Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
>
> LOOK AT THAT BLOCKING, Ramsey or brunell both have
> plenty of time and making good plays. the
> touchdown PITSburgh got was luck, ramsey shoulda
> taken the hit
> i hope you have fun editing this one chump
>
>
>
Yeah. Look at the blocking. Jason Campbell was running like a chicken out there trying not to get hit. He should have been running back for the Steelers considering how far he had to drop back and he still got hit. If you hadn't noticed, most of the Redskin's plays were runs, not passes. And even most of the passes were the same kind of dump-off throws Gibbs tried last year. When the first-team defenses are out there starting in September, the Redskins will suck. I bet Ramsey is out after week 4. Snyder won't fire Gibbs until the end of the season out of respect.
> >
>
> yeah hes short? Michael Westbrook was the size of
> T.O but amounted to nothing. So his height doesnt
> reflect his skill
You still have to have skill. I'm just saying height matters in today's NFL for receivers. You don't think a taller receiver has a distinct advantage in terms of stretching for a catch or jumping up in the back of the end zone? I'm just saying, Santana Moss is a fine receiver, but with the kind of money Danny likes to throw around, it would have been nice to get a top flight receiver and not some other team's option guy.
>
> >
> > Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
> >
> > InIt doesn't work all the time ;) 2001 they
> went 0-5 and didn't.
>
> Blame Danny.
>
>
>
I blame Danny.
Now just wait and see what I do in Oakland. I now have a play-off caliber QB and expensive marquee talent.
...Oh. I guess I had that in DC, too.
My bad. I just suck as a coach.
Forget what I said.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
The Deadskins
Posted by:
Wrong Way Ramsey
()
Date: August 26, 2005 08:34PM
Not even done with the First Quarter and Patrick "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown an interception.
Brunell - Old
New QB - Green
Portis - No Power
Moss - Too Small
Betts - Not Enough Power
Arrington - Who Cares?
Gibbs - Nothing to Prove
Snyder - Moving on to Magic Mountain
So, anyone got some Ravens tickets you are looking to sell?
Brunell - Old
New QB - Green
Portis - No Power
Moss - Too Small
Betts - Not Enough Power
Arrington - Who Cares?
Gibbs - Nothing to Prove
Snyder - Moving on to Magic Mountain
So, anyone got some Ravens tickets you are looking to sell?
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Jack Kent Cooke's Dead Bloating Corps
()
Date: August 26, 2005 09:45PM
Ooops, can I use that name or will someone think me insensitive?
Anyway, it's funny how similar the Skins and the Ravens are, isn't it? Both have bad QB's that are under the gun, good RB's, better than average defense, and plenty of legal problems by their players. If Angelos owned the Ravens, the similarities would be eerily similar with both teams have Napoleonistic micro-managing owners.
Anyway, it's funny how similar the Skins and the Ravens are, isn't it? Both have bad QB's that are under the gun, good RB's, better than average defense, and plenty of legal problems by their players. If Angelos owned the Ravens, the similarities would be eerily similar with both teams have Napoleonistic micro-managing owners.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Ravens' Simone
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:00PM
Jack Kent Cooke's Dead Bloating Corps Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ooops, can I use that name or will someone think
> me insensitive?
>
> Anyway, it's funny how similar the Skins and the
> Ravens are, isn't it? Both have bad QB's that are
> under the gun, good RB's, better than average
> defense, and plenty of legal problems by their
> players. If Angelos owned the Ravens, the
> similarities would be eerily similar with both
> teams have Napoleonistic micro-managing owners.
At least the Ravens make it to the playoffs most years because they play in a crappy division. And and least defensively they are fun to watch.
The Redskins, on the other hand, have become an unmitigated disaster. They basically serve as a farm team for the rest of the league.
Think about it. The Redskins trade Brad Johnson to the Tampa Bay Bucs, the next year Tampa wins the SuperBowl. They trade Steven Davis to the Panthers, the next year the Panthers make it to the SuperBowl. The question this year is which team makes it to the SuperBowl - the Vikings because they got Fred Smoot from the Skins or the Jets because they got Coles. My money is on the Vikings because the Jets can't beat New England.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ooops, can I use that name or will someone think
> me insensitive?
>
> Anyway, it's funny how similar the Skins and the
> Ravens are, isn't it? Both have bad QB's that are
> under the gun, good RB's, better than average
> defense, and plenty of legal problems by their
> players. If Angelos owned the Ravens, the
> similarities would be eerily similar with both
> teams have Napoleonistic micro-managing owners.
At least the Ravens make it to the playoffs most years because they play in a crappy division. And and least defensively they are fun to watch.
The Redskins, on the other hand, have become an unmitigated disaster. They basically serve as a farm team for the rest of the league.
Think about it. The Redskins trade Brad Johnson to the Tampa Bay Bucs, the next year Tampa wins the SuperBowl. They trade Steven Davis to the Panthers, the next year the Panthers make it to the SuperBowl. The question this year is which team makes it to the SuperBowl - the Vikings because they got Fred Smoot from the Skins or the Jets because they got Coles. My money is on the Vikings because the Jets can't beat New England.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
JKC DRC
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:05PM
Ravens Simone--good points all, but I can't see the Vikes doing much without Moss now. I wouldn't put much money in the J-E-T-S Jets Jets Jets either, but we can agree that the Skins won't be going anywhere this year. But the lemmings will continue to show up at Fed Ex and pay all that money for parking, concessions, tickets, etc, etc, so why should lil' Danny care?
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
English Teacher
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:12PM
Redskins are playing good? nice grammar. how do you figure that they are playing "good" anyway? they suck dead bear. even if they were playing well (note the use of correct grammar asshat) it is still only preseason. get back to me when the games count. skins will be no better than 6-10 this year.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
MrDoctor
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:33PM
English Teacher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Redskins are playing good? nice grammar. how do
> you figure that they are playing "good" anyway?
> they suck dead bear. even if they were playing
> well (note the use of correct grammar asshat) it
> is still only preseason. get back to me when the
> games count. skins will be no better than 6-10
> this year.
first of all who cares how i spell shit on the intrenet .. COMPARED to their last 2 preseason games the skins are playing 150% better. you cant argue it. now stfu
LOOK AT THAT BLOCKING, Ramsey or brunell both have plenty of time and making good plays. the touchdown PITSburgh got was luck, ramsey shoulda taken the hit
i hope you have fun editing this one chump
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 10:33PM by MrDoctor.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Redskins are playing good? nice grammar. how do
> you figure that they are playing "good" anyway?
> they suck dead bear. even if they were playing
> well (note the use of correct grammar asshat) it
> is still only preseason. get back to me when the
> games count. skins will be no better than 6-10
> this year.
first of all who cares how i spell shit on the intrenet .. COMPARED to their last 2 preseason games the skins are playing 150% better. you cant argue it. now stfu
LOOK AT THAT BLOCKING, Ramsey or brunell both have plenty of time and making good plays. the touchdown PITSburgh got was luck, ramsey shoulda taken the hit
i hope you have fun editing this one chump
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 10:33PM by MrDoctor.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
MrDoctor
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:34PM
Wrong Way Ramsey Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not even done with the First Quarter and Patrick
> "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown an
> interception.
>
> Brunell - Old
>
> New QB - Green
>
> Portis - No Power
>
> Moss - Too Small
>
Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean too fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go away
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not even done with the First Quarter and Patrick
> "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown an
> interception.
>
> Brunell - Old
>
> New QB - Green
>
> Portis - No Power
>
> Moss - Too Small
>
Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean too fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go away
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
English Teacher
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:40PM
First of all gentleperson, my problem was not with your spelling, it was with your command and usage of the english language. There is a difference, but if you are not sure of that, push away from the computer and pick up a book and figure it out.
Second, as I said before, it is only preseason. No one cares about wins and losses in preseason and until the games mean anything, your debate over how the team is playing is meaningless.
To continue this debate with you would be pointless because you obviously are one of the lemmings that Mr. Snyder relies on to fill his wallet, so nothing I say to you will make a bit of difference. However, if you would like to discuss you lack of command of the language, please to be responding to me and I will do what I can to enlighten you. Now I must say good day to you, sir.
Second, as I said before, it is only preseason. No one cares about wins and losses in preseason and until the games mean anything, your debate over how the team is playing is meaningless.
To continue this debate with you would be pointless because you obviously are one of the lemmings that Mr. Snyder relies on to fill his wallet, so nothing I say to you will make a bit of difference. However, if you would like to discuss you lack of command of the language, please to be responding to me and I will do what I can to enlighten you. Now I must say good day to you, sir.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
English Teacher
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:40PM
First of all gentleperson, my problem was not with your spelling, it was with your command and usage of the english language. There is a difference, but if you are not sure of that, push away from the computer and pick up a book and figure it out.
Second, as I said before, it is only preseason. No one cares about wins and losses in preseason and until the games mean anything, your debate over how the team is playing is meaningless.
To continue this debate with you would be pointless because you obviously are one of the lemmings that Mr. Snyder relies on to fill his wallet, so nothing I say to you will make a bit of difference. However, if you would like to discuss your lack of command of the language, please to be responding to me and I will do what I can to enlighten you. Now I must say good day to you, sir.
Second, as I said before, it is only preseason. No one cares about wins and losses in preseason and until the games mean anything, your debate over how the team is playing is meaningless.
To continue this debate with you would be pointless because you obviously are one of the lemmings that Mr. Snyder relies on to fill his wallet, so nothing I say to you will make a bit of difference. However, if you would like to discuss your lack of command of the language, please to be responding to me and I will do what I can to enlighten you. Now I must say good day to you, sir.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
mad max, JD
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:41PM
In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the preseason.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Randy
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:44PM
Hopefully Snyder will buy 6 flags and have a new toy to distract him from the Redskins.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
MrDoctor
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:47PM
English Teacher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all gentleperson, my problem was not with
> your spelling, it was with your command and usage
> of the english language. There is a difference,
> but if you are not sure of that, push away from
> the computer and pick up a book and figure it out.
>
>
> Second, as I said before, it is only preseason.
yeah exactly dumbass. thats why this thread was made, because sombody was watching the preseason game. Goodjob, therefore what i say is very relivant and second, i obnviously care alot about my spelling and grammer on the internet. im glad you feelmbetter after studying my posts and chuckling your lonely self to sleep. gg redskins 4 life
annoying anonymous people
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 10:50PM by MrDoctor.
-------------------------------------------------------
> First of all gentleperson, my problem was not with
> your spelling, it was with your command and usage
> of the english language. There is a difference,
> but if you are not sure of that, push away from
> the computer and pick up a book and figure it out.
>
>
> Second, as I said before, it is only preseason.
yeah exactly dumbass. thats why this thread was made, because sombody was watching the preseason game. Goodjob, therefore what i say is very relivant and second, i obnviously care alot about my spelling and grammer on the internet. im glad you feelmbetter after studying my posts and chuckling your lonely self to sleep. gg redskins 4 life
annoying anonymous people
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 10:50PM by MrDoctor.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
DoctorMr
()
Date: August 26, 2005 10:49PM
Oh no Randy, 6 Flags and the Skins are very much related. You can't look at them as two different ventures. Say what you will about lil Danny, but he is a good businessman and if there is a way to squeeze a buck out of the lemmings pockets, he will do so. Keep in mind that one of the biggest reasons that lil Danny bought 6 Flags was because he felt the amusement park was underutilized in the area of advertising. Think you'll start seeing more burgandy and gold around the park???
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Better Red than Deadskin
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:05PM
MrDoctor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> redskins are playing good
Really? Their offensive numbers tonight were pretty mediocre. Maybe the Steelers offense just sucks because Ruffleburger was over-rated last year and actually after getting his ass kicked in the play-offs last year even HE now realizes it.
-------------------------------------------------------
> redskins are playing good
Really? Their offensive numbers tonight were pretty mediocre. Maybe the Steelers offense just sucks because Ruffleburger was over-rated last year and actually after getting his ass kicked in the play-offs last year even HE now realizes it.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
DoctorMr
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:07PM
Yup, get your playoff tickets now folks! The Redskins are apparently the team to beat.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Block this, Blockhead
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:09PM
>
> LOOK AT THAT BLOCKING, Ramsey or brunell both have
> plenty of time and making good plays. the
> touchdown PITSburgh got was luck, ramsey shoulda
> taken the hit
> i hope you have fun editing this one chump
>
>
>
Yeah. Look at the blocking. Jason Campbell was running like a chicken out there trying not to get hit. He should have been running back for the Steelers considering how far he had to drop back and he still got hit. If you hadn't noticed, most of the Redskin's plays were runs, not passes. And even most of the passes were the same kind of dump-off throws Gibbs tried last year. When the first-team defenses are out there starting in September, the Redskins will suck. I bet Ramsey is out after week 4. Snyder won't fire Gibbs until the end of the season out of respect.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
MrDoctor
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:10PM
well maybe, but the offenseive line held up EXTREMELY well, looked like back durin the HOGS days. Stealers D is no joke.. i say they were doing good in comparison to their previous games. Redskin 4 life
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Santana? You have a fine tan, man
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:16PM
MrDoctor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrong Way Ramsey Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not even done with the First Quarter and
> Patrick
> > "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown an
> > interception.
> >
> > Brunell - Old
> >
> > New QB - Green
> >
> > Portis - No Power
> >
> > Moss - Too Small
> >
>
> Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean too
> fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go away
First, even Portis admits he has no power. He calls himself a finesse runner. Second, Santana Moss is 5-10. Randy Moss, on the other hand, is 6-4. T.O. is 6-3. Santana should be the option, not the go-to guy. And as for catching like a God, he should have caught at least one of the two passes Ramsey threw short. If he were 6-3, he would have.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrong Way Ramsey Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not even done with the First Quarter and
> Patrick
> > "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown an
> > interception.
> >
> > Brunell - Old
> >
> > New QB - Green
> >
> > Portis - No Power
> >
> > Moss - Too Small
> >
>
> Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean too
> fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go away
First, even Portis admits he has no power. He calls himself a finesse runner. Second, Santana Moss is 5-10. Randy Moss, on the other hand, is 6-4. T.O. is 6-3. Santana should be the option, not the go-to guy. And as for catching like a God, he should have caught at least one of the two passes Ramsey threw short. If he were 6-3, he would have.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
DoctorMr
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:16PM
Lemming. Looking at the world through burgandy and gold glasses. Remember the feeling that you have right now. The happiness that you feel right now resulting from your team winning will not be repeated very often when it matters in the regular season. Get your enjoyment when you can.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Victory Lapse
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:20PM
MrDoctor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Victory
Congratulations. Reminds me of the time when the Redskins swept all of the pre-season games with record scoring. That record belongs to Steve "Take a Knee with Two Minutes Left Before Halftime" Spurrier. Remember that guy?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Victory
Congratulations. Reminds me of the time when the Redskins swept all of the pre-season games with record scoring. That record belongs to Steve "Take a Knee with Two Minutes Left Before Halftime" Spurrier. Remember that guy?
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Marty's Balls
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:20PM
mad max, JD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 8-8, they'll get lucky
Last guy who did that was Coach Marty...and he got fired for it.
Yeeehaw!
-------------------------------------------------------
> 8-8, they'll get lucky
Last guy who did that was Coach Marty...and he got fired for it.
Yeeehaw!
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
MrDoctor
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:21PM
Santana? You have a fine tan, man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrDoctor Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wrong Way Ramsey Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Not even done with the First Quarter
> and
> > Patrick
> > > "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown
> an
> > > interception.
> > >
> > > Brunell - Old
> > >
> > > New QB - Green
> > >
> > > Portis - No Power
> > >
> > > Moss - Too Small
> > >
> >
> > Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean
> too
> > fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go
> away
>
>
>
> First, even Portis admits he has no power. He
> calls himself a finesse runner. Second, Santana
> Moss is 5-10. Randy Moss, on the other hand, is
> 6-4. T.O. is 6-3. Santana should be the option,
> not the go-to guy. And as for catching like a God,
> he should have caught at least one of the two
> passes Ramsey threw short. If he were 6-3, he
> would have.
>
yeah hes short? Michael Westbrook was the size of T.O but amounted to nothing. So his height doesnt reflect his skill
edit: westbrook is actualy a prize fighter now, i saw him kick some dudes ass on Tough Man last month in HD.. he also kicked stephen davis ass in traning camp a few years back, i believe westbrook is a blackbelt
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 11:28PM by MrDoctor.
-------------------------------------------------------
> MrDoctor Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Wrong Way Ramsey Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Not even done with the First Quarter
> and
> > Patrick
> > > "Wrong Way" Ramsey has already thrown
> an
> > > interception.
> > >
> > > Brunell - Old
> > >
> > > New QB - Green
> > >
> > > Portis - No Power
> > >
> > > Moss - Too Small
> > >
> >
> > Portis no power? LOL Moss too small? you mean
> too
> > fast and making Godlike catches. kthx go
> away
>
>
>
> First, even Portis admits he has no power. He
> calls himself a finesse runner. Second, Santana
> Moss is 5-10. Randy Moss, on the other hand, is
> 6-4. T.O. is 6-3. Santana should be the option,
> not the go-to guy. And as for catching like a God,
> he should have caught at least one of the two
> passes Ramsey threw short. If he were 6-3, he
> would have.
>
yeah hes short? Michael Westbrook was the size of T.O but amounted to nothing. So his height doesnt reflect his skill
edit: westbrook is actualy a prize fighter now, i saw him kick some dudes ass on Tough Man last month in HD.. he also kicked stephen davis ass in traning camp a few years back, i believe westbrook is a blackbelt
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/26/2005 11:28PM by MrDoctor.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Miss Mossbacher!
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:30PM
> >
>
> yeah hes short? Michael Westbrook was the size of
> T.O but amounted to nothing. So his height doesnt
> reflect his skill
You still have to have skill. I'm just saying height matters in today's NFL for receivers. You don't think a taller receiver has a distinct advantage in terms of stretching for a catch or jumping up in the back of the end zone? I'm just saying, Santana Moss is a fine receiver, but with the kind of money Danny likes to throw around, it would have been nice to get a top flight receiver and not some other team's option guy.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
mad max, JD
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:34PM
But how tall are today's CBs? The tall ones were groomed to be receivers at an early age. As long as you have a higher reach and jump than the majority of them, you're golden. I saw santana moss play in his final college game at the sugar bowl in 2001. I must say, he kicked ass.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Better Red than Deadskin
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:38PM
mad max, JD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> But how tall are today's CBs? The tall ones were
> groomed to be receivers at an early age. As long
> as you have a higher reach and jump than the
> majority of them, you're golden. I saw santana
> moss play in his final college game at the sugar
> bowl in 2001. I must say, he kicked ass.
Moss is 5-10. He is nearly average height.
As for being good in college, I have two words for you: Danny Weurfel.
Nuff said?
-------------------------------------------------------
> But how tall are today's CBs? The tall ones were
> groomed to be receivers at an early age. As long
> as you have a higher reach and jump than the
> majority of them, you're golden. I saw santana
> moss play in his final college game at the sugar
> bowl in 2001. I must say, he kicked ass.
Moss is 5-10. He is nearly average height.
As for being good in college, I have two words for you: Danny Weurfel.
Nuff said?
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Terps
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:47PM
mad max, JD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the preseason.
In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super Bowl.
-------------------------------------------------------
> In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the preseason.
In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super Bowl.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious
()
Date: August 26, 2005 11:51PM
Terps Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mad max, JD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the preseason.
>
> In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super
> Bowl.
>
>
>
Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
In 2001 they went 0-5 and didn't.
-------------------------------------------------------
> mad max, JD Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the preseason.
>
> In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super
> Bowl.
>
>
>
Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
In 2001 they went 0-5 and didn't.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Terps
()
Date: August 27, 2005 09:37AM
Blinding Glimpse of the Obvious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Terps Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > mad max, JD Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the
> preseason.
> >
> > In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super
> > Bowl.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
>
> InIt doesn't work all the time ;) 2001 they went 0-5 and didn't.
Blame Danny.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Terps Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > mad max, JD Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > In 91-92, they went 0-4 in the
> preseason.
> >
> > In 1982 they also went 0-4 and won the Super
> > Bowl.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
>
> InIt doesn't work all the time ;) 2001 they went 0-5 and didn't.
Blame Danny.
Re: The Deadskins
Posted by:
Norv Turner
()
Date: August 27, 2005 01:30PM
>
> >
> > Last year they went 0-5 and didn't.
> >
> > InIt doesn't work all the time ;) 2001 they
> went 0-5 and didn't.
>
> Blame Danny.
>
>
>
I blame Danny.
Now just wait and see what I do in Oakland. I now have a play-off caliber QB and expensive marquee talent.
...Oh. I guess I had that in DC, too.
My bad. I just suck as a coach.
Forget what I said.
BACK FROM THE LONG DEAD!!!
Posted by:
The -Thread Reviver-
()
Date: June 29, 2013 08:58AM
Hey, this is the oldest thread on FFXU that is not locked, which its last post occurred on August 27th, 2005, so why not resurrect it?
Re: BACK FROM THE LONG DEAD!!!
Posted by:
"Bury my heart at wounded knee"
()
Date: June 29, 2013 11:06AM
The -Thread Reviver- Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey, this is the oldest thread on FFXU that is not
> locked, which its last post occurred on August
> 27th, 2005, so why not resurrect it?
Why resurrect it?
Their still dead.
And with that stated, they won't have to be renamed.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hey, this is the oldest thread on FFXU that is not
> locked, which its last post occurred on August
> 27th, 2005, so why not resurrect it?
Why resurrect it?
Their still dead.
And with that stated, they won't have to be renamed.