Caps Jihadist Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That game against OTA was yet another very
> difficult game to watch. When it was 2-0, I
> thought they'd score a third and close it out. Did
> anyone see the Ward penalty? If so, can you
> describe it please? I haven't seen the replay but,
> Joe and Craig said it should not have been called.
I shouldn’t have been called, it was a follow through. Here is the rule and an excerpt from a good article on it here…
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/capitals-watch/2013/jan/30/morning-after-analysis-senators-3-capitals-2/
Rule 60 – High-sticking
60.1 High-sticking – A “high stick” is one which is carried above the height of the opponent's shoulders. Players must be in control and responsible for their stick. However, a player is permitted accidental contact on an opponent if the act is committed as a normal windup or follow through of a shooting motion, or accidental contact on the opposing center who is bent over during the course of a face-off. A wild swing at a bouncing puck would not be considered a normal windup or follow through and any contact to an opponent above the height of the shoulders shall be penalized accordingly
Ward clipped Ottawa defenseman Patrick Wiercioch with a follow through on a cycle of the puck in the offensive zone. It was not a shot, so by the letter of the law it should have been a penalty.
But Ward wasn't taking a “wild swing” at a bouncing puck; he slid the puck along, and his follow through struck Wiercioch up high. Officials are not required to speak to reporters after games, something I was reminded of last season when a goal by Brooks Laich was disallowed and Eric Furlatt declined to talk.
NHL spokesman Gary Meagher, when asked to clarify the interpretation of the rule, said 60.1 was what applied: "The final sentence of the rule is applicable here and it is a judgement call that the referee makes when assessing (or not) a penalty."
So it was referee Wes McCauley's judgement.
> I really, really, REALLY don't like
> Ovechkin-Beagle-Crabbe. WTF is that, Coach Oates?
> Maybe he's sending a message to Ovechkin but, if
> so...he hasn't received it.
A lot of people think he’s sending a message but I’m not sure what that message is. Play better or play with 4th line guys?
> Speaking of Gonchar...I will never understand why
> we let that guy go. And for Shoane Morrisonn who
> is long gone and 2 draft picks (whom I'll have to
> research later). Morrisonn's line for the Caps? 5
> seasons, 377 games, 9 goals and 43 assists. I get
> that Gonchar would command a high salary and he'd
> be worth EVERY penny.
Yeah, that’s all on GMGM. He left with Jagr and Konowalchuk as part of the firesale to free up cap space and start the young guns, build from the draft thing.