Will you losers give this thing a rest? She plead guilty she will be sentenced,end of story!!!! If you busy bodies had been this concerned when she was taking the money you could have prevented this. Too little too late.
Stop crying about it. geeeeeeesh!!!!!

Whatever you say, Litsa.

Is Litza still due in court on the 18th of July?? If so what time??

Deport her to Greece!

Is scumbag's hearing still the 18th? Does anyone know the time?

Hi-

Is the date still the 18th and if so what time?

Litsa's going to cut some sort of deal where she never sees the inside of a cell. Just wait. She will probably get some health-related bullshit thing.

Send her to the Prince George's County jail.

Okay, so I guess the two people who responded after me don't know if the date is the 18th so does anyone know the anwer?

Call the Prosecuting Attorney, Kathy Stott
(703-246-2776)

When you get the info, please post it.

thanks,

Not sure I agree but would be interested to know if anyone else has heard this.


Re: today's School board meeting
Posted by: Edna (IP Logged)
Date: July 15, 2008 10:45AM


The word on the street is that Strauss and Gibson do not like GT centers. I believe years back Strauss was voted down when she objected to a GT in her district. Could be a rumor and I don't know how to research this rumor.

Question: Is there a move to shut down the GT centers? Would save on transportation cost which is a big issue.

The downside of this is there are some GT centers in low performing schools and if these centers go, then will this not affect the SOLs in some of these schools? Something that the Fx Cty School Bd would not like....especially in Gibson's area.

Therefore, I don't see the GT centers being removed from some of these schools.

Welcome comments from others.

You are spot on. That is exactly what we are hearing in Oakton.



Re: Boundary changes
Posted by: Concerned Parent (IP Logged)
Date: July 15, 2008 11:17AM


Not sure I agree but would be interested to know if anyone else has heard this.


Re: today's School board meeting
Posted by: Edna (IP Logged)
Date: July 15, 2008 10:45AM


The word on the street is that Strauss and Gibson do not like GT centers. I believe years back Strauss was voted down when she objected to a GT in her district. Could be a rumor and I don't know how to research this rumor.

Question: Is there a move to shut down the GT centers? Would save on transportation cost which is a big issue.

The downside of this is there are some GT centers in low performing schools and if these centers go, then will this not affect the SOLs in some of these schools? Something that the Fx Cty School Bd would not like....especially in Gibson's area.

Therefore, I don't see the GT centers being removed from some of these schools.

Welcome comments from others.

Redistricted in Oakton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are spot on. That is exactly what we are
> hearing in Oakton.
>
>
>
> Re: Boundary changes
> Posted by: Concerned Parent (IP Logged)
> Date: July 15, 2008 11:17AM
>
>
> Not sure I agree but would be interested to know
> if anyone else has heard this.
>
>
> Re: today's School board meeting
> Posted by: Edna (IP Logged)
> Date: July 15, 2008 10:45AM
>
>
> The word on the street is that Strauss and Gibson
> do not like GT centers. I believe years back
> Strauss was voted down when she objected to a GT
> in her district. Could be a rumor and I don't know
> how to research this rumor.
>
> Question: Is there a move to shut down the GT
> centers? Would save on transportation cost which
> is a big issue.
>
> The downside of this is there are some GT centers
> in low performing schools and if these centers go,
> then will this not affect the SOLs in some of
> these schools? Something that the Fx Cty School Bd
> would not like....especially in Gibson's area.
>
> Therefore, I don't see the GT centers being
> removed from some of these schools.
>
> Welcome comments from others.

What's this got to do with Litsa? You need to start a new thread.

This issue is affecting so many schools but so few are involved in challenging the decision.

Re: high school redistricting
Posted by: Forum Reader (IP Logged)
Date: July 13, 2008 10:09PM


Stat Man Wrote:
> Forum Reader - The School Board's web site is
> [www.fcps.edu].
>
> If you look at the "Current Meeting Agendas"
> section, the boundary study for the three high
> schools appears as a PDF attachment to Item 6.2 of
> the agenda for the July 14 work session.

---------------------
Thank you for the pointer.

Interesting that FCPS is already telling us who they plan to move where. This seems a lot more fair to the communities involved than the system that was used in the South Lakes redistricting.

It also looks like FCPS realizes communities care about the programs available in their high school: this new proposal also specifies which of the following programs Annandale, Falls Church, and Stuart have:
Advanced Placement Diploma (AP)
Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID)
Early Identification Program (EIP)
English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL)
Focus 2007 Program
International Baccalaureate Middle Years Program (IBMYP)
International Baccalaureate Program (IB)
Modified Calendar
Planetarium
Special Education Services
Transitional High School Program

This thread is about a lady who stole $180,000 from Navy Vale NOT REDISTRICTING.

PLEASE POST ALL REDISTRICTING COMMENTS IN THE REDISTRICTING THREAD,

Thank you



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/16/2008 10:40AM by Lurker..

Lurker. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This thread is about a lady who stole $180,000
> from Navy Vale NOT REDISTRICTING.
>
> PLEASE POST ALL REDISTRICTING COMMENTS IN THE
> REDISTRICTING THREAD,
>
> Thank you


I brought that up already. I think they are posting here to be assholes.

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lurker. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > This thread is about a lady who stole $180,000
> > from Navy Vale NOT REDISTRICTING.
> >
> > PLEASE POST ALL REDISTRICTING COMMENTS IN THE
> > REDISTRICTING THREAD,
> >
> > Thank you
>
>
> I brought that up already. I think they are
> posting here to be assholes.

Cause I am never an asshole, just a friggen loser who craves cock (look at my post about picking up US Marines).

yeah pimple face. I like guys. Are you a homophobe?

You have taken this board to a new all time low.

Re: high school redistricting
Posted by: All Will Be Revealed (IP Logged)
Date: July 16, 2008 05:41PM


Why, pray tell, does that GT student deserve to be bused to a special center? Why can't that kid be taught at their base school. Do kids in the bottom get sent to special centers? No, I am not speaking of MMR or ED kids, just kids at the bottom of the bell curve, so to speak. No, they don't.

Tracking would solve the problem for teachers of teaching to different levels. BTW, not all GT kids are created equal. Some are good at math, but suck at English. What of those poor GT English teachers who have to suffer the pencil-necked geeks who hate to write, at the expense of little Mary the child skilled in language arts who hates math.



GT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A teacher deserves a chance to teach students at
> similar levels to maximize students achievement of
> her effort. If she has to teach a zillion
> different levels. Have you realize how much extra
> material the teacher needs to prepare and keeps
> track of?
>
> A GT student deserves the same education
> opportunity as his/her peers.
>
> Calling regular class as shit, or GT students as
> entitled, privilleged, has nothing to do with GT
> or the students. It's every bit of what the small
> group of parents say or think.


Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message
Re: high school redistricting
Posted by: mr e (IP Logged)
Date: July 16, 2008 05:54PM


so after looking at the county wide high school maps how and why were madison and Oakton built so close together? ( you might say fairfax is close to those two schools as well). How and why were Langley and McLean built so close to each other? Woodoson is also close to Fairfax. I know there are other I am leaving out, one has to ask why and to stop this from happening in the future if and when a new high school would be built. Honestly almost the whole district needs to be re adjusted if you look at where schools appear in their boundaries, often it is at a corner, not in the middle or even close to a central location, students who live in the far west of the fairfax boundary must live closer to at least one high school. Also look at all the islands( pointed out on the map excluding an airport or a college) not addressed. McLean and Woodson are the two big ones, along with Falls Church. Look at the length of some of the boundaries like Oakton, Langley and Hayfeild, long and narrow with Langley looking the worst with students traveling quite a distance to school. Imagine the gas money that could be saved if that was redrawn. So pretty much the whole system needs to be redrawn to make things correct for everyone in the county


Options: Reply To This Message•Quote This Message
Re: high school redistricting
Posted by: Tired of Name Calling (IP Logged)
Date: July 16, 2008 06:00PM


All Will Be Revealed Wrote:
> ... Some are good at math, but
> suck at English. What of those poor GT English
> teachers who have to suffer the pencil-necked
> geeks who hate to write, at the expense of little
> Mary the child skilled in language arts who hates
> math.

---------
Can you try to make your point without insulting children, like calling students who are good at math but weak at English "pencil-necked geeks"?

Then we can discuss if tracking can survive in schools today, especially if it results in too many of some group of students and too few of another. For example, would your elementary school allow the "accelerated math class" to continue if it consistently had about ninety percent boys?

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah pimple face. I like guys. Are you a
> homophobe?

Clear skin here. I know you like guys. You already talked about driving down to Quantico to check them out. No need for you to state the obvious. Am I a homophobe? Nah, not really. I am just someone who realizes that if it was "normal" the human race would have ceased at Cain and Abel.

Is Litsa's sentencing still today? If so, what time and where can I find the outcome?

Today at 10 at the FFX courthouse.

yes
10am/outcome will be posted here later today

this should get interesting. We can then declare a school thread dead.

I'll set the over/under at 4 months prison sentence and 2 years probation.

Any wagers?

2 counts and embezzlement of $180k? 4 months prison? Hah

I'm going to say 30 months with 5 years probation.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/18/2008 09:41AM by ITRADE.

ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 2 counts and embezzlement of $180k? 4 months
> prison? Hah
>
> I'm going to say 30 months with 5 years probation.


I still have my doubts she will see any time behind bars, much less 30 months. Five years probation sounds about right, though. And a permanent felony record.

On two counts of embezzlement...............2 years of jail and 8 years of probation as well as a $75,000 restitution agreement.

Meeper, you owe me....And I originally stated 2 years before I revised it to 30 months...

Let's go double or nothing on the redistricting thread.



ITRADE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Meeper, you owe me....And I originally stated 2
> years before I revised it to 30 months...

chantilly mom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On two counts of embezzlement...............2
> years of jail and 8 years of probation as well as
> a $75,000 restitution agreement.

Are you predicting/guessing, or saying this is what she got? Inquiring minds want to know!

Did Litsa have anything to say today in court? Did she speak?

2 years jail time....did they haul her away right then or did they give a date when she will begin to serve her time.

More details please.

she was taken away in handcuffs for immediate incarceration. She did the manipulative crying saying she was so sorry...........too little too late. Had she apologized from the beginning and not so blatantly gave the community the finger every time she sat at a football game or bought her kids the newest technology than she may have experienced more empathy. The prosecutor was terrific and the judge gave her what she deserved. It is hopeful she can do her time, pay back her restitution, move away from here and start over somewhere else.

chantilly mom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is hopeful she can do her time, pay back her
> restitution, move away from here and start over
> somewhere else.

Heh. I know how you meant 'start over somewhere else' but one COULD read it as 'and return to a life of crime somewhere else'...!

Thus endeth a very strange and ugly story (we can hope).

Not sure how I feel about her husband -- surely he had to know?! -- but her kids are the other real victims here. I hope her husband is able to move them away from here for their sake.

chantilly mom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> she was taken away in handcuffs for immediate
> incarceration. She did the manipulative crying
> saying she was so sorry...........too little too
> late. Had she apologized from the beginning and
> not so blatantly gave the community the finger
> every time she sat at a football game or bought
> her kids the newest technology than she may have
> experienced more empathy. The prosecutor was
> terrific and the judge gave her what she deserved.
> It is hopeful she can do her time, pay back her
> restitution, move away from here and start over
> somewhere else.


Did they have to use those handcuff "extenders" to get around her midsection?

I am curious...what did Litza say. All someone wrote is she cried and said she was sorry. Is that all she said? What prison will she be staying in for 2 years? Can she get out before 2 years?

As for her husband and children moving away-why? Her children are going through enough at this point. They are in high school and sould be be able to finish out their school time here in Fairfax. Can't people be big enough to not take out on her children what she has done? They will be without their mom and will be dealing with enough....

How will she pay back $75,000 being in prison??

Question?? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How will she pay back $75,000 being in prison??


Have you ever heard of liquidization of assets? They will get their money, either by auctioning any assets or possessions she acquired via the proceeds of her nefarious crimes, or docking her pay once she gets out and acquires gainful employment. Paying back the money will be a condition of her probation. Failure to pay will result in her going back to jail to serve whatever sentence time was suspended or held in abeyance.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07/18/2008 09:05PM by inkahootz.

chantilly mom Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> On two counts of embezzlement...............2
> years of jail and 8 years of probation as well as
> a $75,000 restitution agreement.

Considering I didn't think she would get any time, I think this is a pretty fair sentence. I think she should have to pay $180K back, though. Otherwise it looks like she made a net gain of $105K.

She has nothing so I don't think they will get much liquidation! They don't even own the house they live in. But thanks for informing me!

Did she get a min of 2 years or mandatory 2 years? There is a difference....just was curious

You guys are clueLESS as per usual, the attention-span of sparrows

As you are sipping your lattes tomorrow with Cliché after Cliché drooling of your tongues as you regurgiate the latest gossip trying to fill your empty heads and feeling smart - maybe you can look inside and and ask the question, 'what am I doing with my life, that I have time to fill 19 pages of a Forum with BS about 1 crime'.

Now that this part is over - the rest of the ppl involved might want to take cover -- u maybe next ;)

What, you think that Litsa was the only one .... .... c'mon Waken Up Empty-heads !!!!!

- I bet she will be OUT by tomorrow.;)

Question// Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She has nothing so I don't think they will get
> much liquidation! They don't even own the house
> they live in. But thanks for informing me!


Pas de probleme, mon ami!!!

There ya go - Not a full day in detention ---- LOL

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/18/AR2008071802842.html?hpid=topnews

5 years for each - suspended 4 years for both and each 1 year term, to run concurrently from home. (maybe electronic incarceration)

.... probably except for trips to the store to buy necessary items and to the doctors office ( every day) and to work and to church and to the drug store and to the Gym

and it seems that she had already paid-back 80,000 over the 5-years, so it was really only a $100,000 error in managing the account

aw well -- what do we biotch about now --- the general election ?

"$100,000 error in managing the account"...LMAO!!!!

Twinkie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There ya go - Not a full day in detention ----
> LOL
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic
> le/2008/07/18/AR2008071802842.html?hpid=topnews
>
> 5 years for each - suspended 4 years for both and
> each 1 year term, to run concurrently from home.
> (maybe electronic incarceration)
>
> .... probably except for trips to the store to buy
> necessary items and to the doctors office ( every
> day) and to work and to church and to the drug
> store and to the Gym
>
> and it seems that she had already paid-back 80,000
> over the 5-years, so it was really only a $100,000
> error in managing the account
>
> aw well -- what do we biotch about now --- the
> general election ?


The sad thing is I have been predicting she would see no time behind bars, I predicted that she would get a pass because of "her health" and I predicted she would use the excuse that she simply made a mistake and people would buy off on it. But having four years of a five year probation suspended is too much.

Turns out for the most part I was right (and to think earlier today I was going to predict home incarceration but thought, "There's no way in hell they would actually do that!) I bet in the end they even take it off of her record once she completes probation.

l



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 06/01/2010 03:00PM by inkahootz.

inkahootz Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> > He suspended four out five years INCARCERATION
> on each count. The probation wasn't suspended at
> all. She will have to serve a total of eight years
> probation on both counts once released. If she
> violates her terms of probation, she will have to
> do the rest of her sentence ( 8 years suspended)
> which is being held in abeyance (over her head).


oops. My mistake.

Still, this fabricated health stuff is B.S. My understanding from this thread is that this gal is at every Chantilly/Navy sporting event. If her health was that bad, how the hell is she getting around to all of these things??

I call bullocks on the whole thing. How do you mismanage an account to the degree that you are found criminally culpable of embezzlment, fraud, and theft of $180,000? If she was healthy enough to steal, she should be healthy enough to serve the time. She must know the sheriff for him to recommend home detention, or maybe she really is that unhealthy (she does look rather obese).

BTW WTL, you can't get anything expunged (or 'taken off your record') once you are convicted. After she serves her time and completes her probation, she will have to live the rest of her life dealing w/ this 'black eye' as a consequence of her behavior.

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Still, this fabricated health stuff is B.S. My
> understanding from this thread is that this gal is
> at every Chantilly/Navy sporting event. If her
> health was that bad, how the hell is she getting
> around to all of these things??

It may be fabricated. And I'm certainly no fan of Litsa -- we were Navy parents eight years ago, so some of the money she stole probably came from my pocket.

However, in the interests of fairness, I feel obligated to point out that if the health problems ARE legit, and she were being lauded for having done something good rather than pilloried for having done something bad, her attendance at these sporting events would be taken as an example of her making the effort for her kids despite her health problems, and thus held aloft as a positive thing.

Bottom line: it's probably not relevant. If she managed to find a bogus doc who facilitated false claims of health issues, then that's another Very Bad Thing. But going to her kids' events really shouldn't be taken as evidence one way or another.

Do I understand that this criminal stole $180,000 dollars, does not have to payback the total amount, and most likely will not receive jail time because of her morbid obesity, sleep apnea and asthma? And that her husband, who surely knew where the money was coming from that his wife gave him, is not charged with anything?!!

I'm surprised that diabetes was not mentioned in today's Washington Post. It is very probable that this thief has diabetes and its co-morbidities. Big deal (no pun intended). I suffer these conditions also and don't see how they can be used as rationale for not going to jail.

She should be placed in the Prince George's County jail ASAP.

She has health problems? WHY does she have health problems? Did someone forcefully stuff the big macs and dunkin donuts down her throat?

Can I binge eat and then rob a bank and get to stay home for a year? Sounds like a great solution to my credit card debt.

Lurker,

she was at these sporting evnts to fill her pockets you moron. she was not there to be the wonderful litsa you all thought she was at navy and the teachers best friend... she had an agenda it was to get her hands on cold hard cash as quickly as it came in with as few "middle men" as possible handling it. you people are bunch of idiots, she stole from you and all you care about is her health. how gives a crap.

why did she show up at football games and fundraisers, why was she always the one ordering flowers for the teachers, why did she always pay backother volunteers in cash because she was skimming so much off the top.

what is next for her kids and bought friends Jonas Brothers or gift cards to AF!!

It is obvious to me that Litsa is a classic sociopath who has duped many gullible people at Navy and Chantilly and, to a certain degree, the judge and sheriff in this case.

Sociopaths have to conscience. They don't feel guilt. They don't emphasize with their victims or with normal people. Sociopaths have an objective, to manipulate those around them to get what they want and to lie their way out of trouble wherever possible.

It is apparent to me that Litsa is a sociopath with the charisma of a sociopath. She is a very good liar and plays on people's sympathy. As a sociopath, Litsa is plotting her next step. She will get through the year of house arrest, try to bargain down her probation and, within a few years, will be doing the exact same thing again, only this time is a different community with a new set of gullible people.

Anybody who defends this woman is clueless. She is a psychopath. While you sympathize with her plight, she disdains you for it behind your back. You are all pawns and dupes in her game.

Well said and so very true. Even in her fake crying letter to the court she NEVER acknowledged her actions nor took responsibility for her behavior. Till the end she still had the audacity to "remind" the community of how hard she has worked and all she wanted to do was to contribute to the community. Sociopth is the best word to describe her. She is a despicable person.



WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is obvious to me that Litsa is a classic
> sociopath who has duped many gullible people at
> Navy and Chantilly and, to a certain degree, the
> judge and sheriff in this case.
>
> Sociopaths have to conscience. They don't feel
> guilt. They don't emphasize with their victims or
> with normal people. Sociopaths have an objective,
> to manipulate those around them to get what they
> want and to lie their way out of trouble wherever
> possible.
>
> It is apparent to me that Litsa is a sociopath
> with the charisma of a sociopath. She is a very
> good liar and plays on people's sympathy. As a
> sociopath, Litsa is plotting her next step. She
> will get through the year of house arrest, try to
> bargain down her probation and, within a few
> years, will be doing the exact same thing again,
> only this time is a different community with a new
> set of gullible people.
>
> Anybody who defends this woman is clueless. She is
> a psychopath. While you sympathize with her
> plight, she disdains you for it behind your back.
> You are all pawns and dupes in her game.

bookkeeper 43 year old volunteer, embezzled $177K from PTA, Cub Scout Pack, and work. Got 3 years of jail time ordered to pay back $236K. What happened to jail time? HOward County seems to have it right....

george Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lurker,
>
> she was at these sporting evnts to fill her
> pockets you moron. she was not there to be the
> wonderful litsa you all thought she was at navy
> and the teachers best friend... she had an agenda
> it was to get her hands on cold hard cash as
> quickly as it came in with as few "middle men" as
> possible handling it. you people are bunch of
> idiots, she stole from you and all you care about
> is her health. how gives a crap.
>
> why did she show up at football games and
> fundraisers, why was she always the one ordering
> flowers for the teachers, why did she always pay
> backother volunteers in cash because she was
> skimming so much off the top.
>
> what is next for her kids and bought friends Jonas
> Brothers or gift cards to AF!!

If that's aimed at my post, you didn't read what I wrote.

Folks were complaining about her showing up at sporting events *now*, after her conviction. That's what I was referring to. And last time I checked, elementary schools didn't have football games.

A gentle suggestion: Save the invective for those who deserve it. As I said, I'm no fan of Litsa and some of the money she stole was surely mine. But you seem to have missed that point, too...

wpost metro C3 today Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> bookkeeper 43 year old volunteer, embezzled $177K
> from PTA, Cub Scout Pack, and work. Got 3 years
> of jail time ordered to pay back $236K. What
> happened to jail time? HOward County seems to
> have it right....


Litsa is a better liar.

Two years in jail. That's about what I figured. She should have to pay back the full amount with interest.

Lurker- she was only sentenced to a year in jail. And she'll spend it at her home, never spending a full day behind bars.

A total slap on the wrist, IMO.

A fat person who is told to sit home all day watch TV and eat as a penalty?

Lurker. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A fat person who is told to sit home all day watch
> TV and eat as a penalty?


And you can bet in three months her attorney will be before the judge saying that the home incarceration is putting a strain on her fat heart. She will be off the bracelet in six months.

This is halarious, now that she has been sentenced you SAD SACKs are sitting around complaining about the punishment, I bet not one of you pitiful losers went to to the hearing to testify for the prosecution at the sentencing hering, so GET OVER IT!!!!! let this busy body thread die.

FUNNY Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This is halarious, now that she has been sentenced
> you SAD SACKs are sitting around complaining about
> the punishment, I bet not one of you pitiful
> losers went to to the hearing to testify for the
> prosecution at the sentencing hering, so GET OVER
> IT!!!!! let this busy body thread die.


Naw. I think this thread should live as long as possible. A year's worth of posts should be useful for other groups and potential employers who do background checks on Litsa. Hopefully this thread will pop up and inform those folks about what kind of person Litsa really is.

Hi-

Just wondering if anyone knows what is going on with Litza? I know she is at home but what was the final outcome??

Curious Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi-
>
> Just wondering if anyone knows what is going on
> with Litza? I know she is at home but what was
> the final outcome??


Litsa was sentenced by the judge to two 5 year sentences (running concurrently) with 4 years suspended on each sentence. So, she was really sentenced to one year and something like 5 years probation after that. My understanding is that she will not be in jail and will have electronic incarceration. She will be home with an ankle bracelet monitor (or something similar).

Outcome Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Curious Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hi-
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone knows what is going on
> > with Litza? I know she is at home but what was
> > the final outcome??
>
>
> Litsa was sentenced by the judge to two 5 year
> sentences (running concurrently) with 4 years
> suspended on each sentence. So, she was really
> sentenced to one year and something like 5 years
> probation after that. My understanding is that
> she will not be in jail and will have electronic
> incarceration. She will be home with an ankle
> bracelet monitor (or something similar).


Don't forget she only has to pay back $75K of the $180K she "misplaced."

Her name translates literally into "30 kisses"

I think it means she eats 30 hershey kisses a day.

She is an insult to hardworking Greeks all over the world.

One would think that this OUROUNI (Greek word for pig) would have lost some weight during this period due to the shame she caused her family.

SAD MAN Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Her name translates literally into "30 kisses"
>
> I think it means she eats 30 hershey kisses a
> day.
>
> She is an insult to hardworking Greeks all over
> the world.
>
> One would think that this OUROUNI (Greek word for
> pig) would have lost some weight during this
> period due to the shame she caused her family.


She is a sociopath. She is incapable of shame.

She will do her one year of home detention. After a year or two of probation, she will get that dropped. In five years she will be hosing some other PTA or youth organization. She has no conscience, she has no guilt, she has no shame. She's not "Greek." She's a predator who preys on gullible, unsuspecting people who make the mistake of trusting her.

WashingToneLocian Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> She is a sociopath. She is incapable of shame.
>
> She will do her one year of home detention. After
> a year or two of probation, she will get that
> dropped.

You are so right. My guess is that she will "behave" so well that she will get whoever is in charge to reduce her sentence even further. Time off for good behavior or whatever. I bet she still doesn't think she did anything wrong. I did not read anything in the paper that indicated she was remorseful or even that she admitted to any wrongdoing. Did she?

casualobserver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> You are so right. My guess is that she will
> "behave" so well that she will get whoever is in
> charge to reduce her sentence even further. Time
> off for good behavior or whatever. I bet she
> still doesn't think she did anything wrong. I did
> not read anything in the paper that indicated she
> was remorseful or even that she admitted to any
> wrongdoing. Did she?


She tried to explain it away, saying that she borrowed the money but was going to pay it back. Of course, she "borrowed" $180K over a five year period. I call that a crime.

what are the conditions of her "house arrest"? Under what circumstances is she allowed out of her home?

She should be restricted from take out meals, TV, Internet and cooking. AND no Oprah!

LET IT GO!!! Who cares what she is doing in her house, if she leaves, or what kind of bracelet she wears on her cankles. She has to pay back 75k, she had already paid back 80k of it. She did apologize and showed some remorse. IT IS OVER. Literally "THE FAT LADY HAS SUNG"!!!!!

WHY? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LET IT GO!!! Who cares what she is doing in her
> house, if she leaves, or what kind of bracelet she
> wears on her cankles. She has to pay back 75k, she
> had already paid back 80k of it. She did apologize
> and showed some remorse. IT IS OVER. Literally
> "THE FAT LADY HAS SUNG"!!!!!



80 + 75 < 180K. Seems to me she is still $25K short.

Also, she did not show remorse. She came up with a bunch of excuses for why it happened that didn't put the blame on her.

She was only sorry she got caught. She is now sitting in her home, having everything done for her while she is on her computer plotting out her next scheme. She will have the time to make sure she's more careful in covering her tracks. This woman will never stop. We have not heard the last of her and the legal system. Remember, she has two college educations to pay for!

She DID NOT pay but $10,000 of the known $180,000. The court only ordered her to pay 75K. A reminder that the $180 k were checks, not cash that she ALWAYS had her fat nasty hands in.

WHY? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LET IT GO!!! Who cares what she is doing in her
> house, if she leaves, or what kind of bracelet she
> wears on her cankles. She has to pay back 75k, she
> had already paid back 80k of it. She did apologize
> and showed some remorse. IT IS OVER. Literally
> "THE FAT LADY HAS SUNG"!!!!!

MAKE IT A CONDITION THAT SHE HAS TO LOSE 200 pounds.

She never showed remorse..! please..

Are you saying she did show remorse? Because seriously, she did not. Not only that but in her letter to the court, she reminds the community of how hard she worked for her community. She is one of the most despicable people I have ever met.

huh? Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> She never showed remorse..! please..

Looks like this weekend is going to be a great weekend to get out do stuff. How is Litsa's house going?

do you mean her house arrest? We'll see once sports actually begin and back to school night occurs. Let's hope the conniving bitch has to stay home and our legal system can demonstrate just a bit of commone sense. I am sure she is enjoying her time at home eating bon bons, playing on her computer and getting fatter by the minute. She is such a pig.


Outdoors Lover Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Looks like this weekend is going to be a great
> weekend to get out do stuff. How is Litsa's house
> going?

I delivered a pizza to her cell today

What in the hell does being fat have to do with her crime? There's so much animosity here. I feel sorry for overweight people who have to deal with the kind of hatred that's being expressed here. Would you guys be as vitriolic if she were a babe? What's going on?

SlimChick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What in the hell does being fat have to do with
> her crime?

If she were a nice, law abiding citizen, no one would say shit about her being fat (okay, maybe Gravis).

> There's so much animosity here.

The woman who duped a community and stole $180K from kids and essentially got away with deserves animosity.

I
> feel sorry for overweight people who have to deal
> with the kind of hatred that's being expressed
> here.

The hatred is being expressed because of what she. Not simply because she is fat.

>Would you guys be as vitriolic if she were
> a babe?

Considering how much we bashed the drunk Junkette, yeah, probably.

> What's going on?

Isn't it obvious?

Her weight is brought up because she used her weight and the health problems that go with being obese as an excuse to get out of serving any time for her crime. If she was a slim chick like you, she would be behind bars.

Moral of the story....if you're going to break the law, hit Dunkin Donuts first!

I think I'm going to for a walk and then out to dinner tonight. Anybody else have plans to get out of the house?

This looks like Litsa's more successful sister....

http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/18735324/detail.html#


...What is it with these gals being fat?

hahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Stupid ass fat bitch was going to spend all that cash on twinkies and bon bons.
Fuck You hoe. Get slim fast and Jenny Craig.

I can't believe she just moved into my neighborhood...

NewNeighbor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can't believe she just moved into my
> neighborhood...


I heard that the HOA has an opening for a Treasurer. Please pass the word to everyone to vote for me, I will do a great job!

I heard that Litsa is overweight

So, what's the story? Where did she moved to? How can she afford to move? Isn't she paying the school back? Is she owning or renting? Anyone have the answers?

whatsthestory Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So, what's the story? Where did she moved to?
> How can she afford to move? Isn't she paying the
> school back? Is she owning or renting? Anyone
> have the answers?


I believe she rented before, so she is probably renting again. However, isn't she a convicted felon? Not sure who would rent to her. Maybe someone else she has suckered.

It's practically standing still now. They've dropped ropes out of the nose of the ship; and (uh) they've been taken ahold of down on the field by a number of men. It's starting to rain again; it's—the rain had (uh) slacked up a little bit. The back motors of the ship are just holding it (uh) just enough to keep it from— It's burst into flames! It burst into flames, and it's falling, it's crashing! Watch it! Watch it! Get out of the way! Get out of the way! Get this, Charlie; get this, Charlie! It's fire—and it's crashing! It's crashing terrible! Oh, my! Get out of the way, please! It's burning and bursting into flames; and the—and it's falling on the mooring-mast. And all the folks agree that this is terrible; this is the one of the worst catastrophes in the world. [indecipherable] its flames... Crashing, oh! Four- or five-hundred feet into the sky and it—it's a terrific crash, ladies and gentlemen. It's smoke, and it's in flames now; and the frame is crashing to the ground, not quite to the mooring-mast. Oh, the humanity! and all the passengers screaming around here. I told you; it—I can't even talk to people Their friends are out there! Ah! It's—it—it's a—ah! I—I can't talk, ladies and gentlemen. Honest: it's just laying there, mass of smoking wreckage. Ah! And everybody can hardly breathe and talk and the screaming. Lady, I—I—I'm sorry. Honest: I—I can hardly breathe. I—I'm going to step inside, where I cannot see it. Charlie, that's terrible. Ah, ah;—I can't. Listen, folks; I—I'm gonna have to stop for a minute because [indecipherable] I've lost my voice. This is the worst thing I've ever witnessed.

Sneed Hearn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's practically standing still now. They've
> dropped ropes out of the nose of the ship; and
> (uh) they've been taken ahold of down on the field
> by a number of men. It's starting to rain again;
> it's—the rain had (uh) slacked up a little bit.
> The back motors of the ship are just holding it
> (uh) just enough to keep it from— It's burst into
> flames! It burst into flames, and it's falling,
> it's crashing! Watch it! Watch it! Get out of the
> way! Get out of the way! Get this, Charlie; get
> this, Charlie! It's fire—and it's crashing! It's
> crashing terrible! Oh, my! Get out of the way,
> please! It's burning and bursting into flames; and
> the—and it's falling on the mooring-mast. And all
> the folks agree that this is terrible; this is the
> one of the worst catastrophes in the world. its
> flames... Crashing, oh! Four- or five-hundred feet
> into the sky and it—it's a terrific crash, ladies
> and gentlemen. It's smoke, and it's in flames now;
> and the frame is crashing to the ground, not quite
> to the mooring-mast. Oh, the humanity! and all the
> passengers screaming around here. I told you; it—I
> can't even talk to people Their friends are out
> there! Ah! It's—it—it's a—ah! I—I can't talk,
> ladies and gentlemen. Honest: it's just laying
> there, mass of smoking wreckage. Ah! And everybody
> can hardly breathe and talk and the screaming.
> Lady, I—I—I'm sorry. Honest: I—I can hardly
> breathe. I—I'm going to step inside, where I
> cannot see it. Charlie, that's terrible. Ah, ah;—I
> can't. Listen, folks; I—I'm gonna have to stop for
> a minute because I've lost my voice. This is the
> worst thing I've ever witnessed.

Litsa and her husband do not own anything. They rent their house and lease their cars so that the IRS and others cannot attach any liens. I am sure that the lease is not in her name, rather her husband. Remember, she and her husband are experts at skirting around the law.

how can she afford to move? I thought she had to pay back the money?

The judgment is against Litsa, not her husband. Litsa has not had a paying job (legitmate pay) in years. All the leases, etc. are in her husband's name. She has not gone without anything this entire time, he foots the bill for everything. She waddled away, without any remorse or repercussion. If she never works, never owns anything, and all the leases are in her husband's name, she will go to her grave never paying back the money she stole.

Trust me, she had the last laugh here.

your right she does have the last laugh, we are the fools,all the people and the school that she stole from. I wonder if the court knows that she has moved on up. She has at the minimum doubled her rent in her new place.