Wishful thinking. At that point public TV will have to get a revamp also - and then the entertainment industry for anything that gets put on tv... slippery slope there.
Radio is not right wing - no one wants to listen to Al Franken and all those other folks evidently. Face it, the message is not something people want to listen to all day long. If NPR didn't get public funding they would have been out of business a long time ago.
There are so many other radio stations out there - people can choose to listen to music or so many other stations/topics. That fact that folks listen to talk radio does not mean it is "unfair" somehow. Change the channel.
An interesting report:
http://www.cultureandmedia.com/specialreports/2008/Fairness_Doctrine/CMI_FairnessDoctrine_Single.pdf
Quote
1. The scarcity argument. Is conservative dominance of commercial talk radio
distorting the national debate about public policy issues?
- Americans have never enjoyed so many professional sources of news and
opinion. Americans can choose from a dozen or more daily network television
news shows, 10 separate 24/7 cable news and public affairs channels, 1,400
daily newspapers, and more than 2,200 radio stations airing news/talk
- The Internet has exponentially increased the availability of news sources.
Thanks to the Internet, Americans are no longer limited to local media. Any
St. Louis resident with a modem can read the Sacramento Bee and listen to
political talk radio stations in Washington, D.C. The World Wide Web has
pushed the number of daily news sources available well into the thousands for
anybody with Internet access, and 70 percent or more of Americans are on line.
- Only 7 percent of American adults consider radio to be their main source for
news and information. Fifty-five percent rely primarily on television news,
a ratio of nearly 8 to 1. The Newspaper Association of America says 57 percent
of American adults read a newspaper every day.
2. The censorship argument. Are Americans hearing both sides of debates about
controversial public policy issues, or are liberal voices being shut out?
- Liberal voices are well represented in talk radio, and are available to anyone
with a modem or an FM radio. Six of the top 25 commercial talk radio hosts
are liberals. The commercial Air America network, created to spread liberal
ideas, has 55 stations broadcasting over the air. Twenty-six of these stations
also stream over the Internet, as do hundreds of public radio stations.
Noncommercial public radio has more than 800 stations with a total weekly
news/talk audience of 14 million. At least 850 of the nation’s 2,200 talk stations
air mostly liberal programming.
- Radio is only one slice of the pie. Major liberal-leaning sources of news and
opinion reach a far greater audience than conservative-leaning sources.
Audience reach and circulation statistics illustrate the liberal domination of the
five major information media, two of which have no conservative sources:
> Broadcast TV news, millions/day Liberal 42.1 Conservative 0
> Top 25 newspapers, millions/day Liberal 11.7 Conservative 1.3
> Cable TV news, millions/month Liberal 182.8 Conservative 61.6
> Top talk radio, millions/week Liberal 24.5 Conservative 87.0
> Newsweeklies, millions/week Liberal 8.5 Conservative 0
3. The public interest argument. Would the Fairness Doctrine increase or reduce
discussion about public policy issues? History says speech would be curtailed.
- When the Fairness Doctrine was in effect, talk radio avoided controversial
topics. Most stations programmed only general talk and advice.
- Politicians repeatedly have used the Fairness Doctrine to chill speech. John
F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson both used the Fairness Doctrine to stifle
criticism, suppress the speech of political adversaries, and force radio stations
to provide free air time.
The Wiki Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine#cite_note-19
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/15/2008 12:45PM by Registered Voter.