Hey boys & girls, I want to tell you why I'm voting for Barrack Hussein Osama. But I also want to welcome Vincent, Weeper, and THEmental.
1. I want to stick it to those evil corporations that EARN all those profits. How dare they. And what good are they, they only create jobs for the people. But the worst part is they make the government look so bad. These guys have to actually work at earning their money, and turn a profit. But not the government, all they have to do is raise taxes, and who the hell cares about making ends meet.
2. Speaking of taxes, a big thanks to Uncle Joe for letting us know we can buy our patriotism. How many of you knew this? I sure hope we can all become the best patriots money can buy,
3. Again back to Uncle Joe, I can't wait for this big 'test'. I'm so excited, almost like Christmas morning. And as an added bonus, we get to anticipate Osama's response. What could it possibly be? I don't know about you, but this is worth my vote all by itself.
4. Osama will bring us peace through diplomacy no matter what happens to us. If Neville Chamberlain can do it you know Osama can do it.
5. On the subject of 'peace in our time' lets talk about Barney Frank. He wants to cut defense spending by 25%. Hell with America's version of Chamberlain as president, we don't even need a defense budget. As a side note, I was very worried when I heard that the director of Deep Throat had died. I thought it was Barney Frank. Imagine my delight when I found out he wasn't the director, he simply demonstrated to Linda Lovelace how to perform the act. Now I hear he will soon be the spokesman for overstock.com, also known as the Big O.
6. Back to Uncle Joe. I want him to be VP because just has a habit of making everyone around him seem like a genius. Stand up Chuck, I created that 3 letter word (JOBS), for you to earn money so we can tax you even more.
7. I also want to punish all those corporations that moved parts or all of their operations overseas. How arrogant of them to try to get around all the regulations the government has passed. If the government didn't pass ALL those regulations, they would have a very hard time of justifying their existence.
8. As a last reason I will vote for Barrack Hussein Osama, I want to update the White House from cable, to satellite. I heard he can get Directv on one and the Dish Network on the other.
Has anyone else heard this?

I know this is long, but there are just so many wonderful things about the Osama/Liebermen ticket. I thank you for your time and on Wednesday remember the Democraptic motto, vote early, vote often.

I am curious....what did we get for the last 20 years of tax reductions for the rich?

2. Speaking of taxes, a big thanks to Uncle Joe for letting us know we can buy our patriotism. How many of you knew this? I sure hope we can all become the best patriots money can buy,



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2008 10:47AM by Vince(1).

Tax revenues went up, thats what we got.

White trash, telling it like it is...

BigDog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax revenues went up, thats what we got.


So..you arent against raising more tax revenue after all! Interesting...I'll need to think about that.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am curious....what did we get for the last 20
> years of tax reductions for the rich?

Uh, GDP for all of 1988 (20 years ago) isn't much more than what it is for a quarter in 2008 (roughly 20T for all of 1998 and over 14T for any quarter so far in 2008). Higher GDP = more jobs to produce the gross domestic product. So what did you get for tax reductions for those who produce jobs over the last twenty years? Only four times the jobs!!

I never said I was for or against tax revenues going up. I simply state that was the result of tax reductions for the rich. I am for showing my 'patriotism' by the amount of taxes I pay.
And a question for you. Which figure are you using to define the rich?
A. Original Osama figure of $ 250,000
B. Uncle Joe's figure of $ 150,000
C. Second Osama figure of $ 200,000

Big Dog The Plumber, lol

TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Big Dog The Plumber, lol


That was stupid bro.

BigDog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And a question for you. Which figure are you
> using to define the rich?
> A. Original Osama figure of $ 250,000
> B. Uncle Joe's figure of $ 150,000
> C. Second Osama figure of $ 200,000

Senator Obama said $250k on nationally-televised debates, so I assume that is the number his administration will be held to. When Bush Sr. said "No new taxes" he was remembered by history for the failure of that pledge. When Obama said "If you make less than $250k you will not see a penny of new taxes" then one would expect him to be held to that. The $200k is from the infomercial where he says taxes will be reduced. So I'm guessing <200 = lower taxes, 200-250 = same taxes, 250+ higher taxes.

pgens,thanks for clearing that up. But what about Uncle Joe's 150,000 figure?

Nerd Wrote:
>> That was stupid bro.

Stupid in a "four more years" kinda way :))

Just like Kerry and Gore, huh?


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nerd Wrote:
> >> That was stupid bro.
>
> Stupid in a "four more years" kinda way :))

Keep your fingers crossed Wrote:
>> Gore, huh?


I actually voted for Bush in the 2000 election, not Gore.

cv and Reston...I guess based upon your assumption that the economy has grown as a result of tax reductions on the rich you believe it might be a good idea to eliminate all their taxes. Everyone making over $250k pays no taxes and just trickles down on the rest of us!

Have you ever considered that a balanced approach to tax reductions may have expanded the economy even more then what we experienced? Did you object to the stimulus package that focused on persons making less then $175k? After all given your taxation philosophy it would have been better to give the money to the rich.

BigDog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I never said I was for or against tax revenues
> going up. I simply state that was the result of
> tax reductions for the rich. I am for showing my
> 'patriotism' by the amount of taxes I pay.
> And a question for you. Which figure are you
> using to define the rich?
> A. Original Osama figure of $ 250,000
> B. Uncle Joe's figure of $ 150,000
> C. Second Osama figure of $ 200,000

The answer is D. Richardson's figure of $ 120,000

If you make more than $41K, you taxes will go up under Obama

http://www.democratsformccain.com/index.php?option=com_frontpage&Itemid=84

BigDog Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tax revenues went up, thats what we got.


Not enough to cover our debt.

Reston Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you make more than $41K, you taxes will go up
> under Obama
>
> http://www.democratsformccain.com/index.php?option
> =com_frontpage&Itemid=84


liar and the latest republikan dreg on here

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BigDog Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Tax revenues went up, thats what we got.
>
>
> Not enough to cover our debt.

Then we simply spent too much money. This isn't rocket science.