FAIRFAX, Va., Jan. 24, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- This week, Virginia State Senator Dick Black likened legal abortion to the suffering of victims of Nazi Germany and Auschwitz. The Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) of Greater Washington condemns this disturbing trend among elected officials and other public leaders to utilize the Holocaust as a reference point for their personal political agendas. The abuse of Holocaust imagery to score political points is outrageous and offensive to the millions of men, women and children who were brutalized and murdered during the Holocaust and to the millions of soldiers and citizens who sacrificed to defeat the Nazi regime. We call on Senator Black to retract this statement and apologize and urge our elected officials to adhere to standards of decency and civility in their public debates, to avoid inflaming passions with offensive and blatantly manipulative references and to chose substantive and relevant points in supporting their arguments for public policy.


SOURCE Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington


PR Newswire (http://s.tt/1yUVE)

I would think the JCRC would align itself with the systematic slaughter of human beings. Mr. Black made a comment from his personal beliefs, not so much a political statement.
It was the unnamed author of the article, writing on behalf of the JCRC who was making the political statement.
Additionally, the Jewish men and women caught up in the terrible Nazi holocaust at least had their opportunities to defend themselves and fight for their lives and the lives of their loved ones, an opportunity an unborn baby does not have.
And the JCRC demands a retraction?? So to "return to the standards of decency and civility" by wretching human babys from the womb and killing them?
The world is upside down...

SMS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
" by
> wretching human babys from the womb and killing
> them?
> The world is upside down...



It is "Babies," and your knowledge of history is weak and myopic.



I will bet you are a White man.

"get it right" corrects my spelling, yet fails to comment on the substance of the article.
He then adds personal insults and to cap it all off, throws race into the discussion...humm?
Shouldn't you be home watching Jerry Springer?

You are a White male, correct?

Well, "get it right" got it wrong again...now back to the topic tough guy.

Do you have any comments on the Jews being able to fight for themselves, yet unborn babies do not?

SMS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I would think the JCRC would align itself with the
> systematic slaughter of human beings. Mr. Black
> made a comment from his personal beliefs, not so
> much a political statement.
> It was the unnamed author of the article, writing
> on behalf of the JCRC who was making the political
> statement.
> Additionally, the Jewish men and women caught up
> in the terrible Nazi holocaust at least had their
> opportunities to defend themselves and fight for
> their lives and the lives of their loved ones, an
> opportunity an unborn baby does not have.
> And the JCRC demands a retraction?? So to "return
> to the standards of decency and civility" by
> wretching human babys from the womb and killing
> them?
> The world is upside down...

The Poles, Czechs, French, Belgians, Dutch, Danes, Finns, and Norwegians had lots of guns, you dummkopf.

Now try to stay focused...we are not talking about guns here.
We all know that the Nazi's had guns and the Jews did not. Still following me, tough guy?

But when there are 300 jewish men and woman vs 10 German guards and the Jews know they are being marched to their deaths, wouldn't you (yes even you) think that once in a while you would see film of a prisoner revolt?

Yet you still haven't addressed my question about unborn babies not being able to defend themselves at all. I can actually understand Dick Blacks comparison.

However, your inability to explain your point of view speaks volumes.


Now after you spell check my post, go ahead and respond with more name calling and insults...

SMS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Now try to stay focused...we are not talking about
> guns here.
> We all know that the Nazi's had guns and the Jews
> did not. Still following me, tough guy?
>
> But when there are 300 jewish men and woman vs 10
> German guards and the Jews know they are being
> marched to their deaths, wouldn't you (yes even
> you) think that once in a while you would see film
> of a prisoner revolt?
>
> Yet you still haven't addressed my question about
> unborn babies not being able to defend themselves
> at all. I can actually understand Dick Blacks
> comparison.
>
> However, your inability to explain your point of
> view speaks volumes.
>
>
> Now after you spell check my post, go ahead and
> respond with more name calling and insults...


The prisoners were being starved, coupled that with forced labor. They weren't healthy enough to do much of a prison revolt.

God breathes life into the nostril, without a formed nostril to breath into, it is not a human.

Well now, you sure cleared things up for me...

You do realize that you still haven't answered my question, right?

Tell me, how can someone do forced LABOR yet not be healthy enough to fight back, even just a little?

An unborn baby cannot fight back at all, and if God breathes life into a nostril (as you say), who are we to stick a spike through the skull to end that life, be it still within the womb or in a prisoner of war camp?
So do you see now that Dick Blacks analogy is accurate?
I'm guessing that you still won't make the connection.

I should have listened to some good advice given to me many years ago..."never argue with an idiot!"

You assume it is a life; science has made no such conclusion.