It compiles the expression and runs, but gives warnings that are totally incorrect concerning the nature of a planned approved and documented language use.

what is {} (an function? an expression? an BODY?) and does it have a value after }

CLANG doesn't know K&R C I or II, which means it doesn't know shit about C.

supposedly from OHIO intellectual elite, it's distribution is only a little better than the MALWARE bomb that "steamclient in linux" is

(it does not use a simple standard shell and IEEE tools - instead it uses malware PYTHON that (with any runtime use) is full of viruses. it cannot compile without it. and it can't compile itself either due to relying upon it heavily)

a C compiler that's >>223 Megabytes than knows NOTHING MUCH about the (simple) C language, AND IS ALSO FAR FAR SLOWER, OBSTRUCTIVELY ASIAN SLOWER, THAN C

very capable C compiler used to fit on a few floppies (not more than a few M) (they do not know about new Intel cpu but that's not a huge issue that is not WHY they are so much faster and smaller)

they're faster and smaller because they weren't HILLARY developed

broken ass shit from democrats who break everything they touch

.

what you'll find with this 9 gigabyte piece of crap slow compiler is

SPAM SPAM MICROSOFT ATTACKS ON LINUX SPAM SPAM SPAM

so you compile legit code LLVM "because they hacked X to demand you do", then,

SPAM SPAM SPAM your compiler issues shitloads of warnings for no reason SPAM SPAM SPAM which slows down things 100x more than already slow which is already 25x slower than "a C compiler"

i became a learned in ASM was it late 80's.

i at first loved C, then saw on (BBS or newish ISP) "it causes more problems that it's worth" and became suspicious of C seeing the complexity of C++ "was being used totally wrong by idiots resulting in bloat slowness and also bugs"

i'm really more a fan of FLAT ASM (one pass bitch that's all you get) with NO MACROS - but nothing wrong with pre-processing so long as "the code is there and not robot crap after translation"

MICROSOFT HAS ALWAYS discouraged "ASM" use by customers (because it competes with CHINESE and microsoft has always been on the chinese team). THEY STILL DO and STILL DON'T SUPPORT INTEL INSTRUCTIONS MUCH. (and MS is now making "chinese ARM only releases")

WHY INTEL FRIENDED A BUNCH OF ABUSIVE SEATTLE ASSHOLES IDK.

intel has an asm compiler, once made it free (competition ubuntu ARM attacking) and removed it from market

MICROSOFT BOUGHT competing compiler makers and DELETED THEM ALL REMOVED FROM MARKET - INCLUDING ASM THEY MADE. their "customer compiler" both LEGALLY CLAIMS THEFT BY MICROSOFT FROM CUSTOMER IS THE ONLY OPTION, and disclaims customers own anything whatsoever.

THIS FROM THE COMPANY THAT CONTINUALLY STOLD THINGS

MICROSOFT SAYS IT OWNS nVIDIA - but Canada and MICROSOFT teamed to steal GL from SGI (and linux)

they tried to also destroy GL (nvidia d3d only microsoft domination) but failed when sued and a stop order was issued

SO YOU STEAL SOMETHING AND PAY A FINE THEN YOU OWN IT - FINE PAYED WITH GOV MONEY FROM GOV JOBS YOU BRIBED TO GET?

MICROSOFT - YOU ARE THE ONLY FUCKING ASSHOLES ON EARTH WHO AREN'T ALLOWED TO OWN A COPY OF OPENGL: becasue you stole it in a big way as in death penalty sums of money way.

does that have anything to do with LLVM?

it does

.

.

.