Re: Truck spotted in Annandale - have you seen this one?
Posted by:
Confederate Hammer
()
Date: June 17, 2010 04:40PM
Keith the Avenger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Confederate Hammer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Hey dumbass, how is the Confederate Battle Flag
> > overtly racist?
>
> Because it was coopted by the KKK and white
> racists after the war. They weren't waving that
> flag to be welcoming.
((But that doesn't make a piece of cloth racist (and what's wrong with being racist? EVERYONE'S RACIST!! The fact that you married a woman of the same race as you - MAKES YOU A RACIST, because you prefer to "hang out" with people of the same race as you - MAKES YOU A RACIST!!
INTEGRATION HAS TO BE FORCED UPON PEOPLE!!! GIVEN THEIR OWN CHOICES, PEOPLE WILL ASSOCIATE WITH THEIR OWN KIND!!!))
>
> > Slavery flourished under the snot rag you call
> the
> > Stars and Stripes for 245 years (from 1620 to
> > 1865) and only for four years under any of the
> > Flags of the CSA (from 1861 to 1865), so which
> > flag really represents slavery? huh? huh? which
> > one? I'll give you a hint: it's the same one
> you
> > see flying over the US Capitol and the White
> > House, and it's the same one saluted by the US
> > Armed forces.
>
> The stars and stripes were first flown in the
> Revolutionary War, 1776-1783. Also, the 13th
> Amendment outlaws slavery, which means that after
> 1865, the flag didn't represent slavery at all.
> ((INDEED, BUT UP UNTIL 1865, SLAVERY WAS COMMON PRACTICE IN THE U.S. WELL REPRESENTED BY THE US SNOTRAG!!))
> >
> > Also, Lincoln didn't free the slaves, the 13th
> > Amendment did that.
> > But only in States that were in rebellion to
> > Lincoln's onerous taxation of the South to pay
> for
> > his not yet bloated federal government and big
> > business in the North.
>
> >
> > Didja get that, boy and girls?
> > The Northern (Yankee) States got to keep their
> > free negro labor force, which means all the
> slaves
> > in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maine,
> and
> > every other state north of the Mason/Dixon line
> > GOT TO KEEP THEIR SLAVES!!!!!!!
>
> It's more complicated than that. Some states in
> the north had outlawed slaves already. Others
> allowed slavery, but no slave trade. There were
> northern slaves states, AKA border states, like
> Kentucky and Missouri, which Lincoln intended to
> placate by freeing only "southern" slaves. There
> simply weren't many slaves north of those border
> states.
((TRUE ENOUGH MAYBE, BUT THERE WERE STILL SLAVES!
SLAVES THAT HAD IT JUST A ROUGH AS THEIR SOUTHRON COUNTERPARTS
AND BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION, "Some States in the north had outlawed slavery already" - SOME STATES! Not all, but some.))