Off-Topic :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
Libertarian1
()
Date: October 25, 2008 04:50PM
Answer: Who cares?
America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
trapdoor
()
Date: October 25, 2008 04:56PM
Libertarian1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Answer: Who cares?
>
> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
I would if I were supporting it and she dropped 150k in 2 months on cloths (what's this I hear about buying her 10yo kid a Gucci purse??). And to pay 25k to a style advisor for 2wks work? Fuck that.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Answer: Who cares?
>
> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
I would if I were supporting it and she dropped 150k in 2 months on cloths (what's this I hear about buying her 10yo kid a Gucci purse??). And to pay 25k to a style advisor for 2wks work? Fuck that.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
WashingToneLocian
()
Date: October 25, 2008 05:22PM
Libertarian1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Answer: Who cares?
>
> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
Apparently Republicans were incensed that Michelle Obama spent over $600 for lobster and champagne at the Waldorf-Astoria....until it turned out she wasn't staying at the Waldorf-Astoria.
Seriously, the party that complains about a $600 lobster meal, $400 haircut and $800 suits wants us to lay off of a $150K wardrobe? You reap what you sow, asshole.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Answer: Who cares?
>
> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
Apparently Republicans were incensed that Michelle Obama spent over $600 for lobster and champagne at the Waldorf-Astoria....until it turned out she wasn't staying at the Waldorf-Astoria.
Seriously, the party that complains about a $600 lobster meal, $400 haircut and $800 suits wants us to lay off of a $150K wardrobe? You reap what you sow, asshole.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
TheMeeper
()
Date: October 25, 2008 05:59PM
Libertarian1 Wrote:
>>> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
And that was made abundantly clear with the re-election of George W. Bush in 2004, and will be reinforced in a few weeks when the same nitwits vote for his 3rd term.
>>> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
And that was made abundantly clear with the re-election of George W. Bush in 2004, and will be reinforced in a few weeks when the same nitwits vote for his 3rd term.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
Voter
()
Date: October 25, 2008 08:17PM
Yeah, except that this time those nitwits are going to be in the minority. Thank god, I might add.
TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libertarian1 Wrote:
> >>> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
>
>
> And that was made abundantly clear with the
> re-election of George W. Bush in 2004, and will be
> reinforced in a few weeks when the same nitwits
> vote for his 3rd term.
TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Libertarian1 Wrote:
> >>> America has turned into a nation of nitwits.
>
>
> And that was made abundantly clear with the
> re-election of George W. Bush in 2004, and will be
> reinforced in a few weeks when the same nitwits
> vote for his 3rd term.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
Vince(1)
()
Date: October 25, 2008 08:49PM
An electoriate capable of electing bush for a second term is capable of anything.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
May Company
()
Date: October 25, 2008 10:21PM
I am a lot more concerned about who is financing her husband's candidacy than who pays for her clothes.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
mona
()
Date: October 25, 2008 10:51PM
May Company Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am a lot more concerned about who is financing
> her husband's candidacy than who pays for her
> clothes.
I hear Hitler, Mussolini, and Osama Bin Laden donated to his campaign.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am a lot more concerned about who is financing
> her husband's candidacy than who pays for her
> clothes.
I hear Hitler, Mussolini, and Osama Bin Laden donated to his campaign.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
Bob
()
Date: October 25, 2008 11:15PM
mona Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> May Company Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am a lot more concerned about who is
> financing
> > her husband's candidacy than who pays for her
> > clothes.
>
> I hear Hitler, Mussolini, and Osama Bin Laden
> donated to his campaign.
You forgot Marx and Engels, and I hear the entire population of Iran has sent in a dollar. Also, I heard that the reason Kim Jong Il hasn't been seen in recent months is because he's secretly helping the Obama campaign in a bunker in Colorado.
-------------------------------------------------------
> May Company Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I am a lot more concerned about who is
> financing
> > her husband's candidacy than who pays for her
> > clothes.
>
> I hear Hitler, Mussolini, and Osama Bin Laden
> donated to his campaign.
You forgot Marx and Engels, and I hear the entire population of Iran has sent in a dollar. Also, I heard that the reason Kim Jong Il hasn't been seen in recent months is because he's secretly helping the Obama campaign in a bunker in Colorado.
Re: Who pays for Michelle Obama's wardrobe
Posted by:
Rachel Carson
()
Date: October 26, 2008 09:31PM
Huffington has a lot of this info on contributions. Much of it is blurry. There's undoubtedly dirty money on both sides. Dem's seem to have more. Nothing new there.