From all outward indications, this candidate has all the qualities of a solid front-runner.

Vote Bob Malm 2020!

He’s got my vote! The guy who keeps slandering him on here shows that Bob Malm has the patience and dignity of a saint!

I’m in. He’s got my vote and the hundreds of voices in my head as well.

Check it out: My first fundraiser!

BTW, my veep will be Sugarland Chiow—a licensed attorney, known for his veracity and excellent legal research!
Attachments:

Jeff Chiow, lying attorney. Told the Alexandria Circuit court as a statement of fact that I never practiced law. Claims to have spent more than $100K in legal fees, but doesn’t even have the integrity not to lie in court.

Note that he DOES NOT say that he believes this to be true, or that the evidence supports this conclusion. He states it as a fact.

Visit www.gracealexwatch.org to learn more
Social media @gracealexwatch
Bob Malm, perjuring priest
Attachments:

The real question is will Leslie Malm vote for Bob? You know there will be a divorce after Bob retires and he decides to trade her for someone younger, thinner, prettier and less hysterical.

You keep saying he perjured himself, and lied about a couple of things.

But in your hundreds and hundreds of posts, you have not offered a single bit of evidence to prove that fact. You just post childish pictures and repeat that he is lying.

So get Bob to explain how, “time after time,” an elderly woman, unable to get out of bed, use a phone, or a computer, contacted him.

Yet Bob Malm told this lie, under oath, in writing, and with the advice of legal counsel.

$1000 to any charity of your choice if Bob or anyone else can show that Mom EVER made an appointment with him, or anyone claiming to be her.

Go for it.

And the offer stands for Bob, members of his family, and anyone at Grace Church.
Attachments:

And here’s documentation of his lie about my not having been an attorney

https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the-public/find-attorney/attorney-detail/55971

So, both Bob Malm and Jeff Chiow are liars

What year is this from and how long has she been dying for?

Basically, the preacher has made a claim (out of the blue and for no reason, according to you) and your counter-claim is this woman has been so sick and bed-ridden for six years that she can’t pick up the phone.

On top of that, you keep claiming child molestation.

On top of that, you say you’re the victim of church child molestation.

Add to that you incessantly post with rambling, incoherent memes that make no sense.

I have nothing against you, but can you see why no one here is on your side?

I couldn’t care less.

The collapsing numbers at the church, including attendance and cash flow, the early resignation of Bob’s assistant rector (by two years), and the fact that Malm turns a blind eye to the church child molester—someone he knows all about—speak to the real story here.

Healthy organizations don’t have these issues, and they aren’t led by folks who think perjury is okay

And the more Leslie Malm and others babble on with the ad hominem attacks and hateful rhetoric, the more they prove my point. The fact they still haven’t figured this out speaks to the full extent of the church’s problems

Well then why do you post so much here and turn people against you?

I’m pretty sure that you have mental problems, and I’m sure most other people would agree.

You take a grievance against a person and spin it into a psychotic obsession on a message board that doesn’t even represent Alexandria.

Before you started posting, I had never heard of Bob Malm. If someone like you is against him, it speaks better for him..

PS Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And here’s documentation of his lie about my not
> having been an attorney
>
> https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the-public
> /find-attorney/attorney-detail/55971
>
> So, both Bob Malm and Jeff Chiow are liars

Yo dude, that link don’t even work!

It does, but it wrapped for you across two lines. Sorry about that

Visit www.gracealexwatch.org to learn more
Social media @gracealexwatch
Bob Malm, perjuring priest

LOL. If you feel that way, be sure to send your kids or any kids you know to the church school. And if you live in Fairfax County, not a problem; a high percentage come from Fairfax. Even better, send Money. God knows they need it.

There is a reason the church has lost 1/3 of its pledging units, and I can assure you it has nothing to do with people posting here or anywhere else.

Again, healthy organizations of any sort don’t collapse because of what people post on the Internet. They collapse because of internal issues.Like. Priest who is so bogus that he lies under oath.

And for the record, just like anyone else, I stick up for family members, including my mother. Having chosen to try and bully a dying woman, the fake Christians at Grace Church will hear about it for many years to come. Not backing down any time soon, regardless of what you or anyone else thinks.

A bit more... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well then why do you post so much here and turn
> people against you?
>
> I’m pretty sure that you have mental problems,
> and I’m sure most other people would agree.
>
> You take a grievance against a person and spin it
> into a psychotic obsession on a message board that
> doesn’t even represent Alexandria.
>
> Before you started posting, I had never heard of
> Bob Malm. If someone like you is against him, it
> speaks better for him..

Visit www.gracealexwatch.org to learn more
Social media @gracealexwatch
Bob Malm, perjuring priest

PS Sorry for mechanical issues on previous post. Responding from a handheld sucks, LOL

Visit www.gracealexwatch.org to learn more
Social media @gracealexwatch
Bob Malm, perjuring priest

Awesome. A man of the cloth.

Will he have to renounce his allegiance to the Holy Roman Emperor (or whatever that call that guy)?

If elected, will he grab puss or cock? Not sure it makes a difference.

He sounds like he could be a good one!

Elect Jeff Chiow! Make America Great Again!

Former Marine. Rockstar attorney.

Jeff Chiow for Veep!
Attachments:

I hope you understand that you come across as psychopathic.

Everyone keeps telling him this but it doesn't do any good.

1. As stated above, don’t care what you think.

2. The word psychopath has a specific meaning, and you obviously don’t understand that.

3. See point 1 above.

See what I mean? Scaryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!

If you actually knew what the word “psychopath” meant, one could have a conversation with you about it. But since you don’t, you come across like a really bad pop New Age wingnut.

How about this:

Delusions of grandeur

Narcissism

Paranoia

Again, you are clueless.

I know Bob!!! He's the best!!

This thread sorta sounds like typical FFXU fare but I'm an optimist!!!

Every body vote for Bob!!!!!!!

Yes, vote for Bob. As long as he doesn’t come back to NVA, we’re good.

Maybe... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How about this:
>
> Delusions of grandeur
>
> Narcissism
>
> Paranoia


I think that’s about right. He’s never posted any evidence, he just counters their evidence with insane pictures.

Lyin’ Bobby for prez!
Attachments:

> I think that’s about right. He’s never posted
> any evidence, he just counters their evidence with
> insane pictures.


And on cue, he does it again. What a fag.

.
Attachments:

Bob Malm, perjuring priest
Attachments:

BULLSHIT

BULLSHIT

BULLSHIT

BULLSHIT

BULLSHIT

BULLSHIT

That’s not proof. He was planning for you to answer those questions under oath so as determine the fact. He made no outright statement as such. He’s not making a judgement, which is clear in the doc you keep regurgitating on this board incessantly.

You are either a liar or not. Those questions to be posed to you would have made that determination - not that Chiow dude. It’s fairly obvious why you stopped practicing law...if you ever really did.

Why do you keep lying about that over and over and over again?

Chiow tells the court that the answers to these questions would have proved that I lied. He doesn’t state that he believes that to be the case, or that the evidence supports that conclusion.

He proffers it as a statement of fact. Thus, it violates professional rule 3:3, the comment to which says:

Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false.

In other words, if you don’t recognize the difference between a pleading and an interrogatory, do yourself a favor and keep your stupid mouth shut.

That’s a clearly horrible and intentionally bias reading of what you keep verbal diarrhea spewing on here.


Not even close to factually accurate. You gotta bring better evidence than that.

Hit the bricks, troll, LOL
Attachments:

Honest Bob Malm!
Attachments:

Tanned, rested, ready!
Attachments: