SubmissiveWiiRNot Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> sos Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > I would glady vote for more school funds to go
> to
> > help the kids at McNair and Dogwood rather than
> > have had the money spent for additions at
> > Westfield and Langley that were not needed.
>
> I totally agree that additions were not needed at
> the other schools; however, the reason that Title
> I kids at Westfield (McNair) and Oakton (Mosby
> Woods) do better at those schools is because
> disadvantaged kids do better when they don't make
> up a large portion of their school. So throwing
> more money at Dogwood and McNair won't help and
> they will be better served in high schools with a
> larger proportion of middle class kids. That's
> why it's important to bring more middle class kids
> into South Lakes and it should have been done
> before any additions were built elsewhere.
>
> For those who thinks the renovation at SL is being
> done for this study, please know that it has been
> in the bonds for 10 years and the planning stages
> for at least four. Also, the after renovation
> capacity actually drops by 100 students from
> pre-renovation capacity.
Agreed! The rennovation at South Lakes has nothing to do with increasing current capacity. The upgraded facilities have and will continue to improve our learning environment both educationally and for participating in extracurricular activities. Here are some images that have been posted of our new classrooms and athletic facilities.
School Interior
http://www.fcps.edu/SouthLakesHS/renovation/renovationpics_10-2007.htm
Athletic Facilities
http://www.southlakeslacrosse.com/?page_id=15