I just found today that there are different skill shapes. What’s the difference between the the negroid and caucaaoid? Is there a corelation of type of skull and IQ?

IQ is not a racially (or better put) a culturally neutral measure.

Look up a book from 1994 called “The Bell Curve”. It will explain everything.

Professor Wiggins Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Look up a book from 1994 called “The Bell
> Curve”. It will explain everything.


I thought that book was more about average people than race differences.

Studies consistently show that whites, especially those of Germanic and Celtic descent are on average smarter than all other races. Mongoloids are second.

What about babaloids?

I thought Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Professor Wiggins Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Look up a book from 1994 called “The Bell
> > Curve”. It will explain everything.
>
>
> I thought that book was more about average people
> than race differences.


There are several chapters about race IQ diffences. Nogs and libs were protesting the book when it came out.

Professor Wiggins Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I thought Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Professor Wiggins Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Look up a book from 1994 called “The Bell
> > > Curve”. It will explain everything.
> >
> >
> > I thought that book was more about average
> people
> > than race differences.
>
>
> There are several chapters about race IQ
> diffences. Nogs and libs were protesting the book
> when it came out.


The sections pertaining to race and IQ have been thoroughly debunked as pseudoscientific babble. Some of the conclusions drawn in the book are plausible. Race-IQ not so much.

THEORY OF THE UNIVERSE...

www.theoryofuniverse.com/man/races/races-skulls.htm

http://www.theoryofuniverse.com/man/races/races-skulls.htm

,
Attachments:

When it comes up avg IQ, Asian > White > Hispanic > Black.

Scream at God if the truth bothers you.

As we all know, God does not exist. Racist dumbfuck stupidity such as yours is entirely a product of the bottom-feeder mentality, the lowest, lamest, and least clever of all forms of "human" thought.

Even if one race has a lower IQ on average than another, that does not mean the specific individual of that race you are dealing with has a higher or lower IQ than average...or than you.

^^^ THis will not process under the limited mental capacities of a racist right-wing dumbfuck.

Koreans and Japanese have the highest IQ

^^^ The only fact revealed in your post is that you are an extremely foolish person.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As we all know, God does not exist.
>
>
>
>


Here is an arrogant statement. Why do you presume to make statements for everyone else? Make them on your own behalf, or, as the saying goes "Speak for yourself".

Bell Curve = Bullshit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ THis will not process underI have the limited mental
> capacities of a racist righmindless, left-wing dumbfuck.
> That's why the smarter FFXU posters call me "DIMWIT".

FIFY

Bell Curve = Bullshit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ The only fact revealed in your postanywhere on FFXU is that
> you areI am an extremely foolish person. That's why the smart FFXU posters call me "DIMWIT".


FIFY

Research the subject yourself. You will discover that the peoples from colder, northern climates are the group with the highest IQ scores.

The African peoples failed to measure up, so they are not considered IQ leaders.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > As we all know, God does not exist.

> Here is an arrogant statement. Why do you presume
> to make statements for everyone else? Make them
> on your own behalf, or, as the saying goes "Speak
> for yourself".

I AM speaking for myself, you haggard asswipe, it's just that I may be the only person here smart enough to realize that in the entire known universe, there is not a single thing that requires the existence of any sort of supernatural being nor one that even suggests such a thing. All major religions are baseless nonsense crafted from error-filled ancient myth and superstition. None of them is true in any actual sense of that word.

.Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bell Curve = Bullshit Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ^^^ THis will not process underI
> have the limited mental
> > capacities of a racist righmindless,
> left-wing dumbfuck.
> > That's why the smarter FFXU posters call me
> "DIMWIT".
>
> FIFY

Shame and scorn on your worthless, butthurt, and puss-filled persona.

To be clear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Research the subject yourself. You will discover
> that the peoples from colder, northern climates
> are the group with the highest IQ scores.

Oddly, these are the very people who write the tests. In fact, there are massive cultural biases built into standard IQ tests which any actual research would have very quickly pointed out.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > As we all know, God does not exist.
>
> > Here is an arrogant statement. Why do you
> presume
> > to make statements for everyone else? Make
> them
> > on your own behalf, or, as the saying goes
> "Speak
> > for yourself".
>
> I AM speaking for myself, you haggard asswipe,
> it's just that I may be the only person here smart
> enough to realize that in the entire known
> universe, there is not a single thing that
> requires the existence of any sort of
> supernatural being nor one that even suggests such
> a thing. All major religions are baseless
> nonsense crafted from error-filled ancient myth
> and superstition. None of them is true in any
> actual sense of that word.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > As we all know, God does not exist.
>
> > Here is an arrogant statement. Why do you
> presume
> > to make statements for everyone else? Make
> them
> > on your own behalf, or, as the saying goes
> "Speak
> > for yourself".
>
> I AM speaking for myself, you haggard asswipe,
> it's just that I may be the only person here smart
> enough to realize that in the entire known
> universe, there is not a single thing that
> requires the existence of any sort of
> supernatural being nor one that even suggests such
> a thing. All major religions are baseless
> nonsense crafted from error-filled ancient myth
> and superstition. None of them is true in any
> actual sense of that word.


No one can have an intelligent, civilised, adult discussion with you because when anyone disagrees with you on even the smallest point, you resort to juvenile name calling. Add to that the hypocrisy displayed in your posts when you take other posters to task for calling you names, denying what is in print and not answering your objections. Add to the foregoing your airs of superiority, your self-absorption and self-righteousness and the result is predictable.

I was a juvenile once, and was pretty good at it. I was pretty good at calling names and not having anything to contribute to a discussion. I grew up, though, and learned better. Too bad that you never did, -eh? Just to show you that I am better at the game than are you, I will stoop to your level. There are those who might caution me against that, with the advice that you will beat me on experience, but, as I know the game better than you do, your experience is not going to count for much.


We will start with this, you ignorant shithook, you stated "As we all know....". You are presuming to make statements for everyone in this discussion with your use of "we all". That is first, arrogant; second presumptuous and finally making statements (or speaking) for everyone involved in the discussion, whether any specific interlocutor "knows" it, or not.

Do I appear repetitious? Of course, I do? Why? ....because when dealing with a moron who has as low an intellectual capacity as you do, it is necessary to be repetitive so that it sinks into you.


You made the statement that there is not a single thing in this entire known universe that requires the existence of any sort of supernatural being. Since you made the statement, it is incumbent on you to prove it. As you are one of obviously inferior intellect who likely had to repeat third and seventh grades several times, I will explain this in words of two syllables or less: If you say something is a fact, you have to prove it. Of course, a self-righteous buttwipe and all around stupid shithook such as you can not prove such a statement.

Your closing statement is general and vague. Only a self-righteous, presumptive jackoff like you would think that it makes any sense or supports any "argument". Do be aware, stupid shithook, that I am being generous when I refer to your child like but self-important blather as "arguments" and "points". It is obvious that you have the capacity to make neither.

This is why all of these people on Fairfax Underground troll the shit out of you and one or two of these trolls calls you "Dimwit". That is certainly a fitting name for someone like you.

y7ceh Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bell Curve = Bullshit Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ^^^ THis will not process underI
> > have the limited mental
> > > capacities of a racist
> righmindless,
> > left-wing dumbfuck.
> > > That's why the smarter FFXU posters call
> me
> > "DIMWIT".
> >
> > FIFY
>
> Shame and scorn on your worthless, butthurt, and
> puss-filled persona.



RUH-roh!! DIMWIT's calling down more shame and scorn on me! It ever occur to you the reason your BF cruises on you is b/c your breath might smell like pus? I don't know, since I've never met you, but, seeing the stupid shitposts you put up on FFXU, they look like the shitposts of someone who has either pus breath or stale butt breath. Maybe both, in your case, huh. DIMWIT?

I don’t HAVE any gods. You don’t either, you just don’t realize it yet.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> We will start with this, you ignorant shithook,
> you stated "As we all know....". You are
> presuming to make statements for everyone in this
> discussion with your use of "we all".

An actual scholar would have recognized what is a common rhetorical device used in this case to underscore the stupidity of those denying the case of the obvious.

> You made the statement that there is not a single
> thing in this entire known universe that requires
> the existence of any sort of supernatural being.
> Since you made the statement, it is incumbent on
> you to prove it.

A scholar would not presume to ask another to prove a negative. But you are no sort of scholar at all. You are instead an unrelenting dumbfuck -- just another pedestrian loser, one by the way who was completely unable to come up with the single counter example that would have upended the original claim immediately. You had such trouble in that because there are no such counter examples. None at all. You will never come across one.

> This is why all of these people on Fairfax
> Underground troll the shit out of you and one or
> two of these trolls calls you "Dimwit". That is
> certainly a fitting name for someone like you.

The low-grade posters to whom you refer are universally ignorant shits who do not know their asses from a hole in the ground. It is unsurprising however that you would wish to keep company with such brutish dolts.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I don’t HAVE any gods. You don’t either, you
> just don’t realize it yet.

No Gods — No Masters

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> The low-grade posters to whom you refer are
> universally ignorant shits who do not know their
> asses from a hole in the ground. It is
> unsurprising however that you would wish to keep
> company with such brutish dolts.



That is a cop-out, you moronic shithook. If you are going to state it as a negative thus expect everyone to accept it as a postulate, you are hopelessly naive. You complain about people who accept a "myth" yet you preach one. There is a name for that, dimwit, it is called hypocrisy. I did not make the statement; you did. You made it; you prove it or admit that you are once more OWNED.

We see your hypocrisy in not just one statement, but two. You complain about "brutish dolts" but your shitposts demonstrate the nasty little asswipe and all around sorry excuse for a human being that you really are. You are no better than the "brutish dolts" about whom you complain. In fact, they are far smarter than you are, as they seem to attract more than a little of your attention.

In case you have not hear or read it, dimwit, that is why trolls do what they do: to attract attention. They have succeeded with you, have they not, dimwit?

Your try at deflection is sorry, your hypocrisy is sorry and you are a sorry excuse for a human being.

.
Attachments:

To be clear Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Research the subject yourself. You will discover
> that the peoples from colder, northern climates
> are the group with the highest IQ scores.
>
> The African peoples failed to measure up, so they
> are not considered IQ leaders.


So the people where the best schools are, are the smarter ones. Whodathunkit.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > As we all know, God does not exist.
>
> > Here is an arrogant statement. Why do you
> presume
> > to make statements for everyone else? Make
> them
> > on your own behalf, or, as the saying goes
> "Speak
> > for yourself".
>
> I AM speaking for myself, you haggard asswipe,
> it's just that I may be the only person here smart
> enough to realize that in the entire known
> universe, there is not a single thing that
> requires the existence of any sort of
> supernatural being nor one that even suggests such
> a thing. All major religions are baseless
> nonsense crafted from error-filled ancient myth
> and superstition. None of them is true in any
> actual sense of that word.



-
Attachments:

Niggers are idiots and you can see how they live.
Drive down Good Hope Road any morning and it’s like driving in some African shithole.
Niggers love to loiter.
If there was a college class for loitering, these animals would have Ph.D’s

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is a cop-out, you moronic shithook. If you
> are going to state it as a negative thus expect
> everyone to accept it as a postulate, you are
> hopelessly naive.

No, jackass. It's just that I understand how such things work and you apparently do not. If I state that there are no biologically blue pigs in the world, all you must do is find a single biologically blue pig to disprove the point. Be a man, admit that you can't do that either.

> You are no better than the "brutish dolts" about whom
> you complain.

My CV tells quite a different story. And of course I am distinguished as well by not being so childishly dumb as to put faith in any collection of silly ancient fables, myths, and superstitions.

> In fact, they are far smarter than you are, as they
> seem to attract more than a little of your attention.

Play-time. I come to tinker with them and then laugh as they scurry aimlessly about.

> Your try at deflection is sorry, your hypocrisy is
> sorry and you are a sorry excuse for a human being.

You're so mean. And you're an impostor as any sort of scholar at all.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> ----
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
>
> No, jackass. It's just that I understand how such
> things work and you apparently do not. If I state
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
> My CV tells quite a different story. And of
> course I am distinguished as well by not being so
> childishly dumb as to put faith in any collection
> of silly ancient fables, myths, and
> superstitions.
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
> You're so mean. And you're an impostor as any
> sort of scholar at all.



No, you dimwitted shithook, you DO NOT understand how such things work. I do not have to accept a statement just because you made it. If you expect me to accept a statement that you make, it is incumbent on you to prove it. Since you slept in school after fourth grade (this shows in your displayed lack of intellectual, emotional and mental maturity), "incumbent on you" means that you have to do it. Be a man, admit that you can not prove what you are stating.

Your claim to this elevated curriculum vitae is total bullshit. Just because you are a mental midget does not make the rest of us as obviously dimwitted as you are. If you had HALF the "education" that you claim to have, it would be possible to have an intelligent, civilised and adult-level discussion with you. That has proved impossible more than once, on these Boards, alone. As soon as someone posts and intelligent disagreement with you on even the smallest point, you resort to juvenile name calling instead of posting and adult-like counter to his disagreement. When your "arguments" are demonstrated to be baseless and empty, you continue to repeat them and "augment" them with increasingly juvenile name calling ...............or should it be "decreasingly", as the intellectual quality of your posts, which never was too high from the beginning, decreases geometrically with each shitpost that you put up here.

Namecalling and making the same debunked statements repeatedly are characteristics of a brutish dolt. DIPSO FACTO; QED: you are no better than the brutish dolts that you so roundly damn.


Play time? BULLSHIT. Just because you are dimwit does not make the rest of us as slow as you are. It is obvious from your shitpost replies to these trolls that they are living in your head for free. You let loose with these mindless screeds on them and they laugh at you. TROLLING 101: Get your fish's proverbial "goat". They do a good job of it with you. They do it every time. What is really funny, is that they get you going with the same old bullshit, every time. They know that you are too slow to recognise it. Once more, dimwit, DIPSO FACTO; QED: the Fairfax Underground trolls are smarter than you are.

Since you are such a dimwit, you expect me to believe that "play time" bullshit. Your first mistake, dimwit, is that you are trying to bullshit a bullshitter. You can not do that, especially when it comes to a bulshitter who can turn the bullshit ON and OFF at will.

I am going to help you out, now, dimwit, out of the kindness of my heart. It really hurts my heart to see a dimwit like you suffer just because he is one of the dimmer of the dimwits on Fairfax Underground. Here is a HINT, dimwit: If there is one thing that a troll hates, it is being ignored. One of the reasons that a troll does what he does is to call attention to himself. When that fails, he is not happy. If he sees that his fish will not bite the hook or has spit out the hook, he goes trolling elsewhere. Ignore the trolls, dimwit, and they will move out of your head. There: behold my Good Deed for Sunday. I helped out a dimwit.


"Mean"; I suppose that it depends on what sense of "mean" you are using, here. If you are using it in its less frequent sense, I already have informed you that I am stooping to your level just to show you how much better at the game I am than you are.

If you are using it in its usual sense (these days), that is "obnoxious" or "unkind", you once more demonstrate your hypocrisy and double standards. Of course, this makes you an ideal liberal, as hypocrisy and double standards are long and well established hallmarks of the Left. Anyone who resorts to meanness when someone has the imagined gall to disagree with him has no business damning it in anyone else.

Your elitism, hypocrisy and self-righteousness demonstrate what a sorry excuse for a human being you really are. Those qualities, sadly, are far too common among liberals, these days. It is precisely those qualities on the Left that allow a jack donkey like Donald Trump to be elected President of the United States. People get tired of being told that they are no good.

You read it correctly, dimwit, I called Donald Trump a "jack donkey". I do not like him, either. I did not vote for him, either. Despite that, I understand why he won. The responsibility for his victory rests squarely on the shoulders of the elitist nanny staters in the Democratic Party who, for years, have been telling the people who actually show up to vote that they are no damned good. Those people got tired of that and you can see the result of that. Perhaps you can not, though, as you have given ample demonstration of your abject stupidity more than once on these Boards.

well this is odd... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > >
>
>
> -


+1

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Perhaps you can not, though, as you have given ample demonstration
> of your abject stupidity more than once on these Boards.

In total contrast to the sorts of status I enjoy, you are just a badly rattled fraud who cannot come up with the single example that would invalidate the claim that was made. You are Linus without his blanket.

Giver of plus ones Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> +1

FYI, Robert Jastrow was a creationist babbler, and the quote you posted was taken not from some lofty, peer-reviewed, academic journal, but from Christianity Today.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> No, you dimwitted shithook, you DO NOT understand
> how such things work. I do not have to accept a
> statement just because you made it. If you expect
> me to accept a statement that you make, it is
> incumbent on you to prove it. Since you slept in
> school after fourth grade (this shows in your
> displayed lack of intellectual, emotional and
> mental maturity), "incumbent on you" means that
> you have to do it. Be a man, admit that you can
> not prove what you are stating.
>
> Your claim to this elevated curriculum
> vitae is total bullshit. Just because you are
> a mental midget does not make the rest of us as
> obviously dimwitted as you are. If you had
> HALF the "education" that you claim
> to have, it would be possible to have an
> intelligent, civilised and adult-level discussion
> with you. That has proved impossible more than
> once, on these Boards, alone. As soon as someone
> posts and intelligent disagreement with you on
> even the smallest point, you resort to juvenile
> name calling instead of posting and adult-like
> counter to his disagreement. When your
> "arguments" are demonstrated to be baseless and
> empty, you continue to repeat them and "augment"
> them with increasingly juvenile name calling
> ...............or should it be "decreasingly", as
> the intellectual quality of your posts, which
> never was too high from the beginning, decreases
> geometrically with each shitpost that you put up
> here.
>
> Namecalling and making the same debunked
> statements repeatedly are characteristics of a
> brutish dolt. DIPSO FACTO; QED: you are
> no better than the brutish dolts that you so
> roundly damn.
>
>
> Play time? BULLSHIT. Just because you are dimwit
> does not make the rest of us as slow as you are.
> It is obvious from your shitpost replies to these
> trolls that they are living in your head for free.
> You let loose with these mindless screeds on them
> and they laugh at you. TROLLING 101: Get your
> fish's proverbial "goat". They do a good job of
> it with you. They do it every time. What is
> really funny, is that they get you going with the
> same old bullshit, every time. They know that
> you are too slow to recognise it. Once more,
> dimwit, DIPSO FACTO; QED: the Fairfax
> Underground trolls are smarter than you are.
>
> Since you are such a dimwit, you expect me to
> believe that "play time" bullshit. Your first
> mistake, dimwit, is that you are trying to
> bullshit a bullshitter. You can not do that,
> especially when it comes to a bulshitter who can
> turn the bullshit ON and OFF at will.
>
> I am going to help you out, now, dimwit, out of
> the kindness of my heart. It really hurts my
> heart to see a dimwit like you suffer just because
> he is one of the dimmer of the dimwits on Fairfax
> Underground. Here is a HINT, dimwit: If there is
> one thing that a troll hates, it is being ignored.
> One of the reasons that a troll does what he does
> is to call attention to himself. When that fails,
> he is not happy. If he sees that his fish will
> not bite the hook or has spit out the hook, he
> goes trolling elsewhere. Ignore the trolls,
> dimwit, and they will move out of your head.
> There: behold my Good Deed for Sunday. I helped
> out a dimwit.
>
>
> "Mean"; I suppose that it depends on what sense of
> "mean" you are using, here. If you are using it
> in its less frequent sense, I already have
> informed you that I am stooping to your level just
> to show you how much better at the game I am than
> you are.
>
> If you are using it in its usual sense (these
> days), that is "obnoxious" or "unkind", you once
> more demonstrate your hypocrisy and double
> standards. Of course, this makes you an ideal
> liberal, as hypocrisy and double standards are
> long and well established hallmarks of the Left.
> Anyone who resorts to meanness when someone has
> the imagined gall to disagree with him has no
> business damning it in anyone else.
>
> Your elitism, hypocrisy and self-righteousness
> demonstrate what a sorry excuse for a human being
> you really are. Those qualities, sadly, are far
> too common among liberals, these days. It is
> precisely those qualities on the Left that allow a
> jack donkey like Donald Trump to be elected
> President of the United States. People get tired
> of being told that they are no good.
>
> You read it correctly, dimwit, I called Donald
> Trump a "jack donkey". I do not like him, either.
> I did not vote for him, either. Despite that, I
> understand why he won. The responsibility for his
> victory rests squarely on the shoulders of the
> elitist nanny staters in the Democratic Party who,
> for years, have been telling the people who
> actually show up to vote that they are no damned
> good. Those people got tired of that and you can
> see the result of that. Perhaps you can not,
> though, as you have given ample demonstration of
> your abject stupidity more than once on these
> Boards.

SCHOLAR is full of shit. Now that you know the truth, are YOU in good hands?
.
Attachments:

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
> >
>
>
> In total contrast to the sorts of status I enjoy,
> you are just a badly rattled fraud who cannot come
> up with the single example that would invalidate
> the claim that was made. You are Linus without
> his blanket.


Here you go with that bullshit about your imagined education. You have repeatedly demonstrated that it is impossible to have an adult discussion with you. You have demonstrated repeatedly that the only thing that you can do is claim superiority that you do not have, act self-righteously and act like a juvenile. A commonly accepted mark of education is the ability to participate in a discussion without the use of ad hominem, attacks. You have demonstrated repeatedly that you lack that ability. DIPSO FACTO; QED by your own demonstrations, your claim to possess and education is bullshit.

You keep insisting that it is incumbent on me to disprove your statements. The commonly accepted rule of debate is that it is incumbent on the one who makes statements to prove them. Your liberal "burden-shifting" does not apply on a seventy-five cent internet forum. (It should not apply anywhere, but, that is the subject of a different discussion, one in which you would be incapable of participating). Once more, you demonstrate what a juvenile, ignorant. arrogant, elitist shithook you really are. Arrogance and ignorance are a dangerous combination, yet you demonstrate an ample supply of both. It is why it is obvious even to the trolls here what a dimwitted shithook you really are. It is how they manage to get the better of you (if anything "better" actually can be attributed to your sorry excuse for a human being ass).

Your inability to participate in an adult discussion further shows itself when you have to bring in sock puppets in a juvenile attempt to "bolster" what you try to pass off as "arguments". Anyone with half an ounce of brains can see that "Dennnis H." is just one of your sock puppets. Too bad that you do not even have HALF an ounce of brains, -eh?

............an elitist, bullshitting, arrogant, self-righteous, ignorant juvenile shithook; it HAS TO suck to be you.

Dennis H. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> SCHOLAR is full of shit. Now that you know the
> truth, are YOU in good hands?
> .


Shove it up your ass sideways, shithook sock puppet asshole.

>
Attachments:

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Here you go with that bullshit about your imagined education.

Cool envy and butt-hurt, bro.

> You have repeatedly demonstrated that it is impossible
> to have an adult discussion with you.

Actual adults have no problem with that at all. What must that mean?

> You keep insisting that it is incumbent on me to
> disprove your statements. The commonly accepted
> rule of debate is that it is incumbent on the one
> who makes statements to prove them.

Stooge. No actual debate rules permit demand for proof of a negative. For your own part, you need to come up with exactly one counter-example. Where is it, garbage-brain?

You just do not get it, do you, you nasty little shithook? If you make the statement, you must prove it. It is not necessary for me to prove or disprove it. Your job is to prove it. Obviously, you can not, so you continue to act like the juvenile that you are. You think that everyone here is as dimwitted as you. You are sadly mistaken.

You made the statement.

You prove the statement.

If you can not prove it, do not make it.

If you can not prove it, retract it.

If you can not prove it, you admit that you are OWNED.


What is it going to be, you dimwitted nasty little sorry excuse for a human being shithook? Proof or PWND? ............one or the other,,,,,,,,,,which is it?

ENVY? I do not envy a miserable nasty little self-righteous shithook like you. As it sucks to be you, I would not want to be you.

That is more bullshit. If an actual adult could have a conversation with you, dimwit, you would not resort the juvenile name calling that you do when someone disagrees with you. As you resort to juvenile name calling at the first sign of disagreement, you prove, and have proved repeatedly on many a topic on these Boards, , that it is impossible to have an intelligent, civilised and adult discussion with you.


You continue to prove that you are less than useless. I can beat you at your own little juvenile games. The difference between you and me, shit-for-brains, is that I can turn off the juvenile and act like an adult when I encounter one. You, on the other hand, are permanently stuck in your puerile mindset.

You are nothing more than an immature, full of shit, self-righteous nasty little shithook.

The burden of proof is on the positive. That you need to be told this is an indicator of your vast intellectual deficits.

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are nothing more than an immature, full of
> shit, self-righteous nasty little shithook.

With a list of degrees as long as your arm.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The burden of proof is on the positive. That you
> need to be told this is an indicator of your vast
> intellectual deficits.


Urban myth, Dimwit......and you criticise people who believe in God for being "gullible"? If you believe urban myth, not only are you a dimwit, but, once more, you display the hypocrisy that is oh-so-typical of the Left.

You make the statements, you prove them, you gullible little shithook.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are nothing more than an immature, full of
> > shit, self-righteous nasty little shithook.
>
> With a list of degrees as long as your arm.


Degrees? BULLSHIT.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are nothing more than an immature, full of
> > shit, self-righteous nasty little shithook.
>
> With a list of degrees as long as your arm.
(emphasis added)


See, you're missing it, See. he doesn't have any actual degrees, he just has a "list" of them. The list doesn't mean anything, only the degree & he ain't got none.

It's like a bill of goods, you know? Slicksters try to sell you a bill of goods. This slickster's trying to sell you a bill of goods called a list of degrees.

.
Attachments:

The Science is solid. The only ones who refute it are cucks.

,
Attachments:

Darwin declared in The Descent of Man that the negros are so distinct that similar differences found in any other animal would warrant their classification as a different species.

Oy vey goyim, it's been debunked!

Dr. Goldblatt-shekelstein Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oy vey goyim, it's been debunked!


^^^^^Jew boy cuckie

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The burden of proof is on the positive I'm GAY has been shown many times on FFXU. That you
> need to be told this is an indicator of myour vast
> intellectual deficits & just how CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY I really am.


FIFY

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are nothing more than an immature, full of
> > shit, self-righteous nasty little shithook.
>
> With a list of degreesmoron FFXU shitposts as long as your arm.


FIFY

Scholar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Degrees? BULLSHIT.

Yup. More than one. And there's that undergrad magna cum laude thing and a passel of academic honor societies. After that came the grad fellowships and well, you get the picture.

But for the benefit of the far more poorly educated, in genetic terms, while races do exist among chimpanzees, there is no such thing as race among human beings. Race in humans is entirely a social construct. In actual fact, we are are all the same race, differing from each other only in various adaptive traits.

.Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> The burden of proof is on the positive I'm GAY has been shown
> many times on FFXU. That you need to be told this is an
> indicator of myour vast intellectual deficits & just how
> CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY I really am.
>
> FIFY

Fulsome shame and scorn upon one so far beyond utterly stupid as you.

3fyxd

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Degrees? BULLSHIT.
>
> Yup. More than one. And there's that undergrad
> magna cum laude thing and a passel of academic
> honor societies. After that came the grad
> fellowships and well, you get the picture.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


BULLSHIT.

The only "degree" that you might possess would be from McDonald's Hamburger College. You probably had to take French Fries 101 twice.

gnf4w Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > The burden of proof is on the
> positive I'm GAY has been shown
> > many times on FFXU. That you need to be
> told this is an
> > indicator of myour vast
> intellectual deficits & just how
> > CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY I really am.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> Fulsome shame and scorn upon oneI'm so far beyond
> utterly stupid as you.



FIFY

gnf4w Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > The burden of proof is on the
> positive I'm GAY has been shown
> > many times on FFXU. That you need to be
> told this is an
> > indicator of myour vast
> intellectual deficits & just how
> > CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY I really am.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> Fulsome shame and scorn upon one so far beyond
> utterly stupid as you.


Now DIMWIT's calling down "Fulsome" "shame and scorn" upon thee. Thy arse is now going to be super-fried post haste and anon. Thou shalt quake in thy boots.


What a fucking joke of a butt pirate this guy is.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> S
>
> But for the benefit of the far more poorly
> educated, in genetic terms, while races do exist
> among I'm a stupid chimpanzees, there is no such thing as race
> among human beings. Race in humans is entirely a
> social construct. In actual fact, we are are all
> the same race, differing from each other only in
> various adaptive traits. When I get pissed off, I scratch my underarms and my balls, then I shit in my hand and throw it. Aren't you impressed?


As a Public Service to the Readers and Posters of FFXU, I have effected repairs to your moronic shitpost.

You're welcome.

fixing FFXU 1 shitpost at a time Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> > But for the benefit of the far more poorly
> > educated, in genetic terms, while races do exist
> > among I'm a stupid chimpanzees, there is no such thing as race
> > among human beings. Race in humans is entirely a
> > social construct. In actual fact, we are are> all
> > the same race, differing from each other only in
> > various adaptive traits. When I get pissed off,
> > I scratch my underarms and my balls, then I
> > shit in my hand and throw it. Aren't you impressed?
>
> As a Public Service to the Readers and Posters of
> FFXU, I have effected repairs to your moronic shitpost.
>
> You're welcome.

A heaping pile of shame and scorn upon your ignorant, useless, envious, and ever so horribly butthurt self.
Asshole-of-the-Year and then some. Your sagging and sorry-ass city sucks too, by the way.

vnmdf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fixing FFXU 1 shitpost at a time Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > But for the benefit of the far more poorly
> > > educated, in genetic terms, while races do
> exist
> > > among I'm a stupid chimpanzees,
> there is no such thing as race
> > > among human beings. Race in humans is
> entirely a
> > > social construct. In actual fact, we are are>
> all
> > > the same race, differing from each other only
> in
> > > various adaptive traits. When I get
> pissed off,
> > > I scratch my underarms and my balls, then I
> > > shit in my hand and throw it. Aren't you
> impressed?
> >
> > As a Public Service to the Readers and Posters
> of
> > FFXU, I have effected repairs to your moronic
> shitpost.
> >
> > You're welcome.
>
> A heaping pile of shame and scorn upon your
> ignorant, useless, envious, and ever so horribly
> butthurt self.
> Asshole-of-the-Year and then some. Your sagging
> and sorry-ass city sucks too, by the way.


YOu better be quaking in your boots for real, now, DIMWIT has called down a "heaping pile" of shame and scorn on you. You know what that means. You're in for it, now. DIMWIT's coming to get you!

What a dumb ass butt pirate this guy is.

vnmdf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fixing FFXU 1 shitpost at a time Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > > But for the benefit of the far more poorly
> > > educated, in genetic terms, while races do
> exist
> > > among I'm a stupid chimpanzees,
> there is no such thing as race
> > > among human beings. Race in humans is
> entirely a
> > > social construct. In actual fact, we are are>
> all
> > > the same race, differing from each other only
> in
> > > various adaptive traits. When I get
> pissed off,
> > > I scratch my underarms and my balls, then I
> > > shit in my hand and throw it. Aren't you
> impressed?
> >
> > As a Public Service to the Readers and Posters
> of
> > FFXU, I have effected repairs to your moronic
> shitpost.
> >
> > You're welcome.
>
> A heaping pile of shame and scorn upon yourI'm
> ignorant, useless, envious, and ever so horribly
> butthurt self. I need to stop sticking that giant vibrator dildo up my ass. I should use more KY, too. It's probably why my butt hurts so much
> I'm the Asshole-of-the-Year and then some. mYour sagging
> and sorry-ass city sucks used toilet water. too, by the way.


FIFY

vnmdf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> fixing FFXU 1 shitpost at a time Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> Asshole-of-the-Year and then some. Your sagging
> and sorry-ass city sucks too, by the way.


What city does he live in?

Only his hairdresser knows for sure, but rumor has it that it’s the slums of the dying dust-bowl of Falls Church. You know, the so frequently less than seven-figure city.

Bottom of the barrel Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Scholar Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Degrees? BULLSHIT.
>
> Yup. More than one. And there's that undergrad
> magna cum laude thing and a passel of academic
> honor societies. After that came the grad
> fellowships and well, you get the picture.
>
> But for the benefit of the far more poorly
> educated, in genetic terms, while races do exist
> among chimpanzees, there is no such thing as race
> among human beings. Race in humans is entirely a
> social construct. In actual fact, we are are all
> the same race, differing from each other only in
> various adaptive traits.

Quote

Another major point of discussion has been the correspondence between genetic clusters and commonly used racial/ethnic labels. Some have argued for poor correspondence between these two entities (Lewontin 1972; Wilson et al. 2001), whereas others have suggested a strong correlation (Risch et al. 2002; Burchard et al. 2003). We have shown a nearly perfect correspondence between genetic cluster and SIRE for major ethnic groups living in the United States, with a discrepancy rate of only 0.14%. Perhaps this is not surprising for the major groupings (whites, East Asians, and African Americans), since prior studies would suggest enough genetic differentiation between these groups to produce robust clustering.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1196372/

Attachments:

.
Attachments:

You’ve had your ignorant ass booted to kingdom come over that exact same slop before. Time to stop being such a worn-out racist dickhead and admit that you just don’t have even a shadow of a case to make.

Watch out for the 19th century science that’s surely coming soon.

Actually you were unable to refute any of it other than your dumb off-point babbling about chimps. lol

Facts are that:

- Race, being the term which we apply to common phenotypic expressions of ancestral origins, obviously is genetic and can be readily determined by objective genetic analysis.

- Where such analysis is performed results will aggregate in the same way that we define race with near complete correlation to self-identification by those sampled.

- To the extent that there is admixing among populations, genetic analysis also can resolve levels of mixing.

You wanting to play semantic games around the word "race" and incorrectly define race as being equivalent to species due to your own ideological and social beliefs doesn't affect the objective science.

Quote

We note that the genetic cluster results indicate that older geographic ancestry—rather than recent geographic origin—is highly correlated with racial/ethnic categorizations and, thus, is the major determinant of genetic structure in the population. Although our results suggest that genetic stratification may exist within racial/ethnic groups—specifically, whites and African Americans sampled from different geographic locations in the United States—we found the differences based on current geography to be quite modest.

LOL.. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Watch out for the 19th century science that’s
> surely coming soon.


Actually from 2012 and replicated widely prior to and after.

PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e30950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030950. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
Genetic ancestry, self-reported race and ethnicity in African Americans and European Americans in the PCaP cohort.
Sucheston LE1, Bensen JT, Xu Z, Singh PK, Preus L, Mohler JL, Su LJ, Fontham ET, Ruiz B, Smith GJ, Taylor JA.

Clustering of self-reporting AA and EA research subjects and HapMap CEU, YRI, ASI (JPT+CHB) populations based on PC1 and PC2.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22479307
Attachments:

It’s total slop and babble. Race in humans is entirely a social construct originally based on the worst sorts of speciocentric nonsense sorts of thinking. No credible person accepts either that or any other worthless slop that a short-stack racist doofus would have to say on the matter.

Actually lots of people do because it's obvious and can be objectively demonstrated, resolved, and replicated.


Genetics. 2015 Aug;200(4):1285-95. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178616. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
Characterizing Race/Ethnicity and Genetic Ancestry for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort.
Banda Y1, Kvale MN2, Hoffmann TJ3, Hesselson SE2, Ranatunga D4, Tang H5, Sabatti C6, Croen LA4, Dispensa BP2, Henderson M4, Iribarren C4, Jorgenson E4, Kushi LH4, Ludwig D4, Olberg D4, Quesenberry CP Jr4, Rowell S4, Sadler M4, Sakoda LC4, Sciortino S4, Shen L4, Smethurst D4, Somkin CP4, Van Den Eeden SK4, Walter L4, Whitmer RA4, Kwok PY2, Schaefer C7, Risch N8.

Abstract

Using genome-wide genotypes, we characterized the genetic structure of 103,006 participants in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California multi-ethnic Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging Cohort and analyzed the relationship to self-reported race/ethnicity. Participants endorsed any of 23 race/ethnicity/nationality categories, which were collapsed into seven major race/ethnicity groups. By self-report the cohort is 80.8% white and 19.2% minority; 93.8% endorsed a single race/ethnicity group, while 6.2% endorsed two or more. Principal component (PC) and admixture analyses were generally consistent with prior studies. Approximately 17% of subjects had genetic ancestry from more than one continent, and 12% were genetically admixed, considering only nonadjacent geographical origins. Self-reported whites were spread on a continuum along the first two PCs, indicating extensive mixing among European nationalities. Self-identified East Asian nationalities correlated with genetic clustering, consistent with extensive endogamy. Individuals of mixed East Asian-European genetic ancestry were easily identified; we also observed a modest amount of European genetic ancestry in individuals self-identified as Filipinos. Self-reported African Americans and Latinos showed extensive European and African genetic ancestry, and Native American genetic ancestry for the latter. Among 3741 genetically identified parent-child pairs, 93% were concordant for self-reported race/ethnicity; among 2018 genetically identified full-sib pairs, 96% were concordant; the lower rate for parent-child pairs was largely due to intermarriage. The parent-child pairs revealed a trend toward increasing exogamy over time; the presence in the cohort of individuals endorsing multiple race/ethnicity categories creates interesting challenges and future opportunities for genetic epidemiologic studies.

Population genetic structure analyses have recently increased in number due to improvements in capabilities to perform large-scale genomic investigations. Technological developments have improved our ability to address questions associated with phenotypic variation (Wellcome Trust Case Consortium 2007), human genetic variation (Jakobsson et al. 2008; Li et al. 2008), and evolution (Lohmueller et al. 2008). These studies play an important role in a variety of applied settings, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS), admixture analyses, and dissection of traits associated with ancestry.

A major goal was to examine the relationship between self-reported race/ethnicity and genetic ancestry. By and large, there was very high correspondence between the two, allowing for the broad range of genetic ancestry that exists among African Americans and Latinos. We were also able to compare the self-report data of identical twins, parent–child pairs, and sib pairs. All MZ twin pairs were concordant, as were most of the sib pairs. However, we did note that for some sib pairs the self-report data differed. For the majority of these, the discordance related to reporting of Native American or Latino race/ethnicity.

It’s total bio-slop, you ignorant ass. Google it. In genetic terms, there is no such thing as race in human beings. Humans are all of the same race. Notions to the contrary are all a bunch of socially constructed racist bunk.

Obviously false as I showed above and as supported by lots of others.

Anyone who does "Google it" will find the case to be exactly as I said:

There is no dispute that 'race' as we define it as phenotypic expression based on ancestral origin can be resolved based on objective genetic analysis alone.

The only things that exist saying otherwise are some lame attempts at sleight of hand redefinition of race as being the equivalent of species/subspecies (i.e., your dumb HuffPo chimp article) and similar semantic games played in attempts to define 'race.'

There ARE more valid questions around whether as-reported race is a good basis for disease-related and other studies given admixing, potential mischaracterization, and what may be other more significant correlations.

NOBODY with any sense denies that race exists in humans. We have defined it as such based on features common to various ancestral origins.

NOBODY denies that such features are passed along genetic lines corresponding to common ancestry.

NOBODY denies that we now can resolve such differences at a genetic level with a very high degree of certainty. Because there may also be a high degree of commonality does not erase the existence of identifiable differences.

And BTW if there is no such thing as race in humans, then there can be no basis for racial discrimination and other such things as they may apply on the beneficial side. The same problem that you SJW dopes have when you try to define away gender and what that ultimately means in terms of women.

Race as you want to use the term is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT, dumbo. That construct has no genetic basis at all. ALL humans are from the same one and only race.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Race as you want to use the term is a SOCIAL
> CONSTRUCT, dumbo. That construct has no genetic
> basis at all. ALL humans are from the same one
> and only race.


Once again, saying that something is a "SOCIAL CONSTRUCT" is just babble that says nothing. EVERYTHING that humans define is a "social construct." What comprises species also is a "social construct." Scientific method itself is a "social construct" which we have developed as an approach to analyzing and understanding our world.

As above, differences at a genetic level among humans of various common ancestral origins obviously do exist and can be resolved through objective scientific analysis. Your only response to this FACT are weak attempts to redefine the term race and to argue levels of variance.

And, again, if "ALL humans are from the same one and only race," then on what distinctions are you basing racial discrimination and associated benefits?

Stupid social constructs. The same sort of slop that has led you to the grand error of belief in multiple human races. Huge and scientifically unsupportable mistake on your part.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Stupid social constructs. The same sort of slop
> that has led you to the grand error of belief in
> multiple human races. Huge and scientifically
> unsupportable mistake on your part.


So, given your response, you have no response. lol

On what is it again that you're basing racial discrimination and associated benefits since there is, as you claim, no race in humans?

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Stupid social constructs. The same sort of slop
> > that has led you to the grand error of belief
> in
> > multiple human races. Huge and scientifically
> > unsupportable mistake on your part.
>
>
> So, given your response, you have no response.
> lol
>
> On what is it again that you're basing racial
> discrimination and associated benefits since there
> is, as you claim, no race in humans?


He's gay. GAy is a race-a race to the bottom. He races with the other butt pirates to his bf's bottom.

,
Attachments:

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> So, given your response, you have no response. lol

Well, no response that you were capable of comprehending.

> On what is it again that you're basing racial
> discrimination and associated benefits since there
> is, as you claim, no race in humans?

Categories developed by demographers and social statisticians. These have exactly nothing to do with genetics, and neither do you.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOL... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > So, given your response, you have no response.
> lol
>
> Well, no response that you were capable of
> comprehending.
>
> > On what is it again that you're basing racial
> > discrimination and associated benefits since
> there
> > is, as you claim, no race in humans?
>
> Categories developed by demographers and social
> statisticians. These have exactly nothing to do
> with genetics, and neither do you.


And these categories are based on what exactly?

Be specific.

Demographics rather than genetics. How do you have such problems with this?

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Demographics rather than genetics. How do you have
> such problems with this?


What 'demographics' specifically.

Grow up, little boy. Try to pull your own weight. It would be good for you.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Grow up, little boy. Try to pull your own weight.
> It would be good for you.


Great argument you've got there. lol

Here, let's try another way to get to the the answer that you're so lamely avoiding since you stepped in your own bullshit.

Fill in the blank:

Racial categories are based on ancestral _________.

(a) oranges
(b) origami
(c) origin

BTW your statement that "ALL humans are from the same one and only race" is a racist microaggression which denies the significance of persons of color’s racial/ethnic experience and history and the individuals as racial/cultural beings.

https://academicaffairs.ucsc.edu/events/documents/Microaggressions_Examples_Arial_2014_11_12.pdf

Get with the program.

(d) Genetic nonsense

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> (d) Genetic nonsense


About

The U.S. Census Bureau must adhere to the 1997 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards on race and ethnicity which guide the Census Bureau in classifying written responses to the race question:

White – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.

Black or African American – A person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa.

American Indian or Alaska Native – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America) and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.

Asian – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam.

Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands.

Self-identification? Getting back to settled fact, race does not exist in genetic terms in humans. We exhibit differences in adaptive traits, but are all descended in a single line.

.
Attachments:

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Self-identification? Getting back to settled
> fact, race does not exist in genetic terms in
> humans. We exhibit differences in adaptive
> traits, but are all descended in a single line.


So if race doesn't exist then (once again) on what what are you basing racial classifications which are used for a variety of purposes, including forming the basis for racial discrimination and preferences, etc?

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Grow up, little boy. Try to pull your own weight.
> It would be good for you.


SIT THE FUCK DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP, DIMWIT. NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR YOUR BULLSHIT YOU'RE NOTHING BUT A FAKE AND A PONTIFICATING ASSWIPE.

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So if race doesn't exist then (once again) on what what are you
> basing racial classifications which are used for a variety of
> purposes, including forming the basis for racial discrimination
> and preferences, etc?

Second verse, same as the first. Statisticians invent little boxes and put people into them so as to make their own jobs easier. No person understanding actual science would suggest that these boxes necessarily have any sound genetic basis. Such persons would recognize instead that these boxes are interesting but scientifically meaningless social constructs. Some of course have inadequate grounding in such science, being ready instead to accept and believe in all manner of simple horseshit.

In genetic terms, there are no races among human beings. We are all of the same long and singular line. We differ in our adaptive traits, but are unitary in our genetic bases. You should have learned this in some 100-level course or other.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Second verse, same as the first.


NOBODY WITH ANY BRAINS WANTS TO HEAR YOUR BULLSHIT, DIMWIT. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND SIT THE FUCK DOWN, ASSHOLE DIMWIT.

In genetic terms, there are no races among human beings. We are all of the same long and singular line. We differ in our adaptive traits, but are unitary in our genetic bases. You should have learned this in some 100-level course or other.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > So if race doesn't exist then (once again) on
> what what are you
> > basing racial classifications which are used for
> a variety of
> > purposes, including forming the basis for racial
> discrimination
> > and preferences, etc?
>
> Second verse, same as the first. Statisticians
> invent little boxes and put people into them so as
> to make their own jobs easier. No person
> understanding actual science would suggest that
> these boxes necessarily have any sound genetic
> basis. Such persons would recognize instead that
> these boxes are interesting but scientifically
> meaningless social constructs. Some of course
> have inadequate grounding in such science, being
> ready instead to accept and believe in all manner
> of simple horseshit.
>
> In genetic terms, there are no races among human
> beings. We are all of the same long and singular
> line. We differ in our adaptive traits, but are
> You should have
> learned this in some 100-level course or other.


You didn't know the right words to the song the first time, you were just mouthing the them. No reason why that should change this time. Maybe if you'd taken a 100-level biology course you might better understand this stuff.

In genetic terms we're all mammals "all of the same long and singular line... unitary in our genetic bases." In genetic terms we're all vertebrates. In genetic terms we're all eukaryotes. Does that mean that we're "all the same?" Obviously not. Furthermore, the names assigned and the manner in which we have distinguished and structured these various groupings are just a "social construct" which we have defined and use to order them.

It's not the level of similarity, as typical for the off-point response as you attempt here, that is of interest; rather, it's the differences at whatever level they may exist. In this case, these differences can be resolved and replicated objectively at very high degrees of certainty. No matter what box someone checks and no matter how that box may be labeled - race, ethnicity, etc. - a sample of their DNA will aggregate at varying levels of conformance with others having the same selected genetic markers. These differences reflect ancestral origin from which the collection of traits we have observed otherwise and defined to represent "race" are transmitted along genetic lines.



Furthermore, your lack of understanding fails you at a very basic level in your attempt to wave off these differences as "adaptive traits" since such "adaptive traits" are encoded and transmitted at a genetic level along ancestral lines.

Once again, nobody who actually understands the subject disputes any of the above. The only disagreements are around significance and applications for specific purposes. Disingenuous attempts to confuse species/subspecies with race are are just transparently dumb examples of answering a question not asked as diversion. Note that none of this in any way implies anything about IQ or any other specific attributes of these populations.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In genetic terms, there are no races amongI'm a sub human DImWIT
> beings. We are all of the same long and singular
> line. We differ in our adaptive traits, but are
> unitary in our genetic bases. You should have
> learned this in someI flunked 7th gr, so I never took any 100-level course or other.


FIFY

.
Attachments:

Anyone who denies that Blacks are, on average, retarded is likely on the wrong end of the IQ bell curve his/her self.

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Race as you want to use the term is a SOCIAL
> > CONSTRUCT, dumbo.




> And, again, if "ALL humans are from the same one
> and only race," then on what distinctions are you
> basing racial discrimination and associated
> benefits?


^^this is the death blow

while snowflakes cry their are NO RACES when it comes to facts they do not like, an example being IQ differences, they scream about RACISM at every turn and have a list of 20 DIFFERENT RACES available at all times

these same people believe white people are the worlds problem, when in fact white societies are the apex of civilization - past and present

Like everything with libtards, they just scream whatever fits the narrative for that moment. A few minutes later, it may be the opposite.

.Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LOL... Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------

> > In genetic terms, there are no races among
> > I'm a sub human DImWITbeings.
> > We are all of the same long and singular line. We
> > differ in our adaptive traits, but are unitary in
> > our genetic bases. You should have learned
> > this in someI flunked 7th gr, so I never
> > took any 100-level course or other.
>
> FIFY

The usual shame-and-scorn producing sorts of putrid slime and absolute rubbish that are all your worthless ass has ever been capable of. The downscale dumps of Falls Church City are such a total embarrassment to the rest of us.

gdchv Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > LOL... Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > > In genetic terms, there are no races
> among
> > > I'm a sub human DImWITbeings.
>
> > > We are all of the same long and singular line.
> We
> > > differ in our adaptive traits, but are unitary
> in
> > > our genetic bases. You should have
> learned
> > > this in someI flunked 7th gr, so I
> never
> > > took any 100-level course or other.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> The usual shame-and-scorn producing sorts of
> putrid slime and absolute rubbish that are all
> your worthless ass has ever been capable of. The
> downscale dumps of Falls Church City are such a
> total embarrassment to the rest of us.

SIT THE FUCK DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP, DIMWIT. NOBODY WITH ANY BRAINS WANTS TO HEAR YOUR BULLSHIT. GO POST YOUR LIBTARD SHITPOSTS ON DC URBAN MOMS, WHERE THERE ARE PLENTY OF LIBTARD CUCK BUTT PIRATES LIKE YOU.

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again, nobody who actually understands the subject
> disputes any of the above.

LOL! You're a transparent fraud. Which of your cheap floozy posts above do you contend to have established any actual existence of race in human beings?

And of course, this is (at least) the third time you have made these exact same obscurantist claims here, only to see them then shot down in flames. The prior two crash-and-burn events came in September and May of last year, and there were no survivors. Your case has never had merit and it has not at all improved over time.

The actual facts remain that there is a general and broadly accepted scientific consensus that genetically speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings. Also that foolish thinking based on observations of adaptive traits and adherence to pre-scientific perceptions of the social construct of race form what continues to be a significant societal problem today. Basically, what we have here is a group of dimwitted late-adapters who still cling to long-outdated notions of race for no good reason at all. You would seem to be among that sorry group.

For reasons that you surely remember, you might want to be careful what you say next about Neanderthals as well.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again, nobody who actually understands the
> subject
> > disputes any of the above.
>
> LOL! You're a transparent fraud. Which of your
> cheap floozy posts above do you contend to have
> established any actual existence of race in human
> beings?
>
> And of course, this is (at least) the third time
> you have made these exact same obscurantist claims
> here, only to see them then shot down in flames.
> The prior two crash-and-burn events came in
> September and May of last year, and there were no
> survivors. Your case has never had merit and it
> has not at all improved over time.
>
> The actual facts remain that there is a general
> and broadly accepted scientific consensus that
> genetically speaking, there is no such thing as
> race in human beings. Also that foolish thinking
> based on observations of adaptive traits and
> adherence to pre-scientific perceptions of the
> social construct of race form what continues to be
> a significant societal problem today. Basically,
> what we have here is a group of dimwitted
> late-adapters who still cling to long-outdated
> notions of race for no good reason at all. You
> would seem to be among that sorry group.
>
> For reasons that you surely remember, you might
> want to be careful what you say next about
> Neanderthals as well.


GO SHITPOST YOUR FAKE BULLSHIT ON DC URBAN MOMS, WHERE ALL THE LIBCUCKS LIKE YOU WANT TO HEAR THAT STUPID SHIT. NOBODY HERE WITH ANY BRAINS WANTS TO HEAR IT, DIMWIT. SIT THE FUCK DOWN. SHUT THE FUCK UP, DIMWIT ASSHOLE.

^^^ So classy!

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Once again, nobody who actually understands the
> subject
> > disputes any of the above.
>
> LOL! You're a transparent fraud. Which of your
> cheap floozy posts above do you contend to have
> established any actual existence of race in human
> beings?
>
> And of course, this is (at least) the third time
> you have made these exact same obscurantist claims
> here, only to see them then shot down in flames.
> The prior two crash-and-burn events came in
> September and May of last year, and there were no
> survivors. Your case has never had merit and it
> has not at all improved over time.
>
> The actual facts remain that there is a general
> and broadly accepted scientific consensus that
> genetically speaking, there is no such thing as
> race in human beings. Also that foolish thinking
> based on observations of adaptive traits and
> adherence to pre-scientific perceptions of the
> social construct of race form what continues to be
> a significant societal problem today. Basically,
> what we have here is a group of dimwitted
> late-adapters who still cling to long-outdated
> notions of race for no good reason at all. You
> would seem to be among that sorry group.
>
> For reasons that you surely remember, you might
> want to be careful what you say next about
> Neanderthals as well.



So once again, as always, you just conveniently ignored all of what you can't address. Nice job. lol

All of it does. Some of it you don't have a good enough understanding of the subject to realize that. What happened the last time(s) was the same thing that has happened here. I present a reasoned argument with objective, independent evidence to support what I say. You, as you do in all threads, just mumble the same nonsense over and over and over with nothing at all to support it and then declare that you've somehow "won."

First, in your ignorance you're confusing a number of concepts which makes it difficult to even sort out your bullshit.

One being that of common origin. Because there may be common origin at some point does not mean that there are not differences beyond that. In fact, it's implied since understanding common origin is of no interest otherwise.

Another being adaption or "adaptive traits" as you called it. Adaption is a genetic process and therefore has a genetic basis by definition so your nonsense argument fails internally.

Another being confusing race with species/subspecies as you were intentionally mislead by the dumb HuffPo pop science distortion of your chimp study. Race in humans is not at the level of species/subspecies. That does not mean that race does not exist or that there is no genetic basis for the "adaptive traits" which form the basis for common phenotypic expressions which we term "race" reflecting common geographical ancestral origins which are transmitted along genetic lines.

No, there is not "scientific consensus that genetically speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings." That's nonsense which, as I showed above, is directly contradicted by other social justice nonsense. What you will find, as I said, are questions regarding significance/adequacy and regarding applications for specific purposes. If you want to try to dispute this, then post something to support it. I can post literally thousands of studies which prove otherwise.

NOBODY denies that race is genetic. Because of ideology you're attempting to deny the obvious and you're all wrapped up in other confused terms as above. In addition to just being a fucktard. So, since I'm forced to continually point out the obvious, let's take this yet another one small step at at time to try to beat that into you or, alternately, let you just display, yet again, how completely lost in your own bullshit you are.

Consider the differences in these two human offspring:




In explaining the obvious and undeniable observed differences you have what amounts to three fundamental choices as the biological basis for these differences:

a. Random variation
b. Spontaneous mutation
c. Genetic transmission

Pick one.

Or, if you'd like to try, propose some other. That should be entertaining. lol

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ So classy!


It's at your level, DIMWIT.

It's science bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So once again, as always, you just conveniently ignored all
> of what you can't address. Nice job. lol

Once again, I point out that on this your third disastrous foray into this topic, you cannot -- among all the meritless drivel you have posted -- point to a single thing anywhere that confirms the existence of race in human beings You have failed utterly yet again.

> No, there is not "scientific consensus that genetically
> speaking, there is no such thing as race in human beings."

Yes, there is. Here is a small sample of it.....

Race Is a Social Construct, Scientists Argue - Scientific American
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/

Race as a Social Construction | Psychology Today
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/without-prejudice/201612/race-social-construction

Race and Racial Identity Are Social Constructs - NYTimes.com
https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015/06/16/how-fluid-is-racial-identity/race-and-racial-identity-are-social-constructs

What We Mean When We Say 'Race Is a Social Construct' - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/05/what-we-mean-when-we-say-race-is-a-social-construct/275872/

> NOBODY denies that race is genetic.

Of course they do.

> Consider the differences in these two human offspring:
>
> In explaining the obvious and undeniable observed
> differences you have what amounts to three
> fundamental choices as the biological basis for
> these differences:
>
> a. Random variation
> b. Spontaneous mutation
> c. Genetic transmission
>
> Pick one. Or, if you'd like to try, propose some other.
> That should be entertaining. lol

The children pictured are visually but not genetically different. They are of a single race. You make the same stupid mistakes as 19th century 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism made. It's pathetic.

Sorry, none of your examples say that race does not exist at a genetic level.

They are, as I said, arguing other aspects and nuances. e.g., Whether race is a precise enough and useful categorization, application for specific purposes, etc. None deny that the determinants of a given person's "race" are of genetic origin.

And, once again, you're relying on interpretive reporting by writers not actual studies. The last is simply reflecting the opinions in another article written by Andrew Sullivan for cripes sake. lol

Your claim that the children pictured are not genetically different also is false. Very obviously false. Their skin color and other phenotypic features are dictated by differences in their genetic makeup reflecting their genetic ancestry. Are you actually trying to argue that's not the case? Seriously? Come on... you can't actually be THAT stupidly blinded by ideology can you?

And even within your own "social construct" paradigm they obviously are not of the same race as you state.

But the beauty of objective scientific analysis is that it works no matter what specific labels may be applied to "race" or given whatever "social constructs" of whatever country/culture (they're not all the same).

e.g.:

Quote

Genetics. 2015 Aug; 200(4): 1285–1295.
Published online 2015 Jun 19. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178616
PMCID: PMC4574246
PMID: 26092716
Characterizing Race/Ethnicity and Genetic Ancestry for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574246/

If the children pictured are "not genetically different" then what do you suggest as the reason for their visual differences? Chance? Mutation? Body paint? lmao

,
Attachments:

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
> >
>
> >
> >
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
>
>
>
> You make the sameI'm stupid mistakes as 19th century
> 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> made. It's I'm pathetic.


FIFY

Niggers may be dumb as hell, but they vote exactly how I tell them to!

,
Attachments:

Inconvenient FACT Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> When it comes up avg IQ, Asian > White > Hispanic
> > Black.
>
> Scream at God if the truth bothers you.

Nordic/Germanic Europeans > Asian > Mediterranean Europeans > Mestizos > Durkas > Mulattoes

just as the conquistador genes improved the surviving native populations and
american plantation owners improved their stock, millennia of Mediterranean sea trade had the unfortunate side effect of darkening southern Europe a couple shades. the master genes must be preserved at all costs. blue eyes are the mark

The father of Binomial Nomenclature, Carl Linnaeus, had a practical take on human taxonomy that stood for centuries. one powerful support for separate classification is overall racial preferences for reproduction among humans. Wolves and Coyotes can and do breed in the wild but this is not the norm, they are separate species. appearance, behavior, and geographic location make them distinct. virginia had laws against miscegenation until the 60's. Give us a few thousand years to mix more thoroughly before you call us the same species, same as the coywolves

https://www.nature.com/articles/447028a

,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > You make the sameI'm stupid mistakes as 19th century
> > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism made. It's
> > I'm pathetic.
>
> FIFY

So much searing envy and butthurt can be rewarded only with further heaping helpings of shame and scorn.

Diehard Liberal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Niggers may be dumb as hell, but they vote exactly
> how I tell them to!

Unlike so many way-down dumbfuck whites, blacks as a group are too smart to vote against their own best interests.

jvhyu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You make the sameI'm stupid
> mistakes as 19th century
> > > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> made. It's
> > > I'm pathetic.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> So much searing envy and butthurt can be rewarded
> only with further heaping helpings of shame and
> scorn.

DIMWIT's sending "heaping helpings of shame and scorn" your way, now! You're in for it, now, there, bud-ROW!

Beware useless bottom feeders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Diehard Liberal Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Niggers may be dumb as hell, but they vote
> exactly
> > how I tell them to!
>
> Unlike so many way-down dumbfuck whites, blacks as
> a group are too smartcontinue to vote against their own
> best interests.




FIFY

jvhyu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You make the sameI'm stupid
> mistakes as 19th century
> > > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> made. It's
> > > I'm pathetic.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> So much searing envy and butthurt can be rewarded
> only with further heaping helpings of shame and
> scorn.

NOBODY envies you, DIMWIT. Who'd want to be a full of shit dimwit? You might like it, Gerry might like it, but, there aren't too many other people on FFXU who want to be a full of shit DIMWIT like you.

Nobody wants to get shown up as a full of shit DIMWIT and get PWND several times a day like you do, except for maybe Gerry. He seems to like it, too.

I suppose FFXU is cheaper than a pro dominatrix or leather master. Since you and Gerry both are gay, you'd probably prefer the leather master.

Maybe we on FFXU should take up a collection to send you to a leather master. HE'd make you SIT THE FUCK DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP.

Fool! Everyone in Falls Church envies me.

,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > You make the sameI'm stupid
> mistakes as 19th century
> > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> > made. It's I'm pathetic.
> t
> FIFY

Such a burden being a feckless fuckwad from the fens of Falls Church. Your past, present, and future are fit only for the stings of endless shame and scorn.

Tp7vu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fool! Everyno one in Falls Church envies me.


FIFY

6vuke6vuke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > You make the sameI'm stupid
> > mistakes as 19th century
> > > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> > > made. It's I'm pathetic.
> > t
> > FIFY
>
> Such a burden because i'mng a feckless fuckwad from the
> fens of Falls Churchand a DIMWIT. mYour past, present, and
> future are fit only for the stings of endless
> shame and scorn.


FIFY

,
Attachments:

,
Attachments:

FIXER OF |T FOR YOU Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> 6vuke6vuke Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > > You make the sameI'm stupid mistakes as 19th century
> > > > 'white man's burden' defenders of colonialism
> > > > made. It's I'm pathetic.
> > >
> > > FIFY
> >
> > Such a burden because i'mng a feckless fuckwad from the
> > fens of Falls Churchand a DIMWIT. Your past, present, and
> > future are fit only for the stings of endless shame and scorn.
>
> FIFY

Oh look. The Mid-Atlantic's biggest asshole has shown his disgusting derriere yet again. Shame and scorn must forever be upon the empty head of this butthurt failure of a Falls Church dumbfuck.

tkufc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIXER OF |T FOR YOU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 6vuke6vuke Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > > You make the sameI'm stupid
> mistakes as 19th century
> > > > > 'white man's burden' defenders of
> colonialism
> > > > > made. It's I'm pathetic.
> > > >
> > > > FIFY
> > >
> > > Such a burden because
> i'mng a feckless fuckwad from
> the
> > > fens of Falls Churchand a DIMWIT.
> Your past, present, and
> > > future are fit only for the stings of endless
> shame and scorn.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> Oh look. The Mid-Atlantic's biggest asshole has
> shown his disgusting derriere yet again. Shame
> and scorn must forever be upon the empty head of
> this butthurt failure of a Falls Church dumbfuck.



The World's biggest asshole is in your mirror, DIMWIT; just look there & you'll see. I don't live in The Gulch, DIMWIT. I've told you that 100X, DIMWIT, but, since you're such a dolt, you don't get it. It's why they call you DIMWIT.


Now go bACK to wasting your money on PIs to catch your gay BF cruising on you.

tkufc Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIXER OF |T FOR YOU Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > 6vuke6vuke Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > ,FIxer of It for You, Wrote:
> > >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > > -----
> > > > > You make the sameI'm stupid
> mistakes as 19th century
> > > > > 'white man's burden' defenders of
> colonialism
> > > > > made. It's I'm pathetic.
> > > >
> > > > FIFY
> > >
> > > Such a burden because
> i'mng a feckless fuckwad from
> the
> > > fens of Falls Churchand a DIMWIT.
> Your past, present, and
> > > future are fit only for the stings of endless
> shame and scorn.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> Oh look. I'm The Mid-Atlantic's biggest asshole has
> shown hisI'm disgusting; I felch my gay BF's derriere with a strawyet again. Shame
> and scorn must forever be upon theI have an empty head of
> thisand I'm a butthurt failure of a Falls Church dumbfuck.


FIFY

.Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh look. I'm The Mid-Atlantic's biggest asshole has
> shown hisI'm disgusting; I felch my gay BF's
> derriere with a strawyet again. Shame and scorn must
> forever be upon theI have an empty head of this
> and I'm a butthurt failure of a Falls Church dumbfuck.
>
> FIFY

That's right, asshole! You've got to step up and beat back that other guy's challenge to your ASSHOLE crown. Who knows -- he might be from Falls Church too!

enctk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh look. I'm The Mid-Atlantic's biggest
> asshole has
> > shown hisI'm disgusting; I felch
> my gay BF's
> > derriere with a strawyet again. Shame
> and scorn must
> > forever be upon theI have an empty
> head of this
> > and I'm a butthurt failure of a Falls
> Church dumbfuck.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> That's right, I'm a gay asshole! YouI've got to step up and
> beat back that other guy's challenge to yourand claim my
> ASSHOLE crown. Who knows how GAY I am? I know, I'm TOTALLY GAY -- he might be from
> Falls Church too!



FIFY

enctk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .Fíxér of It for You. Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Oh look. I'm The Mid-Atlantic's biggest
> asshole has
> > shown hisI'm disgusting; I felch
> my gay BF's
> > derriere with a strawyet again. Shame
> and scorn must
> > forever be upon theI have an empty
> head of this
> > and I'm a butthurt failure of a Falls
> Church dumbfuck.
> >
> > FIFY
>
> That's right, asshole! You've got to step up and
> beat back that other guy's challenge to your
> ASSHOLE crown. Who knows -- he might be from
> Falls Church too!


Rent free.

You Falls Church dumbfucks just don’t have a clue. So starved for attention, you think ridicule is a good thing.

Hyjcw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You Falls Church dumbfucks just don’t have a
> clue. So starved for attention, you think
> ridicule is a good thing.


But it's OK for YOU to ridicule people, correct, DIMWIT?

Enough with the arguing. Go back to the actual debate y'all.

Hyjcw Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You Falls Church dumbfucks just don’t have a
> clue. So starved for attention, you think
> ridicule is a good thing.


NOBODY WANTS TO BUY YOUR BULLSHIT, DIMWIT, SO TAKE YOUR SHITPOSTS TO THE OTHER SIDE & SEE IF GERRT WANTS TO BUY THEM. HE PROBABLY WILL SINCE HE'S EVEN DUMBER THAN YOU. MEANWHILE, SIT THE FUCK DOWN AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR FROM A DIMWIT LIKE YOU.

There’s no choice when it comes to foolish assholes like you. You’re just a ridiculous dumbfuck.

9gwby Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There’s no choice when it comes to foolish
> assholes like you. You’re just a ridiculous
> dumbfuck.


SHUT THE FUCK UP, DIMWIT & SIT THE FUCK DOWN. NOBODY WANTS TO READ YOUR SHITPOSTS. NOBODY'S BUYING YOUR BULLSHIT.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It's science bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> Second verse, same as the first. Statisticians
> invent little boxes and put people into them so as
> to make their own jobs easier. No person
> understanding actual science would suggest that
> these boxes necessarily have any sound genetic
> basis. Such persons would recognize instead that
> these boxes are interesting but scientifically
> meaningless social constructs. Some of course
> have inadequate grounding in such science, being
> ready instead to accept and believe in all manner
> of simple horseshit.
>
> In genetic terms, there are no races among human
> beings. We are all of the same long and singular
> line. We differ in our adaptive traits, but are
> unitary in our genetic bases. You should have
> learned this in some 100-level course or other.


Anybody who puts up shitposts like this is obviously gay. Take DIMWIT, here. He shitposts like this all the time and he's CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY.

,
Attachments:

Detectorer of DIMWITS Wrote :
————————————————————————————————-
> Some of course are obviously gay. Take DIMWIT, here.
> He shitposts like this all the time and he's CAPITAL
> G-A-Y; GAY.

Some are trying hard to seem relevant. It’s not working for them though.

crty

erty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> crty

Ghc6p Wrote:
________________________________________________________

> Some are trying hard to seem relevant. It’s not working for them though.


Correct, DIMWIT: you keep trying to seem relevant and it's been a TOTAL EPIC FAIL since your first shitpost on FFXU.


Oh, sorry, I was being redundant. I called your posts "shit" posts.

This thread would suggest that research funds might well be granted to projects looking into the genetics of unschooled honky dopesters. It may be that it is some internal mutation that has driven them all to become so hopelessly dumb.

This statement is a no-brainer (see what I did there hehe)

Gene Therapy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This thread would suggest that research funds
> might well be granted to projects looking into the
> genetics of unschooled honky dopesters. It may be
> that it is some internal mutation that has driven
> them all to become so hopelessly dumb.


.


What was it that causes this again?

Gene Therapy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This thread would suggest that research funds
> might well be granted to projects looking into the
> genetics of unschooled honky dopesters. It may be
> that it is some internal mutation that has driven
> them all to become so hopelessly dumb.


Only a rump ranger would shitpost like this.

It takes a worried man to sing a worried song. It's pretty plain that you fear your own genetic info would reveal all manner of damage and disarray.

Missing chromosomes Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------
> I LOVE sucking the BBC. I crave BBC bukkake.
>
>
>

^^^ That puts you in the 3rd percentile. That's low, even amongh total douchebags.

mptvd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ That puts youme in the 3rd percentile. That's
> low, even amongh total douchebags like me.


I've corrected my typos.

Go fuck yourself, FIFY. We all just laugh at you.

Two-figure IQ... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> GoI fuck little boys in the ass yourself, FIFY. Wemakes all FFXU posters just laugh at meyou.

FIFY

Shove some more shame and scorn up your flabby ass, you worthless Falls Church piece of shit.

I'm probably going to write an essay on this topic. Something about Self-identification and racism in modern world. Why don't we have that!

Knhwu Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I Shove vibrator dildossome more shame and scorn up myour flabby
> ass, youI'm a worthless Falls Church piece of shit.


FIFY

FIFY is just such a worthless ass. It's only Falls Church City that would have him.

Alexa says... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIFY is just such a worthless ass. It's only Falls
> Church City that would have him.


What a fucking dolt you are, Dimwit. How many sock puppets do you have, anyhow, Dimwit? You're such a failure at everything, Dimwit. You even fail at sock puppetry.

You even got this wrong, Dimwit. Alexa says: Dimwit's a total failure and the 2nd dumbest poster on FFXU. Only Gerry's dumber.

Alexa says... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIFY isI'm just such a worthless ass. It's only Falls
> Church Citygayboys that would have hime.


FIFY

FIFY is the worst and stupidest and brokest IQ<50 asshole in all of Falls Church City, barely edging out the trash-brained shut-in, Seven Figure City

dlvff Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> FIFY isI'm a dimwit & the worst and stupidest and brokest IQ<50
> asshole in all of FFXUalls Church City, barely edging
> out theI'm also a trash-brained shut-in and a dimwit, Seven Figure City


FIFY

^^^ FIFY again underscores his puke-grade weak-ass status. You need to fire that 7F phony and get yourself a new and better string-puller.

4tjvj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ FIFY again underscores his puke-grade weak-ass
> status. You need to fire that 7F phony and get
> yourself a new and better string-puller.


OH LOOK, DIMWIT's back! See how clever DIMWIT is? See what clever shitposts he puts up on FFXU? Gee, that DIMWIT sure is a clever guy with all his libstain shirposts, isn't he? he's real gay, too, in fact he's not just regular gay, he's not even VERy gay, but he IS very, extremely, totally, completely and thoroughly CAPITAL G-A-Y; GAY.

4tjvj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ FIFY again underscores his puke-grade weak-ass
> status. You need to fire that 7F phony and get
> yourself a new and better string-puller.


Don't YOU wish you were as gay as DIMWIT is?

^^^ What a bunch of fucking loser babble-shit!!!

4tjvj Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ^^^ FIFY again underscores hisI'm a puke-grade weak-ass
> butt piratestatus. You need to fire that 7FI'm a phony tooand get
> yourself a new and better stringa gay pud-puller while I look at gay kiddie porn.


FIFY

The truth of the matter is that genetics do play a role. However, there is just as much evidence that shows economic standing has as much of an impact. Why argue over this?

watch Dr. Welsing debunk monkey boy caucazoids and their psuedo science

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZXWaps2Z2g

"A study performed on African American and European babies shows that African American babies develop fine motor and gross motor skills at a much faster rate than European babies. For example, it took an African American baby 7 weeks to support itself in the sitting position and watch their reflection in a mirror while taking a European child 20 weeks to accomplish the same goal. But this is just one example."

https://urbanintellectuals.com/history-shows-white-psychologists-proving-black-children-natural-geniuses/

mahdi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "A study performed on African American and
> European babies shows that African American babies
> develop fine motor and gross motor skills at a
> much faster rate than European babies. For
> example, it took an African American baby 7 weeks
> to support itself in the sitting position and
> watch their reflection in a mirror while taking a
> European child 20 weeks to accomplish the same
> goal. But this is just one example."
>
> https://urbanintellectuals.com/history-shows-white
> -psychologists-proving-black-children-natural-geni
> uses/

It makes sense that they develop physically much faster than white people. You need motor skills and quickness to escape after you've stolen something. A full grown niggress will often have several niglets in tow when shoplifting.

Believe what you want to believe...
Most of us have that "sixth sense" in us that tells us when something just doesn't seem right...

Whether you choose to listen to it is up to you...

You can be white and be a complete retard-level moron. peekza is a perfect example of this.

LOL... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Self-identification? Getting back to settled
> fact, race does not exist in genetic terms in
> humans. We exhibit differences in adaptive
> traits, but are all descended in a single line.

Not all interspecies hybrids are sterile
Coywolves are the product of relatively rare breeding occurrence where territory overlaps. Differences in physical features from size to color in combination with behavior and an overall preference to breed with the same species is enough make the distinction between the two canids. Linnaeus did not mince words when he created binomial nomenclature

"I'm probably going to write an essay on this topic." If you have troubles with it, don't hesitate to use the services of writing companies. If you don't know any of them, go here https://edureviewer.com/services/papersowl-com-review/ and read reviews. It'll help you to pick a good one.

FIFY

mahdi Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "A study performed on African American and
> European babies shows that African American babies
> develop fine motor and gross motor skills at a
> much faster rate than European babies. For
> example, it took an African American baby 7 weeks
> to support itself in the sitting position and
> watch their reflection in a mirror while taking a
> European child 20 weeks to accomplish the same
> goal. But this is just one example."
>
> https://urbanintellectuals.com/history-shows-white
> -psychologists-proving-black-children-natural-geni
> uses/




Of course their is a physical difference. It’s comparing apples to oranges, 2 completely different races. When it comes to academic and intelligence, Whites are absolutely superior to blacks.

Black babies adopted by wealthy whites still underperform in all academic areas, well below that of poor white trash children.

It’s genetics, plain and simple. You can only deny it if you’re retarded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZXWaps2Z2g

frances cress welsing vs shockley

Adoption Agency Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> Black babies adopted by wealthy whites still
> underperform in all academic areas, well below
> that of poor white trash children.
>
> It’s genetics, plain and simple. You can only
> deny it if you’re retarded.



.
Attachments:

,
Attachments: