Neville Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, your plan is to ban bicycles from many roads
> in Fairfax County for the safety and convenience
> of drivers? You want to make everyone drive a car
> or motorcycle to make the local economy work
> better by making commutes faster by a few seconds
> for commuters in cars. . .
>
> Wait a minute, though. Why does your plan just
> stop with bicycles? There are a lot of things out
> there on the road that delay you, and many of them
> are shaped like cars.
>
> How about 17-year-old drivers who could just as
> easily take the school bus?
> How about banning people going out for a pleasure
> drive at any time when individuals are working?
> How about just banning retirees from driving at
> any time when individuals are working?
> What about substellar drivers who consistently
> speed and crash?
> Oh, but what if a bicycle rider is a substellar
> driver himself and is less of a risk to others on
> a bicycle? That person would be better on a bike,
> right?
> How about specifically banning housewifes driving
> to get nails done? That's particularly frivolous,
> right?
> And parents who could just as easily let their
> child take the school bus or walk or even ride a
> bicycle to school?
> How about drivers of gas guzzlers that aren't as
> thifty as your bicycle Honda Civic, and hence
> consume much more gasoline, increasing the trade
> deficit, enriching OPEC, and increasing the price
> of gasoline for everyone else?
>
> On the other hand, some may argue that freedom to
> travel is a cherished part of our American
> political tradition. Any plan to limit access to
> the roads clashes with a fundamental "Freedom of
> Movement" for U.S. citizens.
>
> "In all the States from the beginning down to the
> adoption of the Articles of Confederation the
> citizens thereof possessed the fundamental right,
> inherent in citizens of all free governments,
> peacefully to dwell within the limits of their
> respective States, to move at will from place to
> place therein, and to have free ingress thereto
> and egress therefrom, with a consequent authority
> in the States to forbid and punish violations of
> this fundamental right."
>
>
http://www.leagle.com/xmlResult.aspx?xmldoc=192053
> 5254US281_1494.xml&docbase=CSLWAR1-1950-1985
>
> Limiting freedom of travel doesn't really sound
> like something our founding fathers would endorse,
> since they didn't like unnecessary restrictions on
> citizens' behavior. Sounds to me like you are
> really saying you just want to speed, and you
> don't want to pay attention to your surroundings
> and take due care to avoid hitting bicyclists,
> pedestrians, deer, trash cans, or other vehicles.
How about you just admit that bicyclists are a public nuisance instead of trying to justify your position with your poor argumentative skills? Actually, just keep doing what you're doing because it simply goes to show the arrogance and selfishness of you and your ilk, which wins no one over to your side of the argument.