HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Off-Topic :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Joydeep P ()
Date: November 12, 2012 07:04PM

Interesting article about radical new problems for leaders in Asia. Glad I moved! ;)

http://leondsouza.blogspot.com/2012/11/riots-in-india-sign-of-trouble-ahead.html

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Bobo the Bodo ()
Date: November 12, 2012 07:24PM

Those poor peaceful, tolerant Muslims.

Someone's always causing them trouble wherever they are.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Demographic certainty ()
Date: November 12, 2012 07:31PM

I remember reading an article back in 2007 that predicted by 2015, India and China would be at war due to the fact that both of their populations are becoming mostly male and mostly young and because of rising resource competition.

Looks like they are still on track. Internal unrest will push the government to seek an external threat to redirect all that rage.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: eesh ()
Date: November 12, 2012 07:36PM

India and China going to war would be a good thing. Two less BRICS nations to compete with the United States.


Of course, if India were to fight China, Pakistan would get involved and India would be fighting a war on two fronts.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Yucky24. ()
Date: November 12, 2012 07:36PM

Diversity is strength.

Wait, no, it's not. As India proves.

All of these retards going on and on about about India's supposed upcoming superpower status are fucktards.

IQ matters. And the average IQ of India is a pathetic 85. Everyone thinks Indians are brilliant because India has a ruthless education system where nearly 2 billion people compete to be on top. Those elite Indians then dominate the science and computer courses in Western universities and then Westerners get the false impression that all Indians are that smart.

No. Most Indians are subhuman slaves. Only about 15% of Indians have high-IQs. And that 15% can't carry the other 85%. There's just way, way too many retarded mud people in India.

For that reason alone India won't reach superpower status. China will however totally dwarf America because East Asians have a very high average IQ.

Another reason why China will surpass America and India won't is because China has a very homogeneous population. Being of the same race (mostly), sharing the same language (mostly), and having the same religion (mostly), all add to China's ultra-nationalist xenophobic unity (which despite decades of subversive libtard brainwashing is actually a tremendous national strength).

India in comparison has a massive population of muslimes - the most powerful and dangerous retrograding force in human history. Despite the islamic myth - supported by Western Leftists - pisslam wasn't spread by trade or because the natives were supposedly being oppressed and WELCOMED "liberation" from islamic invaders...

Since Indians were polytheist infidels, muslimes viewed them as subhuman scum. And so they waged an absolutely savage imperialist jihad against India for centuries as they tried to conquer it. Countless millions of Indians were slaughtered.

So, you have a massive population of retard race traitor muslime Indians in India who hate the majority Indian hindu population and are waging a terrorist jihad campaign against their own country because they want muslime independence for Kashmir and they want to ultimately takeover India itself. And because the muslimes were so brutal in their jihad against India, the hindus in India hate the muslimes with the same genocidal passion. Including the Pakistani's who are basically Indian muslime converts and who also have nuclear weapons.

Yeah... that's definitely going to end well...

And on top of all that there's also a grossly underreported massive militant Marxist (Democrat) insurgency in India who control large swaths of India...

India's economy will continue to grow and their standards of living will slowly increase, and maybe they'll even surpass our national GDP someday. But they'll NEVER surpass our per capita GDP. Too many brown Leftist dumbfucks there and way too much ethnic, religious strife.

India will always be a total mess.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Ito ()
Date: November 12, 2012 08:14PM

Yucky24. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> India will always be a total mess.

Yucky, I'm sorry, but sometimes you really shouldn't comment on stuff you have absolutely no idea about.

"China has a very homogeneous population." -- full of shit

"Since Indians were polytheist infidels, muslimes viewed them as subhuman scum." When? Have you studied any Indian history? Do you have any idea what you are talking about?

"And so they waged an absolutely savage imperialist jihad against India for centuries as they tried to conquer it. Countless millions of Indians were slaughtered."

--- More complete and utter hogwash.

"And on top of all that there's also a grossly underreported massive militant Marxist (Democrat) insurgency in India who control large swaths of India..."

What is your definition of "large swaths of India"? And how many people do you think are in this "massive militant Marxist (Democrat) insurgency"?

You might as well have spread your cheeks and shit all over your keyboard because pretty much of what you wrote is total nonsense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: They all look the same ()
Date: November 12, 2012 08:59PM

Ito Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yucky24. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> "China has a very homogeneous population." -- full
> of shit

Yucky only knows about the chinese person at the local takeout. Besides, they all look alike, anyway. One slanty-eyed dark-haired person looks like every other. Plus they're short.


Mongols, Uighurs, Tatars, etc.

They are even less homogeneous than Europeans:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_China

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Ito ()
Date: November 12, 2012 09:15PM

If you look at the numbers on that page, it is true that Han Chinese dominate the ethnic mix... 91% are Han.

What gives a clue as to homogeneous the population is can be found on this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Chinese_subgroups

Particularly splitting up the dialects of the main group (Mandarin) and you really start to see how different each area of China is.

Madarin_in_Chinese_Mainland_EN.PNG

Cultural differences between each region are quite large as well. If we have a diverse population out of 320 million here in the U.S., you can only imagine how diverse a country like China is.

Mao's Cultural Revolution was an attempt to homogenize the population and perhaps it can be said that the Communists succeeded to a great degree. However, its difficult to erase 5,000 years of culture in one or two generations.

India is another subject altogether and another 5,000 years of history behind what makes India tick.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Yucky24. ()
Date: November 12, 2012 10:38PM

I actually had a poster on my wall as a kid with all of the various ethnic groups in China.

And unlike you, I've actually studied China's history from the ancient past up to the modern day and I've studied their demographics (I like to understand my enemy...)

Han Chinese are about 95% of the population of China last time I checked a few years ago.

All of the other minorities in China are miniscule in comparison, segregated and have virtually no real power in China and therefore can't cause any major national disruption.

And if they tried, the communist Chinese government would ruthlessly crush them without mercy.

So yeah, all of this wishful thinking going on in the West with talk of China being "extremely fragile" and on the verge of a democratic revolution is complete nonsense.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: More violence ahead for India?
Posted by: Ito ()
Date: November 12, 2012 11:15PM

Having a poster on your wall of New Kids on the Block doesn't make you a good singer or dancer.

You're not old enough to remember Tiananmen Square probably. The Chinese economy has been booming largely because of the economic reforms of Deng Xiaoping, but everything is not hunky-dory beneath the surface. If the Chinese economy ever falters, who knows what will happen. You have to understand that there is an amazing diversity in a population of 1.7 billion people beyond whether they are "ethnic Han". This is a country with a population almost 6 times more than the U.S.

Ethnic differences in the Chinese population are irrelevant. If you have never been to China or India or lived in a Third World country, you have no way of "understanding your enemy" as you say. You have no perspective because you have never known unrest in your lifetime. You have never wanted for anything in your cushy little life here in the U.S. where a crisis is that cable TV is out for an hour or that the power once went out for a day because of a storm.

You have no concept of what a dramatic change has come over China even over the past decade -- and how that change is mostly only along the coast. You are used to clean water, clean air, safe food, a public safety net, a legal system where you have rights -- a minimum wage.

When you have a despotic political regime where people cannot express or have redress for their grievances, it is only a matter of time before those grievances become the basis for widespread unrest. For the longest time it looked like the Soviet Union was a monolith that would never fall... It did and it did fall spectacularly.

Conversely, in India, where their political system seems chaotic and the populace extremely diverse, it is because of their democratic system that is noisy and boisterous that grievances at least have a chance to be redressed and the will of the people can be heard. Political discourse in India is extremely lively and it is conducted in over 20 languages.

Both of these places are incredibly poor and life is hard for the majority of the people. Ideologies and theory do not drive their politics as much as mundane everyday social and economic issues.

You have these fantasies of "mud people" and "East Asians" that just have no basis in reality. You spend all your time preaching these theories of yours even though you have never been to any of these places, you don't speak any of the languages and you have very little understanding of what these countries are like beyond an occasional video you have seen or a book you have read.

Its a big world out there and you would be very surprised to see what it is really like if you ever went out and experienced it.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********   **    **  **    **  ********   **        
 **     **  ***   **  **   **   **     **  **    **  
 **     **  ****  **  **  **    **     **  **    **  
 **     **  ** ** **  *****     ********   **    **  
 **     **  **  ****  **  **    **         ********* 
 **     **  **   ***  **   **   **               **  
 ********   **    **  **    **  **               **  
This forum powered by Phorum.