AFMD -
Offering a complete curriculum in both AP and IB is simply against the rules in Fairfax. Since IB was added in the late 90s, the primary advanced curriculum at a FCPS HS can only be one or the other. If the HS is an IB school, the HS may offer a few AP classes in disciplines outside the standard IB offerings.
There is rationale for the rule - the essential problem is that AP and IB (especially HL) classes simply aren't for everyone. There's only so many kids capable of taking (or are at least willing to take) the highest level classes. Combine that with the fact that the the number of kids per teacher in FX HSes is around 30. The schools can't afford to have very many classes below 20 kids or they can't hit the required average.
Consider the number of kids taking either HL Math or Calculus BC or Multivariate Calc or the number of kids taking foreign language AP or IB classes. If you assume that 20% of the kids are going to take a foreign language IB/AP class & 4 languages are offered, that's 8 classes. Take 400 kids * .2 = 80 kids or 10 kids per class. That's 8 classes that would have to be made up with corresponding classes larger than 30 to make the average.
Even at Westfield with 3100 kids and just AP, they end up not canceling some of the highest level classes because there aren't enough kids signed up.
AFMD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FM mom and Forum Reader,
>
> I'm fully aware of the conventional wisdom as
> applied to this thread (ie- large schools such as
> Robinson can't support both, etc, etc). That's
> why I mention Watkins Mill because it apears to
> contradict it.
>
> Watkins Mill has an enrollment of 1,700, is
> racially split (approx 1/3 white, 1/3 black & 1/3
> hispanic) has 25% FRM and has the course offerings
> listed in my above post. So how is a school like
> this able to offer the AP & IB classes they do?
>
> Also, the school rates about the same as SL.
>
>
http://www.greatschools.net/cgi-bin/md/other/1018