Triggered snowflakes were offended that some guy gets his wife a Peloton that she may or may not have asked for. Really? You think the guy is fat shaming? That woman is gorgeous and in great shape already.

Fine.

I am offended now. Why? Because Ryan Reynolds apparently has "rescued" this woman in a gin commercial. Really? A woman needs a man to rescue her? You sexist piece of shit!! You are worse than her husband who loves her and spent over $2000 for a present that might help her mental and physical states due to good exercise.

You sexist piece of shit. Rescuing a woman. How dare you!!!!

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/ryan-reynolds-aviation-gin-just-saved-the-actress-in-the-peloton-girl-ad-2019-12-07?mod=mw_latestnews

This is where we are now.

These bitches don't work, can get any item they wish via Amazon Prime the next day and have lives that third world shithole dwellers can only dream of. So what do they do with all this extra time? Dream up shit to be offended by.

I let the door slam in the face of women rather than risk their ire by holding it for them.

Whenever an attractive women walks near me, I never make eye contact or acknowledge them. It drives them crazy and deflates their ego, I like that!!

come on man. You don't this this whole thing was not a preplanned publicity stunt? How in the hell would Aviation Gin hire an advertising firm, get the ideas for the commercial hashed out, hire actors/actresses, produce and film it, then have it hit the market so quickly after the social media frenzy about the Peloton ad? I guarantee both of these commercials were filmed in conjunction and that Peloton hired people to start the social media "uproar". It benefits both of the products and all involved. That Peloton ad would have passed most people by without as much as a glance, now people are actively looking for it.

in all my life in Fairfax and other places, college + work

elementary school - high school - college - various careers

I am 50! many female friends/gfs/relationships/sexual partners/coworkers......

I have never met one woman/girl who claimed to be a victim of society

what are the chances I have never met even one of these women? or, like I would guess, very few actually feel like victims



my guess is ONLY some naïve college girls buy into this bullshit, but are vocal as fuck

then they grow up and realize how idiotic they were back then

as a male, I can think of plenty of bullshit I believed when I was 20

I've got big balls!
Attachments:

This article is awesome...

https://www.dallasobserver.com/arts/peloton-commercial-isnt-sexist-11810055

libtardz have no sense of reality


great parts of the article...

"...has been deemed by many on social media to be the face of patriarchy and sexism because he surprised his spouse with a $2,000 gift — which, by the way, I doubt most hubbies do unless wifey has dropped a few hints like breadcrumbs around the house."

"...She is, say many “social justice warriors,” abused and repressed by her husband. This is all a narrative made up by viewers who, I can only assume, have other, underlying issues with men or gifts or healthy lifestyles or holiday cheer or just New Year’s resolutions."

"The wife, played by Monica Ruiz, has since appeared in a "sequel" to the Peloton commercial, an ad for Ryan Reynolds' Aviation Gin, playing a psychologically disturbed and perhaps alcoholic bar patron with two friends who say "you're safe now."

"The thing is, there isn’t any one woman who could have been in this ad who wouldn’t have offended somebody. If she were a slightly overweight or obese woman, then the argument would be completely based on fat-shaming. I can see it now: “This husband is horrible and should accept his wife’s body for what it is! #freethemombod!” (Oh, yeah, they’re supposed to be parents. There’s a kid in the commercial for about half a second.) Who would these people be OK with? A yellow Simpsons'-style cartoon dog family? Is that where we have to go now?"

The new rules...

1) The only ads that are acceptable now are where every race is represented, with any stronger representation favoring the negroes.

2) All white individuals that appear as a couple must do so with someone that is minimally yellow if not darker. A slight exception may be made if the children are mulatto or darker.

3) All normal everyday and appropriate stereotypes must be REVERSED. Women cannot be seen doing any form of cooking, house work or manual labor. Fuck men, they can do whatever provided they aren't all white and it's just men.

4) If there is a scenario where someone is employed, knowledgeable and showing someone that might be an idiot something - financial advice for example - the superior person must always be the nigger and the white person must appear to be a dolt.

Violation of these terms is racist, hateful and will be dealt with harshly on social media.

PC Principal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The new rules...
>
> 1) The only ads that are acceptable now are where
> every race is represented, with any stronger
> representation favoring the negroes.
>
> 2) All white individuals that appear as a couple
> must do so with someone that is minimally yellow
> if not darker. A slight exception may be made if
> the children are mulatto or darker.
>
> 3) All normal everyday and appropriate stereotypes
> must be REVERSED. Women cannot be seen doing any
> form of cooking, house work or manual labor. Fuck
> men, they can do whatever provided they aren't all
> white and it's just men.
>
> 4) If there is a scenario where someone is
> employed, knowledgeable and showing someone that
> might be an idiot something - financial advice for
> example - the superior person must always be the
> nigger and the white person must appear to be a
> dolt.
>
> Violation of these terms is racist, hateful and
> will be dealt with harshly on social media.


5) Women must always look smarter than men and in charge. Men, especially white men, must look like complete morons and incapable of accomplishing anything.

Rule #5 is already in place but the addendum was necessary for the terms

PC Principal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> 1) The only ads that are acceptable now are where
> every race is represented, with any stronger
> representation favoring the negroes.
>
> 2) All white individuals that appear as a couple
> must do so with someone that is minimally yellow
> if not darker. A slight exception may be made if
> the children are mulatto or darker.
>
> 3) All normal everyday and appropriate stereotypes
> must be REVERSED. Women cannot be seen doing any
> form of cooking, house work or manual labor. Fuck
> men, they can do whatever provided they aren't all
> white and it's just men.
>
> 4) If there is a scenario where someone is
> employed, knowledgeable and showing someone that
> might be an idiot something - financial advice for
> example - the superior person must always be the
> nigger and the white person must appear to be a
> dolt.
>
>
>


If there are too many 'groids in the ad, I won't buy what's avertised.

If there are ads with a minority male with a white woman, especially if it's a 'groid with a white woman, I won't buy what's advertised.


If it shows the man cooking, washing or doing housework while the wife is watching, I'll assume it's an ad for a cuck or BDSM website and will ignore, since I don't go to those websites. Now, if you got White Boy/Black MILF porn, I'm interested since my GF is a black MILF.

I buy only products that show the white man as superior and the 'groid as a dope.