Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Republican Security Advisers Tied to $40 Billion in Contracts
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-23/republican-security-advisers-tied-to-40-billion-in-contracts.html
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
A Voter
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:31PM
Republican Security Advisers Tied to $40 Billion in Contracts
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-23/republican-security-advisers-tied-to-40-billion-in-contracts.html
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
No goats
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:39PM
I am kind of glad Newt and Santorum are not options.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
WashingTone-Locian
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:40PM
Romney has the nomination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://bible.cc/1_corinthians/13-11.htm
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Awake?
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:45PM
WashingTone-Locian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Romney has the nomination.
Looks like reality hit someone in the face this morning!
-------------------------------------------------------
> Romney has the nomination.
Looks like reality hit someone in the face this morning!
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no contest
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:50PM
Romney will take Va, and will most likely get more than the 50 percent necessary to get all of the VA delegates.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
No goats
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:51PM
I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no contest
()
Date: March 05, 2012 01:55PM
No goats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
Probably Rubio if he wants the job
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
Probably Rubio if he wants the job
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
A Voter
()
Date: March 05, 2012 03:29PM
no contest Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No goats Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
>
>
> Probably Rubio if he wants the job
Rubio who is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible?
Obama's trashed the Constitution. I guess Romney can continue if he's fortunate enough to get the nomination. Enjoy Obama Lite WashingTone-Locian. Romney = Obama
-------------------------------------------------------
> No goats Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
>
>
> Probably Rubio if he wants the job
Rubio who is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible?
Obama's trashed the Constitution. I guess Romney can continue if he's fortunate enough to get the nomination. Enjoy Obama Lite WashingTone-Locian. Romney = Obama
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Floriduh
()
Date: March 05, 2012 03:48PM
A Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no contest Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No goats Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
> >
> >
> > Probably Rubio if he wants the job
>
> Rubio who is not a natural born citizen and
> therefore ineligible?
Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not consider that part of the United States?
-------------------------------------------------------
> no contest Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No goats Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > I wonder who Romney will pick as veep.
> >
> >
> > Probably Rubio if he wants the job
>
> Rubio who is not a natural born citizen and
> therefore ineligible?
Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not consider that part of the United States?
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
A Voter
()
Date: March 05, 2012 04:18PM
Floriduh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> consider that part of the United States?
>
"Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May 1971 per National Archives data. His father applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and international law. Being a dual citizen at birth, Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States”.
U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last sentence: “But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> consider that part of the United States?
>
"Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May 1971 per National Archives data. His father applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and international law. Being a dual citizen at birth, Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States”.
U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last sentence: “But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.”
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Floriduh
()
Date: March 05, 2012 04:21PM
A Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Floriduh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> > consider that part of the United States?
> >
>
> "Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a
> naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May
> 1971 per National Archives data. His father
> applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco
> Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for
> President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed
> Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under
> Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and
> international law. Being a dual citizen at birth,
> Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of
> the United States”.
>
> U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person
> except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
> United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
> Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
> President; neither shall any person be eligible to
> that Office who shall not have attained to the Age
> of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a
> Resident within the United States.
>
> U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last
> sentence: “But no person constitutionally
> ineligible to the office of President shall be
> eligible to that of Vice-President of the United
> States.”
First, Cuban law is irrelevent on US soil. Second, please define the term "natural born Citizen."
-------------------------------------------------------
> Floriduh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> > consider that part of the United States?
> >
>
> "Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a
> naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May
> 1971 per National Archives data. His father
> applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco
> Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for
> President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed
> Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under
> Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and
> international law. Being a dual citizen at birth,
> Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of
> the United States”.
>
> U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person
> except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
> United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
> Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
> President; neither shall any person be eligible to
> that Office who shall not have attained to the Age
> of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a
> Resident within the United States.
>
> U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last
> sentence: “But no person constitutionally
> ineligible to the office of President shall be
> eligible to that of Vice-President of the United
> States.”
First, Cuban law is irrelevent on US soil. Second, please define the term "natural born Citizen."
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
No goats
()
Date: March 05, 2012 04:24PM
"Rubio who is not a natural born citizen and therefore ineligible?"
That would be hilarious if the DNC questions this as much as they do the Obama citizenship thing.
I never could understand the focus on that. There is so much more concrete policy decisions and statments of fact out there to cause me to not vote for Obozo.
That would be hilarious if the DNC questions this as much as they do the Obama citizenship thing.
I never could understand the focus on that. There is so much more concrete policy decisions and statments of fact out there to cause me to not vote for Obozo.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
strategery
()
Date: March 05, 2012 04:27PM
No goats Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I never could understand the focus on that. There
> is so much more concrete policy decisions and
> statments of fact out there to cause me to not
> vote for Obozo.
Exactly, but this is what the DNC and the Obama administration love talking about. They hope this drags out even longer. The more they can deal with this nonsense, the less they have to deal with explaining their crappy handling of the economy.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I never could understand the focus on that. There
> is so much more concrete policy decisions and
> statments of fact out there to cause me to not
> vote for Obozo.
Exactly, but this is what the DNC and the Obama administration love talking about. They hope this drags out even longer. The more they can deal with this nonsense, the less they have to deal with explaining their crappy handling of the economy.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Gunrunner
()
Date: March 05, 2012 05:16PM
I'm voting for Ron Paul.Thanks for reminding me that the primary is tomorrow.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no contest
()
Date: March 05, 2012 06:20PM
A Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Floriduh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> > consider that part of the United States?
> >
>
> "Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a
> naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May
> 1971 per National Archives data. His father
> applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco
> Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for
> President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed
> Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under
> Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and
> international law. Being a dual citizen at birth,
> Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of
> the United States”.
>
> U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person
> except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
> United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
> Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
> President; neither shall any person be eligible to
> that Office who shall not have attained to the Age
> of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a
> Resident within the United States.
>
> U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last
> sentence: “But no person constitutionally
> ineligible to the office of President shall be
> eligible to that of Vice-President of the United
> States.”
Anyone born in the US is a natural born citizen it doesnt matter about their parents. Obamas father isnt a citizen. There would be no issues with Rubio running
-------------------------------------------------------
> Floriduh Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> >
> > Umm, he was born in Miami, FL. Do you not
> > consider that part of the United States?
> >
>
> "Senator Marco Rubio’s father was not a
> naturalized citizen when Marco was born in May
> 1971 per National Archives data. His father
> applied for naturalization in Sep 1975. Marco
> Rubio not constitutionally eligible to run for
> President or VP. Thus Marco’s father passed
> Cuban citizenship at birth to Marco Rubio under
> Cuban law, U.S. law, natural law, and
> international law. Being a dual citizen at birth,
> Marco Rubio is NOT a “natural born Citizen of
> the United States”.
>
> U.S. Constitution Article II Section 1: No Person
> except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the
> United States, at the time of the Adoption of this
> Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of
> President; neither shall any person be eligible to
> that Office who shall not have attained to the Age
> of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a
> Resident within the United States.
>
> U.S. Constitution’s 12th Amendment – last
> sentence: “But no person constitutionally
> ineligible to the office of President shall be
> eligible to that of Vice-President of the United
> States.”
Anyone born in the US is a natural born citizen it doesnt matter about their parents. Obamas father isnt a citizen. There would be no issues with Rubio running
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Two Feet In The Grave
()
Date: March 05, 2012 08:03PM
Rubio was born in Miami. That makes him a natural-born citizen. Period. End of story.
As for whether Rubio should consider the VP slot--if I were any self-respecting Republican, I'd run as fast as I could from being on the ticket.
Anyone here old enough to remember the 1972 presidential campaign: Nixon versus McGovern? The Democratic primaries had some decent candidates (Hubert Humphrey, Ed Muskie), but also had some who could have competed with the likes of Herman Cain and Rick Perry. Remember George Wallace? Wilbur Mills (and the Fanne Fox, the Argentinian Firecracker)? Wayne Hays (and Elizabeth Ray)? Ted Kennedy (and Mary Jo Kopekne)? And "Unpledged," who in the primaries got 19,533 votes. That was more than Ted Kennedy, Vance Harke, or Patsy Mink.
So McGovern gets the nomination and selects as his VP Thomas Eagleton, who--it was then revealed--had received shock therapy. So McGovern tossed Eagleton overboard and selected Sargent Shriver (making the Kennedy connection). Nixon won in a landslide--60.7% of the vote. McGovern carried just Massachusetts (I guess Shriver did help!) and D.C.
Point is: The 1972 Democrats were doomed from the start. And--regardless of my political leanings--the 2012 Republicans are equally doomed. Rubio would be smart to stay as far away from this impending disaster as he can.
Attachments:
As for whether Rubio should consider the VP slot--if I were any self-respecting Republican, I'd run as fast as I could from being on the ticket.
Anyone here old enough to remember the 1972 presidential campaign: Nixon versus McGovern? The Democratic primaries had some decent candidates (Hubert Humphrey, Ed Muskie), but also had some who could have competed with the likes of Herman Cain and Rick Perry. Remember George Wallace? Wilbur Mills (and the Fanne Fox, the Argentinian Firecracker)? Wayne Hays (and Elizabeth Ray)? Ted Kennedy (and Mary Jo Kopekne)? And "Unpledged," who in the primaries got 19,533 votes. That was more than Ted Kennedy, Vance Harke, or Patsy Mink.
So McGovern gets the nomination and selects as his VP Thomas Eagleton, who--it was then revealed--had received shock therapy. So McGovern tossed Eagleton overboard and selected Sargent Shriver (making the Kennedy connection). Nixon won in a landslide--60.7% of the vote. McGovern carried just Massachusetts (I guess Shriver did help!) and D.C.
Point is: The 1972 Democrats were doomed from the start. And--regardless of my political leanings--the 2012 Republicans are equally doomed. Rubio would be smart to stay as far away from this impending disaster as he can.
Attachments:
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no contest
()
Date: March 05, 2012 08:51PM
Two Feet In The Grave Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rubio was born in Miami. That makes him a
> natural-born citizen. Period. End of story.
>
> As for whether Rubio should consider the VP
> slot--if I were any self-respecting Republican,
> I'd run as fast as I could from being on the
> ticket.
>
> Anyone here old enough to remember the 1972
> presidential campaign: Nixon versus McGovern? The
> Democratic primaries had some decent candidates
> (Hubert Humphrey, Ed Muskie), but also had some
> who could have competed with the likes of Herman
> Cain and Rick Perry. Remember George Wallace?
> Wilbur Mills (and the Fanne Fox, the Argentinian
> Firecracker)? Wayne Hays (and Elizabeth Ray)? Ted
> Kennedy (and Mary Jo Kopekne)? And "Unpledged,"
> who in the primaries got 19,533 votes. That was
> more than Ted Kennedy, Vance Harke, or Patsy
> Mink.
>
> So McGovern gets the nomination and selects as his
> VP Thomas Eagleton, who--it was then revealed--had
> received shock therapy. So McGovern tossed
> Eagleton overboard and selected Sargent Shriver
> (making the Kennedy connection). Nixon won in a
> landslide--60.7% of the vote. McGovern carried
> just Massachusetts (I guess Shriver did help!) and
> D.C.
>
> Point is: The 1972 Democrats were doomed from the
> start. And--regardless of my political
> leanings--the 2012 Republicans are equally doomed.
> Rubio would be smart to stay as far away from this
> impending disaster as he can.
Christie Rubio in any order would have almost been assured a victory. Regardless of who wins in november it wont be a Mcgovern or Mondale blowout, its gonna be a close race barring a bad VP choice. Rubio is a guy with appeal who could be a game changer if he wanted to be. Fla is a key state in the election that he would help a lot in. I could see him doing it if Romney wins the nomination and saying thanks but no thanks if he doesnt
Well there is one way it could get ugly and that is if Paul runs as a 3rd party guy. But even then he has some die hard supporters on both sides and im not so sure it wouldnt hurt Obama almost as much as the GOP in that instance.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rubio was born in Miami. That makes him a
> natural-born citizen. Period. End of story.
>
> As for whether Rubio should consider the VP
> slot--if I were any self-respecting Republican,
> I'd run as fast as I could from being on the
> ticket.
>
> Anyone here old enough to remember the 1972
> presidential campaign: Nixon versus McGovern? The
> Democratic primaries had some decent candidates
> (Hubert Humphrey, Ed Muskie), but also had some
> who could have competed with the likes of Herman
> Cain and Rick Perry. Remember George Wallace?
> Wilbur Mills (and the Fanne Fox, the Argentinian
> Firecracker)? Wayne Hays (and Elizabeth Ray)? Ted
> Kennedy (and Mary Jo Kopekne)? And "Unpledged,"
> who in the primaries got 19,533 votes. That was
> more than Ted Kennedy, Vance Harke, or Patsy
> Mink.
>
> So McGovern gets the nomination and selects as his
> VP Thomas Eagleton, who--it was then revealed--had
> received shock therapy. So McGovern tossed
> Eagleton overboard and selected Sargent Shriver
> (making the Kennedy connection). Nixon won in a
> landslide--60.7% of the vote. McGovern carried
> just Massachusetts (I guess Shriver did help!) and
> D.C.
>
> Point is: The 1972 Democrats were doomed from the
> start. And--regardless of my political
> leanings--the 2012 Republicans are equally doomed.
> Rubio would be smart to stay as far away from this
> impending disaster as he can.
Christie Rubio in any order would have almost been assured a victory. Regardless of who wins in november it wont be a Mcgovern or Mondale blowout, its gonna be a close race barring a bad VP choice. Rubio is a guy with appeal who could be a game changer if he wanted to be. Fla is a key state in the election that he would help a lot in. I could see him doing it if Romney wins the nomination and saying thanks but no thanks if he doesnt
Well there is one way it could get ugly and that is if Paul runs as a 3rd party guy. But even then he has some die hard supporters on both sides and im not so sure it wouldnt hurt Obama almost as much as the GOP in that instance.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Taco Flavored Kisses
()
Date: March 05, 2012 08:57PM
Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does Rubio bring to the table? I see him more of a Sarah Palin part 2.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
I have to say
()
Date: March 05, 2012 09:01PM
I hate the idea of four more years of Obamas tax and spend entitlements but the Republican field is a poor choice. I understand Romney is rich but he must have gotten it by luck or inherited it because he doesnt seem all that bright.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
fuck obama
()
Date: March 05, 2012 10:48PM
Don't you pay attention to politics at all? Paul hasnt been attacking Romney, because romney promised to make ron's son, Rand, his veep
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no chance
()
Date: March 05, 2012 11:06PM
Taco Flavored Kisses Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does Rubio
> bring to the table? I see him more of a Sarah
> Palin part 2.
Its not even worth trying to explain it if you really are that uninformed or that partisan
-------------------------------------------------------
> Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does Rubio
> bring to the table? I see him more of a Sarah
> Palin part 2.
Its not even worth trying to explain it if you really are that uninformed or that partisan
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
A Voter
()
Date: March 06, 2012 02:49AM
fuck obama Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul hasnt been attacking Romney, because romney
> promised to make ron's son, Rand, his veep
>
That's nonsense. There are no such plans. That rumor has been dispelled by both Ron Paul and Rand Paul.
Turn off Fox News propaganda channel and find some real news.
---------------------------------------------------------
A vote for Romney, who will not beat Obama without Ron Paul's supporters, will ensure 4 more years of Obama.
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Paul hasnt been attacking Romney, because romney
> promised to make ron's son, Rand, his veep
>
That's nonsense. There are no such plans. That rumor has been dispelled by both Ron Paul and Rand Paul.
Turn off Fox News propaganda channel and find some real news.
---------------------------------------------------------
A vote for Romney, who will not beat Obama without Ron Paul's supporters, will ensure 4 more years of Obama.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Hennifer Lopez
()
Date: March 06, 2012 05:34AM
no chance Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taco Flavored Kisses Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does Rubio
> > bring to the table? I see him more of a Sarah
> > Palin part 2.
>
>
> Its not even worth trying to explain it if you
> really are that uninformed or that partisan
Which means you can't answer the question. I wonder if he can see Cuba from his front porch?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taco Flavored Kisses Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does Rubio
> > bring to the table? I see him more of a Sarah
> > Palin part 2.
>
>
> Its not even worth trying to explain it if you
> really are that uninformed or that partisan
Which means you can't answer the question. I wonder if he can see Cuba from his front porch?
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
dicksh
()
Date: March 06, 2012 06:38AM
Yes 4 more years of Obama, the thinking persons president, no more republican transvaginal probers, the only way they see the inside of a vag.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Lloydster
()
Date: March 06, 2012 08:37AM
I want to see Obama for another 4 years. I did vote in the GOP primary since I am an Independant though. I voted for Paul.
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
I could be wrong but I'm right 99% of the time
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no chance
()
Date: March 06, 2012 11:42AM
Hennifer Lopez Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> no chance Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Taco Flavored Kisses Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does
> Rubio
> > > bring to the table? I see him more of a
> Sarah
> > > Palin part 2.
> >
> >
> > Its not even worth trying to explain it if you
> > really are that uninformed or that partisan
>
>
> Which means you can't answer the question. I
> wonder if he can see Cuba from his front porch?
No it means your a partisan hack if all you think Rubio is is Hispanic.
I like your attempted Sarah Palin joke, but once again you are clueless. Sarah Palin never said that, Tina Faye said it on SNL playing Palin.
-------------------------------------------------------
> no chance Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Taco Flavored Kisses Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Besides being Hispanic, what exactly does
> Rubio
> > > bring to the table? I see him more of a
> Sarah
> > > Palin part 2.
> >
> >
> > Its not even worth trying to explain it if you
> > really are that uninformed or that partisan
>
>
> Which means you can't answer the question. I
> wonder if he can see Cuba from his front porch?
No it means your a partisan hack if all you think Rubio is is Hispanic.
I like your attempted Sarah Palin joke, but once again you are clueless. Sarah Palin never said that, Tina Faye said it on SNL playing Palin.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
dsf
()
Date: March 06, 2012 12:10PM
I have to say Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hate the idea of four more years of Obamas tax
> and spend entitlements but the Republican field is
> a poor choice. I understand Romney is rich but he
> must have gotten it by luck or inherited it
> because he doesnt seem all that bright.
He's actually extremely intelligent. He made the 2004 winter olympics the most profitable in history. NBC was originally slated to LOSE 300 million dollars. Then they hired Mitt Romney, and made lots of cash.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I hate the idea of four more years of Obamas tax
> and spend entitlements but the Republican field is
> a poor choice. I understand Romney is rich but he
> must have gotten it by luck or inherited it
> because he doesnt seem all that bright.
He's actually extremely intelligent. He made the 2004 winter olympics the most profitable in history. NBC was originally slated to LOSE 300 million dollars. Then they hired Mitt Romney, and made lots of cash.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
adfsad
()
Date: March 06, 2012 12:12PM
A Voter Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fuck obama Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Paul hasnt been attacking Romney, because
> romney
> > promised to make ron's son, Rand, his veep
> >
>
> That's nonsense. There are no such plans. That
> rumor has been dispelled by both Ron Paul and Rand
> Paul.
>
> Turn off Fox News propaganda channel and find some
> real news.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> A vote for Romney, who will not beat Obama without
> Ron Paul's supporters, will ensure 4 more years of
> Obama.
Rand Paul doesn't have enough experience yet. But in 2016 or 2020 I will certainly be donating to his presidential campaign. He's a more articulate version of his father with less baggage
-------------------------------------------------------
> fuck obama Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> > Paul hasnt been attacking Romney, because
> romney
> > promised to make ron's son, Rand, his veep
> >
>
> That's nonsense. There are no such plans. That
> rumor has been dispelled by both Ron Paul and Rand
> Paul.
>
> Turn off Fox News propaganda channel and find some
> real news.
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> -------
>
> A vote for Romney, who will not beat Obama without
> Ron Paul's supporters, will ensure 4 more years of
> Obama.
Rand Paul doesn't have enough experience yet. But in 2016 or 2020 I will certainly be donating to his presidential campaign. He's a more articulate version of his father with less baggage
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
A Voter
()
Date: March 06, 2012 12:47PM
dsf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I understand Romney is rich but he
> > must have gotten it by luck or inherited it
> > because he doesnt seem all that bright.
>
>
> He's actually extremely intelligent. He made the
> 2004 winter olympics the most profitable in
> history. NBC was originally slated to LOSE 300
> million dollars. Then they hired Mitt Romney, and
> made lots of cash.
Yeah by fleecing the taxpayers.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I understand Romney is rich but he
> > must have gotten it by luck or inherited it
> > because he doesnt seem all that bright.
>
>
> He's actually extremely intelligent. He made the
> 2004 winter olympics the most profitable in
> history. NBC was originally slated to LOSE 300
> million dollars. Then they hired Mitt Romney, and
> made lots of cash.
Yeah by fleecing the taxpayers.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
FUNdamental
()
Date: March 06, 2012 01:18PM
I voted for Ron Paul.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
Operation Chaos
()
Date: March 06, 2012 02:03PM
FUNdamental Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I voted for Ron Paul.
So, do you have a point?
Oh yeah, let me articulate it for you: FUNdamental is the poster boy for party registration and a closed primary.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I voted for Ron Paul.
So, do you have a point?
Oh yeah, let me articulate it for you: FUNdamental is the poster boy for party registration and a closed primary.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
No goats
()
Date: March 06, 2012 02:55PM
Polling places close at 7PM, so us working goons can still go.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Romney Tomorrow
Posted by:
no chance
()
Date: March 06, 2012 03:39PM
Operation Chaos Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUNdamental Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I voted for Ron Paul.
>
>
> So, do you have a point?
>
> Oh yeah, let me articulate it for you:
> FUNdamental is the poster boy for party
> registration and a closed primary.
His point is hes trying to influence the election because hes scared Romney could beat Obama. Same thing that happened in Michigan.
-------------------------------------------------------
> FUNdamental Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I voted for Ron Paul.
>
>
> So, do you have a point?
>
> Oh yeah, let me articulate it for you:
> FUNdamental is the poster boy for party
> registration and a closed primary.
His point is hes trying to influence the election because hes scared Romney could beat Obama. Same thing that happened in Michigan.