LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again, nobody who actually understands the
> subject
> > disputes any of the above.
>
> LOL! You're a transparent fraud. Which of your
> cheap floozy posts above do you contend to have
> established any actual existence of race in human
> beings?
>
> And of course, this is (at least) the third time
> you have made these exact same obscurantist claims
> here, only to see them then shot down in flames.
> The prior two crash-and-burn events came in
> September and May of last year, and there were no
> survivors. Your case has never had merit and it
> has not at all improved over time.
>
> The actual facts remain that there is a general
> and broadly accepted scientific consensus that
> genetically speaking, there is no such thing as
> race in human beings. Also that foolish thinking
> based on observations of adaptive traits and
> adherence to pre-scientific perceptions of the
> social construct of race form what continues to be
> a significant societal problem today. Basically,
> what we have here is a group of dimwitted
> late-adapters who still cling to long-outdated
> notions of race for no good reason at all. You
> would seem to be among that sorry group.
>
> For reasons that you surely remember, you might
> want to be careful what you say next about
> Neanderthals as well.
So once again, as always, you just conveniently ignored all of what you can't address. Nice job. lol
All of it does. Some of it you don't have a good enough understanding of the subject to realize that. What happened the last time(s) was the same thing that has happened here. I present a reasoned argument with objective, independent evidence to support what I say. You, as you do in all threads, just mumble the same nonsense over and over and over with nothing at all to support it and then declare that you've somehow "won."
First, in your ignorance you're confusing a number of concepts which makes it difficult to even sort out your bullshit.
One being that of common origin. Because there may be common origin at some point does not mean that there are not differences beyond that. In fact, it's implied since understanding common origin is of no interest otherwise.
Another being adaption or "adaptive traits" as you called it. Adaption is a genetic process and therefore has a genetic basis by definition so your nonsense argument fails internally.
Another being confusing race with species/subspecies as you were intentionally mislead by the dumb HuffPo pop science distortion of your chimp study. Race in humans is not at the level of species/subspecies. That does not mean that race does not exist or that there is no genetic basis for the "adaptive traits" which form the basis for common phenotypic expressions which we term "race" reflecting common geographical ancestral origins which are transmitted along genetic lines.
No, there is not "scientific consensus that genetically speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings." That's nonsense which, as I showed above, is directly contradicted by other social justice nonsense. What you will find, as I said, are questions regarding significance/adequacy and regarding applications for specific purposes. If you want to try to dispute this, then post something to support it. I can post literally thousands of studies which prove otherwise.
NOBODY denies that race is genetic. Because of ideology you're attempting to deny the obvious and you're all wrapped up in other confused terms as above. In addition to just being a fucktard. So, since I'm forced to continually point out the obvious, let's take this yet another one small step at at time to try to beat that into you or, alternately, let you just display, yet again, how completely lost in your own bullshit you are.
Consider the differences in these two human offspring:
In explaining the obvious and undeniable observed differences you have what amounts to three fundamental choices as the biological basis for these differences:
a. Random variation
b. Spontaneous mutation
c. Genetic transmission
Pick one.
Or, if you'd like to try, propose some other. That should be entertaining. lol