HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Pages: Previous12345678910AllNext
Current Page: 6 of 10
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: YA___, ()
Date: May 18, 2009 10:25PM

Cary know who posts what and what IP it comes from, so he knows the real truth. I wasn't even on here last night or whenever the posts were made. Plus I have absolutely no idea how to alter posts.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ... ()
Date: May 18, 2009 10:32PM

You're a loser.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: YA==== ()
Date: May 18, 2009 10:32PM

... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're a loser.

Obviously. Its why I post here with the rest of the losers, like you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: gat.re ()
Date: May 20, 2009 02:50PM

the guy who posts "gay" as his only reply. thats "gay"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Judge Crater ()
Date: May 20, 2009 04:03PM

gat.re Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> the guy who posts "gay" as his only reply. thats
> "gay"


GAY

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: May 20, 2009 04:29PM

totally gay

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Date: May 20, 2009 04:33PM

nicko

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Robert Akins ()
Date: May 20, 2009 04:38PM

trebor snika!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fairfaxdude ()
Date: May 20, 2009 04:49PM

trebor snika, robert atkins AND Dwight. Let God sort em out.

______________________________________________
I have had to change the addresses to my retaliatory blogs over half a dozen times.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: New nick ()
Date: May 20, 2009 05:02PM

fairfaxdude Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> trebor snika, robert atkins AND Dwight. Let God
> sort em out.


You shall know be known as fairfaxdouche.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Dwight. ()
Date: May 20, 2009 05:19PM

New nick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fairfaxdude Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > trebor snika, robert atkins AND Dwight. Let
> God
> > sort em out.
>
>
> You shall know be known as fairfaxdouche.



:-D

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Vince=sexist ()
Date: May 21, 2009 10:12AM

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are all rather smug in your kangaroo court...I
> have made no anti-semite remarks..that is an
> outright lie...and except for you inept fat-ass
> white twenty-somethings..I have made no racial
> remarks.


you did make sexist comments in the past - you pig

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: May 30, 2009 06:46PM

i think Vince(1) needs a timeout for bogging down threads by uploading the maximum amount of data you can as image attachments. this doesnt effect me personally but he's attacking other people than just me which isnt cool. not everyone has a fast internet connection (like if you are using a smart phone) so he's punishing unintended targets as well as being obnoxious (not his normal obnoxious posts).

so please, send vince to his room for his bad behavior/tantrums.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Dwight. ()
Date: May 30, 2009 07:32PM

I know i am not the most credible person but i second what Gravis has so nicely stated above me.

Time out for vince.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ansel Adams ()
Date: May 30, 2009 07:34PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think Vince(1) needs a timeout for bogging down
> threads by uploading the maximum amount of data
> you can as image attachments. this doesnt effect
> me personally but he's attacking other people than
> just me which isnt cool. not everyone has a fast
> internet connection (like if you are using a smart
> phone) so he's punishing unintended targets as
> well as being obnoxious (not his normal obnoxious
> posts).
>
> so please, send vince to his room for his bad
> behavior/tantrums.

I second that motion.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Meeper is a loser ()
Date: May 30, 2009 07:52PM

Please ban The Meeper dude. He posts way too much dumb shit- then maybe he actually will go out and get a real job so he won't as much time on here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: he's so sexy ()
Date: May 30, 2009 08:12PM

Of course he has a real job, a good bod, handsome face, and rich as hell-
hahahahahahahaha

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: pgens ()
Date: May 30, 2009 08:17PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> not everyone has a fast
> internet connection (like if you are using a smart
> phone) so he's punishing unintended targets as
> well as being obnoxious (not his normal obnoxious
> posts).

And some of us use mobile Internet devices with 5GB data caps before shit gets REAL expensive.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: friendofVince ()
Date: May 30, 2009 08:27PM

I loved the picture! Please send more...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Furfur ()
Date: May 31, 2009 12:50AM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think Vince(1) needs a timeout

> so please, send vince to his room for his bad
> behavior/tantrums.
Attachments:
Dunce_Cap.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: June 03, 2009 02:46PM

ban user LOLcat, he's just annoying and contributes nothing but lame ass "lolspeak"


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: LOLcat ()
Date: June 03, 2009 03:05PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ban user LOLcat, he's just annoying and
> contributes nothing but lame ass "lolspeak"


Y so seerious?

Options: ReplyQuote
s
Posted by: inkahootz ()
Date: June 03, 2009 03:49PM

s

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 02:27PM by inkahootz.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: LOLcat ()
Date: June 03, 2009 04:24PM

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ban user LOLcat, he's just annoying and
> > contributes nothing but lame ass "lolspeak"
>
>
> Yeah, he and Niko are about as cool as Terbor
> Snika and the rest of the C'ville cRAP squad!


Y so Seriez? LOL!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: graymoose1 ()
Date: June 03, 2009 08:50PM

Please ban LOLcat If I see one more of his stupid writings I might have to tell his mom to take away his computer, and dragon ball z dvds and cards

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: June 04, 2009 01:14AM

oh and it would be nice if all the posts by LOLcat were deleted as well.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: I R Serious Cat ()
Date: June 04, 2009 10:03AM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> oh and it would be nice if all the posts by LOLcat
> were deleted as well.
Attachments:
serious_cat.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ban The Meeper ()
Date: June 05, 2009 01:13PM

On general principle.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: June 05, 2009 01:22PM

lol, what a faggot

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ban The Meeper ()
Date: June 05, 2009 01:23PM

lol, what a faggot

Yes you are Meeper, yes you are.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: inkahootz ()
Date: June 05, 2009 01:30PM

Ban The Meeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On general principle.


That's never going to happen.

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: June 05, 2009 01:53PM

Ok, I just banned Meeper. Who else?

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Furfur ()
Date: June 05, 2009 10:56PM

Can we ban Junes? Her statements are ten times more offensive than anything Vince can say.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton Lavey



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 06/06/2009 02:59AM by Furfur.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Dwight. ()
Date: June 05, 2009 11:38PM

nope

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: June 07, 2009 07:19PM

Furfur Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can we ban Junes? Her statements are ten times
> more offensive than anything Vince can say.



only if vince is banned because she is the anti-vince that levels things out. besides, offensiveness isnt listed under the banable offenses.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Vince(1) ()
Date: June 07, 2009 10:28PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i think Vince(1) needs a timeout for bogging down
> threads by uploading the maximum amount of data
> you can as image attachments. this doesnt effect
> me personally but he's attacking other people than
> just me which isnt cool. not everyone has a fast
> internet connection (like if you are using a smart
> phone) so he's punishing unintended targets as
> well as being obnoxious (not his normal obnoxious
> posts).
>
> so please, send vince to his room for his bad
> behavior/tantrums.


What is the definition of "attacking" as used on this board? And who have I "attacked"?

What is the process for being banned?

What is a bannable offence?

Is there a jury...a judge and jury?

Is this a serious thread...or just another way for Grufus to convince others he is in charge?

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Furfur ()
Date: June 07, 2009 10:34PM

Gravis wrote that on May 30....you're just now noticing that?
Attachments:
fail2.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: June 07, 2009 10:48PM

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > i think Vince(1) needs a timeout for bogging
> down
> > threads by uploading the maximum amount of data
> > you can as image attachments. this doesnt
> effect
> > me personally but he's attacking other people
> than
> > just me which isnt cool. not everyone has a
> fast
> > internet connection (like if you are using a
> smart
> > phone) so he's punishing unintended targets as
> > well as being obnoxious (not his normal
> obnoxious
> > posts).
> >
> > so please, send vince to his room for his bad
> > behavior/tantrums.
>
>
> What is the definition of "attacking" as used on
> this board? And who have I "attacked"?
>
> What is the process for being banned?
>
> What is a bannable offence?
>
> Is there a jury...a judge and jury?
>
> Is this a serious thread...or just another way for
> Grufus to convince others he is in charge?

You still seem to be under the misconception that, even though this is in the public domain, it is subject to public domain policies. We use this board at the pleasure of the owner, Cary. He has final say on what does or does not happen. And, he pays for it.

When you upload those huge images, you're mostly attacking the guy that allows you to get on here and post your bullshit hate speech. The rest of us can just click "stop" and scroll down, but his equipment has to host your dumbass pictures.

So knock it the fuck off.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Concerned 4 Fairfax ()
Date: June 15, 2009 11:58PM

Inkahootz


He's going beyond flaming and trolling, even for an "old school regular."

Options: ReplyQuote
s
Posted by: inkahootz ()
Date: June 16, 2009 12:05AM

s

edit by Cary: Account password compromised, disabled by administrator.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/02/2010 12:07AM by inkahootz.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: [YA][ ()
Date: June 16, 2009 12:04PM

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Concerned 4 Fairfax Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Inkahootz

>
>
> I am only doing what was done to me.


That's right. None of this would have ever happened in the first place if you people had just left Inkahootz alone. Can't you all just give the guy a break???!?! Seriously you guys....srsly...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:11AM

i'm recommending Vince(1) be banned, at least temporarily (90 days) because of yesterdays DoS attack. he previously posted obscenely large images and now he's just posting obscenely long posts of entire threads in a single post. same attack different method. oh, his level of personal attacks have gone up significantly, especially with starting threads for the sole purpose of attacking poster Registered Voter.

anyone else agree with me?


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Lurker. ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:15AM

Agreed. If it is Vince really posting the junk 90 day ban.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: SRE ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:17AM

^^^^^
+194,658,134,756,228.73

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ITRADE ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:17AM

Concur.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:22AM

+1

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:42AM

Please.

EDIT: Based on his own postings it would need to be against him and any/all aliases he has used here.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2009 12:54PM by Registered Voter.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Date: December 09, 2009 11:45AM

Yes

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Date: December 09, 2009 12:22PM

agreed

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Voter ()
Date: December 09, 2009 12:41PM

+1

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: graymoose1 ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:09PM

yes

---------------------------------------------------
W.W.S.D. what would Scooby Doo

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: trident and true ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:11PM

who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: blame game ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:01PM


A) Bill Clinton
B) George Bush Jr.
C) Barack hussein obama


vote now! Who gets the majority of the blame for 9/11. Perhaps it can be divided up, 30%-30%-30%?


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: ThePackLeader ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:06PM


A. Slick Willy

President Bush wasn't in office during the entire build-up to it (Which took years), and as much as I despise Obama, I don't see what he has to do with it.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: blame game ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:22PM


ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A. Slick Willy
>
> President Bush wasn't in office during the entire
> build-up to it (Which took years), and as much as
> I despise Obama, I don't see what he has to do
> with it.


good analysis


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Reggie Voter ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:26PM




Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:27PM


A + B

Although ultimately it falls on the assholes who flew the planes into our buildings.

-------------------------------------------------
Well if you said it, obviously it must make sense then.




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/06/2009 07:29PM by Registered Voter.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: blame game ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:28PM


Although, no one should get the blame. By default, we can just blame Bush and the Republicans for everything bad. Failure seems to follow them everywhere.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Frank ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:42PM


Osama Bin Laden.... how are you gonna place blame on a president.. he did not fly any airplanes that hit the WTT ...Idiots.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:48PM


Frank Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Osama Bin Laden.... how are you gonna place blame
> on a president.. he did not fly any airplanes that
> hit the WTT ...Idiots.


+1

I think it's ridiculous, and quite frankly, disgusting, to blame any president for what happened that day. Using a terrorist act as a divisive political issue- EXACTLY what the terrorists want.

It's people who say shit like this that ARE the problem with this country. They're more patriotic to the GOP than they are to America. They're fucking disgraceful and should be ashamed of themselves.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: blame game ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:51PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Frank Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Osama Bin Laden.... how are you gonna place
> blame
> > on a president.. he did not fly any airplanes
> that
> > hit the WTT ...Idiots.
>
>
> +1
>
> I think it's ridiculous, and quite frankly,
> disgusting, to blame any president for what
> happened that day. Using a terrorist act as a
> divisive political issue- EXACTLY what the
> terrorists want.
>
> It's people who say shit like this that ARE the
> problem with this country. They're more patriotic
> to the GOP than they are to America. They're
> fucking disgraceful and should be ashamed of
> themselves.

I have no allegiance to any part. I just put the issues on the table and let WE THE PEOPLE decide whos at fault. BTW, I vote A, B, and C, with the heaviest load on A, a little less on B, and just a few slivers on C. I think Clinton will ultimately be remembered as the one who dropped the ball


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: December 06, 2009 07:58PM


blame game Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think Clinton will ultimately
> be remembered as the one who dropped the ball

George W. Bush will forever bear the legacy of 9-11, whether conservatives like that or not.

But that does not mean he is to blame for a couple of guys sneaking knives onto planes and crashing them. That's ridiculous and it just goes to show you how far removed from reality conservative americans are today by thinking up this blame game shit.

Go to hell, all of you.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Fair fax ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:08PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Go to hell, all of you.

Hey Meep...



Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:10PM


Fair fax Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheMeeper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Go to hell, all of you.
>
> Hey Meep...
>


lol.

I gotta admit, I sorta miss that goofy voice sometimes.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:10PM


No, of course. The Republicans pointed at Bill Clinton and said - "blame him!" correct?

LOL Meep. You act like the Republicans or other folks on that side started the blame game. It is called a deflection - and folks on both sides worked hard to make it happen. Ask Sandy Berger what he was doing destroying records in the archives and why that was so important. It seems that both the Bush and Clinton administrations worked to suppress information important to the investigation - I am guessing in their minds, they both feel they own the issue as far as government failures in dealing with the problem.

Ultimately though, it falls on the terrorists. But keep feeling good about getting in that parting shot to blame Bush in your responses - it makes your indignation all that more believable :)

-------------------------------------------------
Well if you said it, obviously it must make sense then.



Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:19PM


For the record RV, I do not blame Bush in any way. Not at all. Sure, I think he was a failure in many ways, but 9/11 has nothing to do with that. Bush is not to blame for what happened that day.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: PEN15 ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:23PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For the record RV, I do not blame Bush in any way.
> Not at all. Sure, I think he was a failure in
> many ways, but 9/11 has nothing to do with that.
> Bush is not to blame for what happened that day.


He is, however, accountable for all the BS that came after that fateful day.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: truth1 ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:26PM


9/11 was an inside job, the governments official fantasy account has more holes in it than swiss cheese.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:27PM


Well, now we have representatives from all sides lol.

-------------------------------------------------
Well if you said it, obviously it must make sense then.



Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: raunch ()
Date: December 06, 2009 08:52PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For the record RV, I do not blame Bush in any way.
> Not at all. Sure, I think he was a failure in
> many ways, but 9/11 has nothing to do with that.
> Bush is not to blame for what happened that day.


Not saying it was entirely GWB fault but the guy had 11mo. He had access to all the prior knowledge. If he brought in a new team that ignored certain data then, well, there's something to be said about being able to effectively manage the transition team.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: TheMeeper ()
Date: December 06, 2009 09:16PM


I'm not defending Bush's presidency. I just think it is entirely inappropriate, and wrong, to blame Bush for what happened that day. If anything, why not blame the security guards at Dulles and Logan? They're the ones who let those guys onto the airplanes with knives. Maybe we should hunt them down and string them up on lamp posts?

It's all just crazy talk that serves no purpose. To use it as a political liberal vs. conservative issue is simply disgusting.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: J35U5 ()
Date: December 06, 2009 09:21PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> To use it as a political liberal vs. conservative
> issue is simply disgusting.

Very true.


Options: Reply•Quote
Re: who gets the blame for 9/11
Posted by: raunch ()
Date: December 06, 2009 09:30PM


TheMeeper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm not defending Bush's presidency. I just think
> it is entirely inappropriate, and wrong, to blame
> Bush for what happened that day. If anything, why
> not blame the security guards at Dulles and Logan?
> They're the ones who let those guys onto the
> airplanes with knives. Maybe we should hunt them
> down and string them up on lamp posts?
>
> It's all just crazy talk that serves no purpose.
> To use it as a political liberal vs. conservative
> issue is simply disgusting.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:19PM

Hopefully it will happen soon - he is a frickin loon.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:20PM

Yeah. Vince should be banned, at least temporarily.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fan o' Vince ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:21PM

Looks like Vince(1) is PWNING his detractors.

.

pwned Pictures, Images and Photos

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:32PM

Now he's flooding the main forum with gay porn. Why is Cary letting this continue?

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: not cary ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:35PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now he's flooding the main forum with gay porn.
> Why is Cary letting this continue?

Maybe Cary is busy with something else, or maybe he likes gay porn - not that there is anything wrong with that, Who knows.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:48PM

edit by Cary: troll post from banned user removed



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/10/2009 02:58PM by Cary.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Registered Voter ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:51PM

Seriously, who the fuck cares about inkahootz or you.. whoever you are. At least Vince and I just disagree with each other (although he has proven a bit more unstable then previously thought). You all need to take this outing BS and send each other registered mail.

If you can’t model the past, where you know the answer pretty well, how can you model the future? - William Happer Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics Princeton University

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Opus ()
Date: December 09, 2009 01:56PM

Maybe the agreement inkahootz has with that girl is she has lose 200lbs first.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: December 09, 2009 04:09PM

with Vince(1)'s continued posting of DoS posts, I think a six month band would be useful.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/09/2009 04:12PM by Gravis.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: December 09, 2009 04:26PM

I agree with Gravman...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Vince(1) ()
Date: December 09, 2009 05:38PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> with Vince(1)'s continued posting of DoS posts, I
> think a six month band would be useful.


LOL..I wouldnt even know how to do it...Gravis...why so mean to me darling...just because I hoped your Mom died of cancer? I change my mind..you should..you fucking fat ass!

Stop with your false accusations....

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: December 09, 2009 05:44PM

Unfortunately for us, Vince, you can do it even if you don't know what it is.

Quote

A denial-of-service attack (DoS attack) or distributed denial-of-service attack (DDoS attack) is an attempt to make a computer resource unavailable to its intended users. Although the means to carry out, motives for, and targets of a DoS attack may vary, it generally consists of the concerted efforts of a person or people to prevent an Internet site or service from functioning efficiently or at all, temporarily or indefinitely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denial-of-service_attack

I was tempted to paste the whole article, but I just gave a snippet.

Vince(1) Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL..I wouldnt even know how to do
> it...Gravis...why so mean to me darling...just
> because I hoped your Mom died of cancer? I change
> my mind..you should..you fucking fat ass!
>
> Stop with your false accusations....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Night They Drove Ol' FU Down
Posted by: Observer. ()
Date: December 09, 2009 06:04PM

Good-bye FU. It was fun while it lasted.
Harpers_8_11_1877_Destruction_of_the_Uni

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ThePackLeader ()
Date: December 09, 2009 07:05PM

Damn Vince, you've really been going off the deep-end this past week. I think you need to take a voluntary break from FU for a little while, because you seem increasingly frustrated to say the least. Maybe just stay off the site and chill for a few days, go out and hang-out with some friends, visit the bar, whatever suits your fancy.

==================================================================================================
"And if any women or children get their legs torn off, or faces caved in, well, it's tough shit for them." -2LT. Bert Stiles, 505th, 339th (On Berlin Bombardier Mission, 1944).
Attachments:
tropical-island-escape-animated-3d-screensaver-shot5.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Dane Bramage ()
Date: December 09, 2009 08:27PM

ThePackLeader Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Damn Vince, you've really been going off the
> deep-end this past week. I think you need to take
> a voluntary break from FU for a little while,
> because you seem increasingly frustrated to say
> the least. Maybe just stay off the site and chill
> for a few days, go out and hang-out with some
> friends, visit the bar, whatever suits your fancy.

+1

I think you're losing it, dude.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Vince(1) ()
Date: December 09, 2009 11:20PM

Appreciate your concern..but I feel absolutely fine.

Registered Voter...a Big talking coward..big man on FFXU...little man in life.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:07PM

please ban Melon Coli who masquerades an the anon troll with different IP addresses. the latest are 71.241.236.32, 96.241.74.129 and 98.169.102.166

all the posts made by this person are trolls.

one more thing, many posts by this user have been deleted by cary already.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 12/31/2009 04:19PM by Gravis.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: haha ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:11PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> please ban Melon Coli who masquerades an the anon
> troll with different IP addresses. the latest are
> 71.241.236.32 and 71.241.236.32
>
> all the posts made by this person are trolls.


hahaha...fuck off fatty!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fyi ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:15PM

> Gravis Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > please ban Melon Coli who masquerades an the
> anon
> > troll with different IP addresses. the latest
> are
> > 71.241.236.32 and 71.241.236.32

those are the same address.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:18PM

fyi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> those are the same address.


whoops. copy/paste fail. fixed it.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Garvisgamel ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:24PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fyi Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > those are the same address.
>
> whoops. copy/paste fail. fixed it.


now if you could only fix your weight and busted grill issues you'd be set! :)

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:50PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> please ban Melon Coli who masquerades an the anon
> troll with different IP addresses. the latest are
> 71.241.236.32, 96.241.74.129 and 98.169.102.166
>
> all the posts made by this person are trolls.
>
> one more thing, many posts by this user have been
> deleted by cary already.




pwned.jpgBlessed are the murderous.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:50PM

Must... Resist... Urges...

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Waaaaaht??? ()
Date: December 31, 2009 04:54PM

His George Foreman grill is broken?

How does he go on?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Red Winger ()
Date: December 31, 2009 05:35PM

Waaaaaht??? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> His George Foreman grill is broken?
>
> How does he go on?


what will Gravy(s) do now?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Heres One ()
Date: December 31, 2009 08:40PM

Auto- Masturbator

Name says enough

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Auto-Aswerer ()
Date: January 01, 2010 03:22PM

Agreed.

I have been granted a copyright on the "Auto" surname.

Don't worry the letter from my lawyer is in the mail.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Auto~Answerer ()
Date: January 01, 2010 03:24PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Gravis ()
Date: January 17, 2010 04:49PM

Gravis Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> please ban Melon Coli who masquerades an the anon
> troll with different IP addresses. the latest are
> 71.241.236.32, 96.241.74.129 and 98.169.102.166
>
> all the posts made by this person are trolls.
>
> one more thing, many posts by this user have been
> deleted by cary already.

please ban 96.231.37.197 aka Melon Coli/Anonymous Coward/haiku hacker and is mostly just an anon troll.

http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/291835/291945.html#msg-291945
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/291566/292073.html#msg-292073
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/290403/292077.html#msg-292077
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/291566/292104.html#msg-292104
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/291584/292107.html#msg-292107
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292163/292454.html#msg-292454
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292688.html#msg-292688
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292691.html#msg-292691
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292695.html#msg-292695
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292163/292702.html#msg-292702
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292708.html#msg-292708
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292711.html#msg-292711
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292730.html#msg-292730
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292732.html#msg-292732
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/292746.html#msg-292746
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292163/292831.html#msg-292831
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292682/293028.html#msg-293028
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/254616/293031.html#msg-293031
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/163306/293080.html#msg-293080
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/163306/293141.html#msg-293141
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293861.html#msg-293861
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293867.html#msg-293867
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292465/293886.html#msg-293886
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292465/293886.html#msg-293886
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/293015/293893.html#msg-293893
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293896.html#msg-293896
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293905.html#msg-293905
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293910.html#msg-293910
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/293237/293917.html#msg-293917
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292465/293956.html#msg-293956
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/40/292465/293956.html#msg-293956
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/293978/293987.html#msg-293987
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/293978/293988.html#msg-293988
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/293856/293993.html#msg-293993
http://www.fairfaxunderground.com/forum/read/2/293856/293996.html#msg-293996



"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."095042938540

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: January 17, 2010 05:12PM

haiku hacker is Melon Coli? I had higher hopes for him...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: haiku hacker ()
Date: January 17, 2010 05:15PM

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/17/2010 05:18PM by haiku hacker.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: goldy pants ()
Date: January 24, 2010 12:09AM

Prada Denim Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am gone.
>
>
> Fairfax Underground: 1 Prada Denim: 0
>
> Please be aware everyone that Expensive Jeans and
> I are two individuals. I am not responsible for
> his posts.
>
> Unhandled exception:
> 0x80000003body{visibility:hidden} done at request.

so this whiney bitch is eesh? LOL

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: graymoose1 ()
Date: January 24, 2010 01:37PM

Is this you goldy pants?

---------------------------------------------------
W.W.S.D. what would Scooby Doo
Attachments:
golddust[1].jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: January 24, 2010 01:48PM

Holy shit look at that bulge.

(Yes, that was a completely gay comment.)

Blessed are the murderous.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: fucxk ()
Date: January 24, 2010 02:20PM

Let's ban eesh and Registered Voter. They cause so much drama you'd think FU was the National Enquirer.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: kcj9y ()
Date: January 24, 2010 03:57PM

fucxk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Let's ban eesh and Registered Voter. They cause so
> much drama you'd think FU was the National
> Enquirer.

eesh will just say he's leaving, then come back as another screen name after trolling anonymously for a couple months. he did it with Prada Denim, he'll do it again.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Night They Drove Ol' FU Down
Posted by: ft ()
Date: January 24, 2010 03:58PM

Observer. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good-bye FU. It was fun while it lasted.
>


another example of EJ's many farewells

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Night They Drove Ol' FU Down
Posted by: in the know ()
Date: January 24, 2010 04:08PM

ft Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Observer. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Good-bye FU. It was fun while it lasted.
> >
>
>
> another example of EJ's many farewells

eesh and ej are two different people. eesh actually does what people think ej is doing.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Night They Drove Ol' FU Down
Posted by: in the reality we know ()
Date: January 24, 2010 04:14PM

in the know Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ft Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Observer. Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Good-bye FU. It was fun while it lasted.
> > >
> >
> >
> > another example of EJ's many farewells
>
> eesh and ej are two different people.


sure thing...whatever you say, ej.


eesh
> actually does what people think ej is doing.


that's because they are one and the same

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: The Night They Drove Ol' FU Down
Posted by: Harry Tuttle ()
Date: January 24, 2010 05:42PM

ft Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Observer. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Good-bye FU. It was fun while it lasted.
> >
>
>
> another example of EJ's many farewells


Are you trying to get people to take your accusations lightly?

It is highly unlikely that Observer. is Expensive Jeans.

Especially since Cary said Mr. Jeans always posts from the same IP block.

Yours Truly,
Harry Jeans

P.S. I acknowledged my true identity as Expensive Jeans to save you the trouble of posting "gay EJ post" in response to my post.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 24, 2010 06:26PM

Eesh and EJ are two different people.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ban Hammer Request ()
Date: January 25, 2010 10:36AM

It goes without saying, but PLEASE ban Vince(1) for the DOS attacks this morning. It was almost funny the first time; the second time it's DEFCON LEVEL 5 annoying.

Also, if possible, please ban Registered Voter because I think he needs a break from this site for a while to shower, shave, get a haircut and meet new real-life people. Thank you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ban Hammer Indeed ()
Date: January 25, 2010 10:40AM

Ban Hammer Request Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It goes without saying, but PLEASE ban Vince(1)
> for the DOS attacks this morning. It was almost
> funny the first time; the second time it's DEFCON
> LEVEL 5 annoying.
>
> Also, if possible, please ban Registered Voter
> because I think he needs a break from this site
> for a while to shower, shave, get a haircut and
> meet new real-life people. Thank you.

Looks like somebody got their feelings hirt. Speaking of needing a break from the site, if you are this worked up, you might consider one for yourself.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: Ban Hammer Indeed ()
Date: January 25, 2010 10:54AM

Actually, I guess I just admire and love Registered Voter. As a gay conservative, I cannot control my feelings.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: ban this scat loving asshat^^^^ ()
Date: January 25, 2010 10:59AM

I think imposter is ripe for a banning.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: JuJu Fruit ()
Date: January 25, 2010 11:38AM

How about fucktard and ky jelly for pasting that enormous MOM post in several threads today.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Posted by: MrMephisto ()
Date: January 25, 2010 12:49PM

Ban Hammer Request Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It goes without saying, but PLEASE ban Vince(1)
> for the DOS attacks this morning. It was almost
> funny the first time; the second time it's DEFCON
> LEVEL 5 annoying.
>
> Also, if possible, please ban Registered Voter
> because I think he needs a break from this site
> for a while to shower, shave, get a haircut and
> meet new real-life people. Thank you.

Agreed. In terms of douchebaggery, eesh can't hold a candle to Vince.

--------------------------------------------------------------
13 4826 0948 82695 25847. Yes.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: people who deserved to be banned
Date: January 25, 2010 03:43PM

MrMephisto Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ban Hammer Request Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It goes without saying, but PLEASE ban Vince(1)
> > for the DOS attacks this morning. It was
> almost
> > funny the first time; the second time it's
> DEFCON
> > LEVEL 5 annoying.
> >
> > Also, if possible, please ban Registered Voter
> > because I think he needs a break from this site
> > for a while to shower, shave, get a haircut and
> > meet new real-life people. Thank you.
>
> Agreed. In terms of douchebaggery, eesh can't
> hold a candle to Vince.


All thanks to Mr. Washingtone...

Options: ReplyQuote
Pages: Previous12345678910AllNext
Current Page: 6 of 10


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **      **  **     **  **     **  ******** 
    **     **  **  **  ***   ***  **     **     **    
    **     **  **  **  **** ****  **     **     **    
    **     **  **  **  ** *** **  **     **     **    
    **     **  **  **  **     **  **     **     **    
    **     **  **  **  **     **  **     **     **    
    **      ***  ***   **     **   *******      **    
This forum powered by Phorum.