To Oakton Parent:
"1) A first-rate education in a learning
> environment enriched by diversity. Every year,
> SLHS produces academic stars who are prepared to
> thrive in a flat, diverse world."
>
> I don't quite know that this means. It looks to
> be a statement that other school environments are
> inferior because they are less diverse?
> Otherwise, its meaningless as an "advantage".
As long as a school provides an excellent academic experience - which SLHS clearly does - diversity is an advantage. School is as much about social growth as it is academics. Diversity enhances social growth in students, and better prepares students for leadership and teamwork in the real world.
"2) An IB program - which recently was graded
> higher than AP."
>
> "The implication is non-IB schools are inferior,
> when that is hardly a defensible statement. The
> programs are different, and will meet different
> needs for different students. AP is much more
> popular across the US (14,000 schools vs. 500
> schools) and in the county. Anecdotally, there
> seem to be many more families who prefer AP when
> the choice of both is available, if for no other
> reason than the breadth of AP offerings and the
> potential for college credit for one year AP
> classes."
The implication is not that non-IB schools are inferior. The point is that IB and AP both offer academic rigor for students. All else being equal, academic achievement is primarily a function of a student's motivation and effort, and family suport. There is no reason to think that a student who would have excelled at Oakton or Westfield will not excel at SLHS.
3) A better chance to engage in extracurriculars,
> particularly for Floris students."
>
> I think this argument is based on student
> population moreso than looking into specific
> extracurricular opportunities and criteria for
> participating in them.
True. Population matters, both for Westfield and for SLHS.
"4) A sense of community that comes with attending
> a more local school."
>
> Fox mill students will have a more local school,
> Floris is equidistant from both, and Navy will
> have a more distant school. Even in that
> scenario, Fox Mill students are well integrated
> into the Oakton community well before high
> school.
No one can say with a straigh face that it makes sense for Fox Mill students to travel past SLHS, which is underenrolled, in order to travel 9 or 10 miles on back roads to get to Oakton. Moreover, it is obvious that Fox Mill is effectively part of the Reston community, not the "Oakton community" to which some Fox Mill parents apparently aspire, and, as everyone knows, high school is a different experience than elementary or middle school, full of new friends and new experiences and new sense of community tethered to the school. As for Floris, all Floris students east of Monroe street are clearly closer to SLHS than to Westfield. Only Floris students west of Monroe are equidistant.
5) A shorter commute to school."
>
> See previous point...less than half of the
> students affected will have a shorter commute.
See previous point.
"6) A newly renovated, state-of-the-art
> facility."
>
> The implication being that SLHS is better than
> others now? Are you suggesting that FCPS doesn't
> offer equal facilities to all its students?
I assume FCPS provides high quality facilities to all its students. SLHS, however, has received the most recent renovation and therefore has the most to offer in this regard. This does not mean it is "better," but it does mean that it is by no means inferior to any school facility in the County.
> "7) The best young principal in the school
> system."
>
> This is the point that made me gag. This sounds
> much more like an opinion, or a hope, as opposed
> to something that can be objectively determined.
This is not a subjective opinion. Bruce Butler was named the FCPS First-Year Principal of the Year. See
http://www.fcps.edu/mediapub/cable-tv/archive/0607/ss0607.htm
"8) Freedom from the shackles of fear and
> elitism."
>
> By posting this, you're basically branding as
> elitist anybody who might feel that their needs
> are best met at another school.
>
> Trying to compare schools to see which one is
> "better" is a losing proposition. Everybody will
> make their own determination. And even if someone
> thinks their school is right for them, it doesn't
> give them standing to make this claim on behalf of
> other families.
I'm not branding everyone - only those who deserve it. No one with eyes, ears, and a brain who has read this forum or attended the meetings can doubt that fear and elitism are strong undercurrents in this debate. Fox Mill and Floris parents of conscience should be just as offended as SLHS parents.
To your point about everyone making their own decision, and who has standing to make claims on behalf other families ... your're right. The only people who have standing to make these decisions are our elected public officials, who must make their decision based on the merits and based on the highest standards of public trust. To be sure, Fox Mill and Floris parents have a right to their personal preferences, even if grounded in fear, elitism, and misunderstanding of the greatness of SLHS. They have every right, as well, to stir up discord and dissension in the community and to try to poison the debate, and to poison their kids' perception of SLHS. However, Fox Mill and Floris parents have no legitimate expectation that public officials, using public money for public schools, acquiesce to such sentiments instead of doing the right thing.
The legitimate options of unhappy parents are to (a) move; (b) send their kids to a private school of their choice; (c) hope to be permitted to pupil place. I urge Fox Mill and Floris parents of good will to choose none of the above. They and their kids will find that SHLS is an excellent school, with excellent students, who will welcome them with open arms. Diversity united in excellence. E Pluribus Unum.