HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Pages: Previous12345678910AllNext
Current Page: 7 of 10
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Scat Brown(R) ()
Date: January 25, 2010 03:57PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Agreed. In terms of douchebaggery, eesh can't
> hold a candle to Vince.

MrMephisto,

Personally, I wouldn't hold a candle to Vince(1). That's dangerous. There's a high probability that he would spontaneously combust from his latino diet of refried beans and corn tortillas.

Hasta Luego,
Scat Brown(R)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: mdcbe ()
Date: January 25, 2010 04:42PM

maybe vince could pull a Prada Denim. it's easy. tell everyone you just can't take it anymore, post anonymously for a couple weeks, and come back later with a new name.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eke ()
Date: January 25, 2010 06:27PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eesh and EJ are two different people.


Didn't you say he was Prada denim the other day?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 06:49PM

eke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eesh and EJ are two different people.
>
>
> Didn't you say he was Prada denim the other day?

I also said Prada Denim is not Expensive Jeans.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Shenanigans ()
Date: January 25, 2010 06:55PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eke Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MrMephisto Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Eesh and EJ are two different people.
> >
> >
> > Didn't you say he was Prada denim the other
> day?
>
> I also said Prada Denim is not Expensive Jeans.


Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh and EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting from 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 07:00PM

Shenanigans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > eke Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > MrMephisto Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > Eesh and EJ are two different people.
> > >
> > >
> > > Didn't you say he was Prada denim the other
> > day?
> >
> > I also said Prada Denim is not Expensive Jeans.
>
>
> Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh and
> EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting from
> 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.

I don't remember that particular detail, and I don't care enough to search for the thread. I've talked to them both via PM, and I currently think they're two different people.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: DSM ()
Date: January 25, 2010 07:04PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Shenanigans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MrMephisto Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > eke Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > MrMephisto Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > Eesh and EJ are two different people.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Didn't you say he was Prada denim the other
> > > day?
> > >
> > > I also said Prada Denim is not Expensive
> Jeans.
> >
> >
> > Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh
> and
> > EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> > raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting
> from
> > 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> > Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.
>
> I don't remember that particular detail, and I
> don't care enough to search for the thread. I've
> talked to them both via PM, and I currently think
> they're two different people.


Well then, you have fallen victim to his DID personas...so be it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 25, 2010 07:09PM

Can I join in the conversation?

Blessed are the murderous.
Attachments:
ohfuck.jpg
its_a_conspiracy.jpg
At_First.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Date: January 25, 2010 07:13PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can I join in the conversation?


when all along you were just a bisexual ginger kid!
Attachments:
bloodyblisterSTFU.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: January 25, 2010 07:16PM

Holy mackerel! That's a lot of blisters...

the mirror has spoken Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> when all along you were just a bisexual ginger
> kid!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:12PM

DSM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well then, you have fallen victim to his DID
> personas...so be it.

I go on what I know, not what I think.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Donald Rumsfeld ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:19PM

You go on what you *think* you know, but the "unknown unknown" always lies in wait, like a dragon at the perimeter of the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_unknown

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:36PM

Donald Rumsfeld Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You go on what you *think* you know, but the
> "unknown unknown" always lies in wait, like a
> dragon at the perimeter of the world.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unknown_unknown

No, it's a known known.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Expensive Jeans ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:43PM

Shenanigans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh and
> EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting from
> 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.


I explained at the time that I was not Prada Denim. And Prada explained that he was not Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen and tie us together due to the similar screen names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot could tell us apart due to our distinct posting styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one day posting high level and it confused me too because I was like, wait, could this actually be me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when I was really bored with the board and was about to call it quits but then I started posting like crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and we were just really on the same page with how we wanted to post.

At first we kind of played along with being the same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain in the you know what further down the road so we began to differentiate ourselves and started the painful process of educating, the then, at the time rather dull posting community base -- helping them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction -- with respect to the denim dilemma.

The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on the same work machine, at the same company, was a bizarre twist which I am still attempting to understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not the type of person to manufacturer some sort of lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly message board drama. But he could not be convinced otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion and spread of disinformation across the hearts and minds of off-topic. The board cheered their victory and rabble rousers partied late into the night. I was left only shaking my head.

During the arms race for personal information of '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and Prada link I was forced into the underground. Something that was very difficult for me. People know that I love to post more than anything. It also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting all of my posts from the past. Do you have any clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some undeniably profound points over the course of my membership to the forum and I did not want to subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some of my more potent moments and life revelations. It may have been simply too much for them to handle.

I considered returning to the board and posting on the main forum, exclusively. And developing a real, helpful, and educated voice where I could share my opinion on local politics, restaurants, rumors, and just generally assert my vast knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that I realized I that didn't possess the ability to converse on mature topics like political party affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded that I was no longer welcome there after my exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some soul searching. I wandered google and the dark corners of the internet and saw things which I would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled days which I look back upon fondly only due to the humbling experience provided in that it forced me to come to terms with how good I had it back on Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and just unwind with whoever was around at the time.

Since then I still have been checking in on the board. I like to keep up on all the latest gossip. Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned. Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming back.

I would like to take this opportunity to announce that this will be my final post. I thought that I would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered her call. I will be moving to a small town in Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very best and appreciate the support and camaraderie provided by all of my friends here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:51PM

Don't be a stranger now, ya hear... You can take the man out of Nothern Virginia, but you can't take the Northern Virginia out of the man...

Expensive Jeans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen
> and tie us together due to the similar screen
> names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot
> could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one
> day posting high level and it confused me too
> because I was like, wait, could this actually be
> me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when I
> was really bored with the board and was about to
> call it quits but then I started posting like
> crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and
> we were just really on the same page with how we
> wanted to post.
>
> At first we kind of played along with being the
> same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain
> in the you know what further down the road so we
> began to differentiate ourselves and started the
> painful process of educating, the then, at the
> time rather dull posting community base -- helping
> them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction
> -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
>
> The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on
> the same work machine, at the same company, was a
> bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> message board drama. But he could not be convinced
> otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion
> and spread of disinformation across the hearts and
> minds of off-topic. The board cheered their
> victory and rabble rousers partied late into the
> night. I was left only shaking my head.
>
> During the arms race for personal information of
> '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> Something that was very difficult for me. People
> know that I love to post more than anything. It
> also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting
> all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> undeniably profound points over the course of my
> membership to the forum and I did not want to
> subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some
> of my more potent moments and life revelations. It
> may have been simply too much for them to handle.
>
>
> I considered returning to the board and posting on
> the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> share my opinion on local politics, restaurants,
> rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that
> I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> converse on mature topics like political party
> affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated
> back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded
> that I was no longer welcome there after my
> exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some
> soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> corners of the internet and saw things which I
> would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled
> days which I look back upon fondly only due to the
> humbling experience provided in that it forced me
> to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by
> Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three
> months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the
> simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the
> chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> just unwind with whoever was around at the time.
>
> Since then I still have been checking in on the
> board. I like to keep up on all the latest gossip.
> Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the
> next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned.
> Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming
> back.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to announce
> that this will be my final post. I thought that I
> would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle
> to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered
> her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very
> best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> provided by all of my friends here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:56PM

Now that's EJ.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: lies...lies...lies... ()
Date: January 25, 2010 08:57PM

blah blah blah...tl;dr...don't care...



Expensive Jeans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Shenanigans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh
> and
> > EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> > raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting
> from
> > 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> > Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.
>
>
> I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen
> and tie us together due to the similar screen
> names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot
> could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one
> day posting high level and it confused me too
> because I was like, wait, could this actually be
> me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when I
> was really bored with the board and was about to
> call it quits but then I started posting like
> crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and
> we were just really on the same page with how we
> wanted to post.
>
> At first we kind of played along with being the
> same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain
> in the you know what further down the road so we
> began to differentiate ourselves and started the
> painful process of educating, the then, at the
> time rather dull posting community base -- helping
> them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction
> -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
>
> The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on
> the same work machine, at the same company, was a
> bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> message board drama. But he could not be convinced
> otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion
> and spread of disinformation across the hearts and
> minds of off-topic. The board cheered their
> victory and rabble rousers partied late into the
> night. I was left only shaking my head.
>
> During the arms race for personal information of
> '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> Something that was very difficult for me. People
> know that I love to post more than anything. It
> also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting
> all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> undeniably profound points over the course of my
> membership to the forum and I did not want to
> subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some
> of my more potent moments and life revelations. It
> may have been simply too much for them to handle.
>
>
> I considered returning to the board and posting on
> the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> share my opinion on local politics, restaurants,
> rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that
> I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> converse on mature topics like political party
> affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated
> back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded
> that I was no longer welcome there after my
> exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some
> soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> corners of the internet and saw things which I
> would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled
> days which I look back upon fondly only due to the
> humbling experience provided in that it forced me
> to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by
> Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three
> months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the
> simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the
> chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> just unwind with whoever was around at the time.
>
> Since then I still have been checking in on the
> board. I like to keep up on all the latest gossip.
> Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the
> next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned.
> Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming
> back.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to announce
> that this will be my final post. I thought that I
> would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle
> to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered
> her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very
> best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> provided by all of my friends here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: loser ()
Date: January 25, 2010 09:00PM

what a fucking cry baby loser...and once again, another fake farewell!


Expensive Jeans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Shenanigans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh
> and
> > EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> > raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting
> from
> > 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> > Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.
>
>
> I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen
> and tie us together due to the similar screen
> names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot
> could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one
> day posting high level and it confused me too
> because I was like, wait, could this actually be
> me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when I
> was really bored with the board and was about to
> call it quits but then I started posting like
> crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and
> we were just really on the same page with how we
> wanted to post.
>
> At first we kind of played along with being the
> same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain
> in the you know what further down the road so we
> began to differentiate ourselves and started the
> painful process of educating, the then, at the
> time rather dull posting community base -- helping
> them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction
> -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
>
> The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on
> the same work machine, at the same company, was a
> bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> message board drama. But he could not be convinced
> otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion
> and spread of disinformation across the hearts and
> minds of off-topic. The board cheered their
> victory and rabble rousers partied late into the
> night. I was left only shaking my head.
>
> During the arms race for personal information of
> '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> Something that was very difficult for me. People
> know that I love to post more than anything. It
> also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting
> all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> undeniably profound points over the course of my
> membership to the forum and I did not want to
> subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some
> of my more potent moments and life revelations. It
> may have been simply too much for them to handle.
>
>
> I considered returning to the board and posting on
> the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> share my opinion on local politics, restaurants,
> rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that
> I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> converse on mature topics like political party
> affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated
> back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded
> that I was no longer welcome there after my
> exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some
> soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> corners of the internet and saw things which I
> would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled
> days which I look back upon fondly only due to the
> humbling experience provided in that it forced me
> to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by
> Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three
> months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the
> simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the
> chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> just unwind with whoever was around at the time.
>
> Since then I still have been checking in on the
> board. I like to keep up on all the latest gossip.
> Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the
> next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned.
> Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming
> back.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to announce
> that this will be my final post. I thought that I
> would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle
> to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered
> her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very
> best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> provided by all of my friends here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 09:05PM

Eesh/prada denim is not EJ.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: 496 ()
Date: January 25, 2010 09:17PM

that was hilarious! Well played there EJ.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Alias ()
Date: January 25, 2010 09:18PM

"Prada came out of the blue one day posting high level and it confused me too because I was like, wait, could this actually be me?"

Haha.

I like EJ.... he's funny!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Elle Diabla ()
Date: January 26, 2010 09:46AM

Why don't you fags use proxies?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: bs ()
Date: January 26, 2010 10:45AM

Expensive Jeans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen
> and tie us together due to the similar screen
> names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot
> could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one
> day posting high level and it confused me too
> because I was like, wait, could this actually be
> me? But it wasn't.


you found your male/life 'partner', congrats.


It was though at a time when I
> was really bored with the board and was about to
> call it quits but then I started posting like
> crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and
> we were just really on the same page with how we
> wanted to post.
>
> At first we kind of played along with being the
> same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain
> in the you know what further down the road so we
> began to differentiate ourselves and started the
> painful process of educating, the then, at the
> time rather dull posting community base -- helping
> them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction
> -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
>
> The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on
> the same work machine, at the same company, was a
> bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> understand.


Gravis proved that and you tried to play it off by saying there were two fashionable homosexuals who worked there and posted on here at the same time.


I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> message board drama. But he could not be convinced
> otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion
> and spread of disinformation across the hearts and
> minds of off-topic.


Could the great Gravis be wrong? So, you're saying he spread lies about you?


The board cheered their
> victory and rabble rousers partied late into the
> night. I was left only shaking my head.
>
> During the arms race of personal information of


'arms race'? I know someone else who associates that word with flame wars on here.


> '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> Something that was very difficult for me. People
> know that I love to post more than anything. It
> also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting
> all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> undeniably profound points over the course of my
> membership to the forum and I did not want to
> subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some
> of my more potent moments and life revelations. It
> may have been simply too much for them to handle.
>
>
> I considered returning to the board and posting on
> the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> share my opinion on local politics, restaurants,
> rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that
> I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> converse on mature topics like political party
> affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated
> back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded
> that I was no longer welcome there after my
> exposure and subsequent prosecution.


you are still aren't welcome here.


I did some
> soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> corners of the internet and saw things which I
> would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled
> days which I look back upon fondly only due to the
> humbling experience provided in that it forced me
> to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by
> Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three
> months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the
> simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the
> chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> just unwind with whoever was around at the time.
>
> Since then I still have been checking in on the
> board.


If you want to call it that.


I like to keep up on all the latest gossip.
> Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the
> next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned.
> Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming
> back.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to announce
> that this will be my final post.


we've heard that before.


I thought that I
> would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle
> to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered
> her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> Long Island Sound.


sounds perfectly gay.


I do wish everyone the very
> best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> provided by all of my friends here.


you have no friends here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: dumb ()
Date: January 26, 2010 10:50AM

Expensive Jeans Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Shenanigans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Then what is the connection between Prada/eesh
> and
> > EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> > raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting
> from
> > 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> > Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.
>
>
> I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to listen
> and tie us together due to the similar screen
> names. However anyone that wasn't a complete idiot
> could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue one
> day posting high level and it confused me too
> because I was like, wait, could this actually be
> me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when I
> was really bored with the board and was about to
> call it quits but then I started posting like
> crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM and
> we were just really on the same page with how we
> wanted to post.
>
> At first we kind of played along with being the
> same boarder but then we knew it would be a pain
> in the you know what further down the road so we
> began to differentiate ourselves and started the
> painful process of educating, the then, at the
> time rather dull posting community base -- helping
> them to separate right and wrong, fact and fiction
> -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
>
> The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I on
> the same work machine, at the same company, was a
> bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> message board drama. But he could not be convinced
> otherwise and was unwavering with his conclusion
> and spread of disinformation across the hearts and
> minds of off-topic. The board cheered their
> victory and rabble rousers partied late into the
> night. I was left only shaking my head.
>
> During the arms race for personal information of
> '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> Something that was very difficult for me. People
> know that I love to post more than anything. It
> also led to the rather humiliating act of deleting
> all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> undeniably profound points over the course of my
> membership to the forum and I did not want to
> subject my family, friends, and colleagues to some
> of my more potent moments and life revelations. It
> may have been simply too much for them to handle.
>
>
> I considered returning to the board and posting on
> the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> share my opinion on local politics, restaurants,
> rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then that
> I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> converse on mature topics like political party
> affiliation and immigration and quickly retreated
> back to the off-topic forum. Only to be reminded
> that I was no longer welcome there after my
> exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some
> soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> corners of the internet and saw things which I
> would prefer to not describe. Those were troubled
> days which I look back upon fondly only due to the
> humbling experience provided in that it forced me
> to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> return. I was then IP banned from the chat room by
> Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over three
> months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of the
> simple pleasures of my existence was visiting the
> chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> just unwind with whoever was around at the time.
>
> Since then I still have been checking in on the
> board. I like to keep up on all the latest gossip.
> Who is who - who is dating - when and where is the
> next forum gathering - who deserves to be banned.
> Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all coming
> back.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to announce
> that this will be my final post. I thought that I
> would spend my life in Northern Virginia - cradle
> to the grave. But life beckons, and I've answered
> her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very
> best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> provided by all of my friends here.


You're stupid.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: yuppie ()
Date: January 26, 2010 10:53AM

dumb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Expensive Jeans Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Shenanigans Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> >
> > > Then what is the connection between
> Prada/eesh
> > and
> > > EJ. Is eesh/prada EJ's 'supposed' coworker at
> > > raytheon ( who pretended not to be EJ posting
> > from
> > > 'their' work)? this was proven to be false by
> > > Gravis, FU senior Gestapo net detective.
> >
> >
> > I explained at the time that I was not Prada
> > Denim. And Prada explained that he was not
> > Expensive Jeans. People just chose not to
> listen
> > and tie us together due to the similar screen
> > names. However anyone that wasn't a complete
> idiot
> > could tell us apart due to our distinct posting
> > styles and habits. Prada came out of the blue
> one
> > day posting high level and it confused me too
> > because I was like, wait, could this actually
> be
> > me? But it wasn't. It was though at a time when
> I
> > was really bored with the board and was about
> to
> > call it quits but then I started posting like
> > crazy and talking to Prada in threads and PM
> and
> > we were just really on the same page with how
> we
> > wanted to post.
> >
> > At first we kind of played along with being the
> > same boarder but then we knew it would be a
> pain
> > in the you know what further down the road so
> we
> > began to differentiate ourselves and started
> the
> > painful process of educating, the then, at the
> > time rather dull posting community base --
> helping
> > them to separate right and wrong, fact and
> fiction
> > -- with respect to the denim dilemma.
> >
> > The IP address discovery, putting Prada and I
> on
> > the same work machine, at the same company, was
> a
> > bizarre twist which I am still attempting to
> > understand. I know Gravis, and I know he is not
> > the type of person to manufacturer some sort of
> > lie or false scenario simply to fuel a silly
> > message board drama. But he could not be
> convinced
> > otherwise and was unwavering with his
> conclusion
> > and spread of disinformation across the hearts
> and
> > minds of off-topic. The board cheered their
> > victory and rabble rousers partied late into
> the
> > night. I was left only shaking my head.
> >
> > During the arms race for personal information
> of
> > '09 that ensued following my grand exposure and
> > Prada link I was forced into the underground.
> > Something that was very difficult for me.
> People
> > know that I love to post more than anything. It
> > also led to the rather humiliating act of
> deleting
> > all of my posts from the past. Do you have any
> > clue how long it takes to delete seven hundred
> > posts? But it was necessary. I had stated some
> > undeniably profound points over the course of
> my
> > membership to the forum and I did not want to
> > subject my family, friends, and colleagues to
> some
> > of my more potent moments and life revelations.
> It
> > may have been simply too much for them to
> handle.
> >
> >
> > I considered returning to the board and posting
> on
> > the main forum, exclusively. And developing a
> > real, helpful, and educated voice where I could
> > share my opinion on local politics,
> restaurants,
> > rumors, and just generally assert my vast
> > knowledge of all things Fairfax. It was then
> that
> > I realized I that didn't possess the ability to
> > converse on mature topics like political party
> > affiliation and immigration and quickly
> retreated
> > back to the off-topic forum. Only to be
> reminded
> > that I was no longer welcome there after my
> > exposure and subsequent prosecution. I did some
> > soul searching. I wandered google and the dark
> > corners of the internet and saw things which I
> > would prefer to not describe. Those were
> troubled
> > days which I look back upon fondly only due to
> the
> > humbling experience provided in that it forced
> me
> > to come to terms with how good I had it back on
> > Fairfax Underground -- and how bad I wanted to
> > return. I was then IP banned from the chat room
> by
> > Gravis for a silly offense. It has been over
> three
> > months and the ban hasn't been lifted. One of
> the
> > simple pleasures of my existence was visiting
> the
> > chat room from five o'clock to five thirty and
> > just unwind with whoever was around at the
> time.
> >
> > Since then I still have been checking in on the
> > board. I like to keep up on all the latest
> gossip.
> > Who is who - who is dating - when and where is
> the
> > next forum gathering - who deserves to be
> banned.
> > Ya know, just the stuff that keeps us all
> coming
> > back.
> >
> > I would like to take this opportunity to
> announce
> > that this will be my final post. I thought that
> I
> > would spend my life in Northern Virginia -
> cradle
> > to the grave. But life beckons, and I've
> answered
> > her call. I will be moving to a small town in
> > Connecticut. A hillside hamlet overlooking the
> > Long Island Sound. I do wish everyone the very
> > best and appreciate the support and camaraderie
> > provided by all of my friends here.
>
>
> You're stupid.


Fruppie, is that you?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: January 26, 2010 05:18PM

Elle Diabla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why don't you fags use proxies?



a) a zillion proxies are banned/
b) not everyone here even know what a proxy is/
c) only trolls care about proxies, the rest of us dont give a damn.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Elle Diabla ()
Date: January 26, 2010 11:38PM

Well, what I mean is, why keep coming back if you're just caught again?

Meh, whatever

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fna ()
Date: January 26, 2010 11:43PM

Elle Diabla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, what I mean is, why keep coming back if
> you're just caught again?
>
> Meh, whatever


Ej and alias used used proxies to troll a la carte blanche. That's why Cary banned all proxies.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 27, 2010 12:00AM

fna Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> Ej and alias used used proxies to troll a la carte
> blanche. That's why Cary banned all proxies.
Attachments:
inkalovesej.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ?. ()
Date: January 27, 2010 12:07AM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fna Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Ej and alias used used proxies to troll a la
> carte
> > blanche. That's why Cary banned all proxies.


When did you grow hair out, EJ?


I prefer this look of your crew. Which one is Prada denim, failsafe, and valutime?
Attachments:
bliss2.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 27, 2010 12:22AM

Elle Diabla Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well, what I mean is, why keep coming back if
> you're just caught again?
>
> Meh, whatever

You don't understand. Some people NEED this board.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: garbanzo ()
Date: April 30, 2010 12:57AM

Ban that "Troll@AOL" troll.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Alias ()
Date: April 30, 2010 02:02AM

garbanzo,

You wanna become a dip?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 16, 2010 06:12PM

Please get rid of Eli as this person floods the forum when he doesn't receive attention from other users.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Eli ()
Date: July 16, 2010 06:22PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please get rid of Eli as this person floods the
> forum when he doesn't receive attention from other
> users.


Can't happen. i own these peasants.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: She DeviI ()
Date: July 16, 2010 08:51PM

haha

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:11PM

Eli, and his many incarnations.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Yeasss ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:27PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eli, and his many incarnations.


Ditto

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Bonie ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:29PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eli, and his many incarnations.


Eli is a good guy.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Maybe ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:38PM

Bonie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Eli, and his many incarnations.
>
>
> Eli is a good guy.


He may be, but he's still a trouble maker in this forum,

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:43PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eli, and his many incarnations.





Cary has already deleted a few of his Conie threads, "Hash-eesh" and She Devil posts.

Hopefully if Eli is banned my PM inbox will stop being filled up with Conie crap.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Eli ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:48PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Cary has already deleted a few of his Conie
> threads, "Hash-eesh" and She Devil posts.
>
> Hopefully if Eli is banned my PM inbox will stop
> being filled up with Conie crap.


FYI I am not She Devil. Also any Conie crap that you claim is being sent to your PM inbox is not coming from me. I have sent you 3 PM messages ever and if you claim otherwise then you are a liar which is worse than me... at least I speak the truth. Finally last I heard "a few" did not equal 1.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Cary ()
Date: July 19, 2010 10:56PM

The user "She Devil" has been banned for creating numerous junk posts and threads.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: July 19, 2010 11:09PM

Cary Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The user "She Devil" has been banned for creating
> numerous junk posts and threads.


Gol!!!!!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ThePackLeader ()
Date: July 19, 2010 11:10PM

Woohoo, great to see Cary still in action.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Cobbins ()
Date: July 19, 2010 11:33PM

All praise the great Cary.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: She DeviI ()
Date: July 20, 2010 12:44AM

Conie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Cary Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > The user "She Devil" has been banned for
> creating
> > numerous junk posts and threads.
>
>
> Gol!!!!!!


Really?! I have?! It's GOAL btw!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: July 20, 2010 05:05PM

file.php?40,file=20989

prepare yourself.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: She DeviI ()
Date: July 20, 2010 09:48PM

k

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:14PM

Please ban the user known as "Registered Voter" for writing negative reviews about FairfaxUnderground on WTOP's comment section. Not only did he bad mouth the site, he also had the comments directed at him deleted.

What a dick.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ITRADE ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:19PM

Is there any evidence that the RV there is the RV here?

You can set up a profile on wtop.com in about 45 seconds.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:23PM

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Is there any evidence that the RV there is the RV
> here?
>
> You can set up a profile on wtop.com in about 45
> seconds.




He's already admitted to being the "Registerd Voter" there.

Blessed are the murderous.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ITRADE ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:31PM

I think he's admitted to providing some of the rebuttal to some of that, but to the other stuff?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:35PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please ban the user known as "Registered Voter"
> for writing negative reviews about
> FairfaxUnderground on WTOP's comment section. Not
> only did he bad mouth the site, he also had the
> comments directed at him deleted.
>
> What a dick.

I'm not going to say he should be banned, but it did make me lose some respect for him (for whatever that's worth on here). Why complain on another site about how much you dislike the site you frequently visit? At best, it makes you look petty, and at worst, you sound like a complete idiot.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:38PM

I'm just fucking around with him.

No, I wouldn't have him banned, at all, I just noticed that most of the comments on that site directed at RV after he made that statement about FFXU were deleted, which only would have happened if he reported them for abuse.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:45PM

*snicker*

"Abuse."

I'm sorry, but I would feel ashamed to report those comments as "abuse."

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: July 22, 2010 04:55PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> *snicker*
>
> "Abuse."
>
> I'm sorry, but I would feel ashamed to report
> those comments as "abuse."


Hey, eesh made them - obviously they were abusive just by their very nature :)

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: July 22, 2010 05:22PM

Registered Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrMephisto Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > *snicker*
> >
> > "Abuse."
> >
> > I'm sorry, but I would feel ashamed to report
> > those comments as "abuse."
>
>
> Hey, eesh made them - obviously they were abusive
> just by their very nature :)

I'd ask if you have any proof of this, but it'd be a rhetorical question. You don't know that eesh made them. Since you had to register for the site to post a comment, you clearly understand how quickly and easily one can make an account over there.

I'm about to blow your mind:

It's possible that someone is pretending to be eesh over there, so he takes the blame for it.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Tigerstyle ()
Date: July 22, 2010 05:24PM

I, Hairy Turtle, am pretending to be both eesh and RV on WTOP. Also, MrMephisto is just my cat running on my laptops keyboard.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: July 22, 2010 05:48PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Registered Voter Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MrMephisto Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > *snicker*
> > >
> > > "Abuse."
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, but I would feel ashamed to report
> > > those comments as "abuse."
> >
> >
> > Hey, eesh made them - obviously they were
> abusive
> > just by their very nature :)
>
> I'd ask if you have any proof of this, but it'd be
> a rhetorical question. You don't know that eesh
> made them. Since you had to register for the site
> to post a comment, you clearly understand how
> quickly and easily one can make an account over
> there.
>
> I'm about to blow your mind:
>
> It's possible that someone is pretending to be
> eesh over there, so he takes the blame for it.

Yeah, I don't think eesh has denied he made those comments. If it wasn't him, I am sure he would have noted that in conversations here - in particular since he was following the one over there so closely. And note, my comments to and about eesh were secondary to my initial post over there - triggered by whomever decided to register as me over there and post their blatant BS.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fairfaxdude ()
Date: July 22, 2010 06:54PM

Registered Voter Wrote:

> Yeah, I don't think eesh has denied he made those
> comments. If it wasn't him, I am sure he would
> have noted that in conversations here - in
> particular since he was following the one over
> there so closely. And note, my comments to and
> about eesh were secondary to my initial post over
> there - triggered by whomever decided to register
> as me over there and post their blatant BS.


Reggie, you're a putz. A useless, humorless, dickwad putz.

Stop typing.

Just go die or something as useful.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Espana ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:10PM

She DeviI Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Conie Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Cary Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > The user "She Devil" has been banned for
> > creating
> > > numerous junk posts and threads.
> >
> >
> > Gol!!!!!!
>
>
> Really?! I have?! It's GOAL btw!


In Spanish, 'goal' is 'gol'.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: El Pollo Loco ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:14PM

Espana Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> In Spanish, 'goal' is 'gol'.


In English, Espana means Illegals. Go back to your homeland bendejo.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you = retarded ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:22PM

El Pollo Loco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Espana Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > In Spanish, 'goal' is 'gol'.
>
>
> In English, Espana means Illegals. Go back to
> your homeland bendejo.

Sorry, but Espagna means Spain; in addition, it's 'pendejo', not 'bendejo', idiot.
Attachments:
retard.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you=illegal ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:26PM

you = retarded Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Sorry, but Espagna means Spain; in addition, it's
> 'pendejo', not 'bendejo', idiot.


i'm sorry i don't speak illegal.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you=idiot ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:27PM

you = retarded Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but Espagna means Spain;

are you part italian... i could go for some lasagna with your Espagna. idiot.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you = uneducated ignoramus ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:28PM

you=illegal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you = retarded Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > Sorry, but Espagna means Spain; in addition,
> it's
> > 'pendejo', not 'bendejo', idiot.
>
>
> i'm sorry i don't speak illegal.


I am not illegal and neither are most people from Spain.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you need dictionary ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:29PM

you = uneducated ignoramus Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > > Sorry, but Espagna means Spain;


when trying to insult someone for incorrect spelling, make sure that you use the correct spelling.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: whatever. ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:30PM

you=idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you = retarded Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Sorry, but Espagna means Spain;
>
> are you part italian... i could go for some
> lasagna with your Espagna. idiot.


So, you caught me on a typo; congratulations, ass!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you=idiot ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:32PM

whatever. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> So, you caught me on a typo; congratulations, ass!


you're welcome bendejo.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Dos Pendejos ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:39PM

¡Huyas, pendejo!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: tard ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:39PM

you=idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> whatever. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > So, you caught me on a typo; congratulations,
> ass!
>
>
> you're welcome bendejo.


I misspell once; shame on me.
You misspell twice; you're retarded! lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you=idiot ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:40PM

tard Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> I misspell once; shame on me.
> You misspell twice; you're retarded! lol


go back to your homeland bendejo.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: dumbass ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:43PM

you=idiot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> tard Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > I misspell once; shame on me.
> > You misspell twice; you're retarded! lol
>
>
> go back to your homeland bendejo.

I am already there, idiot!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Elle Diabla ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:44PM

***NEWSFLASH!***

YOU'RE ALL dumbfucks!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: you=illegal ()
Date: July 22, 2010 11:45PM

dumbass Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> I am already there, idiot!


are you a beaner lover? you have no right to be here beaner. go to mexico with the other illegals bendejo. your u.s. citizenship has been renounced. you are now an illegal.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: July 30, 2010 10:27PM

please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and a few others (even in this very thread). every single post they have made is a troll.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: July 30, 2010 10:31PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and a
> few others (even in this very thread). every
> single post they have made is a troll.




Interesting, that's the same IP that keeps creating wiki articles on me for the past month.

Blessed are the murderous.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: anony eli ()
Date: July 30, 2010 10:58PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and a
> few others (even in this very thread). every
> single post they have made is a troll.

Hairy = Gravis?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: :) ()
Date: July 30, 2010 10:59PM

anony eli Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and a
>
> > few others (even in this very thread). every
> > single post they have made is a troll.
>
> Hairy = Gravis?


Yes Gravis is rather Hairy and fat also!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: foolio ()
Date: July 30, 2010 11:07PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and a
> > few others (even in this very thread). every
> > single post they have made is a troll.
>
>
>
> Interesting, that's the same IP that keeps
> creating wiki articles on me for the past month.


...and you were the one who started that battle, asshole!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fooliohootz ()
Date: July 30, 2010 11:37PM

foolio Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> eesh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Gravis Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > please ban 173.66.247.152 aka "eesh info" and
> a
> > > few others (even in this very thread). every
> > > single post they have made is a troll.
> >
> >
> >
> > Interesting, that's the same IP that keeps
> > creating wiki articles on me for the past
> month.
>
>
> ...and you were the one who started that battle,
> asshole!


LOL +1

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: July 31, 2010 01:35AM

oh yeah and they use Windows Vista Home Basic (poor man's version of vista). ;D


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: September 13, 2010 06:01PM

Please ban Conie as this person floods private message inboxes almost on a daily basis.



EDIT: Still getting private messages.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/13/2010 06:19PM by eesh.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Conie ()
Date: September 13, 2010 06:13PM

Please ban eesh as this person pretends to be gay yet
posts "hot or not" on a daily basis.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: October 04, 2010 11:21AM

Please ban chuckhoffmann for his blatant html abuse in every thread. He is starved for attention and is getting more theatrical by the day.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 04, 2010 11:23AM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please ban chuckhoffmann for his blatant html
> abuse in every thread. He is starved for attention
> and is getting more theatrical by the day.

You beat me to it.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Warhawk ()
Date: October 04, 2010 12:00PM

eesh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Please ban chuckhoffmann for his blatant html
> abuse in every thread. He is starved for attention
> and is getting more theatrical by the day.


+1. I'm by no means the wittiest one here or the make the best contributions, but I'm fucking Chris Rock and Plato compared to Chuck.

__________________________________
That's not a ladybug, that's a cannapiller.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Wahhh ()
Date: October 04, 2010 12:06PM

Yeah, chuck is but a partial kernel of corn in my shit.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ITRADE ()
Date: October 04, 2010 12:32PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: NicoleH ()
Date: October 04, 2010 12:59PM

Chuckie honey. I gave you fair warning.

And you're coming back for more abuse.

Not only that, but you seem to like provoking others

on this site.

I majored in psychology in college...but I have to tell ya, I'm afraid to go there.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:03PM

NicoleH Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Chuckie honey. I gave you fair warning.
>
> And you're coming back for more abuse.
>
> Not only that, but you seem to like provoking
> others
>
> on this site.
>
> I majored in psychology in college...but I have to
> tell ya, I'm afraid to go there.

Most of the people on here aren't as bad as people think, so "afraid" wouldn't necessarily be the word I'd use.

But if you're going to walk into any gathering of people and start being an asshole, well... you deserve what you get.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
­
Posted by: chuckhoffmann ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:10PM

­



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2014 10:44AM by chuckhoffmann.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: 496 ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:15PM

ChuckHoffman, the new Vince1.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Chuckhoffmann deserves to be banned?
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:18PM

chuckhoffmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Any "provocation" is nothing more than the verbal
> and literary equivalent of throwing elbows in a
> hockey game. If any of my playmates are too stupid
> or too unstable to be hip to that, then they
> should go play in somebody else's sandbox or be
> locked up by the police (their choice).

Actually, "provocation" is you threatening me with legal action over a perceived death threat. The rest of it was just business as usual, but you had to go and make it personal, Chuck. Not cool.

> And the truth is, if Eesh or MrMephisto or any of
> those guys want to be the biggest turd in the
> bowl, more power to them!

How old are you? 45? Just discovered the internet, maybe?

I bet you're the kind of guy who fancies himself "one cool customer."

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
­
Posted by: chuckhoffmann ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:19PM

­



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2014 10:43AM by chuckhoffmann.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Chuckhoffmann deserves to be banned?
Posted by: NicoleH ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:23PM

chuckhoffmann Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> NicoleH wrote:
> >Chuckie honey. I gave you fair warning.
> >And you're coming back for more abuse.
> >Not only that, but you seem to like provoking
> others on this site.
> >I majored in psychology in college...but I have
> to tell ya, I'm afraid to go there.
>
> Not for abuse, for entertainment. I think I'm the
> exact demographic that this whole site is meant
> for, except I'm poor, and advertisers kinda want
> you to have money.
>
> Any "provocation" is nothing more than the verbal
> and literary equivalent of throwing elbows in a
> hockey game. If any of my playmates are too stupid
> or too unstable to be hip to that, then they
> should go play in somebody else's sandbox or be
> locked up by the police (their choice).
>
> And the truth is, if Eesh or MrMephisto or any of
> those guys want to be the biggest turd in the
> bowl, more power to them!


I don't think anyone on here considers you their "playmate" right

now Chuckie.

And I actually feel sorry for you. Because, I may be wrong but I

think you came on here hoping to look for friends and soon after that

you couldn't take the heat and you took the offensive.

And I told you!! what this site was all about. But, you didn't listen.















Wait....we may need you here

Options: ReplyQuote
­
Posted by: chuckhoffmann ()
Date: October 04, 2010 01:43PM

­



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2014 10:40AM by chuckhoffmann.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: October 04, 2010 02:28PM

Well, at least you're confirming what everyone already thought; you're only here because you want people to read your stupid blog.

I suppose having clever or original things to draw people to your blog is too much effort, so the Spam Shotgun technique suits you well. God knows there's probably one mouth-breather on here that cares what some random douchebag thinks about topics as riveting as Katy Perry's tits.

Real Pulitzer stuff there.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
­
Posted by: chuckhoffmann ()
Date: October 04, 2010 02:39PM

­



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 11/02/2014 10:40AM by chuckhoffmann.

Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: Previous12345678910AllNext
Current Page: 7 of 10


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **    **  **     **  ********   ******   **    ** 
 ***   **  **     **     **     **    **   **  **  
 ****  **  **     **     **     **          ****   
 ** ** **  *********     **     **           **    
 **  ****  **     **     **     **           **    
 **   ***  **     **     **     **    **     **    
 **    **  **     **     **      ******      **    
This forum powered by Phorum.