useful idiots like you under their big tent.

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> Bringing race and class warfare to a whole new
> level. Way to go. Straight from the Farrakhan
> and Sharpton playbook. It is good the Democrats
> have useful idiots like you under their big tent.


Class warfare? Like calling those with college degrees "snobs?"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WTL Wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the
> > jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> > for the most part, a party that favors rich,white
> > and straight men. They will occasionally elect or
> > appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and
> > minorities pretty much have to support policies
> > that are pro-rich, white and straight men.

Sandoval Wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Bringing race and class warfare to a whole new
> level. Way to go. Straight from the Farrakhan
> and Sharpton playbook. It is good the Democrats
> have useful idiots like you under their big tent.

It is telling that you stop short of refuting WTL's actual assertion. Very telling, indeed.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hay Zeus Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> > Democrat?
>
> GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the
> jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> for the most part, a party that favors rich, white
> and straight men. They will occasionally elect or
> appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and
> minorities pretty much have to support policies
> that are pro-rich, white and straight men.

Aside from gay marriage what are those policies?

Do you even have friends that are self-identified Republicans?

Hay Zeus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Aside from gay marriage what are those policies?
>
> Do you even have friends that are self-identified
> Republicans?


Most of my friends are Republicans and some of them are gay.

I don't know. Are the Republicans open to gay adoption and gays in the military? Have they elected openly gay politicians to office? Have they appointed openly gay people? Republicans have also fought efforts to allow sexual orientation to be covered by EEOC laws.

So what Republican policies have been pro gay?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hay Zeus Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> > Democrat?
>
> GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the
> jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> for the most part, a party that favors rich, white
> and straight men. They will occasionally elect or
> appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and
> minorities pretty much have to support policies
> that are pro-rich, white and straight men.

You could be more wrong it's just hard to imagine how.

31% of gay voters go GOP

Percent of gay voters who voted Republican in House races:
2006 House races: 24%
2008 House races: 19%
2010 House races: 31%

There is no mystery as to the reasons behind this shift. Despite the constant onslaught of liberal rhetoric about how the 2010 elections swept far-Right extremists into power, heralding terrible things for gays and lesbians, the truth is that voters across the country elected a wide range of Republicans united by a core set of principles – that America is stronger when its citizens keep more of what they earn, that jobs are created by a vibrant private sector in a free-market economy, and that the government governs best which governs least. The Republicans who won did not do so on a platform of anti-gay discrimination, and in fact those GOP candidates, like Ken Buck, who did indulge in anti-gay rhetoric, lost.

http://www.blogcabin.net/?p=981

The problem is people like you who think all gays worry about is sticking their shalalee's up other guys bagpipes.

I know it's news to ignorant liberals like you but gays are concerned more about the economy than they are about hot homosexual action. Rick Santorum isn't going to chain your anus shut if he wins. That's what you want gays to believe and you are stupid. We are much smarter than that believe it or not and we are not single issue voters like you are just because you're black and brainwashed.

Chooger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libs love to hate on Breitbart. The do it while
> listening to the fabrications of Olbermann and
> Maddow.


Breitbart was huge factor in getting Huffington Post going so Libs can thank him for that.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Class warfare? Like calling those with college
> degrees "snobs?"


This area has a high % of people with college degrees and post-graduate degrees. Most (if not everyone) on this board from time to time has complained about the amount assholes and douchebags living here.

Ever stop to think if maybe there is a correlation?

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WTL Wrote:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite
> the
> > > jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it
> is,
> > > for the most part, a party that favors
> rich,white
> > > and straight men. They will occasionally elect
> or
> > > appoint a woman or a minority. But those women
> and
> > > minorities pretty much have to support
> policies
> > > that are pro-rich, white and straight men.
>
> Sandoval Wrote:
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Bringing race and class warfare to a whole new
> > level. Way to go. Straight from the Farrakhan
> > and Sharpton playbook. It is good the
> Democrats
> > have useful idiots like you under their big
> tent.
>
> It is telling that you stop short of refuting
> WTL's actual assertion. Very telling, indeed.


What is telling is Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice, JC Watts, Elizabeth Dole, Elaine Chao, Mel Martinez, Michael Steele. I didn't want to insult the dolt by giving him a history lesson. I doubt he actually needs one given that he knows his statement was vapid rhetoric.

Want to know what is truly telling? The fact that you probably believe what he wrote. He probably knows he is full of shit, but feels the need to shovel the party's shit. You probably swallow it whole.

WTL wrong again Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hay Zeus Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > >
> > > so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> > > Democrat?
> >
> > GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite
> the
> > jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> > for the most part, a party that favors rich,
> white
> > and straight men. They will occasionally elect
> or
> > appoint a woman or a minority. But those women
> and
> > minorities pretty much have to support policies
> > that are pro-rich, white and straight men.
>
> You could be more wrong it's just hard to imagine
> how.
>
> 31% of gay voters go GOP
>
>

I'm not saying there aren't gay Republicans. I'm saying they are stupid for being Republicans.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandoval Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Bringing race and class warfare to a whole new
> > level. Way to go. Straight from the Farrakhan
> > and Sharpton playbook. It is good the
> Democrats
> > have useful idiots like you under their big
> tent.
>
>
> Class warfare? Like calling those with college
> degrees "snobs?"


Exactly, Santorum is an idiot. Attacking people because they are educated, successful or wealthy is pathetic and contrary to the land of opportunity and anything is possible idea of the US. Attacking success is the lowest form of class warfare.

If you want your guy to run a campaign like Santorum, go for it. Romney will win in November if you go that route.

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Inquiring Minds Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > WTL Wrote:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay.
> Despite
> > the
> > > > jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it
> > is,
> > > > for the most part, a party that favors
> > rich,white
> > > > and straight men. They will occasionally
> elect
> > or
> > > > appoint a woman or a minority. But those
> women
> > and
> > > > minorities pretty much have to support
> > policies
> > > > that are pro-rich, white and straight men.
> >
> > Sandoval Wrote:
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Bringing race and class warfare to a whole
> new
> > > level. Way to go. Straight from the
> Farrakhan
> > > and Sharpton playbook. It is good the
> > Democrats
> > > have useful idiots like you under their big
> > tent.
> >
> > It is telling that you stop short of refuting
> > WTL's actual assertion. Very telling, indeed.
>
>
> What is telling is Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice,
> JC Watts, Elizabeth Dole, Elaine Chao, Mel
> Martinez, Michael Steele. I didn't want to insult
> the dolt by giving him a history lesson. I doubt
> he actually needs one given that he knows his
> statement was vapid rhetoric.
>
> Want to know what is truly telling? The fact that
> you probably believe what he wrote. He probably
> knows he is full of shit, but feels the need to
> shovel the party's shit. You probably swallow it
> whole.


Colin Powell and Condi Rice had no backbone in the Bush Administration. Chao did shit. And look at what the Republicans did to Steele when he got a leadership role at the RNC and actually helped lead them to historic wins...they drove him out because he was too black for their tastes.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandoval Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Inquiring Minds Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > WTL Wrote:
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay.
> > Despite
> > > the
> > > > > jawboning the GOP does about "big tent,"
> it
> > > is,
> > > > > for the most part, a party that favors
> > > rich,white
> > > > > and straight men. They will occasionally
> > elect
> > > or
> > > > > appoint a woman or a minority. But those
> > women
> > > and
> > > > > minorities pretty much have to support
> > > policies
> > > > > that are pro-rich, white and straight
> men.
> > >
> > > Sandoval Wrote:
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > Bringing race and class warfare to a whole
> > new
> > > > level. Way to go. Straight from the
> > Farrakhan
> > > > and Sharpton playbook. It is good the
> > > Democrats
> > > > have useful idiots like you under their big
> > > tent.
> > >
> > > It is telling that you stop short of refuting
> > > WTL's actual assertion. Very telling,
> indeed.
> >
> >
> > What is telling is Colin Powell, Condoleeza
> Rice,
> > JC Watts, Elizabeth Dole, Elaine Chao, Mel
> > Martinez, Michael Steele. I didn't want to
> insult
> > the dolt by giving him a history lesson. I
> doubt
> > he actually needs one given that he knows his
> > statement was vapid rhetoric.
> >
> > Want to know what is truly telling? The fact
> that
> > you probably believe what he wrote. He
> probably
> > knows he is full of shit, but feels the need to
> > shovel the party's shit. You probably swallow
> it
> > whole.
>
>
> Colin Powell and Condi Rice had no backbone in the
> Bush Administration. Chao did shit. And look at
> what the Republicans did to Steele when he got a
> leadership role at the RNC and actually helped
> lead them to historic wins...they drove him out
> because he was too black for their tastes.


Well, now you are talking about what they did when they got their jobs. That is different from getting their job. You probably know that, but need a distraction at the moment to deflect an obvious flaw in your contention.

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> Well, now you are talking about what they did when
> they got their jobs. That is different from
> getting their job. You probably know that, but
> need a distraction at the moment to deflect an
> obvious flaw in your contention.


If you read what I wrote, there is no flaw in my contention. I said the women and minorities that are elected/appointed within the GOP tow the GOP line on rich, white and straight men.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What is telling is Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice,
> JC Watts, Elizabeth Dole, Elaine Chao, Mel
> Martinez, Michael Steele. I didn't want to insult
> the dolt by giving him a history lesson. I doubt
> he actually needs one given that he knows his
> statement was vapid rhetoric.

I believe that these folks fall under WTL's observation that:

"[GOP-tards] will occasionally elect or appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and minorities pretty much have to support policies that are pro-rich, white and straight men."

> Want to know what is truly telling?

Do tell.

> The fact that you probably believe what he wrote.

Of course I believe what WTL wrote, because it is demonstrably true. Here’s my proof: Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, and Alberto Gonzalez.
.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandoval Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Well, now you are talking about what they did
> when
> > they got their jobs. That is different from
> > getting their job. You probably know that, but
> > need a distraction at the moment to deflect an
> > obvious flaw in your contention.
>
>
> If you read what I wrote, there is no flaw in my
> contention. I said the women and minorities that
> are elected/appointed within the GOP tow the GOP
> line on rich, white and straight men.

Well, most appointees toe (yes, it is toe, not tow) the line. If they didn't they wouldn't be appointed in the first place. Appointees by their very nature (Republican or Democrat) serve the President. The President, as leader of his party, usually demands that his appointess follow his priorities. That being said, the second post powerful person in the last administration supports gay marriage. As does the former party chair. PEPFAR can nardly be seen as a rich, wite and straight man policy.

There are plenty of second amendment rights advocats and pro-lifers in the Democrat party. Are they stupid for being Democrats? If you ask me, the ones who are stupid in the Democrat party are the ones that fall for the class warfare rhetoric and have become reliable patsies without getting anything in return.

Closet homosexual like having all his orifices penetrated. The title above is misleading, he may have died of aids or he may have suffered a heart attack or aneurysm from having his two ears penetrated simultaneous with sucking on a big black johnson in his mouth. Brain may have exploded. Autopsy will expand on this.

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > The fact that you probably believe what he
> wrote.
>
> Of course I believe what WTL wrote, because it is
> demonstrably true. Here’s my proof: Michelle
> Bachmann, Herman Cain, and Alberto Gonzalez.
> .


If that is what you consider demonstrably true, then your logic skills fail you. Incompetence is not indicative of any attribute being contended here.

When you get out of college, you will have hopefully acquired enough skills to seel the flaws in your contention.

Specifically which candidate is running on the "rich, white and straight men" line?

Or is it just your given prejudiced and biased interpretation you ascribe to republicans in general to support your socialist agenda? You try and set up straw men then tell gays women and blacks that they are stupid if they don't buy into your tripe.

I refuse to believe you are that stupid. "Hey I'm for the rich white straight man"?

Truth be known you are a bigoted, racist socialist just like Obama who tries to manipulate the lowest common social denominators in our society.

Now go fill your car up with Obama's pond scum.

All I can say is that I hope I don't look like that when I hit 43.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

In happier times

Stopped reading him after I realized it was a pro-big government web site. It's just my big government is better than yours.

WashingTone-Locian Wrote:

> GOP policies are almost 100% anti-gay. Despite the
> jawboning the GOP does about "big tent," it is,
> for the most part, a party that favors rich, white
> and straight men. They will occasionally elect or
> appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and
> minorities pretty much have to support policies
> that are pro-rich, white and straight men.


Right as opposed to the party of tolerance for everyone as long as you agree with absolutely everything they say and believe. The dems are 100% anti-everyone except their own power. They have idiots like you that blindly support them which isnt a shock considering what a pathetic example you are of a person with youre comments above, then they have white liberal guilt voters that want to feel guilty about what happened before anyone was alive.

Its only okay to be a woman, black, gay, minority, minority religion if your a democrat. Otherwise the left will attack you in the most vicious ways possible out of fear you will eat into the voting base they have and dont want those people to actually think they can make something of themselves because they need them dependent on programs to keep their own power.

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If that is what you consider demonstrably true,
> then your logic skills fail you.

So you say. Yet you offer not rebuttal, but mere insults and name-calling.

It is you, sir and/or madamn, whose logical skills are lacking.

wtl is a joke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Right as opposed to the party of tolerance for
> everyone as long as you agree with absolutely
> everything they say and believe. The dems are
> 100% anti-everyone except their own power. They
> have idiots like you that blindly support them
> which isnt a shock considering what a pathetic
> example you are of a person with youre comments
> above, then they have white liberal guilt voters
> that want to feel guilty about what happened
> before anyone was alive.
>
> Its only okay to be a woman, black, gay, minority,
> minority religion if your a democrat. Otherwise
> the left will attack you in the most vicious ways
> possible out of fear you will eat into the voting
> base they have and dont want those people to
> actually think they can make something of
> themselves because they need them dependent on
> programs to keep their own power.

Right as opposed to the Imploding Party of No, where there’s room for everyone as long as you agree with absolutely everything they say and believe. GOP is 100% anti-everyone except their own power. They have idiots like you that blindly support them which isn’t a shock considering what a pathetic example you are of a person with your comments above, then they have white power, hate darky voters who believe that slavery was a very good thing and sorely missed.

It’s okay to be a woman, black, gay, or minority in the Imploding Party of No, as long as you’re self-loathing and will vote/choose against you own interests in support of the power elites who hate you. Otherwise, the GOP-tards will attack you in the most vicious ways possible out of fear that you’ll wake up and expose their vile cynicism and hateful self-interest.

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandoval Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > If that is what you consider demonstrably true,
> > then your logic skills fail you.
>
> So you say. Yet you offer not rebuttal, but mere
> insults and name-calling.
>
> It is you, sir and/or madamn, whose logical skills
> are lacking.

There is nothing of substance or relevance to rebut. And, nowhere did I call you a name or offer an insulting remark towards you.

Assertion: [GOP-tards] will occasionally elect or appoint a woman or a minority. But those women and minorities pretty much have to support policies that are pro-rich, white and straight men.

Evidence in support of assertion: The voting records, statements, policy proposals, etc. of Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, and Alberto Gonzalez.

Breitbart's w/me now here in purgatory. Satan says we have to wait for Karl Rove to join us before he will mete out our joint punishment for all eternity. Frankly, the suspense is killing me.

Inquiring Minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Assertion: will occasionally elect or appoint a
> woman or a minority. But those women and
> minorities pretty much have to support policies
> that are pro-rich, white and straight men.
>
> Evidence in support of assertion: The voting
> records, statements, policy proposals, etc. of
> Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, and Alberto
> Gonzalez.

A sampling of the few is representative of the whole? Logic does escape you.

By the way, you may want to consider the fact that Herman Cain has never been appointed or elected by the GOP to any office.

Reagarding Gonzales (it is an s, not a z), see my statemement regarding appointees generally.

Use of GOP-tards, insults and name calling. Logic definitely escapes you.

Sandoval Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A sampling of the few is representative of the
> whole? Logic does escape you.

Google "sampling" and read the results, you'll learn something.

Inquiring minds Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sandoval Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > A sampling of the few is representative of the
> > whole? Logic does escape you.
>
> Google "sampling" and read the results, you'll
> learn something.

LOL. The things they don't teach in college these days.

Google "sample size." We may get you educated just yet.

Please ignore me guys. I know I am not too bright and have to rely on the nonsense spoon fed to me from the Obama campaign. I promis to take my meds now.

Lee Atwater Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Breitbart's w/me now here in purgatory. Satan
> says we have to wait for Karl Rove to join us
> before he will mete out our joint punishment for
> all eternity. Frankly, the suspense is killing
> me.


Is there room for him with fat teddy kennedy there?

Hay Zeus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > klatu Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > natural cause at 43, WTF?? I would laugh if
> it
> > > turned out to be drug related.
> >
> >
> > Breitbart used to be close buddies with Matt
> > Drudge, who is a self-loathing semi-closeted
> > Republican homosexual. While the HIV/AIDS thing
> is
> > pure speculation, it wouldn't shock me.
>
> so being gay is only acceptible if you're a
> Democrat?

Yes, because you're not going around telling everybody they can't be gay, writing fucked up laws against gays and not allowing same sex marraiges.

No idea who this is so it doesn't matter

I have everything you said I wouldn't, HA!
#stillwinning

gotta ask Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee Atwater Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Breitbart's w/me now here in purgatory. Satan
> > says we have to wait for Karl Rove to join us
> > before he will mete out our joint punishment
> for
> > all eternity. Frankly, the suspense is killing
> > me.
>
>
> Is there room for him with fat teddy kennedy
> there?

Naw, only lyin' sack-o-shit scumbags, like me, Breitbart & Turd Blossom, are allowed here.

Fine, upstanding "Lions of the Senate" like Teddy Kennedy are seated immediately at God's right hand.

gotta ask Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lee Atwater Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Breitbart's w/me now here in purgatory. Satan
> > says we have to wait for Karl Rove to join us
> > before he will mete out our joint punishment
> for
> > all eternity. Frankly, the suspense is killing
> > me.
>
>
> Is there room for him with fat teddy kennedy
> there?

God told Teddy that Mary Jo Kopechne had it coming.

Andrew Breitbart was too gay to function.

Good Riddance...

Another POS overweight,fat white male with heart problems kicks the bucket..

This is the only thread I saw that didn't have the last post by lizzie, figured he missed this one so I thought I'd help out.

Andrew was a good guy. RIP.

Andrew Schmandrew. Where's my fucking thread?

Breitbart takes a dirt nap

I was listening to Opie and Anthony when the news broke. Anthony Cumia apparently partied with Breitbart a few times and commented on how Breitbart really could party hard. He also said Breitbart was a guy who "liked to stay awake". So heart problems at 43 isn't surprising with that bit of information.

LOL now there are conspiracy theories about it.

O&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was listening to Opie and Anthony when the news
> broke. Anthony Cumia apparently partied with
> Breitbart a few times and commented on how
> Breitbart really could party hard. He also said
> Breitbart was a guy who "liked to stay awake". So
> heart problems at 43 isn't surprising with that
> bit of information.


A fat drunkard with a history of heart disease. Oh, it must have been Obama!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Some funny Breitbart moments:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-UlmJDF_cQ&hd=1&t=22m8s
http://youtu.be/3-UlmJDF_cQ?t=20m22s



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/04/2012 03:14AM by trogdor!.