HomeFairfax General ForumArrest/Ticket SearchWiki newPictures/VideosChatArticlesLinksAbout
Fairfax County General :  Fairfax Underground fairfax underground logo
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Truth Fairfax ()
Date: March 26, 2019 05:04PM

Memorandum

Date: March 26, 2019

Re: Corruption Allegations Regarding Jeff McKay

I. Executive Summary

Recently uncovered evidence suggests that Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Member Jeff McKay may have violated the bribery of public servants statute, Virginia Code Section 18.2-446, as well as the conflict of interest statute, Virginia Code Section 15.2-852, by failing to disclose that he used his public position for private financial gain.

Specifically, it appears that, on June 21, 2016, Supervisor McKay directed the approval of a rezoning application and later obtained valuable residential property (the Roxann Road Property) from the applicant’s principal (Warren Halle) after the property was funneled through an entity affiliated with Supervisor McKay’s friend (Michael McGhan). It defies credulity to believe that Supervisor McKay did not have an arrangement to purchase the house prior to June 21, 2016, and he failed to disclose that arrangement as required by law.

As set forth in more detail herein, the day before the originally scheduled vote on the re-zoning request, Michael McGhan (or people affiliated with him) created Roxann LLC, the entity that ultimately purchased the Roxann Road Property from Warren Halle’s company and later transferred it to Supervisor McKay. The vote was then delayed for two weeks. The day after the final vote on the re-zoning request, Michael McGhan began the process of obtaining permits in order to build a house on the Roxann Road Property. Efforts were made to hide the identities of the sellers and buyers in the various transactions, and Supervisor McKay never revealed his conflict of interest or potential conflict to the Board before the rezoning vote occurred. The Roxann Road Property was purchased by Supervisor McKay and his wife at a below market rate and was never publicly listed for sale.

In summary, our investigation to date has uncovered the following facts:

1. On August 24, 2015, Kingstowne LLP, a partnership controlled by prominent developer Warren Halle, asked the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors (“Board”) to rezone a valuable piece of property. The property is part of the Kingstowne Town Center Development Project (“Kingstowne”), which Halle and his companies have been developing for the past 30 years.
2. The property that Halle wanted rezoned (“the Kingstowne Property”) is located in the district served by Supervisor Jeff McKay, whose recommendation on zoning requests in his district carries great weight with the full Board.
3. The Kingstowne rezoning request was scheduled for a public hearing and vote on June 7, 2016. On that day, Supervisor McKay moved to defer the public hearing and vote until June 21, 2016. McKay’s recommendation was unanimously approved by the full Board.
4. On June 6, 2016, one day before the deferral of the rezoning application, an entity named Roxann LLC was incorporated in Virginia by an attorney who has incorporated several other entities for McShay Communities. McShay Communities is a high end residential building company owned by Supervisor McKay’s friend, Michael McGhan.
3. At the June 21, 2016 public hearing, Supervisor McKay recommended and voted for the Kingstowne Property rezoning application, which was approved by the full Board. He did not disclose any conflict of interest before recommending and voting on the rezoning.
4. One day after the vote, on June 22, 2016, BC Consultants, a land planning and surveying company, submitted a land disturbance permit application for a vacant lot located at 7016 Roxann Road (“the Roxann Road Property”) in Alexandria, VA. The developer listed on the permit application was McShay at McDonald Estates LLC and the applying owner was listed as McShay at Pohick River LLC. But the Roxann Road Property was not owned by McShay at Pohick River LLC at this time, so this portion of the application was false. The Roxann Road Property was instead owned by Kingstowne Commercial LP, another Halle controlled entity. The lot was one of four parcels owned by Kingstowne Commercial LLP. The land disturbance permit was disapproved on August 5, 2016 and resubmitted on September 22. 2016.
5. A building permit for a new single family dwelling at the Roxann Road Property, with a declared value of $265,000.00, was applied for on September 26, 2016. The applicant was James Mueller, with the same listed address as McShay Communities. An additional contact listed on the application was Roxann LLC. The building permit failed review on three occasions, but all issues raised in the review process were listed as corrected by December 19, 2016.
6. On January 16, 2017, Halle-controlled Kingstowne Commercial LP transferred both the Roxanne Road Property and the property across the street, located at 7015 Roxann Road (“the Roxann II Property”), to Roxann LLC. The names of the seller and buyer to the transaction were withheld from the public record by request. The recorded price for the transfer of both properties was $365,000.00. There is no record of any liens filed against the properties.
8. The building permit for the Roxann Road Property was approved on February 16, 2017. A permit was issued on February 24, 2017.
9. Roxann LLC then built an upscale residential house on the Roxann Road Property. The house passed inspection on November 9, 2017.
10. On November 14, 2017, the Roxann Road Property was transferred from Roxann LLC to Supervisor McKay and his wife Crystal for a recorded price of $850,000.00. The names of the seller and buyer to the transaction were withheld from the public record by request. That same day, the McKays obtained a deed of trust on the property in the amount of $582,515.00. The property was never listed in MLS. The assessed tax value of the property was $853,000.00. Given its size and location, the property was purchased at a below market price.
11. McGhan lives in a house on the Roxann II Property.

At a minimum, Supervisor McKay should provide a detailed explanation for the above series of actions.

There are also additional facts that should be ascertained and can probably only be developed through the vehicle of a grand jury subpoena for documents and testimony. Several important questions remain, among them:

1. What if any documents were executed by Supervisor McKay, Michael McGhan, Warren Halle and/or entities controlled by them between June 6 and June 21, 2016?
2. Was $365,000.00 actually paid for the Roxann Road Property and the Roxann II Property when they were transferred from Kingstowne Commercial LP to Roxann LLC on January 16, 2017? If so, who made the payments and/or provided the funds used?
3. How much money, if any, did Supervisor McKay and his wife pay in total for the Roxann Road Property? If money was paid, where did it come from?
4. What were the financial arrangements between the McKays and Michael McGhan with respect to the Roxann Road Property?

As detailed more fully below, these allegations do find support in the publicly available records, and Supervisor McKay may have acted illegally, unethically, or improperly, but it is too early to say definitively whether that is so. However, further investigation is unquestionably warranted.

II. Detailed Factual and Historical Background

A. Key Players

• Jeff McKay: the Supervisor for the Lee District of Fairfax County, VA.
• Warren Halle: a prominent developer developing the Kingstowne Town Center. Owns the Halle and Kingstowne family of companies, which includes the Halle Companies; Halle Enterprises, Inc.; Kingstowne Commercial LP; and Kingstowne Associates LP.
• Michael McGhan: a residential developer and a personal friend of McKay. Owns the McShay Communities family of companies, which includes McShay Communities, McShay at McDonald Estates LLC, McShay at Pohick River LLC, and McShay at Madison Lane LLC.
• Glenn Silver: a real estate attorney who has represented McShay Communities for years and the apparent sole member of Roxann LLC.
• Roxann LLC: A shell LLC with the apparent sole purpose of facilitating the Roxann Property transaction described below.

B. The Roxann Property Transaction

Kingstowne is a large planned community and town center located in Fairfax County, Virginia, owned by Halle and first developed in 1985. Over the next 30 years, Halle faced significant financial constraints and opposition in developing Kingstowne. Residents opposed development plans that would lead to increased traffic, resulting in the Fairfax County Planning Commission, on occasion, denying Halle’s plans for more profitable developments. Prior to 2007, the Board had approved Halle’s plan to develop two office buildings.

In January 2007, Jeff McKay, then the Chief of Staff to Supervisor T. Dana Kauffman, announced his intention to run for a seat on the Board as the designated successor of Kauffman, who was retiring.

In 2007, Halle sought to modify the proposed development from two office buildings to four. On October 15, 2007, the Board was scheduled to consider Halle’s modified proposal. However, the hearing was deferred due to a late-filed conflict of interest form by another Supervisor.

On November 3, 2007, the Washington Post reported that McKay had received $35,000 in campaign contributions over the prior six months by entities associated with Warren Halle. Of those contributions, $15,000 had been donated within four days of the date that the Board deferred the vote on Kingstowne. In November 2007, McKay was elected to the Board to represent Lee District.

On January 28, 2008, the Board considered Halle’s modified Kingstowne proposal. As a result of the deferral, McKay had been seated and participated in the vote. During the hearing, McKay disclosed that he had received campaign contributions in excess of $100 from a company owned by Burkhart and nine companies owned by Halle. McKay moved for approval of the project, which was approved.

As of 2015, demand for office space was not materializing as expected, and Halle had yet to find any tenant interest in the proposed office buildings. As a result, construction had not begun on any of the office buildings. On August 24, 2015, Kingstowne LP applied to change the plan for Kingstowne from the four previously-approved office buildings to residential developments.

On March 30, 2016, the Department of Planning and Zoning staff issued a report recommending approval of the application, conditioned on acceptance of certain immaterial modifications. On April 26, 2016, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the modified project to the Board. The Board’s public hearing was scheduled for June 7, 2016.

On June 6, 2016, one day before the planned vote, Roxann LLC was incorporated in Virginia by Glenn Silver, an attorney. Glenn Silver has registered certain other entities owned by McShay Communities and appeared on behalf of McShay Communities in Les Project Holdings, LLC v. McShay Communities, Inc., C.A. No. 1:18-cv-1279 (E.D. Va. 2018). McShay Communities is a residential building corporation in Northern Virginia, and its owner, Michael McGhan, is a personal friend of McKay.

At the hearing on June 7, 2016, McKay moved to defer the public hearing on the new Kingstowne plan until June 21, 2016. The deferral was unanimously approved.

On June 21, 2016, the Board held the public hearing on the modified Kingstowne proposal. No members of the public appeared. The Chair asked whether any Supervisors had disclosures to make and stated that she had received campaign contributions in excess of $100 from Halle. McKay did not disclose any conflicts or contributions from Halle. The Chair noted that Kingstowne was in McKay’s district and requested that he tell the Supervisors “what action he would have [them] take.” McKay moved to approve, and voted for the modified Kingstowne proposal, and the other Supervisors unanimously agreed.

On June 22, 2016—one day after the vote—BC Consultants submitted an application for a land disturbance permit for a vacant lot located at the Roxann Road Property. The Roxann Road Property and the lot across the street, the Roxann II Property, were two of four parcels subdivided from the Kingstowne property in 2008.

The developer on the permit applications for the Roxann Property was McShay at McDonald Estates LLC, and the applying owner was McShay at Pohick River LLC. The permit was disapproved on August 5, 2016, and resubmitted on September 22, 2016.

A permit for a new single family dwelling at the Roxann Property with a declared valuation of $265,000 was processed on September 26, 2016. The applicant was James Mueller, with the same listed address as McShay Communities, and the additional contacts on the application were Roxann LLC and McShay at Madison Lane, Inc. The building permit failed review on three occasions, but all of the issues raised in the review were resolved by December 19, 2016.

On January 16, 2017, the Roxann Property, as well as the Roxann II Property, were transferred from Kingstowne Commercial LP to Roxann LLC. The recorded price of the transfer was $365,000. The names of the parties to the transaction were withheld from the public record by request. Kingstowne Commercial LP is registered at Halle’s business address. Marco A. Lopez, Esq., prepared the deed from Kingstowne Commercial LP to Roxanne LLC. There is no record of any liens filed against the properties.

The building permit was reviewed for the fourth time on February 16, 2017, and approved. The building permit was issued on February 24, 2017. A house was built on the property during 2017. The property passed inspection on November 9, 2017.

On November 14, 2017, the Roxann Property was transferred from Roxann LLC to Jeff and Crystal McKay for a recorded price of $850,000. Marco Lopez also prepared this deed, which was signed by Glenn Silver as managing member and authorized agent of Roxann LLC. The property was never listed in MLS. The assessed tax value of the property was $853,000, and given the size and location of the house, the property was purchased at a below market price. The names of the parties to the transaction were withheld from the public record by request. That same day, the McKays obtained a deed of trust on the property in the amount of $582,515. Marco Lopez notarized the Deed of Trust. There do not appear to be any lien satisfactions for the land acquisition or construction on the title report.

The public record reflects some inconsistency about the date that the McKays obtained the Roxann Property. A report by LexisNexis shows that the property is owned by Crystal McKay and provides the recording date for the sale as January 17, 2017.

The title report for the Roxann II Property reflects that it is still owned by Roxann LLC. There are no liens on the property. The residential property tax assessment for the Roxann II Property is still billed to Roxann LLC.

C. Campaign Contributions

McKay appears to accept up to two-thirds of his campaign donations from real estate, construction, and development interests. Collectively, the largest donors are Halle and Halle’s firms, whose contributions totaled around $62,000. Approximately $50,000 of those contributions being placed during McKay’s initial run for office in 2007. He has also accepted around $4,000 in contributions from McShay Communities and Timely Properties, also owned by McGhan. McKay has received around $73,000 in contributions from other development firms not associated with Halle.

Eleven individuals who donated directly or indirectly (through their companies) to McKay or Kauffman were appointed to positions in support of the Board or Fairfax County government business development. These eleven individuals donated a total of $19,550 to McKay. Almost all of these donors had ongoing or planned real estate development projects in Fairfax County, which often required approval by the Board of Supervisors.

III. Analysis

These circumstances are very concerning and strongly suggestive of a quid pro quo or other connection between McKay’s actions and the purchase of the Roxann Property and warrant further investigation. A quid pro quo may violate the Virginia bribery of public servants statute, Virginia Code Section 18.2-446, and may be prosecuted under several federal laws criminalizing public corruption: (1) program bribery, 18 U.S.C. § 666; (2) the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and (3) honest services fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1346. It should be noted that it is irrelevant for purposes of each of these statutes that McKay was only one of several votes or that the rezoning may have been approved regardless of his recommendation. Additionally, if a financial relationship existed prior to June 21, 2016, McKay’s failure to disclose the arrangement would violate Virginia Code Section 15.2-852.

First, it appears the applicant had faced unexpected resident opposition and financial constraints during the development of Kingstowne. After finding no tenant interest over a seven-year period for the already-approved office buildings, the applicant modified the project to more profitable residential developments. As the Supervisor for the district where Kingstowne was located, McKay had de facto plenary authority over Halle’s modifications to Kingstowne. The Chair’s comment for McKay to tell the Supervisors “what action he would have [them] take” and the subsequent unanimous vote reflected McKay’s authority.

Second, the events in the Kingstowne vote and the property development are so close it defies credulity that they would not be related:

• After April 26, 2016: The Board is scheduled to vote on Kingstowne on June 7, 2016.
• June 6, 2016: McShay Communities forms Roxann LLC.
• June 7, 2016: McKay moves to defer the Board’s vote on Kingstowne.
• June 21, 2016: The Board votes on Kingstowne. McKay moves for the Board to vote in favor.
• June 22, 2016: McShay Communities initiates the permit process for the Roxann Property.
• December 19, 2016: McShay Communities resolves the issues in the permit process for the Roxann Property.
• January 17, 2017: The Roxann Property and the Roxann II Property are transferred from Kingstowne Commercial to McShay Communities, through the vehicle of Roxann LLC. There is no record of any liens filed against the property.
• November 9, 2017: The Roxann Property passes inspection.
• November 14, 2017: The Roxann Property is transferred to McKay.

Third, it appears that the parties used extraordinary efforts to hide the transactions from the public. Roxann LLC has no apparent function other than as the temporary owner of the Roxann Property and the Roxann II Property. Notably, although some corporate entities affiliated with McShay Communities listed their registered agent address as McShay Communities’ office, Roxann LLC listed its registered agent address as McShay Communities’ attorney’s address. The party names in both of the property transfers—Kingstowne Commercial LP to Roxann LLC and Roxann LLC to McKay—were withheld from the public record by request, even though Virginia law requires that deeds be recorded and indexed by the name of all of the parties identified in the instrument. Va. Code Ann. §§ 17.1-223, -249. Additionally, as stated earlier, it appears that McShay Communities constructed the house on the property without publicly recording any liens on it. The question should be asked if McGhan may have received the residence at the Roxann II Property for a below-market value in exchange for his involvement.

A. Program Bribery

This conduct may constitute a violation of the program bribery statute, which prohibits corruptly accepting or agreeing to accept anything of value with the intent to be influenced in connection with a government transaction over $5,000, where the government entity receives over $10,000 in annual federal funding. 18 U.S.C. § 666(1)(B). The public official accepting the bribe must be an agent of the government entity. Id. The government need not prove that the federal funds are implicated in the bribery scheme. Sabri v. United States, 541 U.S. 600 (2004).

A Supervisor is an agent of Fairfax County, which likely receives over $10,000 in federal funds each year, and both Kingstowne and the Roxann Property are valued over $5,000. A Supervisor agreeing to accept the Roxann Property in exchange for being influenced in connection with the Kingstowne vote would constitute program bribery.

B. Hobbs Act

This alleged conduct may also constitute a violation of the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime to obtain property from another with that person’s consent under color of official right in a manner that affects interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 1951. To prove extortion under the “under color of official right” prong of the Hobbs Act, “[t]he Government need only show that a public official has obtained a payment to which he was not entitled, knowing that the payment was made in return for official acts.” Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 (1992). The public official need not actually make a direct demand for a bribe or otherwise state the quid pro quo in express terms, “for otherwise the law's effect could be frustrated by knowing winks and nods.” Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 274 (1992).

For the same reasons discussed above in connection with program bribery, a Supervisor obtaining a house or other such financial benefit in exchange for a favorable official vote may constitute a bribe under color of official right, in violation of the Hobbs Act.

C. Honest Services Fraud

This conduct may also constitute honest services fraud, which is a scheme or artifice to defraud citizens of their intangible right to a public official’s honest services. 18 U.S.C. § 1346. The elements of honest services fraud are (1) that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the intent to defraud; (3) that it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate mail or wire communications would be used; and (4) that interstate mail or wire communications were in fact used. See United States v. Vinyard, 266 F.3d 320, 326 (4th Cir. 2001). The honest services fraud statute only criminalizes bribes and kickbacks, Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. 358, 412 (2010), and the bribe or kickback must be in exchange for an “official act,” which is a formal exercise of governmental power in which the government official makes a decision or takes an action on a pending proceeding. McDonnell v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2355, 2372 (2016).

A Supervisor voting in favor of a development project would constitute an “official act,” and a scheme to provide a public official with a house directly in exchange for a vote would be a bribe that deprives citizens of their intangible right to the honest services of a Supervisor.

IV. Questions to Be Answered

There are a number of outstanding questions that need to be investigated and answered in order to understand whether the conduct described above rises to the level of a crime:

• How did McKay and or McGhan learn that the land for their respective future houses was for sale as it appears the lots were never publicly listed for sale.
• When did they learn the land was for sale.
• Was there a real estate agent involved.
• It appears the McKay house was purchased at a low market price. Did McKay ever disclose this financial benefit.
• Whether the applicant and McKay had an agreement to transfer the Roxann Property to McKay in exchange for McKay’s vote on Kingstowne.
• Why the Kingstowne vote was deferred.
• Whether a contract between McKay, McGhan, Roxann LLC, and or Halle or other proof of sale regarding the Roxann Property was signed during the two-week period of June 6-21, 2016 that the Kingstowne vote was delayed.
• Who paid the real estate taxes between January 16 and November of 2017.
• Why LexisNexis shows that Crystal McKay took title to the land one day after Kingstowne LP transferred it to Roxann LLC, thus showing inconsistent dates for the transfer of the Roxann Property to the McKays.
• Because it appears that there was no lien recorded at the time Halle transferred the Roxann Property to Roxann LLC, how was the purchase price paid.
• Given that there does not appear to have been a lien placed on the property during the construction of the soon to be McKay house, how and by whom was construction funded.
• Given the irregularities of this transaction, how much cash back to the purchaser at closing is noted on the November 2017 McKay HUD-1.
• Was the purchase price paid via a purchase money deed of trust. If so, what were the terms of the loan.
• What was the relationship between the 2008 transfer of the four parcels of land (including the Roxann Property) to Kingstowne Commercial LP and the Board’s 2008 vote.
• Whether McKay communicated with his staff, members of the Planning Commission, or other members of the Board prior to the vote on Kingstowne, and the nature of such communications.
• If it is determined that the actions of McKay are improper, what employees or staff did McKay use to conceal the transaction.
• Why Fairfax County permitted the names of the parties to the transactions to be withheld from the public record.
• Has McKay bestowed any benefit to the McGhan family.
• The nature of McShay Communities’ involvement in and knowledge of the Roxann Property transaction, including McGhan’s use of the Roxann II Property.
• The nature of Glenn Silver’s and Marco Lopez’s involvement in and knowledge of the Roxann Property transaction.
• When the contracts for McShay Communities’ contractors on the Roxann Property were executed, and the scope of work for those contractors.
• The market value of the Roxann Property and why it was not publicly listed for sale.
• Whether other developers’ campaign contributions to McKay resulted in any benefits to those developers.
• Has Halle and or related entities donated to McKay’s current election campaign.
• Have any of the current Fairfax County Board members been made aware of these troubling circumstances and, if so, what actions have they taken.
Attachments:
Exhibits to McKay memo.pdf

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Truth Fairfax ()
Date: March 27, 2019 07:51AM

People need to pay attention to corruption at all levels.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Caitlin ()
Date: March 27, 2019 09:36AM

This is long, but you guys need to read this!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: xxnem ()
Date: March 27, 2019 10:54AM


the lawsuit is a fraud and so is that government



#1 this is a petty case

* they are giving HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS to illegal aliens to stay in power

* the FCPS is their "income" and is composed of PURELY DEBT, $6,000,000,000 a year - they aren't even paying interest on the debt


#2 anyone who's read news for a decades realizes that county supervisors charges with real-estate fraud NEVER get convicted. include dianne feinstein and her husband: not convicted.

dulles access corridor had a land rip-off of re-zoning, ownership, and county execs profiting. it was in the news. they got off scott's law free.

.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: wfhtg ()
Date: March 27, 2019 10:56AM

FAIRFAX IS RUN BY CORRUPT DEMOCRATS

you could video tape them gang raping a 7-11 and they wouldn't be prosecuted

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Jeff McKay Sounds Like a Crook ()
Date: March 27, 2019 11:10AM

Jeff McKay Sounds Like a Crook.

Isn't he running to replace the POS old commie who's currently in charge?
Attachments:
Chairman Sharon Bulova - Witch.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: McKay Is Dirty ()
Date: March 27, 2019 03:14PM

McKay's got a lot of explaining to do!!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Halle and McKay--Besties ()
Date: March 27, 2019 04:48PM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: You need to do better ()
Date: March 27, 2019 05:22PM

I read it. Your smoking gun is that in return for a favorable vote in 2016 the Supervisor was permitted to purchase an improved property for an alleged sweetheart price seventeen months later, and the property in question wasn't even improved until after the Supervisor cast his favorable vote. Not saying he wasn't bribed, but that falls well short of a smoking gun. It barely merits a raised eyebrow.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Don't Need All That Bullshit ()
Date: March 27, 2019 06:49PM

You need to do better Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I read it. Your smoking gun is that in return for
> a favorable vote in 2016 the Supervisor was
> permitted to purchase an improved property for an
> alleged sweetheart price seventeen months later,
> and the property in question wasn't even improved
> until after the Supervisor cast his favorable
> vote. Not saying he wasn't bribed, but that falls
> well short of a smoking gun. It barely merits a
> raised eyebrow.

If the words "in return for a favorable vote" are not enough for you all by themselves, then you are a crooked, corrupt, POS, too.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Yes You Do ()
Date: March 27, 2019 09:16PM

It isn't our fault that your trail went cold.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Don't Need All That Bullshit ()
Date: March 28, 2019 12:03AM

Yes You Do Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It isn't our fault that your trail went cold.

Not my trail, asshole. I'm not the OP, but I know a corrupt POS scumbag when I see one, and right now I see two: Jeff McKay and you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Don’t Need All That Bullshit ()
Date: March 28, 2019 05:51AM

I’m sorry about that last post. I was busy chugging cock when I wrote it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: It's all there ()
Date: March 28, 2019 12:54PM

All the facts are backed up in the attached documents. It's ALL there.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: What turning to insults means ()
Date: March 28, 2019 01:26PM

Don't Need All That Bullshit Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes You Do Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > It isn't our fault that your trail went cold.
>
> Not my trail, asshole. I'm not the OP, but I know
> a corrupt POS scumbag when I see one, and right
> now I see two: Jeff McKay and you.

So in other words you've got nothing.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: No it isn't ()
Date: March 28, 2019 01:51PM

It's all there Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All the facts are backed up in the attached
> documents. It's ALL there.

And it all has a giant hole in the middle.

There is a reason that deferred bribery arrangements are seldom prosecuted, and it isn't because the prosecution is in on it. It is because deferred bribery arrangements are hard to prove. In your fact pattern it will be even harder because the property McKay ultimately got wasn't in existence at the time of the vote, and might never have come into existence.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Answer the Questions ()
Date: March 28, 2019 02:20PM

McKay needs to answer the questions posed. It looks bad, but if he can answer those questions he could clear everything up. If not, then he's got a problem.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Yes it is ()
Date: March 28, 2019 05:59PM

Respectfully...No Giant hole. I think the title report shows the Halle family trust transferred the "future" McKay property to the KingsTown company (which the halle family owns) and then transferred it to Roxann LLC, which then transferred it to Mckay. This may have been done to hide these acts. There is never a straight line when hiding bad acts. The whole thing is an embarrassment to FFC.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Don't Need All That Bullshit ()
Date: March 28, 2019 10:00PM

What turning to insults means Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> So in other words you've got nothing.

Actually, I have one corrupt asshole selling his public office for private benefit, and another corrupt asshole (you) who thinks that's just fine.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: K6XHT ()
Date: March 29, 2019 01:41PM

Lieutenant McReynolds from Magnum PI?
Attachments:
2_14_e_full.jpg

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Matk j ()
Date: March 29, 2019 11:26PM

Sadly, nothing is going to happen with any prosecution...this is just how it goes today

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Machine Politics ()
Date: March 30, 2019 09:43PM

Are people too stupid to understand what this means or no one cares? Gross!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Boo fn hoo ()
Date: March 30, 2019 11:06PM

After reading this, I drove up Roxann Rd...two beautiful homes sit at the end...especially 7015...wow, our money scam at work...he should resign

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Anybody but Jeff ()
Date: March 31, 2019 11:32AM

J.M. comes off as a shady guy. About 4 years ago he approached a group in Hayfield about voting for a storm water pipe project on Hayfield. The community has a flooding issue when there is a hundred year rain. He told them they had to vote that night for the project funding, if hey didn't they would never get that money again. The project was for a 60+ inch pipe for 1.3 million. Today, its a 48 inch pipe at 3 Million dollars. This project will add tons more water into Huntley Meadows eco system. Never got the approval from DEQ for this discharge. The folks at Huntley Meadows aren't saying much because the project is run by a former park employee they said. What ever he says is right. It's time for a change in Fairfax County and Lee District and he is not it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Anybody but Jeff ()
Date: April 02, 2019 01:42PM

More to come.....

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Huh ()
Date: April 02, 2019 09:25PM

Hey Anybody But Jeff...

Ummm residents don’t vote on flooding projects. That makes no sense and doesn’t happen. Nice try in making stuff up.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Popo ()
Date: April 02, 2019 10:32PM

It is time for a change from the Dems AND Jeff Mc.in Lee District..but only Dems seem to run...and no one challenges McKay...solid Demtard area

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Lee District Rep ()
Date: April 03, 2019 05:35PM

Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Huh ()
Date: April 02, 2019 09:25PM

Hey Anybody But Jeff...

Ummm residents don’t vote on flooding projects. That makes no sense and doesn’t happen. Nice try in making stuff up.

Hate to say it, but on September 17 2014 the Hayfield Civic Association took a vote with McKay present to proceed with the project. www.hayfieldfarmva.com/newsletters/
Use this link, click on all archives and go to October 2014. Page 5 General Membership Meeting September 17. They voted for it then.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: More to come ()
Date: April 04, 2019 07:38PM

Truth Fairfax- Who has the original Memo.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Pandering ()
Date: April 11, 2019 03:11AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: yesyesyes ()
Date: April 13, 2019 09:35PM

So McKay was part of a decade-plus conspiracy to ... buy a house at a $10,000 discount?

Dying to know who did all this research and posted it here. It's an impressive amount of work, if nothing else!

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Itslegal ()
Date: April 22, 2019 03:38PM

Corruption is Legal in Fairfax https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tu32CCA_Ig

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Sooooooooo ()
Date: April 24, 2019 12:15AM

What are You Waiting For To file a civil or criminal complaint?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Brock Lesnar ()
Date: May 26, 2019 06:10PM

Truth Fairfax, submitting that content on here is like someone who used to use Google+; nobody important will read your shit and it definitely will not go viral.

You would have much better luck on Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: I didnt do it ()
Date: July 14, 2019 07:18AM

I have to say at no time did I ever think that J.M. could sink this low. Wow, is all I can say. I will no longer be supporting this typical corrupt bastard. Look luck in tearing down a once great community.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: The truth came out ()
Date: July 14, 2019 09:00AM

This thread was brought to you by one of McKay’s opponents for the Democratic nomination.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Realyyyyyy ()
Date: July 14, 2019 09:33AM

I don't care who brought this up. How come no one is talking about it. Oh wait, this is a democrat and we will have a George Soros Commonwealth Attorney Soon so this will be dropped.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: TBD69 ()
Date: July 15, 2019 08:52AM

WTF J.M. What kind of crap is this. and nothing is done about this.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: not voting for him ()
Date: July 29, 2019 09:57AM

Here is the better choice.

https://galdoforchairman.com/

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Hi Jeffery ()
Date: August 07, 2019 01:29PM

Hi Jeff or Jeff's staff that reads this site for him. Just a few things to share with you. If you are thinking about supporting this change in the school boundaries, please think again. To vote for this and the tax increase that will go along with it is soo sad. Sad for. This will cost you some serious votes and could make you unemployed.

Jeff, you also supported to change in school time back a few years ago to make a minority amount of voters happy. That caused an increase in our taxes to do so.

Jeff, you supported the building of the pump station along Hunting Creek. That was built to prevent flooding in the Huntington area. It's built and up and running. But on July 8th after the heavy rain the community flooded again.

Couples of months ago Jeff you tooted your horn about the future widening to help with traffic along Telegraph Rd in the Hayfield area. You did that to secure votes for your potential future new job. However the only info about this is the fact that the widening will only go to 100yds north of Hayfield Rd. What will happen with the raised crosswalk installed 5 years ago that no body uses. Oh, that will have to be removed to accommodate the widening. This issue was brought up in a civic association meeting and everyone said the widening of Telegraph Rd was not even on the radar. Well you lied. IT is and you waisted money again.

I found on Fairfax Underground a page about the Hayfield Pipe Project. 7 million dollars to maybe fix the flooding that Might take place. This is being built because of the potential of 48 homes might get flooded if the 100 year rain comes. Why would only 48 homes flood and not the entire community? The community voted for a 60 inch pipe at 1.2 million dollars. They are getting a 48 inch pipe at 7 million dollars.

Summation: You waste money and that's a big reason no one should vote for you.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Yieks!!!!!! ()
Date: August 09, 2019 11:31AM

The last post is pretty damning.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: 5ytr ()
Date: August 12, 2019 06:36PM

OP seems to be forgetting that dirty deeds are common by fx co gov members

INFACT - the news reported on (reston planned town) a board member in reston and husband/wife team who

(1) bought property cheap on dulles cooridoor (already suspicious who didn't know the value was going up? who everybody knew)

(2) rezoned the property directly after purchase

(3) THE WAY ILLEGAL PART: used reston money to begin government projects on or around that land to make it more valuable (such as critical infrastructure: sewer road electrical water and gas)

(4) hugely reported in the news as a DEMOCRAT SCAM

THE TWO RESTON COUNTY EXECS WERE NOT EVEN PROSECUTED

and we're still waiting

and about that deal of letting DC marion barry skip welfare by having huge DC condos built in reston? about that scam ??

oh - and about reston suddenly building ALLOT OF FEDERAL BUILDINGS EXACLY ON THE LAND DISCUSSED ABOVE (you see no legit buyers, fed buyers)

-------------------------------

and how bulova is funding illegal aliens for votes ? where is the balance sheet on that ?

that BULOVA POSTED ON FX CO GOV WEBSITE flaunting her pay was "well above 250,000 but that foia is refused"

flaunting she'd have anyone arrested and DEAD LIKE EPSTEIN if they demanded her real pay

HEY - FUCK OFF AND DIE

you can talk about a land deal of 1 person making his own home zoned as a living space

-----------------------------

> Department of Planning and Zoning staff issued a report recommending approval of the application

* every step of the way the county was involved and approved and took actions - BY DEMOCRATS - the people SUPPOSEDLY complaining. if a paper was anonymous it was the county who did that work and signed it as so.

* it's not illegal to buy land

it IS illegal to evaluate a $356k land at a higher rate just after purchase (to raise taxes upon illegally) - which the county is apparently attempting

* WAYS AND MEANS SHOULD BE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, that thieves cannot raise their own pay nor make money appear out of no-where. however: fx co gov, police, and democrats in general have ASSULTED people who make such inquiries

THERE ISN'T A DAMN CHANCE THE POST ABOVE IS MAKING PROGRESS

WHERE IS THE URL FOR THE WP ARTICLE?

who typed in all that crap ? even g2 isn't that crazy - too lazy for that.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: e8dfkdfj ()
Date: August 12, 2019 06:38PM

fx co gov et al have acted with impunity for DECADES

the above isn't a drop in the bucket of what's been going on

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Criminal Investigation Begins ()
Date: September 17, 2019 10:32AM


Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: large and in charge ()
Date: September 17, 2019 05:17PM

If the VSP is investigating this nothing will happen. The 2nd black face down in Richmond will be in charge of making sure of this. It's all corrupt.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Human Tripod ()
Date: September 18, 2019 04:08PM

Nothing will happen...

Democrats have a lifetime exemption from prosecution.

"Law Enforcement" in Virginia is as corrupt as it is elsewhere in the U.S. from the leadership of the FBI on down.

Unless it's traffic related, Virginia "Law Enforcement" cannot handle it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: LORDHUMONGOUS ()
Date: September 19, 2019 11:23AM

THIS MAGNIFICENT BASTARD IS CORRECT, GOOGLE DRUNKIN" GERRY AND HIS DWI ACCIDENT 15 YEARS AGO, FCPD INVESTIGATING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOS, YEAH< THERE'S NO CONFLICT.... I'LL BET YOU A OUTDOOR DECK BUILT BY ON DUTY FIREFIGHTERS WITH COUNTY LUMBER, I"M CORRECT.

Human Tripod Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nothing will happen...
>
> Democrats have a lifetime exemption from
> prosecution.
>
> "Law Enforcement" in Virginia is as corrupt as it
> is elsewhere in the U.S. from the leadership of
> the FBI on down.
>
> Unless it's traffic related, Virginia "Law
> Enforcement" cannot handle it.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: Chevette ()
Date: September 19, 2019 06:00PM

Bought my very first new car from Jim McKay Chevrolet in 1984.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: lee dist Vibe ()
Date: September 19, 2019 07:25PM

Bought my very first new car from Jim McKay Chevrolet in 1984. Not even the same family.
Did anyone ever here the story before the above person moved. he lived across the street from Hayfield High. He complained to the school system because the loudspeaker for the football games was too loud and it was keeping his precious babies up on Friday nights......So they had to turn it down.

What I found interesting is he also told county officials not to post on the public website who owned the property before he did. What are you hiding.

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: newsmuster ()
Date: September 27, 2019 02:59PM

Criminal Investigation Begins Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> McKay is officially under criminal investigation
> by
> Virginia State Police
>
> https://wamu.org/story/19/08/29/virginia-state-pol
> ice-open-investigation-into-fairfax-county-board-m
> ember-jeff-mckay/?fbclid=IwAR0lsG0TSEpz4_uxumHqCLI
> 6musiv7XY4WrdfMVBfdPVjrEIDfj9vi--DBA


No new news a month later.

Maybe someone directed them to bury the story until he is elected?

Options: ReplyQuote
Re: Jeff McKay Corruption Conflict of Interest Complaint and Supporting Documents
Posted by: PRIAPRISM ()
Date: September 29, 2019 11:00AM

NOTHING BURGER. IT WILL BE QUIETLY CLOSED, DEC 1.

Options: ReplyQuote


Your Name: 
Your Email (Optional): 
Subject: 
Attach a file
  • No file can be larger than 75 MB
  • All files together cannot be larger than 300 MB
  • 30 more file(s) can be attached to this message
Spam prevention:
Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
 **         **         ********   ********   *******  
 **    **   **    **   **     **  **        **     ** 
 **    **   **    **   **     **  **        **     ** 
 **    **   **    **   ********   ******     ******** 
 *********  *********  **         **               ** 
       **         **   **         **        **     ** 
       **         **   **         ********   *******  
This forum powered by Phorum.