HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Loudoun :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Town council sinks into Chesapeake Bay issues
Posted by: Enviro Man! ()
Date: May 13, 2011 06:23AM

Town council sinks into Chesapeake Bay issues
Tue., May. 10 | 04:13 PM
http://www.loudountimes.com/index.php/news/article/town_council_sinks_into_chesapeake_bay_issues213/

Leesburg will do their part in cleaning up the mess that Virginia and other neighboring states have created in the Chesapeake Bay. Leesburg has two years to reduce pollution in the bay.

Leesburg will do their part in cleaning up the mess that Virginia and other neighboring states have created in the Chesapeake Bay. Leesburg has two years to reduce pollution in the bay.

The May 9 Town Council meeting was flooded with funding options to address the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load or TMDL, a “pollution diet” aimed at reducing pollution in the bay. This reduction is mandated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and applies to the entirety of the Commonwealth.

David Bulova, senior environmental planner for AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc. presented plans and requirements to council on what needs to be done for the Total Maximum Daily Load requirements.

In November 2010, Virginia submitted a revised plan to the EPA, and now officials have until July of 2013 to start with phase two of the plan. The TDML “diet” requires three five-year permit cycles.

The next cycle will require a 5 percent reduction of phosphorous, nitrogen, and sediment in the bay, and plans must begin by July 2013. The second period calls for an additional 30 percent reduction, totaling 35 percent, while the third calls for the remaining reduction adding up to 100 percent.

According to Bulova, the town would need to develop scenarios to meet the full reduction within the first permit cycle. Also, he said they would need to identify and implement specific controls to meet that 5 percent reduction.

“Right now under the permit, you’re not required to do anything new,” Bulova said. “You’re not required until July of 2013.”

Bulova guarenteed the council that when July of 2013, they will need to do something to meet the permit requirements.

At the end of the first cycle, the town must submit a conceptual plan for the next cycle of 35 percent reduction.

Some advantages that the Town of Leesburg has over other jurisdictions is that they have a street sweeping program that is eligible for credit.

The Chesapeake Research Consortium are currently developing a methodology to assign local pollutant reduction allocations, meaning, they are still determining how the town will be credited for reductions.

During their first cycle, the town also needs to identify and implement specific controls to meet the 5 percent reduction. The town must also demonstrate the ability to fund chosen controls, according to Bulova.

Another Leesburg advantage is that there are several existing flood control facilities that have the potential to be modified for water quality control at a smaller price, according to Bulova.

Another good thing that Loudoun County and Leesburg have, according to Bulova is that The fact that both Loudoun and Leesburg maintain control over most of the roads will pay off in the long run accordign to Bulova. Neighboring Fairfax County has most of their roads run by the Virginia Department of Transportation.

Some challenges Bulova pointed out is that street sweeping doesn’t get a lot of credit, and to qualify, the town may need to increase the frequencies of them.

He also said, additional nutrient management planning will be needed, but it won’t be counted toward the reductions needed.

“The model already assumes you are going to do it, so you don’t get any credit for it,” Bulova said.
There will be no credit towards the town for any reductions placed before July 1, 2009, Bulova said.

One potential control strategy, according to Bulova is to take credit for street sweeping, install tree box filters, convert 40 percent of existing dry ponds to control for water quality and install bio-retention, like rain gardens. These installations would help with excess runoff that carries sediments to the bay.

The control strategy needs to cover 922 acres. The question is where those acres would come from. According to Leesburg Town Manager, John Wells, the acres can come from a variety of locations including easements presented to the town or various areas within the town, but need to cover that acreage by 2018.

Bulova estimated that over the 15 years of these reductions—which includes the acreage coverage provided in the control strategy—may cost roughly $34 million. But, it could cost more or less, depending on how things are done, according to Wells.

Wells also asked for residents not to focus on the total dollar amount just yet. It’s just a scenario, he said, and the town is just now in the midst of putting a plan together.
Bulova said the biggest TMDL challenge facing Leesburg is with stormwater.

“Your problem is primarily in the velocity of stormwater,” Bulova said. “Most of the impacts are on downstreams [because of stormwater].”

One method of funding stormwater improvements would be using a utility fee much like paying for sewer and water services, which has been done in Rockville, Md. By using a utility fee, instead of a real estate tax approach would be cheaper by almost $4,000.

But, Bulova said the first thing the town should do is inform the public.

“You need to involve your community,” Bulova said. “The first thing people are going to ask is, ‘why are we doing this?’ You need to inform the public before the funding process [begins].”

Bulova outlined his proposal: the town should create a communications plan, an advisory board and policy papers. He also said the town should define the problems and issues, have program development and create funding options and recommendations.

“We need to determine the education process and get started on this,” Council member Katie Hammler said. “We need to determine how to lobby other types of goverment if necessary. We need to start doing this now, and put a system in place.”

The majority of council members seemed to be on board with the project and getting the public informed.

“My initial reaction is to get council votes and then get a plan, and lay out a broader game plan,” Wells said. “We also need to understand what we will get credit for and what we won’t. Before we vote, I think there’s further guidance [needed] to put the framework out for various groups. The purpose of the night was what are the questions ... now we need to focus on how do we get the answers.”

“The staff would like to bring a couple options for a game plan in engaging community groups to take that message out to implement this,” Wells said.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
  *******   **      **  ********   **    **  **     ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **   **  **   **     ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **     **    ****    **     ** 
  ********  **  **  **  ********      **     ********* 
        **  **  **  **  **            **     **     ** 
 **     **  **  **  **  **            **     **     ** 
  *******    ***  ***   **            **     **     ** 
This forum powered by Phorum.