HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Fairfax Court Drama ()
Date: January 07, 2020 10:25AM

This Judge vs Commonwealth's Attorney battle in Court ought to be quite entertaining over the next few months.


Below are two writeups of what actually happened in Court last week when the New Prosecutors attempted to dismiss charges of simple possession of Marijuana. This round was Judge Mark Simmons vs Prosecutor Terry Adams

1) https://twitter.com/DrewWilderTV/status/1212757475050577921

2) https://bluevirginia.us/2020/01/having-my-day-in-court-first-day-under-new-fairfax-commonwealths-attorney


Grab your Popcorn...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: yxyum ()
Date: January 07, 2020 10:38AM

Fairfax Court Drama Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This Judge vs Commonwealth's Attorney battle in
> Court ought to be quite entertaining over the next
> few months.
>
>
> Below are two writeups of what actually happened
> in Court last week when the New Prosecutors
> attempted to dismiss charges of simple possession
> of Marijuana. This round was Judge Mark Simmons vs
> Prosecutor Terry Adams
>
> 1)
> https://twitter.com/DrewWilderTV/status/1212757475
> 050577921
>
> 2)
> https://bluevirginia.us/2020/01/having-my-day-in-c
> ourt-first-day-under-new-fairfax-commonwealths-att
> orney
>
>
> Grab your Popcorn...

Pretty cool. We are witnessing the end of civilized society in the United States. With the nationwide move to decriminalize crime (except for law abiding gun owners) the inevitable result will be a massive increase in crime. Oops, actually it won't because no one will charge and prosecute. Petty crime is now legal in San Francisco. Why this sickness that crime is OK?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Dems Will Lose It All ()
Date: January 07, 2020 10:45AM

So "Silly Steve Weed" wants to keep narcotic drug use out of the NCIS so drug pushers can buy guns as his Democrats suppress the rights of the law abiding people to keep and bear arms

The Federal firearms purchase form 4473 Question 11E Means no guns for narcotic users , no weed info in the NCIS means sell the gun to the narcotics addict or drug pusher . What good are Democrats "Universal Joke On America Fake Gun Background Checks"

In the meantime illegal drugs are causing 85 % of all gun crimes

Baltimore...No No No scream Democrats Is doing well with loving one another so much

Dems have set themselves up for a colossal fall in 2020 and 2021 and that's good news for Americans
Attachments:
DrugPushersReliefBill.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Dems Raised Felonys to 600 ()
Date: January 07, 2020 10:48AM

from 200 in Virginia known as the "Criminals Relief Bill" now comes the "Drug Pushers Gun Buy Relief Bill"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Sick Very Sick Blue America ()
Date: January 07, 2020 11:48AM

So what there were no "white people" in the court on trial, the statement is clearly reverse discrimination.

So who committed the offenses ? That's all there is too it

Then the rest of the weak liberal whine , totally sick and a view into the demented minds of liberals who pamper criminals while demanding law abiding citizens turn in firearms and become victims of crime

Herring is the Drug Pushers best friend in Richmond with the Gov standing by his side

This will not play well to Virginias overall as we watch as Democrats vastly overplay their hand

Democrats desperately need the black vote for softness on crime and the sympathy vote of the legal Spanish for illegals , without it they would fall out of the political arena in disgrace and anyone who can think that sees what they are doing should recognize it also if their eyes are not clouded by hatred created by excess liberal propaganda throughout their lives

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: 09widefj ()
Date: January 07, 2020 04:02PM


THE CHIEF JUDGE IS FROM CALIFORNIA, THE SHERIFF NOT FROM ANYWHERE'S AROUND HERE

THE CHIEF JUDGE LICKS PELOSI'S BOOTS

THE CHIEF JUDGE WAS SEATED BY FX CO GOV

DROP DEAD G2 - YOUR NOT FOOLING ANYONE - FAIRFAX COURTS ARE CORRUPT AS HELL ITSELF


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Sane Person ()
Date: January 07, 2020 04:30PM

The number of stupid people on here never fails to amaze.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Law & Order: Fairfax edition ()
Date: January 08, 2020 12:26PM

Below is a link to a writeup of what happened in Fairfax Court on Monday 1/6/20.

Seems like Judge Simmons silenced the Prosecutors and allowed the Police to directly a prosecute the suspects!


https://townhall.com/columnists/marinamedvin/2020/01/06/police-officers-and-judge-push-back-on-leftist-prosecutors-marijuana-sanctuary-policy-n2559053


Who's got the report for what happened on Tuesday?


Gonna need more Popcorn...

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Insane Your Upside Down Lib ()
Date: January 08, 2020 01:30PM

"Sane Person" who sees everything as left is right, right is wrong, upside down is right side up, backwards is progressively forward good is bad and bad is good

That's a descriptive of a self imposed title of "Sane Liberal"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: The Big Question Is ()
Date: January 08, 2020 01:40PM

When police prosecute these illegal narcotic using defendants does the conviction go into the NCIS to deny them the ability to buy a gun with a "Universal Background Check" the Democrats are about to pass

Or is it a Shill for a Con Game by not sending the conviction to the NCIS to allow criminal narcotics users under federal law to buy firearms to possibly deal drugs and shoot police officers in the line of duty and any persons in the line of fire or for a robbery at a late night restaurant killing innocent people in cold blood for some kicks and quick cash to obtain more narcotics

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: EML ()
Date: January 08, 2020 02:59PM

There is some misinformation on what is actually happening. Before Descano was elected it was not unusual for first time possession defendants to have the charges kicked, especially if the Defendants had clean records and were represented by attorneys. There were two ways this could happen. The charges could be dismissed by the judge, or the charges could be nolle prossed by the Commonwealth Attorney. A dismissal bars further prosecution for the same crime. A nolle prosse in theory leaves open the possibility of a prosecution of the charges again later. The general assumption has traditionally been that the Commonwealth Attorney had a right to nolle prosse a case if the trial had not been begun or there wasn't an existing basis to dismiss the case.

Prosecutions in General District Court have traditionally been handled in two different ways. Either the case is presented by the police officer who witnessed the crime, or the case is presented by the Commonwealth Attorney. The assumption has been that the Commonwealth Attorney is entitled to present the case if he chose, even if it is a case a police officer could present. Police officers are not permitted to cross examine defense witnesses, conduct direct examination of prosecution witnesses or argue motions. Doing any of these by a non-lawyer, except when authorized by statute, is unauthorized practice of law, a crime. The assumption has also been that only the Commonwealth Attorney is permitted to enter into a plea bargain agreement or argue for or against sentences. When the Defendant is represented by an attorney, Commonwealth Attorneys almost always conducts the prosecution. Cases in Circuit Court are presented by the Commonwealth Attorney.

Where the charge is one which would result in jail time the Defendant is constitutionally entitled to be represented by an attorney. If jail time won't be sought in a case, even though it can be imposed by statute, then a defendant is not entitled to court appointed counsel. He is entitled to hire counsel though. It is not uncommon for police officers to advise the judge whether the police officer believes jail is appropriate and the judge to decide whether to proceed with a trial without court appointed counsel based on the officer's assessment.

Now here is what I have observed from the ground level.

When cases are called and the officer indicates it isn't a case meriting jail time, the judge will advise the defendant he has a right to hire his own attorney. If the defendant declines the opportunity to hire his own attorney the trial proceeds. Many of those Defendants are then appealing the conviction to the Circuit Court where it is assumed the cases will be dismissed by the Commonwealth Attorney.

When the defendant shows up for court with an attorney, cases are being continued for trial at a later date by the judge even though neither defense counsel nor the Commonwealth Attorney requests a continuance. It is rumored this is being done to discourage defendants from hiring attorneys at the courthouse on the cheap so that the Commonwealth Attorney's office will get involved and will kick the case.

I have heard but have not personally seen that if the judge refused to nolle prosse simple possession cases when requested by the Commonwealth Attorney, the Commonwealth Attorney will present an incomplete case which required the judge to acquit.

The effort to frustrate kicking low level pot possession cases only seems to be occurring in Fairfax so far.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: LegalAbuse ()
Date: January 08, 2020 03:59PM

Putting the suspects through all this nonsense when in the end, the charges will get dropped is terrorism and harrasment.

I hope the newly elected Democratice House & Democratic Senate in the swiftly votes to decriminalized pot this year.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: So Drug Pushers Can Buy Guns ()
Date: January 08, 2020 08:13PM

That's your wish as well as addicts and narcotics users. Your Democrats background checks are going to F a lot of people up who use weed and lie on the 4473

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Hey EML ()
Date: January 08, 2020 08:19PM

What about question 11e and The NCIS when the defendant is convicted of possession of narcotics in any amount, Is that conviction going to the NCIS

National Criminal Information System NCIS to deny sale of a firearm to a user of narcotics by federal law

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Steve Supports Gun Strawmen ()
Date: January 08, 2020 10:16PM

A Gun Strawman is a person who buys a gun passing the federal NCIS background check for a drug dealing criminal who can not . Thousands of guns are bought in Virginia alone by Strawmen who are predominately women . These guns become crime guns.

These Strawmen use marijuana and if they are caught in possession of a small quantity of weed now Steve lets them off the hook. So with no conviction the Strawman can keep buying guns for criminals. The one whom ends up getting killed may BE YOU Un Armed Liberals !

Way to Go Steve ! Now your a "Double Hitter" letting drug pushers addicts and Strawmen buy guns with a federal background check because you let them off the weed possession hook . Supplying the criminals with guns up and down the US East coast that kill people .

Don't blame Virginias laws , We have Insta Check for federal background checks that access the NCIS and stop Strawman purchases when they used weed and are convicted and that information is entered into the NCIS .

What Good Are Democrats background checks when Strawmen Drug Addicts and Pushers can slip thur Steve's Reefer Gun Buying Loophole for narcotics users

Steve Resign ! Or Start prosecuting marijuana narcotic users no matter the amount of weed they possess as Virginia state law demands you do with the oath you took!

This issue is going to blow up in your face huge once a police officer in the line of duty or innocent citizen is killed by a weed possession criminal that you let slide with weed and bought a gun for themselves or a Strawman who used weed was caught and you let slide

When That Happens Steve "The Blood Is On Your Hands" Enjoy your short term in Office

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: If Virginia Democrats ()
Date: January 08, 2020 10:48PM

Want to decriminalize marijuana in Richmond they will be doing exactly what Steve is doing now, supporting Drug Pushers Addicts Narcotics Users and Strawmen to buy guns passing their Universal Background Checks to do so

Then "The Blood Is On Democrats Hands" after they passed law after law blaming law abiding citizens for the criminals use of firearms to kill

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Stand Up Steve ()
Date: January 08, 2020 10:51PM

Tell the people of Fairfax you endorse Strawmen buying guns for drug dealers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Early Morning Lawyer ()
Date: January 09, 2020 07:23AM

Hey EML Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> What about question 11e and The NCIS when the
> defendant is convicted of possession of narcotics
> in any amount, Is that conviction going to the
> NCIS


I am simply reporting the facts as I see and hear about them. As it relates to what I have said above the kicking of a possession charge, whether by dismissal or nonsuit, and whether in the General District Court or on appeal by the Circuit Court on appeal, would not ordinarily be considered a conviction. Whether the charge or the underlying facts resulting in the charge would otherwise bar someone from owning a firearm is something that the potential gun owner should discuss with his lawyer.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Robert G ()
Date: January 09, 2020 09:13AM

At what point does some higher authority step in and bring a halt to this nonsense? Descano has no authority to decide what gets prosecuted and what doesn't. He has selective discretion in individual cases but we know that's not what's happening here - and no one is arguing that. What if he decides cocaine is worthy of nolle prosse treatment? how about touching kids? rape of certain individuals but not others? Where does this end? We know democrats have a lot of pedophiles among them.

This started with the sanctuary city bullshit where libtards decided that laws they don't like were optional and it's growing. Growing into something that looks more like banana land than anything civilized and developed.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: prosecutors will decide ()
Date: January 09, 2020 10:32AM

prosecutors will decide

Prosecutors: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET_b78GSBUs

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Accept it. ()
Date: January 09, 2020 12:50PM

1) Read The Law. It clearly states the commonwealth's attorney can decide whether or not to prosecute all misdemeanor crimes. If you don't like the law lobby your legislator to change the law. https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title15.2/chapter16/section15.2-1627/

2) Descano informed everyone what he would do, and he won the election. That's democracy at work. The majority of residents in Fairfax County & Fairfax City want Descano to do what he said he would do. If you don't like what he's doing, gather up your support to vote him out next time. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b08d8fd85ede1b5cc3e7d9c/t/5d8b5b91def8834a61161e22/1569414039552/ProgressiveJustice-SteveDescano.pdf

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Kicking The Charge ()
Date: January 09, 2020 12:53PM

Or anything that is not a guilty conviction means no information goes to the NCIS. Without that information in the NCIS the gun sale will be approved if there are no other disqualifications .

Yes to be sure of their legal status , any one that has been arrested or ticketed for possession of the narcotic marijuana needs to consult with a attorney for determination of their rights to possess firearms

The problem in Fairfax is that tickets that are issued and users found guilty in court for marijuana possession are convictions and that information is not being entered into the NCIS for small quantity of marijuana which is Decriminalization of Marijuana by default by Steve and his AG Democrat comrade not by current state law

No info = Green Light For Strawmen

<At what point does some higher authority step in and bring a halt to this nonsense?

That's AG Herring and he's OK with Strawman sales it seems to keep the gun violence rolling on for more anti gun bait as he supports Steve , he just wants to punish law abiding Virginias with gun laws that criminals don't obey

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Only For The Reason ()
Date: January 09, 2020 12:57PM

>It clearly states the commonwealth's attorney can decide whether or not to prosecute all misdemeanor crimes

That there is not enough evidence of a crime , not just for his personal amusement and support for narcotic users

The General Assembly writes Virginias laws not Steve

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: JBM ()
Date: January 09, 2020 01:53PM

Accept it. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 1) Read The Law. It clearly states the
> commonwealth's attorney can decide whether or not
> to prosecute all misdemeanor crimes. If you don't
> like the law lobby your legislator to change the
> law.
> https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title15.2/chap
> ter16/section15.2-1627/
>
> 2) Descano informed everyone what he would do, and
> he won the election. That's democracy at work. The
> majority of residents in Fairfax County & Fairfax
> City want Descano to do what he said he would do.
> If you don't like what he's doing, gather up your
> support to vote him out next time.
> https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b08d8fd85e
> de1b5cc3e7d9c/t/5d8b5b91def8834a61161e22/156941403
> 9552/ProgressiveJustice-SteveDescano.pdf

1) You either didn't read it or don't understand it.

2) If someone ran on the platform of stringing up niggers and got elected, would you be cool with that?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: We Know Where Steve Stands ()
Date: January 09, 2020 03:55PM

For "Steves Strawman Gun Sales Loophole"

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: With Sanity ()
Date: January 09, 2020 05:38PM

The only strawman here is the poster who is trying to stir up a second amendment argument against de facto decriminilization of pot use. The vast majority of recreational pot users have no need or inclination to engage in other criminal activities to support or enhance their drug use. Further unlike those who consume alcohol pot users are less likely rather than more likely to use firearms while under the influence.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: I know right ()
Date: January 09, 2020 05:46PM

With Sanity Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The only strawman here is the poster who is trying
> to stir up a second amendment argument against de
> facto decriminilization of pot use. The vast
> majority of recreational pot users have no need or
> inclination to engage in other criminal activities
> to support or enhance their drug use. Further
> unlike those who consume alcohol pot users are
> less likely rather than more likely to use
> firearms while under the influence.


Yes. That faggot pothead here all wrapped around some dumbass 11E question or whatever. What's so hard about just lying on the form? I mean you are using weed - so when exactly did following the law become a concern?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Daves Two Faces Talk ()
Date: January 09, 2020 08:53PM

One side of Dave's face says he will severely prosecute all gun crimes

Then the other side of Dave's face says he will not prosecute small quantity's of marijuana possession , thus no disqualifying information will be placed into the NCIS to stop drug pushers addicts users and strawmen from buying the guns that will be used to commit those gun crimes killing maiming or wounding people before they are caught and prosecuted .

Yes Steve is a hypocritical Democrat. Read what he says as his campaign statement posted in the link . If its "Progressive" Its bad for America

So no death penalty period! for child killers, or police officers in the line of duty, mass killers , or rapists robbers kidnappers who kill . Steve talks about deterrents. The death penalty is not a deterrent. Its a punishment that absolutely stops the worse of the worst killers from ever killing again

No capitol death cases have come before Steve so we will see .

Steve's position is clearly one of the worst cases of political pandering for votes I have ever seen . Too bad voters did not pay attention in November

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b08d8fd85ede1b5cc3e7d9c/t/5d8b5b91def8834a61161e22/1569414039552/ProgressiveJustice-SteveDescano.pdf

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Idiot LOL ()
Date: January 09, 2020 09:11PM

Dave who

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: one that knows ()
Date: January 09, 2020 09:32PM

Idiot LOL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Dave who

That's the weed talking.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Take A Guess ()
Date: January 09, 2020 09:41PM

How many mass shooters were marijuana users . Many . How many other killers were marijuana users Hundreds of thousands

How many people on death rows that were marijuana users Thousands !

>The vast majority of recreational pot users have no need or inclination to engage in other criminal activities to support or enhance their drug use. Further unlike those who consume alcohol pot users are less likely rather than more likely to use firearms while under the influence.

>What's so hard about just lying on the form? I mean you are using weed - so when exactly did following the law become a concern?

This is the concern a old Fairfax Arrest Data Base not convictions from FXU

Searched for: Offense: marijuana
14526 matches found, up to first 500 displayed

How many in the future will lie and slip through the cracks or will not prosecuted so they could say NO on the 4473

The background check that is ran through the NCIS will disqualify them then and there at the time of sale if police are at a gun show or called to a gun dealers location they will notify the BATFE who will prosecute them for the federal felony of lying on the 4473 question 11E if they say NO . If they said Yes the sale will be denied and no background check will be ran and they are free to leave . Remember firearms dealers get the persons government issued photo ID when they fill out the 4473

The point is Democrats want background check laws without disqualifying information entered into the NCIS to stop the gun sales to criminals and that's been occurring now a good while with decimalization and legalization in America and now refusal to prosecute narcotics users in Fairfax County and many other places in the United States

The result is Democrats are liars and hypocrites when it comes to the 2nd amendment as they pass laws that do not stop killers nor crimes with guns that punish law abiding citizens instead

Cho the Va Tech Killer passed a background check . So did a lot of the mass killers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Former Cop ()
Date: January 09, 2020 10:19PM

As a former cop let me put some perspective on this from the Law Enforcement side. Simple possession of marijuana is one of the most inefficient crimes to prosecute. Assuming it's only a simple possession charge and no charges after the fact (i.e. weapons, intent to distribute, DUI etc.) For the people on here that disagree here me out, let me run you through a scenario I personally went through many times.

I'm a cop and i'm patrolling at midnight looking for crimes in progress or potential crimes. I make about roughly 50k a year as a rookie. That equates to about $26 hr. Anyways I see a car with a defective brake light and I decide to conduct a traffic stop on said vehicle. Once making contact with the driver I notice a strong odor of marijuana. I request an additional unit to conduct a full search of the vehicle. All in all I discover a small amount of marijuana and I charge the driver with simple posses-ion of marijuana. A class 1 misdemeanor in the state of Virginia. The driver signs the summons and he is sent on his way. This probably took about roughly 1.5 hours of my time. So that's about 39*2(cover officer) $78 dollars. (Mind you this is for rookie wages, not considering vets who make more) I could have spent those 1.5 hours on finding impaired drivers assuming this driver wasn't under the influence, checking businesses, and just simply allowing my presence to suppress crime. Anyhow, now I have to go to the station and type up my report and log my property and send the sample to the state lab. Why? Because the field test kits are obsolete due to legal hemp. This takes about another 1.5 hours. $39. Again this time could have been utilized to make my presence known and suppress robberies, burglaries and other more serious crimes. A total of about 3 hours out of service. Also remember this is assuming I don't have to do this after my EOT, which would mean I'd have to get paid overtime. Now I go to court and since I work nights, this is overtime for me at a rate of $36hr. About two hours per session for two witnesses this comes out to about $144. Now I understand it's not the only case i'm likely to hear that day so that number is a bit inflated but the witnesses usually have no other business except your case. In the end just for the officers pay it comes out to about $260. Remember this doesn't take into consideration property office people, prosecutors, records and the cost to use the state lab. Now imagine having about 500 of these per year. That's $130,000 spent on just for a simple marijuana charge. Again, this is a conservative number because i'm using rookie pay numbers and if I didn't this could easily jump to 250k. Now is this really what you want your police out her doing? Now if it's a pretext stop and I use the marijuana to get into your car and find illegal guns or serious dope then yeah prosecute to the fullest, but most of these aren't. I'm with the CA on this one and i'm a hardcore republican.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Comon Mon Really Mon ()
Date: January 09, 2020 11:02PM

There aren't all those robberies going down in Fairfax ,all I got was you wanted to loaf all night with a couple of business checks and a couple of stops

Now tell us how as a police officer how you would feel if that person who you stopped was a strawman and bought a gun legally with a background check after Steve refused to prosecute that a real drug pusher got and then killed your best friend on the force, then after they were caught Steve refused to prosecute the killer for capitol murder even though the murder was heinous in circumstance in addition to being capitol murder of a police officer in the line of duty

Be honest now Mon

As far as the dough that's why we pay taxes Mon So are you suggesting cops make too much money and 20 an hour should be tops . Enjoy the OT Mon why did you give up such a good gig, do you know the state paid me 700 some a month back in 75 to start even today they don't make what you did Mon.

The man who wore a big grey hat a long time and wants the law enforced

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: If Virginia Changes the Law ()
Date: January 09, 2020 11:16PM

Then that many more will slip and slide thru background checks to buy guns with decriminalization or legalization of narcotics . All known legally documented narcotics use should be entered into the NCIS including criminal convictions legal rec or medical as long as Narcotics are illegal under federal law and are disqualifying to buy a gun

That's enforcing the law and making background checks work . Medical cards should be entered into the NCIS, Rec users would have purchase ID entered into the NCIS the same to deny weed users the sale of a gun

Its OK for Democrats to pass laws to register law abiding citizens guns a constitutional right , but it wrong to do the same with weed use which is not a constitutional right

That's hypocrisy at its best and a unconstitutional act

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Ask The Victims Family ()
Date: January 09, 2020 11:22PM

>that's $130,000 spent on just for a simple marijuana charge.

Of a killing or mass killings that a weed user committed with a firearm who slipped through "Steves Loophole" how much was their loved ones life worth

How much is your life worth BTW

Democrats talk up a good story for a vote , but never back up the talk

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Peace to You Road Dog ()
Date: January 09, 2020 11:26PM

I know you did a good job , thanks for your service .

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Former Cop ()
Date: January 09, 2020 11:40PM

Comon Mon Really Mon Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There aren't all those robberies going down in
> Fairfax ,all I got was you wanted to loaf all
> night with a couple of business checks and a
> couple of stops
>
> Now tell us how as a police officer how you would
> feel if that person who you stopped was a strawman
> and bought a gun legally with a background check
> after Steve refused to prosecute that a real drug
> pusher got and then killed your best friend on the
> force, then after they were caught Steve refused
> to prosecute the killer for capitol murder even
> though the murder was heinous in circumstance in
> addition to being capitol murder of a police
> officer in the line of duty
>
> Be honest now Mon
>
> As far as the dough that's why we pay taxes Mon So
> are you suggesting cops make too much money and 20
> an hour should be tops . Enjoy the OT Mon why did
> you give up such a good gig, do you know the state
> paid me 700 some a month back in 75 to start even
> today they don't make what you did Mon.
>
> The man who wore a big grey hat a long time and
> wants the law enforced

Your argument is based on the principle of the matter in lieu of the substance. Of course I’d want that perp charged with capital but we’re talking about apples and oranges. As for the poster below, most of the simple possession charges are on every day people. Not the drug running gangbangers you think they are. Not to say the latter doesn’t smoke weed, it’s just when I stopped them they always had additional stuff (i.e. scales, guns, suspended/revoked operator licenses, false tags, stolen vehicle, various prescription meds, booze, etc.) do you think we prosecuted them to the fullest? Yes. However like I said majority of the recreational pot smokers especially in FX cty were your every day college kids, waiters, bartenders, teachers, cops kids, etc.) So cut the crap I know what i’m talking about because i’ve been there done that. As for the money i’m making a helluva a lot more now and not working nights and stressing out my wife.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Two Examples Marijuana Users ()
Date: January 10, 2020 11:06AM

From the FXU arrest search database the one male the other female

Do you think that these people would not be a "Strawman" to buy a gun if they did not have the marijuana possession charge to disqualify them and money was offered to them to do so. That is if the marijuana possession charge was not entered into the NCIS . Your telling people they are everyday people

The first person was at a gun show and did commit a felony there which a grand jury indicted them by returning a true bill , before trial the person fled and is currently still a fugitive

The FXU data base has well over 14 thousand names on it for marijuana possession . How many would also commit a gun buy as a Strawman or for themselves to commit crimes if Steve did not prosecute them and enter the case information into the federal NCIS to deny them any firearms purchases as narcotics users or in the case they lied on the federal 4473 by saying NO on question 11E committing a federal felony with a back ground check as they attempted to purchase the gun from a federal licensed dealer as the new Virginia upcoming law will require.

So Democrats pass gun laws as usual that suppress the rights of the people while not actually stopping gun crimes

Steve is not part of any solution to stop gun crimes Steve is aiding criminals to buy guns with his policy to not prosecute minor marijuana offences and enter the case information into the NCIS

LOOK UP AS MANY AS YOU WANT UNDER MARIJUANA Then Enter Their names to see what other offenses "Everyday People "college kids bartenders cops " commit

There's good reasons that marijuana use is a gateway drug to harder drugs and crime

Steves "Progressive Democrat" answer is let narcotics users off marijuana possession charges to appease "The Fairfax County Communities Moral Ideology" as Steve sees judicial morality as a "Progressive Democrat" CA

CASE CLOSED

"CONCEAL MERCHANDISE/MISD "
"TRESPASS-PVT PROP AFTER NOTICE "
"DRIVE-OL RVKD/SUSP "
"POSS MARIJUANA "
"PT LARC-OTHER "
"IMPROPER LANE CHANGE "
"DISREGARD TRAFFIC LIGHTS "

--------------------------------------------

"DWI-ALCOHOL "
"POSS MARIJUANA "
"POSS MARIJUANA "
"POSS MARIJUANA "

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Just Another College Kid ()
Date: January 10, 2020 12:17PM

"DWI-ALCOHOL "
"POSS MARIJUANA "
"POSS MARIJUANA "
"REFUSAL OF BLOOD/BREATH TEST "

And potential gun buyer under Steves "leadership" as CA

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: 1E In Plain View ()
Date: January 10, 2020 03:44PM

Read
Attachments:
11E.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: What good Is background vheck ()
Date: January 10, 2020 03:47PM

When Dems dont not input marijuana use convictions into the crime computers

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: You are flying false flags ()
Date: January 10, 2020 04:53PM

Because as discussed on another thread just being convicted or possession of marijuana isn't a bar to owning a firearm under Federal law. Plus mere recreational use of pot does not make someone more likely to misuse a firearm than consumption of alcohol.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: More false flag BS about pot ()
Date: January 10, 2020 05:01PM

"There's good reasons that marijuana use is a gateway drug to harder drugs and crime"

Except that it isn't. Studies have shown that among people who turned to nonoccasional use harder drugs for reasons other than medical related addictions, that tobacco use was the introduction. Those same studies have shown that alcohol was just as likely as pot to have been on the road to more serious drug use. If you wish to condemn marijuana because a very small number of people who try it move on abuse harder drugs, then you also need to condemn alcohol and tobacco use for the same reason.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: So I'll Repete My Post here ()
Date: January 10, 2020 05:54PM

Unlawful "Reefer's" To Fed Law

Not state laws . Federal law supersedes state law Did you not read the federal 4473 form . Its not a state form.

So your a legal pot wizard ?? That's why weed smokes get caught because your in the know all right.

Since your in the know, you should know

"Some can smoke it legally anywhere they want under anybodys law" its their natural right but its not your right

But I will admit its natural but its federally illegal so go ahead and write a law legalizing it and when your finished do a amendment to the constitution removing then 2nd and ratify it .

it would be a non issue but Democrats want to write gun laws to punish law abiding citizens not criminals and then leave gaping loopholes for narcotics users as they lie and propagandize how successful they are when they failed miserably to stop gun crimes
Attachments:
Heslegal.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Tobbaco Is Legal ()
Date: January 10, 2020 06:20PM

Not illegal and alcohol is legal in its lawful use.

There are felonies in Virginia for getting several DWIs on the law books which deny obtaining a firearm for life unless your pardoned and petition the circuit court to reinstate your gun rights as well as legal restrictions for obtaining concealed hand gun permit if your convicted of DWI for the next three years or driving or carrying a concealed handgun with a permit or not while under the influence of alcohol and other laws pertaining to alcohol abuse and firearms in possession of the person in Virginia today .

As well as very serious laws with heavy felony penalties pertaining to possession of firearms and narcotics together . You don't want to go anywhere near there and get busted for that one

Just ask Steve ! Im with him on that too

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: LMAO Prisons Are Full ()
Date: January 10, 2020 06:29PM

>if you wish to condemn marijuana because a very small number of people who try it move on abuse harder drugs,

Prisons are full of people who started out on the road of crime with use of marijuana . If anyone thinks they did not they should pay close attention to the first part of question 11F on the 4473 above

"Very small number" Did Hillary tell you that along with "All the AK47s all over the streets" She Lost !

Tell me what parents would want their children to smoke marijuana

I know the answers already from people who cant say NO on the 4473.

Steve is a "Progressive Democrats and Steve is wrong but do you think he would have gotten into West Point and graduated to become a US Army office serving his country then go to law school and today be elected as Commonwealth Attorney of Fairfax County if he could not answer NO to 11E

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Another One Above The Law ()
Date: January 10, 2020 06:35PM

There are only a select few, but the big question is does Santa need a gun to go with his weed . No he's escorted by US Airforce fighters and he can fly "sky high" but not you
Attachments:
WeedSanta.png

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Since Democrats Are Passing ()
Date: January 10, 2020 06:41PM

Gun laws, any chances that they will pass a law requiring Steve to enforce weed use laws

Not A Chance they want that loophole to stay for their street creed letting criminals off easy and guns available with background checks for narcotic users who commit the majority of gun crimes

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Fred78 ()
Date: January 10, 2020 07:34PM

You seem real pissed you're on the loser side of this. Nobody think weed is dangerous, or at least, any more dangerous then booze. Just admit you lost and move on to the next battle in the culture war that you'll lose.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Take The Deal or You Lose ()
Date: January 10, 2020 08:08PM

ON the main forum legal rec Weed thread

No prob man just register with the State and NCIS and get your rec weed card

Legalization can start right here , you will never get guns and weed choose one only

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Pentuple Dump Champion ()
Date: January 10, 2020 09:28PM

Fred78 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You seem real pissed you're on the loser side of
> this. Nobody think weed is dangerous, or at least,
> any more dangerous then booze. Just admit you lost
> and move on to the next battle in the culture war
> that you'll lose.


80% of these posts are one angry pothead.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Angry Citizen ()
Date: January 11, 2020 08:09AM

No guns for sketchy pot heads

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: SocialMediaCA ()
Date: February 21, 2020 05:06AM

Descano is on Twitter now at https://twitter.com/FairfaxCountyCA

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: chimp out monitor ()
Date: February 21, 2020 08:57AM

SocialMediaCA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Descano is on Twitter now at
> https://twitter.com/FairfaxCountyCA


Descano has decried that immigration is a "Federal matter" and not the purview of local law enforcement. Well guess what.. so is the Bhijan case. You are either working and cooperating with the Feds or you aren't. You SJW anarchists don't get to choose when and where you want to play nice with the Feds. Solid move by the Feds to remind him where he stands.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Bye Steve ()
Date: November 30, 2020 03:41PM

LOL...

Steve says it was Ray's fault that they hide evidence from the defense...

Who's running to get him out during the next election?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/prosecutor-evidence-fairfax-brady/2020/11/13/e7f6f36a-23c1-11eb-8672-c281c7a2c96e_story.html

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: EML: ()
Date: November 30, 2020 05:04PM

chimp out monitor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SocialMediaCA Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Descano is on Twitter now at
> > https://twitter.com/FairfaxCountyCA
>
>
> Descano has decried that immigration is a "Federal
> matter" and not the purview of local law
> enforcement. Well guess what.. so is the Bhijan
> case. You are either working and cooperating with
> the Feds or you aren't. You SJW anarchists don't
> get to choose when and where you want to play nice
> with the Feds. Solid move by the Feds to remind
> him where he stands.

This is not correct. The killing of a person within the borders of the Commonwealth of Virginia is a Virginia matter regardless of the identity of the victim or the killer. However if it is determined that the killer was a Federal officer who lawfully committed the act in the performance of his duties as a Federal officer, then under the Supremacy Clause Virginia cannot prosecute the killer.

In theory the way it is supposed to work is that the case gets removed to the Federal court with a Federal judge and jury, but with the state prosecutors being responsible for prosecuting the case. The question of whether the killing was lawfully committed by a Federal officer in the performance of his duties as a Federal officer is supposed to be an affirmative defense, and a question of fact and law to be submitted to the jury.

The law in this area has been perverted in recent years. Now instead of the Federal officer being entitled to a not guilty verdict at trial if the jury finds the killing was lawfully committed by the Federal officer in the performance of his duties, cases are being dismissed before trial based on the judge making that finding. Legally this is the equivalent of a killer getting his murder charge dismissed before trial because the judge believes the killer acted in self defense. When you make the rules you can get away with things like this.

There is a long string of cases in the past century or so saying that immigration is strictly a Federal matter, and the states have no authority over it. If you go back to America's earliest days as an independent nation it was the states, not the Federal government which controlled immigration policy. The exception was during the Adams administration when the Alien and Sedition Acts were in place. A reading of the U.S. Constitution says that Congress can determine naturalization laws under which an immigrant can become a U.S. citizen. It does not expressly state the Feds are entitled to determine who gets in and who gets kicked out. If you are a lawyer looking to make a name for yourself, one way to do it is to challenge the rule that immigration is solely a Federal issue based on the framer's original intent.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: TJMMK ()
Date: November 30, 2020 09:56PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Deadly Hypocrisy Of Democrats ()
Date: December 01, 2020 06:43PM

Reading this thread I saw reference to the 11E question that is posted , it is true that users of illegal narcotics which marijuana is under federal law may not posses firearms and can not buy them legally.

It is also true that if the Commonwealth Attorney of Fairfax County does not prosecute users of the narcotic marijuana there will be no NCIS record to prevent the narcotics user from purchasing a firearm from a federally licensed dealer.

In short Democrats are making a mockery of the very laws they pass to require background checks for all firearm sales then leave loopholes for narcotics users who are straw purchasers who buy guns for the deadly drug trade , which is the root cause of the great majority of firearms crimes in the USA

Such deadly hypocrisy is only one of the huge faults of the Democrat party and their media supporters who never mention any effects of buying a firearm if marijuana is legalized

If the citizens of Fairfax Country fully realized what the position of Commonwealth Steve T. Descano (D) is with regard to allowing firearm sales to narcotic users they would not confirm any further service as Commonwealth Attorney of Fairfax County in the next election , for that reason Democrats hide that information from the public

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: A simple solution to this ()
Date: December 01, 2020 07:05PM

The citizens of Fairfax County have finally come to their senses that the War on Drugs was an extremely misguided effort. They have chosen not to pursue it further. One reason why the Virginia Constitution allows voters to elect their Commonwealth Attorney is so the voters can make precisely this kind of determination.

That Fairfax County's choice not to pursue criminal actions against recreational drug users would adversely affect the ability of the Federal government to pursue its own policies is, to put it bluntly the Feds' problems. Federalism, that principal that conservatives like to trot out when it is convenient, is supposed to work both ways.

Assuming you are correct that narcotics users are purchasing guns as strawmen, it is because anti-drug policies make it advantageous for them to do so. Rational drug laws would remove this incentive, IF it was actually happening. Of course we would be in a better position to know whether this is happening if we had comprehensive gun registration laws.

So what say you? Are you willing to step up in the name of public safety and require the registration of all firearms upon purchase or upon relocation? I thought not. Public safety is simply your strawman argument against rational reform of our misguided drug laws.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: SorosBot637283094 ()
Date: December 01, 2020 07:34PM

East German Show trials for Conservatives over petty charges. Catch and release for Liberal arsonists and rioters.

Such malicious abuse of discretion is ILLEGAL - a flagrant violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

Descano is just one in a large, nationally coordinated effort to abuse the justice system to create propaganda. The Corrupt prosecutors just pitch to the Corrupt media, the actual facts of any case are completely irrelevant


"Abstract. Prosecutors are the most powerful officials in the American criminal justice system. The decisions they make, particularly the charging and plea-bargaining decisions, control the operation of the system and often predetermine the outcome of criminal cases."

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: ptmdy ()
Date: December 01, 2020 07:39PM

SorosBot637283094 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> East German Show trials for Conservatives over
> petty charges. Catch and release for Liberal
> arsonists and rioters.
>
> Such malicious abuse of discretion is ILLEGAL - a
> flagrant violation of the equal protection clause
> of the 14th amendment.
>
> Descano is just one in a large, nationally
> coordinated effort to abuse the justice system to
> create propaganda. The Corrupt prosecutors just
> pitch to the Corrupt media, the actual facts of
> any case are completely irrelevant
>
>
> "Abstract. Prosecutors are the most powerful
> officials in the American criminal justice system.
> The decisions they make, particularly the charging
> and plea-bargaining decisions, control the
> operation of the system and often predetermine the
> outcome of criminal cases."

^^^^
An excellent description of what has been going on. Jail time for Republicans who mis-remember item #1012 in a two hour interview. Free pass for Democrats that deliberately lie and fabricate data.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: udve9 ()
Date: December 01, 2020 07:41PM

Also, why is Descano crying that he needs more prosecutors? We are defunding the police and making crime legal - why are we not defunding prosecutors as well?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: SorosBot4723974942 ()
Date: December 01, 2020 07:47PM

udve9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Also, why is Descano crying that he needs more
> prosecutors? We are defunding the police and
> making crime legal - why are we not defunding
> prosecutors as well?


Kim Gardner, another Soros-bought prosecutor has had well over 100% turnover rate in her office during her short tenure.

What this coordinated front is doing is ILLEGAL and they damn well know it. Any underling with a conscience or a brain has to go. The last thing these draconian monsters need is an inside whistleblower!

You should be very, very concerned for the immediate future

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/470-years-of-experience-gone-kimberly-m-gardner-has-lost-more-lawyers-than-she-had/article_c5b70e30-d3c3-551c-8a90-d1f03b47c1e3.html

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Misguided Liberal Weed Smokers ()
Date: December 01, 2020 11:51PM

>The citizens of Fairfax County have finally come to their senses that the War on Drugs was an extremely misguided effort. They have chosen not to pursue it further.

The citizens at large would say legalize weed fine , but weed users can not use or own guns to put it simply " we don't want narcos or dopers having guns "

They are not aware of the points brought up here as Democrats hide that from them and so does their biased liberal loving media

>So what say you? Are you willing to step up in the name of public safety and require the registration of all firearms upon purchase or upon relocation?

I say registration does nothing to stop gun crimes when your talking about many millions of highly popular common firearms in circulation . Not a small number such as were full automatics which were rare and expensive when the NFA act of 1934 was passed into law . The Thompson submachine gun and the BAR rifle were THE gangster's weapons of the roaring 20's and 30's , they cost 250.00 in 1934 when a brand new Ford automobile cost 450 dollars and not that many were in circulation so registration with a special tax stamp that was unconstitutional as you can not tax a civil right, worked to control crimes with those guns that were not in criminal hands .

I say criminals steal guns and don't obey any laws . I say most black on black gun crime is over illegal drugs and drug turf wars that does not stop with legal weed. I say most gun crime is caused by the same drug problems with the general population in not as high as percentiles as in the black communities. I say registration is a Democrat scheme to take guns from the law abiding without amending and ratifying the US constitutions 2nd amendment . I say if Democrats get control of the US Supreme court . I say if that happens you will see the most dangerous affront to personal liberty , a green light to abuse all your rights that make you a free person today.

Finally I say Democrat are purely the worst hypocrites on the planet as they want to take guns from the people then talk about legalizing the very substance that is a gateway drug to the harder drugs creating drug crimes that are the cause of the huge number of gun deaths in this country

I say level with the people Democrats and tell people you want legal weed you can have it but not the guns with it

I say stop hiding it Democrats and let the facts be known up front so if the people want legal guns and weed too so be it . But that's not what Democrats want they want to pander to drug criminals and empty prisons of very dangerous people to prey on those weaker again as they wish to disarm the people to make them victims of crime which makes no sense

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: You First ()
Date: December 02, 2020 12:33AM

>Because as discussed on another thread just being convicted or possession of marijuana isn't a bar to owning a firearm under Federal law.

Go ahead try it

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Really Who Needs Steve ()
Date: December 02, 2020 12:46AM

>We are defunding the police and making crime legal

JOE and Kamal have vowed to open the prison gates because there's too many blacks inside because they commit the most crimes and that's unfair to Democrats

So why do we need Steve anymore when no ones going inside anymore

Those well to do liberal suburban white housewives will so pleased when they have libtarded friends over for wine and cheese as long as the security system is working the armed guards are in the gate house of the gated community they live in or the police make regular trips by their house several times a day and night stopping any person of color they see

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Dan Knows ()
Date: December 04, 2020 09:10AM

It's clear the Commonwealth' Attorny needs to watch the authorative movie about the consequences of smoking marijuana

REEFER MADNESS

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: MaybeMoot ()
Date: December 05, 2020 07:16AM

What's the Likely hood The Senate will approve of Legalizing Marijuana and come to rescue Descano.

https://www.npr.org/2020/12/04/942949288/house-approves-decriminalizing-marijuana-bill-to-stall-in-senate

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: lifelong democrat ()
Date: December 05, 2020 08:10AM

Really Who Needs Steve Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >We are defunding the police and making crime
> legal
>
> JOE and Kamal have vowed to open the prison gates
> because there's too many blacks inside because
> they commit the most crimes and that's unfair to
> Democrats
>
> So why do we need Steve anymore when no ones going
> inside anymore
>
> Those well to do liberal suburban white housewives
> will so pleased when they have libtarded friends
> over for wine and cheese as long as the security
> system is working the armed guards are in the gate
> house of the gated community they live in or the
> police make regular trips by their house several
> times a day and night stopping any person of color
> they see


The point of releasing the negros is so they can resume killing each other.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: YFMXB ()
Date: December 05, 2020 08:41AM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: GHNTV ()
Date: December 05, 2020 09:49PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: LLXH3 ()
Date: December 06, 2020 02:39PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: D73WU ()
Date: December 06, 2020 06:18PM

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: FCA Exposed ()
Date: December 07, 2020 03:40AM

Descano & Co is getting exposed by Dr Exposure on Twitter

Read more at https://twitter.com/DrExposure/with_replies

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: CertifiedAgreement ()
Date: December 15, 2020 04:47PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: FX CWA Statements ()
Date: January 16, 2021 11:37AM

https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/commonwealthattorney/current-caseload-capacity


Current Caseload Capacity
The Fairfax County Commonwealth's Attorney's Office serves our community by keeping it safe, reflecting its values, and ensuring justice is done. One of the ways in which the Office achieves these goals is by handling a notably wider array of cases than is statutorily required. Typically, Commonwealth’s Attorney’s offices across Virginia pursue only the cases they are obligated to prosecute by law—felony cases in Circuit Court and appeals to Circuit Court from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court. By contrast, this Office strives to do much more by additionally prosecuting misdemeanor and traffic cases, well beyond the statutory requirements. However, as the most underfunded Commonwealth’s Attorney’s office in the Commonwealth of Virginia, this Office must deploy its limited resources with the objective of prosecuting the largest number of cases possible while maintaining the ability to give each case the individual time and attention it deserves and our community expects. There are no shortcuts to justice—only injustice in the absence of thorough and ethical prosecutorial work. As part of its mission to do justice in every case it touches, the Fairfax County Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office will regularly review its capacity to ensure the Office is handling as many cases as it can while also giving those cases the attention they deserve.

The Commonwealth's Attorney's Office has analyzed its current resources and determined the following:

FELONY CASES
The Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office will be involved in all felony cases in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court (JDR), General District Court (GDC), and Circuit Court (Circuit). This includes felony probation violations and attendant programs such as Drug Court.

MISDEMEANOR CASES
With respect to misdemeanor cases, the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office is currently handling the following matters:

DWI (GDC and Circuit)

Intimate partner domestic violence (IPDV) (JDR and Circuit)

Stalking (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Sexual battery (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Violation of protective orders issued in stalking & IPDV cases (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Traffic fatalities (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Possession of marijuana with an offense date prior to July 1, 2020 (GDC and Circuit)

Violations of §18.2-308.1:6 arising out of noncompliance with a substantial risk order issued pursuant to §§19.2-152.13 or 19.2-152.14 (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Misdemeanor cases attached to felony cases to the extent such cases are part of the same incident and have been consolidated with the felony case(s) for preliminary hearing. (JDR, GDC, and Circuit)

Misdemeanor cases covered by VA Code 16.1-232 appealed from JDR to Circuit.

Veterans Treatment Docket

Mental Health Docket

Offenses relating to failure to register under, or providing materially false information to, the Sex Offender and Crimes Against Minors registry. (GDC and Circuit)

Cases pertaining to statutory duties under §3.2-6507.6 with respect to the enforcement of Article 2.1 under the Comprehensive Animal Care Act. (GDC and Circuit)

Criminal violations of election law, such as voter intimidation or interference and disturbance or disruption of polling places.

Any case of significance or public importance as determined by the Commonwealth’s Attorney.



THIS LIST IS UPDATED REGULARLY



PLEASE NOTE: If an individual is charged with a misdemeanor offense that is not listed here (including traffic infractions), although the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office may not be involved in a case, the prosecution of that case will still proceed by other means. That individual is still required to appear in court and follow the prescribed actions related to their charge.

The Fairfax County Court System is currently processing a considerable number of backlogged cases due to the COVID-19 crisis. Therefore, in addition to the above-mentioned case types, there are a number of specific cases that the Commonwealth's Attorney's Office has previously appeared in and will maintain their involvement with moving forward. These cases are denoted here:

CASES CWA IS MAINTAINING APPEARANCES
The full list of backlogged cases that the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office will be maintaining appearances in can be viewed/downloaded HERE.
https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/commonwealthattorney/sites/commonwealthattorney/files/Assets/documents/CWA%20Public%20List%20of%20COVID%20Cases%20Being%20Handled.pdf


PLEASE NOTE: There may be a rare occasion when the CWA's Office has previously signed a discovery order or made an in-person appearance that has been inadvertently omitted from this list. If you are an attorney and believe that is the case, please contact the CWA's Office for clarification.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Judicial Help ()
Date: January 16, 2021 11:47AM

Fairfax Judge invited several "Justice" Organizations to comment on one criminal Appeal that Descano's declined to prosecute.
https://acluva.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/commonwealth_v._harwinder_sangha_mi-2020-0000565_invitation_to_amici.pdf



Seems like the ACLU Virginia believes the Court should dismiss all cases that Descano declines to prosecute.
https://acluva.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/amicus_brief_of_aclu-va_vf.pdf

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Where's Mine ()
Date: January 16, 2021 12:04PM

Im hippy Fairfax Democrat squirrel I dont want any job I hate Trump I need more weed and I can buy guns thur Democrat Steve D's narcotic users loophole as everytime cops roust me and ticket me for my reefer I get off with a slap and no info put into the feds NCIS making a laugh at the Democrats mandatory background checks. Lunatics like me and all narcotics users can lie and laugh on 11E on that 4473 as we get out of the gun shoop with our guns and ammo to give it to our narcotics pushers as strawmen getting free weed for our efforts

The true 11E and mental health info witheld by Dems makes Democrats loopholes in their gun background checks insure the wackyist lunatics can buy guns

Like every thing Democrats do is a FAIL , just like "serving sizes" they paid billions to feel good Democrat college hacks to figure out and put on all foods sold other then prepared in places to eat and carry outs . Serving sizes for Democrats screaming that Trump and his voters are all racists and white supremists by fat members of congress at his impeachment should be 10000 calories a day ! Every one knows it too ! The old fatty with his colostomy bag should be at least 10000 too which he had with him in a huge duffle bag
Attachments:
FurmanNO!.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Policy ()
Date: February 11, 2021 02:09PM

Check out Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney Descano’s Policies at https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/commonwealthattorney/reforms

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: sane ()
Date: February 11, 2021 03:28PM

If people weren't such morons, and had enough sense to stay away from drugs in the first place, INCLUDING MARIJUANA, we wouldn't have these problems to start with. Most of them start with simply human stupidity.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: 1 Year Later ()
Date: February 11, 2021 04:24PM

Strawmen and mostly strawwomen in need of quick cash from drug pushers were able to buy guns used to commit drug crimes as there was no info in the NCIS to stop them when they used the weed and got a minor bust thanks to Steve D.

So much for Steve D and his "law enforcement" work huh

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: imagine that ()
Date: February 11, 2021 04:25PM

Policy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Check out Fairfax Commonwealth’s Attorney
> Descano’s Policies at
> https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/commonwealthattorney
> /reforms


Steve just makes his own laws and decides what he likes and doesn't like and that's it. No need for this "general assembly" bullshit when you have the ability to just make a PDF with all the new laws.

What's felony larceny? $1,000? Steve says that's too low so let's make it $1500. But wait, STEVE says that even that doesn't mean it's a felony. Steve will need to look at your case and see if you are black or not before deciding.

This is the absolute fastest way to create an even bigger shithole of a county.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: WE All Know That Fatty ()
Date: February 11, 2021 04:27PM

AS one of the panderers it was probably filled with cheesecake stuffed Mexican chocolate covered tacos for his snacks

>The old fatty with his colostomy bag should be at least 10000 too which he had with him in a huge duffle bag
Attachments:

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Fairfax Judges VS Fairfax Prosecutors
Posted by: Same old same old ()
Date: February 11, 2021 04:54PM

imagine that Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Steve just makes his own laws and decides what he
> likes and doesn't like and that's it. No need for
> this "general assembly" bullshit when you have the
> ability to just make a PDF with all the new laws.

Horan did the same thing. He just drew the lines differently. Others did as well.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **     **   *******   **      **   ******     *******  
 ***   ***  **     **  **  **  **  **    **   **     ** 
 **** ****  **         **  **  **  **         **     ** 
 ** *** **  ********   **  **  **  **   ****   ******** 
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **    **          ** 
 **     **  **     **  **  **  **  **    **   **     ** 
 **     **   *******    ***  ***    ******     *******  
This forum powered by Phorum.