Can you believe that Dave Albo still doesn't get it? What a putz!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/09/AR2008010902501.html?hpid=topnews
While I believe that some sort of penalties are in order to punish truly abusive drivers, attaching it to a financing scheme for transportation improvements makes no sense. Penalize drivers for DUI starting with the first offense, habitual/serial offenders, severely aggressive driving, speeding > 30 miles over the limit, etc., but don't over burden the generally good driver who make a mistake. The insurance hit and normal civil penalties are usually enough to make people pay attention and be more careful.