I concurr. IB has it's merits particularly for smaller school systems, private, or charter schools where it serves many of the overhead or curriculum development functions found within FCPS. Jay Matthews wrote Supertest about the installation of IB at Mount Vernon HS. IB forces a school to have quality instruction and requires it's own training for staff.
FCPS pays an exhorbitant amount of money for IB which was not supposed to go in at so many schools. FCPS has a contract with the College Board where tests are $74 and increase $1 annually for 10 years if I rememebr correctly. IB charges over $8500 per school and might charge about 5200 in FY2008 for IBMY [FY2009 might see a 20% increase in these fees. FY2008 Each student has a $123 fee
and a $84 per test or evaluation fee. I don't know if these charges will increase in this budget. IB also requires a full-time staff member to work with the diploma candiates as a coach/guidance person.
If a school has 300 students testing in IB that is:
annual student fee 36900=300*123
1st test all students 25200=300*84
2nd test 150 students =12600
3rd test 50 diploma candidates= 4200
total tests= 500*84=$42000
500 AP test *74=37000
diff 5000
Allocating a per school fee of 8500{?} for 300 =28
Allocating that over diploma candidates =170 annually per student
The 50 diploma candidates are :
fee 6150
tests 12600
teacher/coach/IB coordinator 80000?
school fee 8500
total 107250/50=$2145
3 AP exams =$222
Diff $1923
Also AP training is less costly and FCPS has revenue from training other districts AP teachers. IB might not have local training for all requirements ------so flights-hotels-junkets. Trip to Canada , Wales, or Geneva? Not a car mileage reimbursement to George Mason or UVA and a Court yard Marriot [or dorm].
MIT grad Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> AP vs IB Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > MIT grad Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > >
> > > I am an MIT grad, a nuclear engineer and an
> > > electrical engineer. I have never taken an
> AP
> > > class or an IB class. It is not possible for
> > me
> > > to directly 'experience' IB or AP as a
> student
> > or
> > > parent without being enrolled or having my
> son
> > > enrolled. So, lacking a direct experience, I
> > have
> > > looked at the Oakton and SL IB and AP math
> text
> > > books and curriculum. I have emailed with
> > someone
> > > at SL who was given to me as a point of
> contact
> > > for the IB math curriculum. After looking at
> > > this, and comparing to my experience at MIT,
> I
> > do
> > > not like it. Therefore, I do not want my son
> > to
> > > take IB. Therefore, I do not want to go to SL.
>
> > If
> > > SL was AP, I would go with a mixture of
> > optimism
> > > and trepidation.
> > >
> > > Let me try it this way... I do not want to
> try
> > IB.
> > > In fact, I cannot just 'try it.' If we are
> > sent
> > > to SL, there is no "trying it"...there is
> only
> > > "doing it", or pupil placing. Pupil placing
> > will
> > > be a pain, so again I'd rather not go to SL.
>
> > >
> > > Proponents of IB cannot really fault people
> for
> > > not wanting to try IB. I was recently in
> Korea
> > for
> > > the first time and was offered stewed silk
> worm
> > > larva...some Koreans apparently love it...I
> did
> > > not want to try it...same for IB...I know
> > people
> > > like it, but I do not want to try it.
> > >
> > > And for the IB proponents, the discomfort you
> > feel
> > > about people attempting to push AP at you is
> > the
> > > mirror of the discomfort AP proponents feel
> > about
> > > your advocacy.
> > >
> > > So what to do? Obviously, for people with my
> > > perspective, the only thing to do is to
> oppose
> > the
> > > RD.
> > >
> > > If opposition fails and my neighborhood is
> sent
> > to
> > > SL, I will join the PTA to join/form a
> > committee
> > > to jettison IB in favor of AP. I think a lot
> > of
> > > people will be interested in the same. We
> may
> > not
> > > be able to get rid of it immediately, or ever.
>
> > > But I would think that if more folks want to
> > get
> > > rid of it than keep it, the Board will have a
> > hard
> > > time keeping it. I imagine it will be testy
> > the
> > > first few years. But what else can I do...I
> do
> > > not want my kids taking IB, and I really do
> not
> > > want to pupil place. I think there should be
> a
> > > survey for current opinion, along with a
> > recurring
> > > campaign of advocacy by both IB and AP
> > proponents.
> > > Time will tell what happens...but it
> probably
> > > will not be a fun time. If the IB proponents
> > at
> > > SL do not want to have an anti-IB campaign in
> > > their PTA, they should consider opposing the
> RD.
> >
> > > Do you really want a bunch of people in your
> > > school who do not want to be there and who
> will
> > > actively work to jettison IB? It worked at
> > > Woodson, and it will probably work at SL too.
> > >
> > > Be nice in your reply..I am not attacking
> > anyone.
> >
> > You might want to check out this report that
> > compares AP and IB math and science courses.
> > Scroll down the link to see relevant chapters
> > relating to math on the left, and on the right
> > hand side you will find different subjects too:
> >
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10380
>
> Thanks for the link...it is very very interesting.
> I compared the appendices listing the curricula
> for AP Calculus B/C and for IB Math HL. The AP
> curriculum is familiar to me in that it matches
> what I experienced at MIT (albeit very
> quickly...MIT is very very intensive, so we blew
> through that material pretty quickly). I was one
> of the only kids at MIT who never had calculus in
> high school. Boy did I suffer. I envied the kids
> who took AP. The material at this link leaves me
> further in favor of AP for my family. MIT does
> not teach math or the sciences in an IB-like
> context (maybe they should, but that is a
> different story). MIT teaches math and science
> like AP does. It is perhaps too glib to say, if
> the approach is good enough for the best (my
> bias!) engineering school in the world, it is good
> enough for me. Said more reasonably, I want my
> son (who is a great math/science kid who hopes to
> follow his dad to MIT) to get there and hit the
> ground running. Maybe he could do that with IB.
> Maybe he could do it better with IB. But I know
> he can do it with AP. Furthermore, I am qualified
> to tutor him in an AP construct. I have no idea
> if I can help him with the IB approach...maybe I
> can, maybe I cannot. But, because I know I can
> with AP, I want him to take AP. (Kinda like his
> language studies...he had a choice of languages in
> 8th grade. I steered toward French because his
> mother and I took French, so we knew we could help
> him. In fact, the language analogy is similar to
> the silk worm analogy. Imagine a family who had
> planned on having their kid educated in language
> A, which they were familiar with, only to find out
> they would be forced to have him educated in
> language B...clearly a recipe for unhappiness.)
>
> My position is not changed. I think AP is best
> for my family. Hence I am opposed to the RD.
> Drop IB in favor of AP, and we have a different
> story.
>
> Comments?