mahhhhdi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fjtjy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > mahhhdiiii Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > hey nah...hey nah....the chemtrails back
> > >
> > > it was a nice break but Mr. Burns and his gay
> > > lover pilots are back at it again
> >
> > So I went on to Newspapers.com recently and
> > searched the word "contrails." Turns out new
> > stories start appearing in the historical
> record
> > just after the introduction of the jet engine.
> >
> > When did the chem-spraying program begin?
> After
> > all, I found 1000s of stories mentioning
> contrails
> > dating back to the 1950s.
> >
> > What up with that genius?
>
> well, first read this....
>
>
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC50415
> 45/
>
> so they been doing shit like this and of course
> they wait decades after they stop doing it to tell
> people they were doing it
>
> eye was too busy surviving to pay attention to
> chemtrails in the past so eye cannot pin point
> when Mr. Burns and his fag boy pilots started
> this
>
> but they did it throughout the entire O-Bomb-yah
> presidency
>
> remember little trooper....CONTRAILS DISSAPPEAR
I read the paper and found that it did not specifically mention contrails or the "coincidence" of contrails emerging at the same time as the advent of the jet engine. In fact, I found the paper completely unresponsive to my question.
Trying to claim this article buttresses evidence of chemtrails is like saying that a doctor removing a wart from your hand is evidence that he is a butcher and wants to chop your arm off.