I says this is about "forcing Poland to stop mining coal" because German buys coal from Russia and is EXTREMELY JEALOUS.

Russia says this is about EU placing TROOPS ON UKRAINIAN BORDER, to eventually demand UKRAINE are "part of EU".

HOWEVER - Russia spent allot of money putting nuclear, weapons, and mining installations in "southern russia" some which "exited" some which are "trying to exit". The wealthiest part of this russia, minearal wealthy: IS UKRAINE

Russia says: "they want to exit like Texas of USA wants to succeede - they want to run off with a major national asset and live richly while other russians get their boots robbed"

little red riding hood

Russia says this is about EU placing TROOPS ON UKRAINIAN BORDER, to eventually demand UKRAINE are "part of EU".

Russia denies they are "helping china and iran undermine EU"

what millenials look like when they are dressed up political (right)

what millenials look like when they are laughing at poland for quitting coal mining (left)

Not EU.

Turn the microphone off on all settings.
Camera too.
Like it matters but it’s an extra layer !!

FUIstheattack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not EU.
>
> Turn the microphone off on all settings.
> Camera too.
> Like it matters but it’s an extra layer !!

DROP DEAD G2

SPUTNIK RADIO'S COMPLAIN IS UK EU IS THREATENING TO SEND "peace keeping troups" to the poland boarder - because of it's very close to the UKRAINE BORDER

i don't distrust that it is truly russia's position

FUIstheattack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not EU.
>
> Turn the microphone off on all settings.
> Camera too.
> Like it matters but it’s an extra layer !!

let's go over VBIS revisions again, will we

34tt4y Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
yea he's canadian but he doubles well as a shifty french politician

i was hoping nobody noticed!

https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2021/12/03/ukraine-warns-of-large-scale-russian-offensive-in-january/

THIS IS FAKE NEWS - IN THAT IT OMITS ALLOT OF TRUTH

ukraine has natural resources russia build infrastructure to mine and "owns"

Ukraine, during OBAMA, raised a token army to ward off russia WHICH FAILED - russia entered with tanks and they fled offered little resistance

THIS IS THE TYPICAL DEMOCRAT PLOT - denying history entering fake records on the book

Will not allow being stepped on , why do we..weak DEMOCRATS

aruably Russia's border post WWII, perhaps arguably today

WWII Allies cut up the map. UK for some reason gained 0 land. Russia for some reason was given allot of land (today politically problematic since mineral resources are on them and there is "a land crunch"). The allies i beleive didn't think things through well.

USSR, RUSSIA, WENT COMMUNIST - and began a post-war cold war build up but also an industrialization of Russia (for common goods, fuel for cooking, metal mining, and so on).

PERHAPS UNWISELY, ussr built allot of it on the outer borders (to protect it's borders cold war - and for proximity of imports / exports)

INCLUDED IN THE BORDER BUILD-UP - NUCLEAR MISSILES. One of the countries with many nuclear missles threatened to use them aginst russia to succeede (obviously greedy - russian taxpayers had made the area rich with tax funding then the area wanted to "immediately succeede" with ALL THE USSR GOODS). It was painful for russia to correct the situation. They had to do so while their economy was collapsing. Very painful

Not everyone stayed around in Ukraine and Russia for the fighting. SOME FLED, fed up with the feuding.

ONE CAME TO FAIRFAX I knew him well. A fine man and great worker that everyone who knew him loved (except perhaps hispanics who were trying to take over fairfax and get his job as well). Have no idea if he's still in fairfax.

I asked him once about Russia he said "no Ukraine - that's all a mess and do not ask about it again - too difficult to explain - things were not good". he struggled with his toung and decided to stop a speach about it, and did. he stopped there.

so - you have WWII allies saying "sure - you can have all those border countries we don't want them"

russia STILL has the problem all the border countries (which have a TON of russian assets) want to split

(they would split, become "democrats", sell off all the russian assets, sell not just the resources but the land to foreigners, then in 50 yrs demand russia or EU pay welfare since all of their state was foreign owned and in debt. that's usually how democrats who want to "run with the money" work)

those little border countries were "considered way out farming outposts" back then

europeans, splitting land boundaries after the war - saw them more as "poverty and liability" than an asset to argue with Russia over

IT CAN BE ARGUED RUSSIA MADE THOSE COUNTRIES THRIVE (taxing all of russia sending infrastructure buildup for mother russia to the borders) - though others say Russia was a bully collecting taxes adding nothing. (one has to assume the MANY NUCLEAR WEAPONS weren't all the work of the small country that "tried to run-away with them - threatened to use them against russia", i just assume it)

(UK certainly fought hitler more than anyone else - got 0 land increase out of the deal - which is another problem - UK needs land and people are falling off the island trying to urbanize farms and so on - urban sprawl)

------------------------------

these things were not thought out well after WWII

IT WAS THE WAR TO END ALL WARS - usa media said

they just assumed that "reasonable trade deals" could be made

the issue of "muslims fucking up a storm, flooding borders, demanding welfare, democrat handing jobs to illegal aliens who then voted themselves into power by number" ?? of all of europe USA suddenly "quitting manufacturing - selling out their own to asia - shipping USA's 200 year machine infrastructure to asia so cheap labor would use the machines" ??

these things weren't on the mind of the Allies nor the "general public" - or you must assume not by the outcome of their decisions at the end of WWII

====================

RACE - THE FINAL FRONTIER

so - England and allies - they though those little states were "not worth anything industrially or commercially for trade" - just a bunch of hicks

the little countries disputed after WWI "part of russia or part of europe" - but they didn't have much power they were a string of farms and agricultural centers (or in-transit towns) basically (a rough depiction that would offend - well so what)

how Allies decided the EU-Russian borders, screwed the serbs without knowing it, and left asia and arabs "out of the picture", all that is a Wonder of the World

ah - those little areas of poor people "the big people laugh at as a welfare area"

BILL CLINTON 1998: "west virginia is a bunch of back water un-educated people - that we'd either pay for coal or not steal land from little people using the corrupt courts is rediculous" (we'd invade them if needed they would fall like flies)

(and he wasn't kidding, during Bill Clinton the death rate of EVICTIONS soared across the USA)

(they call them powerless un-educated welfare areas people shouldn't care about - but they fight to steal them without admitting it. cute, that)

UAE G10 OPEC Summit

Whlie Israel is taking an OPEC brochure, "Wait - were you invited to the Summit?"

Israeli, "of course I was invited - you have security at the doors right?"

(see the press pass is hidden under lapel!)

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2021/12/13/eu-threatens-putin-aggression-against-ukraine-will-have-a-high-cost-for-russia/

meanwhile - white un-employed English males are being told to be gay and GET OUT OF THE WAY, while "the committee" decides how to fondle THE MONEY from illegal alien labor. in other words: the democrat usual. with pay raises for dems.

BUT HOW WILL THIS THREAT REDUCE FOSSIL FUEL PRICES FOR UK? Russia is an important source (close to them). They "were in USA's gulf and created a damn mess instead of winning allot of oil".

HOW WILL THREATENING RUSSIA help UK? Well. China wants BOTH of them weaker and may be paying bribes today.

But for UK's own good (meaning NOT UK's democrats) I see only wreckage. Russia will respond BY RAISING PRICES on EU, then lowering after threats, then raising. But in the end: raising.

UK also seems to have been involved in HI-JACKING OPEC OIL, also a dim-witted move - being that "this would certainly cause higher prices" unless continued indefinitely.

UK's "committees" keep getting the raises, the "un-connected" keep attacking USA using UBUNTU as a "weapon to kill on behalf of china". But as to helping UK's economy. I see one wreck after another and a few at the top who don't give a damn as long as they aren't the next one to fall.

certain people in UK are "partly connected" to the people WHO LEFT UK and "kinda #owned Hong Kong"

which - just recently - all became property of china

so there is that "connection there" of why UK might still be "cheerleading for china" despite Hong Kong is now in chinese hands. kinda like ghost actions newly failing.

vcv

there's another bug EU UBUNTU EVOLUTION on what's going on

it can be that UK'S RICH GOV WORKERS, lording over the poor unemployed, are INVESTED IN RUSSIAN FUEL

and that their "arming the border russia ukraine poland" IS A SIDE TRACK

follow me like you would the groove on a beatles record ...

1) they give CREDIBLE EXCUSE FOR RUSSIA TO BE ANGRY

2) UK PRICES SPIKE, the poor get eviced pay out the ass - or in it - whichever cums first

3) UK admits it's forces can't be risked in a conflict - after only giving russia an excuse to raise prices

4) TURNS OUT - NOT AN ADVERTISED FACT - ALLOT OF THE FUEL PRICE IN UK FRANCE ARE ACTUALLY LOCAL DEMOCRAT GOVERNMENT TAX INCREASES THEY ARE BLAMING ON RUSSIA


LOCAL DEMOCRAT GOVERNMENT TAX INCREASES THEY ARE BLAMING ON RUSSIA

NOW, can you dig that?

meanwhile - russia can't really expose the nasty democrat UK france politicians for the SCUM they really are

it's not their job or place - for one thing

though russia does what it wants - usually

* we all know "end fossil fuel" is a bullshit

* we all know democrats drive toyota hate usa AND PUT THEIR FOOT ON THE GAS LIKE NOBODY'S BUSINESS

* we al know Al Gore "green" are pork and barrel DEMOCRAT FUNDIGN which spend more fuel than they save: windmills and solar are NOT the future. they have significant fuel cost which they DO NOT recover during service - heavily maintained expensive service

* we all know Air Conditioning (cooling not heating) is the hugest consumer of fossil fuel (2nd to all of industry use only factually): and DEMOCRATS have installed it EVERYWHERE where in the past it hadn't been

* we all know SOLAR is chinese imports with allot of lies and catches unaware consumers don't know about until they are $$$ deep into it. more al gore rip-offs

* we all know DEMOCRATS are "against nuclear", which defies their standing against oil

* we all know DEMOCRATS are just MAKING EXCUSES FOR HIGHER TAXES on all the options: high tax on fuel, high tax on nuclear, and chinese in your windmills (illegal aliens continually maintaining the bad designs - a total bust) AND democrat grants to make rich whoever is running a wind-mill rip-off

(we all know windmills have been around since the Greeks made metal gears - that their usefullness in Power is not news nor any kind of cover-up)

* NONE OF US WISH for fuel to be all gone for future generations. But implementing huge windmill chinese solar to let democrats live lavishly IS EXACTLY THAT - QUADRUPLE DIPPING SCREWING THE FUTURE. You can only conserve by ACTUALLY CONSERVING. Using broken plans that might in the future absolutely counts for nothing - but PROFITING DOING IT is absolutely rotten.

* DAMS. The world has been all about DAMS and that's due to THE GREATEST GENERATION and before - not democrats since Clinton - who actually hacked and destroyed some DAM projects. (FFU has an article on a DAM in Afghanistan USA Afghanistan and others worked on ATTACKED BY DEMOCRATS specifically to keep Afghanistan poor an on fuel)

DEMOCRATS HAVE CONTINUALLY IMPLEMENTED THE DEVIL'S COOKBOOK

* BEFORE BILL CLINTON - almost everything that could be damned for making Energy WAS. that the world was "overyly using non-green" was simply untrue

.

.

.

.

.

WHEN BIDEN ADMITTED HE AND BBC WERE LYING

HIS NEXT LIE WAS "THIS WILL ONLY TAKE A FEW DAYS, DON'T WORRY ABOUT YOUR STOCK POSITIONS OR SAFETY"

.

i actually learned to predict like that beggining with DOS when i was a kid (bill gates lies)

then w95 then studying unix wars of the "big 5" then linux wars (google/china/germany/microsoft warfare on linux (free software maintained by educators rather than big tech) using taxpayer money). from that i learned their propaganda and following (or usually ongoing) war actions.

i knew the second if not before BBC said "muslim migrants through poland" they were lying and were there to aggresively attack russia long term if necessary. which is clinton against USA's interests and really FOR CHINA

yes - the war is for china who wants capitol in ukraine which is a bitch of china - for Russia's immense land holdings which have many mines - including nuclear fuel mines

and perhaps from being around military kids when i was young - who's parents taught them not to leave their guard down around hostile foreigers. all their expressions were no less than damn straight.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

ask bbc they will release spam england is just some nice people and don't know what it is all about

BUT THERE'S MASSIVE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - that's simply not true

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2023/12/19/uk-wants-to-build-mini-nuke-plants-in-ukraine/

biden is a lying devil