HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Poster ()
Date: July 17, 2020 05:43PM

Re: Identity of attorneys who defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant muslim female attorney Geloo solely because she was successful and well liked.

The anonymous bullies were successfully unveiled by Andi Geloo in a lawsuit she filed on her own behalf-- Brian Roman and Demetrius Pikrallidas.

New York Times- Women in the World


Woman changes law to fight anonymous harassers on the Internet

When the law prevented Andaleeb Geloo from taking legal action against her Internet bullies, she changed the law
Asra Q. Nomani
07.30.15
Photo by Christopher Sessums (Flickr)
Photo by Christopher Sessums (Flickr)

On January 14, 2013, Andaleeb Geloo, a friendly and charismatic attorney at the Fairfax County Courthouse in Virginia, outside of Washington, D.C., got a shocking phone call from a recent client. Raised in the United States by immigrant parents from Pakistan, she had a stellar career and was well-liked by colleagues, who called her “Andi” and nicknamed her “the sweetheart of the courthouse.” She had graduated in the top 10 percent of her law school class at George Washington University in 2003 with high honors and academic awards, then launched a successful law firm.

But her client warned her that on a community website, FairfaxUnderground, anonymous users had posted vile, disparaging comments about Geloo’s sexuality, legal practice and physique, essentially “slut shaming” and “fat shaming” her. (Not that it mattered, but she was athletically fit.) The attorney initially ignored the warning. Then, days later, while representing clients at the Fairfax County Courthouse, she heard whispers about “the Geloo posts.” That night, she huddled over a computer and dared to open the FairfaxUnderground website. “I was compelled to look,” she says.

She was stunned by the vitriol hurled against her. About a week earlier, the client had written a favorable review about Geloo representing him well in court on a driving violation. About 20 minutes later, an anonymous writer using the ID “BEH” responded: “I hope you kill Andi and yourself in the fiery crash that you will inevitably cause.” Hours later, “Tea Baggins,” a sexual reference to a man putting his testicles into a sexual partner’s mouth, wrote, “This thread is useless without pictures of Andi.” The verbal assaults continued relentlessly for days.

User “Bang Bros,” using the name of a Miami-based porn film production company, chimed in, asking, “So … did you give Andi the old boosh kadoosh.” A user posted, “Andi Geloo — Bullshit Artist,” and “Andi Fan” responded to the “Tea Baggins” request for photos of Geloo, posting pictures of her from her Facebook page. An anonymous writer, calling her “a run of the mill court appointed attorney” accused her of writing her client’s positive review. (She hadn’t, and, in fact, didn’t advertise.) The conversation got slimier, with “fur” writing, “Andi Geloo equals FAT PAKI,” referencing a derogatory slur for Pakistanis. The poster “BS Detector” challenged Geloo’s trial expertise, adding, “Please post a picture of yourself from this week, including the full body.”

“Total Bullshit by Andi Geloo.” “Andi Geloo should be disbarred.” “Andi Geloo is a nut case who deserves to be outed [sic] . .. Whoever is [expletive]ing Andi Geloo must be doing it as a mercy case. LOL.” The obscene litany prompted Geloo to act.

Over the next two-and-a-half years, she became an accidental activist, investigating her anonymous “John Doe” antagonists and lobbying in the Virginia statehouse to expand a victim’s right to press charges. The resulting new state law—called “Andi’s Law,” by some—went into effect earlier this month in Virginia, with implications nationwide, as lawmakers in other states potentially expand the rights of plaintiffs against “John Doe” harassers on the Internet. The new “Andi’s Law” allows a plaintiff who has filed a timely lawsuit against a “John Doe” to motion the court to stop the clock, to give a plaintiff time to unmask a “John Doe.” Prior to this law, it was virtually impossible, at least in the case of anonymous bullying, to have a “cause of action,” which requires knowing the identity of a bully, within Virginia’s one-year statute of limitations for defamation.

“It’s new nationally. It will set precedent. Other states will recognize they have the same problem,” says Alan Cilman, an attorney in Fairfax. “John Doe” cyber bullies “try to ridicule and scorn and ruin reputations. And they’re doing it in a way that people can’t defend themselves. They are cowards. It’s always been a tough haul for women, and their cowardly tormenters should be held accountable.”

Often thought to be limited to children and teens, cyber-bullying is also an issue for adults. Last October, Pew Research Center released an exhaustive report on online bullying, finding 40 percent of Internet users had experienced some form of harassment online, and women had experienced the most severe form of harassment.

In the fall of 2014, MSNBC host Melissa Harris-Perry stopped re-tweeting messages, saying, “Because I fear that I would send all of…the harassment that comes to me over to some person who doesn’t deserve it.” Soon after that, NPR’s Rachel Martin did a segment, “Why Women Get the Worst of Internet Bullying.” This past March, actress Ashley Judd tweeted that when she “expressed a stout opinion during #MarchMadness I am called a whore, c—, threatened with sexual violence. Not okay.” She said on MSNBC, “The way things happen on social media is so abusive and everyone needs to take personal responsibility for what they write.”

That month, Monica Lewinsky, shamed for her involvement with President Clinton, delivered a much-watched TED Talk, arguing, “Public shaming as a blood sport has to stop.”

Rather than take to the media to expose her bullies, however, Geloo took a methodical, lawyerly approach, contacting the administrator at FairfaxUnderground, Cary Wiedemann. He initially didn’t remove the postings but sent her the Internet Protocol addresses for the messages. Wiedemann said he deleted “many posts,” leaving “a few innocuous opinions.”

IP addresses are unique numbers associated with a computer. While users can mask IP addresses, they are a way to identify anonymous Internet users. That week, Geloo called legal experts who advised her that she would never learn the identities of her “John Doe” bullies or get the posts removed. One attorney told her, “Get over it. Get thicker skin.” Another later ridiculed her cause, stating that it was more appropriate for TMZ.

“I decided to take matters into my own hands,” Geloo says. She knew the clock was ticking on the one year plaintiffs have to file a defamation lawsuit. “I was tortured by it,” she says. She stayed up through the night and wrote up a 10-page lawsuit against Wiedemann and twelve “John Doe” defendants who had written negative comments on Fairfax Underground. She was seeking to unmask their identities. An attorney friend, Susan Earman, filed the lawsuit at Fairfax County Circuit Court, where Geloo practiced law. Eventually, Wiedemann agreed to remove the posts, and Geloo dropped him from the lawsuit.

Geloo filed “John Doe subpoenas” with the three telecommunications companies –Verizon Communications Inc., Cox Communications Inc. and Time Warner Cable Inc. – who were the Internet service providers for the IP addresses associated with the various “John Doe” comments. She wanted them to provide the real names of the “John Doe” harassers so she could file a defamation complaint against them within the one-year limit. The companies contacted the “John Doe” defendants and two of them hired local attorneys – anonymously. One of the defense firms was Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath and Judkins, based in Fairfax. The two “John Doe” attorneys filed motions to block Geloo from learning their clients’ names. The clock was still ticking on the statute of limitations. It wasn’t “tolled,” a legal term that means the clock is temporarily halted, while the decision to withhold or make public the real identity of the “John Doe” defendants was adjudicated. No other attorneys stepped forward to represent “John Doe” defendants.

One day, Geloo received correspondence from an insurance carrier, Allstate Corp. — a copy of a letter, dated Feb. 25, 2014, and addressed to a local attorney, Demetrious Pikrallidas. It concerned a claim Pikrallidas had filed, stating that he was one of the defendants in Geloo’s defamation lawsuit. (A receptionist at the firm of Pikrallidas directed questions to the firm of Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath and Judkins, the firm that was representing a “John Doe” in the Geloo case. There, an attorney representing Pikrallidas told Women in the World his client declined to comment. When Geloo filed a complaint with the Virginia State Bar, Pikrallidas responded, through another attorney, that that he considered Geloo’s allegations unfair, but he declined to comment to the state bar on whether he wrote any disparaging comments against Geloo).

Geloo hadn’t named anyone in her “John Doe” complaint, because she didn’t know any of the names of her anonymous bullies. Now, with this letter in her hand, she had made a significant breakthrough. To be sure, the letter didn’t confirm or deny that the lawyer was the one who actually wrote any of the messages, just that he was a defendant in the case, Geloo vs. John Does, et al. But she had just missed the one-year statute of limitations to file a lawsuit. As defense attorneys challenged the complaint, delaying it further in the court, the clock had expired.

On June 23, 2014 Fairfax County Circuit Court Judge Robert J. Smith ruled against Geloo’s motion to have the telecommunication companies reveal the real identities of the “John Doe” defendants because “the statement at issue does not involve a criminal offense involving moral turpitude or a contagious disease,” nor did it “impliedly suggest” Geloo was “guilty of unethical or unprofessional conduct such as false advertising.” The telecommunication companies didn’t have to reveal the names of the “John Doe” bullies. Geloo had lost in court.

“I was offered a lot of money to settle and sign a non-disclosure agreement,” she says. “I felt taking their money with a deal to shut up, was ‘blood money.’ I felt I owed it to the bar to find out their names. Seriously, you can always make more money, but you can never get your life back.”

A few days later, an attorney passed Geloo in the halls of a local courthouse and said, “I heard you had a crush on me.” When she responded, confused, that she didn’t and that she was married, he answered, “Somebody has taken mercy on you.”

Geloo’s eyes widened. That was the same language used by one of her “John Doe” detractors. Geloo filed her subpoena request again. To her surprise, the “John Doe” attorneys didn’t file objections. Instead, she received a response from Verizon, dated Sept. 12, 2014. It named a local lawyer in Manassas, Va., Brian Patrick Roman, as the owner of the IP for one of the “John Doe” defendants. Geloo filed another complaint with the Virginia State Bar.

He was the lawyer who had spoken to Geloo in the halls of the courthouse, alleging she had a “crush.” Despite repeated efforts to contact Roman, he declined to comment for this article.

The Virginia Bar Association said it couldn’t release the results of Geloo’s complaints against the lawyers identified in the Verizon and Allstate letters. According to letters sent to Geloo, however, the state bar dismissed the complaints against the two attorneys, who denied they had acted improperly. Anastasia Billy, assistant bar counsel at the state bar association, wrote, that the “Virginia Rule of Professional Conduct” doesn’t cover a lawyer’s communications with another lawyer, but she stated, “The Virginia State Bar does not condone rude, unprofessional, or offensive behavior.” In a letter to the Virginia State Bar, Roman accused Geloo of “bizarre behavior,” revealing “confidential” information and leveling “false and malicious” charges against him. Armed with the Verizon information, Geloo might have filed a new lawsuit. But, again, the statute of limitations had elapsed.

There was one thing to do, she concluded. Change the law. She drafted House Bill 1635 to allow a defamation lawsuit against a “John Doe” to “toll,” or stop the clock, for a reasonable amount of time to discover the real identity of a “John Doe.” A colleague in the Virginia state legislature, Del. David B. Albo (R-Dist. 42), introduced the legislation, which passed the Virginia state legislature this spring.

Says Albo, “The way America works, you get your opportunity to be heard. Andi was unable to get into court to state her case. It was literally impossible for her to get the names of these people who were hiding like cowards behind anonymous Internet identities. There was a problem with the law, and we had to fix it.” He noted that when defamation laws were first written, “the Internet didn’t exist, with its capacity for anonymous identities. We need to update the law to match the situation in 2015.”

“Publicity was something I never sought,” said Geloo. “In fact, I cherish my privacy. But when you are bullied and attacked this viciously by people you hardly know—your own colleagues—you have to take a stand. Lawyers should not engage in such unprofessional conduct in public or anonymously. It brings disgrace to our profession. My lawsuit was filed to protect my practice and me, but also to protect the members of the bar from such disgrace, not for self-aggrandizement.”

Her legal victory may not mitigate the discomfort she feels when she comes into contact with the alleged bullies in question.

“When I see the attorneys, I feel anxiety because one attorney taunted me when I saw him, and I feel disappointment because I referred cases to the other attorney’s firm. I had always been kind to both,” Geloo says.

Nonetheless, she is satisfied. “I accomplished what I set out to do,” she says. “I won.”
Attachments:
connection.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Pookies ()
Date: July 17, 2020 06:30PM

What a whiny attention whore bitch. Cutting the first amendment into a million pieces. Next saying "give me liberty or give me death" and "sic semper tyrannis" will be charged as felony threats. Oh wait....

Fuck this socialist cunt

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Popcorn sutton ()
Date: July 17, 2020 06:36PM

I'm just surprised there are real live attorneys posting here.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: student researcher ()
Date: July 17, 2020 07:15PM

We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax circuit file on this case... including this subpoena.. apparently this was what the fight was about...she kept going to get the name..and got it..she got his name..wow...she persevered! That's pretty impressive. Roman ismust have blown a gasket when he realized his identity was unveiled. Who was the other guy...this Roman posted the worst of the comments. Good for attorney Geloo.
Attachments:
verizon subpoena-roman.PNG

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Federalist papers - publius ()
Date: July 17, 2020 07:39PM

student researcher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax circuit
> file on this case... including this subpoena..
> apparently this was what the fight was about...she
> kept going to get the name..and got it..she got
> his name..wow...she persevered! That's pretty
> impressive. Roman ismust have blown a gasket when
> he realized his identity was unveiled. Who was the
> other guy...this Roman posted the worst of the
> comments. Good for attorney Geloo.


Fuck you. The right to true free speech - including anonymous criticism and even mockery and threats - is what this country was built on. Go to hell bitch. Sic semper tyrannis!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Coonman ()
Date: July 17, 2020 08:12PM

Federalist papers - publius Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> student researcher Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax circuit
> > file on this case... including this subpoena..
> > apparently this was what the fight was
> about...she
> > kept going to get the name..and got it..she got
> > his name..wow...she persevered! That's pretty
> > impressive. Roman ismust have blown a gasket
> when
> > he realized his identity was unveiled. Who was
> the
> > other guy...this Roman posted the worst of the
> > comments. Good for attorney Geloo.
>
>
> Fuck you. The right to true free speech -
> including anonymous criticism and even mockery and
> threats - is what this country was built on. Go to
> hell bitch. Sic semper tyrannis!

You're a fucking idiot. It was never meant to hide behind to harass or defame someone. Remember, this a case of defamation. If what you say in a post is TRUE, you have nothing to worry about. Truth is an absolute defense. But the burden of proof is on the defendant (the harasser / defamer).

If what you say isn't true, you should burn in troll hell with your bank account a lot lighter. So, pick your battles. The big question is, do you feel lucky that someone aint going to come for you? Well do you punk?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Culture of litigation ()
Date: July 17, 2020 09:22PM

Coonman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Federalist papers - publius Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > student researcher Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax
> circuit
> > > file on this case... including this
> subpoena..
> > > apparently this was what the fight was
> > about...she
> > > kept going to get the name..and got it..she
> got
> > > his name..wow...she persevered! That's pretty
> > > impressive. Roman ismust have blown a gasket
> > when
> > > he realized his identity was unveiled. Who
> was
> > the
> > > other guy...this Roman posted the worst of
> the
> > > comments. Good for attorney Geloo.
> >
> >
> > Fuck you. The right to true free speech -
> > including anonymous criticism and even mockery
> and
> > threats - is what this country was built on. Go
> to
> > hell bitch. Sic semper tyrannis!
>
> You're a fucking idiot. It was never meant to hide
> behind to harass or defame someone. Remember, this
> a case of defamation. If what you say in a post is
> TRUE, you have nothing to worry about. Truth is an
> absolute defense. But the burden of proof is on
> the defendant (the harasser / defamer).
>
> If what you say isn't true, you should burn in
> troll hell with your bank account a lot lighter.
> So, pick your battles. The big question is, do you
> feel lucky that someone aint going to come for
> you? Well do you punk?

You have every right to refute any statements made about you sweetie. grow up. Hell go tell lies about them if it makes you feel better. But suing folks because you have thin skin is why we waste likely millions of dollars of ink every goddamn year printing "caution hot" all over crap. No one believes anything posted on this site. Few people even visit. If you think some rantings on FXU are going to disadvantage your career in any way you're batty. So monetary damages should be zip. It's just name calling. As with fraud, there must be actual harm caused by an utterance for it to be unprotected by 1A - at least in the spirit in which the founders wrote it. And despite current (downhill) trends, I don't think snowflake feelings should be protected. This is nothing but an attention whore whoring.

Yelling fire in a crowded theater is illegal because people can be physically trampled not because it hurts their feely weelys

Sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me


As for that last line, if I was as petty as you, I would intentionally misconstrue that as a threat so I could get more attention lmfao punk
Attachments:
Instagram-litasaur-d8b6da.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: The voice of reasonn ()
Date: July 17, 2020 09:35PM

From that stupid article:

"That week, Geloo called legal experts who advised her that she would never learn the identities of her “John Doe” bullies or get the posts removed. One attorney told her, “Get over it. Get thicker skin.” Another later ridiculed her cause, stating that it was more appropriate for TMZ."

In the medical profession this is known as "malingering" and "doctor shopping".... The victim-complex is just another shameless self-promotion tactic these days, related to virtue-signaling. Shoulda saved it for TMZ yet you go right back to FXU expecting a pity party? Nuts man

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Digger of FXU gold ()
Date: July 17, 2020 10:05PM

A cursory glance at Andi's AVVO profile shows that multiple reviews were posted on a single day in 2014. I believe they were mostly or entirely written by the same person based on writing style. Even more recent ones look inorganic af.. There even seems be a crude attempt to appear organic by formatting speeds differently -(75/60) 80-65mph etc. but the consistent use of parentheses and capitalization bleeds through. Now I can't prove it conclusively. I'm not a linguistics analyst and I haven't seen the IPs of the AVVO reviewers. If I said it was that might be libelous, it's a hunch that's all. you'll have to judge for yourself. But if it's true that would be very ironic but I think that irony would be lost on the poster. Total lack of self esteem maybe? More like lack of self-awareness lol


https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/22030-va-andaleeb-geloo-691986.html
Attachments:
Screenshot_20200717-215040.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Publius ()
Date: July 17, 2020 10:16PM

I wonder if the Mr Roman has any options against Verizon for disclosing personal info lmao. Sounds kinda fishy he didn't contest?

This quote from the article struck me... When simpering liberals tried to compare muskets to modern battle rifles we reminded them the difference between the quill and the smartphone. Guess these Orwellian tyrants are calling our bluff!

"He noted that when defamation laws were first written, “the Internet didn’t exist, with its capacity for anonymous identities. We need to update the law to match the situation in 2015.”

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Publius ()
Date: July 17, 2020 10:20PM

.
Attachments:
Screenshot_20200717-221820.png
Screenshot_20200717-221820.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Priceless treasure ()
Date: July 18, 2020 12:10AM

Digger of FXU gold Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A cursory glance at Andi's AVVO profile shows that
> multiple reviews were posted on a single day in
> 2014. I believe they were mostly or entirely
> written by the same person based on writing style.
> Even more recent ones look inorganic af.. There
> even seems be a crude attempt to appear organic by
> formatting speeds differently -(75/60) 80-65mph
> etc. but the consistent use of parentheses and
> capitalization bleeds through. Now I can't prove
> it conclusively. I'm not a linguistics analyst and
> I haven't seen the IPs of the AVVO reviewers. If I
> said it was that might be libelous, it's a hunch
> that's all. you'll have to judge for yourself. But
> if it's true that would be very ironic but I think
> that irony would be lost on the poster. Total lack
> of self esteem maybe? More like lack of
> self-awareness lol
>
>
> https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/22030-va-andaleeb-g
> eloo-691986.html


Holy fuck. Those are some seriously sketchy reviews. Does the Bar Association approve of false advertising/shilling among it's members?? I feel bad for Mr Roman, victim of an attention whoring cunt!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Yelp critic ()
Date: July 18, 2020 08:17AM

Whoever wrote those reviews isn't the brightest. Obv fake

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Coonman ()
Date: July 18, 2020 09:05AM

Culture of litigation Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Coonman Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Federalist papers - publius Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > student researcher Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax
> > circuit
> > > > file on this case... including this
> > subpoena..
> > > > apparently this was what the fight was
> > > about...she
> > > > kept going to get the name..and got it..she
> > got
> > > > his name..wow...she persevered! That's
> pretty
> > > > impressive. Roman ismust have blown a
> gasket
> > > when
> > > > he realized his identity was unveiled. Who
> > was
> > > the
> > > > other guy...this Roman posted the worst of
> > the
> > > > comments. Good for attorney Geloo.
> > >
> > >
> > > Fuck you. The right to true free speech -
> > > including anonymous criticism and even
> mockery
> > and
> > > threats - is what this country was built on.
> Go
> > to
> > > hell bitch. Sic semper tyrannis!
> >
> > You're a fucking idiot. It was never meant to
> hide
> > behind to harass or defame someone. Remember,
> this
> > a case of defamation. If what you say in a post
> is
> > TRUE, you have nothing to worry about. Truth is
> an
> > absolute defense. But the burden of proof is on
> > the defendant (the harasser / defamer).
> >
> > If what you say isn't true, you should burn in
> > troll hell with your bank account a lot
> lighter.
> > So, pick your battles. The big question is, do
> you
> > feel lucky that someone aint going to come for
> > you? Well do you punk?
>
> You have every right to refute any statements made
> about you sweetie. grow up. Hell go tell lies
> about them if it makes you feel better. But suing
> folks because you have thin skin is why we waste
> likely millions of dollars of ink every goddamn
> year printing "caution hot" all over crap. No one
> believes anything posted on this site. Few people
> even visit. If you think some rantings on FXU are
> going to disadvantage your career in any way
> you're batty. So monetary damages should be zip.
> It's just name calling. As with fraud, there must
> be actual harm caused by an utterance for it to be
> unprotected by 1A - at least in the spirit in
> which the founders wrote it. And despite current
> (downhill) trends, I don't think snowflake
> feelings should be protected. This is nothing but
> an attention whore whoring.
>
> Yelling fire in a crowded theater is illegal
> because people can be physically trampled not
> because it hurts their feely weelys
>
> Sticks and stones may break my bones but words
> will never hurt me
>
>
> As for that last line, if I was as petty as you, I
> would intentionally misconstrue that as a threat
> so I could get more attention lmfao punk

Sweetcheeks, you are allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater, IF there is a fire. Just as you allowed to report bad things about someone, IF they are true. The TRUTH is an affirmative defense.

You are also allowed to defame, yell, swear or just talk mean to any of the anonymous virtual caricatures you so please. Yes that means you are allowed to go full retard. BUT as soon as you cross over into the real world, you assume real world consequences.

Just because she laughed at your little pee-pee, you are not allowed to post revenge porn. Just because she won't give you the time of day or a second glance you are not allowed to defame her character to satisfy your tiny little fragile ego.

So grow up and put your big girl panties on, there will not be a world without rules. Step out of your mother's basement, open the door and step into the sun of the REAL WORLD.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: geetyamo ()
Date: July 18, 2020 09:58AM

Avvo has too many measures in place for people to muck with it..they will put you for false reviews and share your IP for defamation.. many reviews concentrated in one day is common..you can find that in many pages. It could be the date she calimed her avvo page and an influx of people were able to post. Avvos pretty legit

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: free speacher ()
Date: July 18, 2020 10:07AM

Read the first amendment..if you understand it, you'll see it protects free speech..free speech is not defamation. While Roman may have said ugly things about her...she is not suing for the racial and nigotted remarks or that he called her fat and ugly..based on pics she is not..based on what we read he said she gets results by lying and some posts that she screws the judges. I would sue for that. She actually won the right to sue but dropped after she got his name. Shows she was not after money but was pissed.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Nah they fake af ()
Date: July 18, 2020 01:04PM

geetyamo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Avvo has too many measures in place for people to
> muck with it..they will put you for false reviews
> and share your IP for defamation.. many reviews
> concentrated in one day is common..you can find
> that in many pages. It could be the date she
> calimed her avvo page and an influx of people were
> able to post. Avvos pretty legit

Shilling to cover up shilling!! I put the odds of those reviews being organic at less than 1%. Go read them. Same author. And in the unlikely event they are organic, the concentration makes me wonder if she was begging or paying former clients to write that day lol.. I just don't buy dozens of schmucks being so over the moon about speeding tickets as to write so much drivel. The reviews are fake. Andi is a scumbag crying wolf. Saying she bangs judges in the context of FXU is comedic genius not defamation. Save it for ems...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Fireeee ()
Date: July 18, 2020 01:09PM

Coonman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Culture of litigation Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Coonman Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Federalist papers - publius Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > student researcher Wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
> > > > -----
> > > > > We found a ton of stuff in the Fairfax
> > > circuit
> > > > > file on this case... including this
> > > subpoena..
> > > > > apparently this was what the fight was
> > > > about...she
> > > > > kept going to get the name..and got
> it..she
> > > got
> > > > > his name..wow...she persevered! That's
> > pretty
> > > > > impressive. Roman ismust have blown a
> > gasket
> > > > when
> > > > > he realized his identity was unveiled.
> Who
> > > was
> > > > the
> > > > > other guy...this Roman posted the worst
> of
> > > the
> > > > > comments. Good for attorney Geloo.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Fuck you. The right to true free speech -
> > > > including anonymous criticism and even
> > mockery
> > > and
> > > > threats - is what this country was built
> on.
> > Go
> > > to
> > > > hell bitch. Sic semper tyrannis!
> > >
> > > You're a fucking idiot. It was never meant to
> > hide
> > > behind to harass or defame someone. Remember,
> > this
> > > a case of defamation. If what you say in a
> post
> > is
> > > TRUE, you have nothing to worry about. Truth
> is
> > an
> > > absolute defense. But the burden of proof is
> on
> > > the defendant (the harasser / defamer).
> > >
> > > If what you say isn't true, you should burn
> in
> > > troll hell with your bank account a lot
> > lighter.
> > > So, pick your battles. The big question is,
> do
> > you
> > > feel lucky that someone aint going to come
> for
> > > you? Well do you punk?
> >
> > You have every right to refute any statements
> made
> > about you sweetie. grow up. Hell go tell lies
> > about them if it makes you feel better. But
> suing
> > folks because you have thin skin is why we
> waste
> > likely millions of dollars of ink every goddamn
> > year printing "caution hot" all over crap. No
> one
> > believes anything posted on this site. Few
> people
> > even visit. If you think some rantings on FXU
> are
> > going to disadvantage your career in any way
> > you're batty. So monetary damages should be
> zip.
> > It's just name calling. As with fraud, there
> must
> > be actual harm caused by an utterance for it to
> be
> > unprotected by 1A - at least in the spirit in
> > which the founders wrote it. And despite
> current
> > (downhill) trends, I don't think snowflake
> > feelings should be protected. This is nothing
> but
> > an attention whore whoring.
> >
> > Yelling fire in a crowded theater is illegal
> > because people can be physically trampled not
> > because it hurts their feely weelys
> >
> > Sticks and stones may break my bones but words
> > will never hurt me
> >
> >
> > As for that last line, if I was as petty as you,
> I
> > would intentionally misconstrue that as a
> threat
> > so I could get more attention lmfao punk
>
> Sweetcheeks, you are allowed to yell fire in a
> crowded theater, IF there is a fire.


Yelling fire in a crowded theater is illegal because people can be physically trampled and they paid money for tickets.






Just as you
> allowed to report bad things about someone, IF
> they are true. The TRUTH is an affirmative
> defense.
>
> You are also allowed to defame, yell, swear or
> just talk mean to any of the anonymous virtual
> caricatures you so please. Yes that means you are
> allowed to go full retard. BUT as soon as you
> cross over into the real world, you assume real
> world consequences.
>
> Just because she laughed at your little pee-pee,
> you are not allowed to post revenge porn. Just
> because she won't give you the time of day or a
> second glance you are not allowed to defame her
> character to satisfy your tiny little fragile
> ego.
>
> So grow up and put your big girl panties on, there
> will not be a world without rules. Step out of
> your mother's basement, open the door and step
> into the sun of the REAL WORLD.



I've never met the bitch. Thank fucking god! I think my wife would slap me if I wore her panties

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Context matters ()
Date: July 18, 2020 01:14PM

Im confused. Wouldn't a lawyer with an "in" with a judge be highly sought after? Unless this was a formal complaint to the bar, she should be paying for advertising not suing for defamation... Saying that on FXU is comedic gold - a metaphor for her winning so many cases its suspect! I would be flattered

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Yelp critic ()
Date: July 18, 2020 01:18PM

The voice of reasonn Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> From that stupid article:
>
> "That week, Geloo called legal experts who advised
> her that she would never learn the identities of
> her “John Doe” bullies or get the posts
> removed. One attorney told her, “Get over it.
> Get thicker skin.” Another later ridiculed her
> cause, stating that it was more appropriate for
> TMZ."
>
> In the medical profession this is known as
> "malingering" and "doctor shopping".... The
> victim-complex is just another shameless
> self-promotion tactic these days, related to
> virtue-signaling. Shoulda saved it for TMZ yet you
> go right back to FXU expecting a pity party? Nuts
> man

Fake reviews. Lawyer shopping. Now back on FXU looking for sympathy. What a loser she is. Seriously shoulda saved it for TMZ .

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Wvdzy ()
Date: July 18, 2020 01:47PM

free speacher Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Read the first amendment..if you understand it,
> you'll see it protects free speech..free speech is
> not defamation. While Roman may have said ugly
> things about her...she is not suing for the racial
> and nigotted remarks or that he called her fat and
> ugly..based on pics she is not..based on what we
> read he said she gets results by lying and some
> posts that she screws the judges. I would sue for
> that. She actually won the right to sue but
> dropped after she got his name. Shows she was not
> after money but was pissed.

Read the federalist papers before you go spouting off about our first amendment. Lies that actually harm someone's career merit legal action. But saying she bangs nudges on FXU is positive coverage! Dropping the suit was just virtue-signaling. Feigning compassion because her true objective was whoring out her victim complex for attention, not money. Shameless self promotion just like the AVVO reviews.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Yelp critic ()
Date: July 20, 2020 07:25PM

Fake ass AVVO reviews bought from a factory full of pakis working 14 hour shifts for 54 cents an hour!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Mystery solved ()
Date: July 20, 2020 08:59PM

Andi is the drug spammer. She hates free speech so she hired a botnet. What a loser

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Realm of possibility ()
Date: July 20, 2020 09:08PM

Mystery solved Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Andi is the drug spammer. She hates free speech so
> she hired a botnet. What a loser


Andi is too stupid to hire a botnet at least not all by herself

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: mmmmahhhhdiiii ()
Date: July 20, 2020 09:22PM

who posted revenge porn?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Whofuckincares ()
Date: July 20, 2020 09:30PM

mmmmahhhhdiiii Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> who posted revenge porn?


The crywolf paki princess hasn't specified which attorney friend it was. I thought copyrights belong to the photographer?? Wonder why she let him take pics/sent him nudes? Slut shaming lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Cry ()
Date: July 22, 2020 01:28AM

Wolf?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: LL ()
Date: July 22, 2020 07:38AM

Old news.

Also before she filed her lawsuit I had never heard of her.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Horny toad ()
Date: July 22, 2020 08:01AM

If I was into Pakis I would hit it. But even horny toad has his limits.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: BEH2 ()
Date: July 22, 2020 11:06AM

LL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Old news.
>
> Also before she filed her lawsuit I had never
> heard of her.


Exactly why she did it. Determined to shake her loser status by any means necessary

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Fairfax Attorney Scum ()
Date: July 23, 2020 11:09AM

Good research. Keep posting about scumbag attorneys.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: a teen carrot ()
Date: August 23, 2020 05:07PM

Digger of FXU gold Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> A cursory glance at Andi's AVVO profile shows that
> multiple reviews were posted on a single day in
> 2014. I believe they were mostly or entirely
> written by the same person based on writing style.
> Even more recent ones look inorganic af.. There
> even seems be a crude attempt to appear organic by
> formatting speeds differently -(75/60) 80-65mph
> etc. but the consistent use of parentheses and
> capitalization bleeds through. Now I can't prove
> it conclusively. I'm not a linguistics analyst and
> I haven't seen the IPs of the AVVO reviewers. If I
> said it was that might be libelous, it's a hunch
> that's all. you'll have to judge for yourself. But
> if it's true that would be very ironic but I think
> that irony would be lost on the poster. Total lack
> of self esteem maybe? More like lack of
> self-awareness lol
>
>
> https://www.avvo.com/attorneys/22030-va-andaleeb-g
> eloo-691986.html


Somone needs to prove the reviews are fake and have this hypocritical whore charged under VA code subsection 18.2-216: Untrue, deceptive or misleading advertising, inducements, writings or documents.

she's begging for it

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: karmic debt collector ()
Date: August 23, 2020 07:15PM

"18.2-216. Untrue, deceptive or misleading advertising, inducements, writings or documents.
A. Any person, firm, corporation or association who, with intent to sell or in anywise dispose of merchandise, securities, service or anything offered by such person, firm, corporation or association, directly or indirectly, to the public for sale or distribution or with intent to increase the consumption thereof, or to induce the public in any manner to enter into any obligation relating thereto, or to acquire title thereto, or any interest therein, makes, publishes, disseminates, circulates or places before the public, or causes, directly or indirectly to be made, published, disseminated, circulated or placed before the public, in a newspaper or other publications, or in the form of a book, notice, handbill, poster, blueprint, map, bill, tag, label, circular, pamphlet or letter or in any other way, an advertisement of any sort regarding merchandise, securities, service, land, lot or anything so offered to the public, which advertisement contains any promise, assertion, representation or statement of fact which is untrue, deceptive or misleading, or uses any other method, device or practice which is fraudulent, deceptive or misleading to induce the public to enter into any obligation, shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor."


whiny-ass libtards can always dish it but never take it...
Attachments:
Screenshot_20200717-215040.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: BEH2 ()
Date: August 23, 2020 07:24PM

Even if the reviews are provably fake, good luck getting the new Soros CA plants to prosecute anyone but a white man defending his family!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: BEH3 ()
Date: August 23, 2020 07:25PM

BEH2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Even if the reviews are provably fake, good luck
> getting the new Soros CA plants to prosecute
> anyone but a white man defending his family!!


...or a cop doing his job like Tyler Timberlake lol

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: jogncartman ()
Date: October 06, 2020 05:37PM

Wow, this is a disaster. As a lawyer, this woman can get a good compensation back.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: lakersgirl ()
Date: October 07, 2020 12:19PM

Oh my god, I honestly do not understand why crap like that keeps happening. We live in the 21st century for Christ's sake and there is not a single reason for people so racially intolerant. I think that that lawyer needs to file a complaint to the civil court and actually get a decent compensation. It irks me that some lawyers actually think that they are better then someone else just because of skin color or the religion the other person practices. I have been friends with a lot of lawyers or many years now and I always ask the what companies are more open minded and are willing to take on cases with their clients being people of color. One of the nest ones that they told me about was a really cool company (you guys can check their website here : crowdo.net/lawyer). They are very tolerant and very respectful. I hope situations like this will not happen any time soon and preferably never again. I hope that lady got the compensation she deserved.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/07/2020 12:20PM by lakersgirl.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Grammarly ()
Date: October 07, 2020 01:29PM

lakersgirl Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh my god, I honestly do not understand why crap
> like that keeps happening. We live in the 21st
> century for Christ's sake and there is not a
> single reason for people so racially intolerant. I
> think that that lawyer needs to file a complaint
> to the civil court and actually get a decent
> compensation. It irks me that some lawyers
> actually think that they are better then someone
> else just because of skin color or the religion
> the other person practices. I have been friends
> with a lot of lawyers or many years now and I
> always ask the what companies are more open minded
> and are willing to take on cases with their
> clients being people of color. One of the nest
> ones that they told me about was a really cool
> company (you guys can check their website here :
> href="https://crowdo.net/lawyer">crowdo.net/lawyer
>
). They are very tolerant and very respectful.
> I hope situations like this will not happen any
> time soon and preferably never again. I hope that
> lady got the compensation she deserved.

> Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/07/2020 12:20PM by lakersgirl.

I think you need to edit it a few more times.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Orin Conor ()
Date: June 17, 2021 06:32AM

Why is cultural identity such a hot topic now?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Darel Aranovski ()
Date: June 17, 2021 06:47AM

A bit of a cultural identity is at issue here. You should correct your knowledge a little on this basis. Read the essays about this https://phdessay.com/free-essays-on/cultural-identity/ for self-education. I especially like the second one that talks about cultural harassment and identity with other cultures. Here we are talking about the already established problem of indigency.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Spencer Roane ()
Date: June 17, 2021 10:08AM

> Even if the reviews are provably fake, good luck
> getting the new Soros CA plants to prosecute
> anyone but a white man defending his family!!

Posting fake reviews seldom amounted to criminal activity even in the pre-Woke world. At best a fake review might constitute a disciplinary violation. However it is doubtful the bar would have pursued it.

> Oh my god, I honestly do not understand why crap
> like that keeps happening. We live in the 21st
> century for Christ's sake and there is not a
> single reason for people so racially intolerant.

Part of living in a free society means people have the right to choose their beliefs...even if that choice is to be a racial bigot. The First Amendment does not say people have the right to speak, write or worship the way you or I feel is appropriate. If it did it would be fucking worthless.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Identity of attorneys who racially defamed and racially attacked prominent and successful immigrant brown muslim female attorney
Posted by: Franconia Fister ()
Date: June 17, 2021 11:59AM

Does anyone know her personally? I’m specifically asking if she’s good in bed.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 ********  **         ******     ******          ** 
 **    **  **        **    **   **    **         ** 
     **    **        **         **               ** 
    **     **        **   ****  **   ****        ** 
   **      **        **    **   **    **   **    ** 
   **      **        **    **   **    **   **    ** 
   **      ********   ******     ******     ******  
This forum powered by Phorum.