I think 300+ is too low of a population for a country as big as the US. Look at states like Idaho, Utah, and Alaska with only few million people while similar sized countries have 20+ million or more. Either import more people into the country or have more babies, cuz 300 million is not much when you look at India and China. Just my thought.

we just imported 20 million latinos.

give them some time would you?

Its nice to know that Timothy Leary is still alive and in Fairfax. Whats next?
Hi-rise condo's on the median strips of I-66? Guess you havent been out much
lately, but much of the states you mention are uninhabitable.

really?

if people live without running water and a/c, I think they could survive Ohio LOL

Uninhabitable you say - well look at the much of East, and North Africa. Those are very uninhabitable places but somehow manage to have people living in it and in large numbers too. The problem as i see it is, is the population is spread around in a very large area. You don't have in much of the world. People need to live near large city centers and surrounding areas. Look at London, Tokyo, Shangai, Cairo, Hong Kong, Mexico City. These cities 10 million or more living in it, and even some more living around it. DC has something like half a million people living in it, what is that? It can support upto 5-7 million living in its city limits. I am saying if people in the U.S lived near big metropolis areas, it would mean a lot of benefits (which i can't remember on top of my head now). The U.S could support a population of up to 700 million people.

off-topic.


"the wisdom of the wise will perish, the intelligence of the intelligent will vanish."

Gee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think 300+ is too low of a population for a
> country as big as the US. Look at states like
> Idaho, Utah, and Alaska with only few million
> people while similar sized countries have 20+
> million or more. Either import more people into
> the country or have more babies, cuz 300 million
> is not much when you look at India and China. Just
> my thought.

You're stupid.

"Gee" you are retarded. I hope that was not a serious post. We dont want every state to be as jam packed as indonesia or india, they are poor as effff cuz they dont have enough farmland and other resources to support the population. not to mention problems with pollution, traffic, overcrowded schools etc.

Our population numbers are artificially low because affluent white people in the South Lakes district do not fill out the school census forms because they are ashamed that their base school is so ghetto.

Gee Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Uninhabitable you say - well look at the much of
> East, and North Africa. Those are very
> uninhabitable places but somehow manage to have
> people living in it and in large numbers too. The
> problem as i see it is, is the population is
> spread around in a very large area. You don't have
> in much of the world.

They also all have AIDS. coincidence?