Fairfax County General :
Fairfax Underground
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
Welcome to Fairfax Underground, a project site designed to improve communication among residents of Fairfax County, VA. Feel free to post anything Northern Virginia residents would find interesting.
PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
fake card
()
Date: February 17, 2019 11:02AM
if they are corrupt they could steer way too much money to a business hoping for a larger kickback, such as a very cheap deal on a home (which would be "detected" maybe), or cash in another country (which also might get detected - it did for gen. patraeus)
if they are slightly corrupt, they'll save as much money as possible and steer the extra back to the pentagon, installing a new pinball machine in the basement
being the pentagon they have to mobilize. they have troops near the border the question is if they are qualified or trainable.
if they come in under cost they get more money for their other concerns. but if they come in over cost congress might be forced to pay for "cost over-run" (this depends on politics)
if they take a really long time they can keep certain "jobs" open and paid longer.
if they are slightly corrupt, they'll save as much money as possible and steer the extra back to the pentagon, installing a new pinball machine in the basement
being the pentagon they have to mobilize. they have troops near the border the question is if they are qualified or trainable.
if they come in under cost they get more money for their other concerns. but if they come in over cost congress might be forced to pay for "cost over-run" (this depends on politics)
if they take a really long time they can keep certain "jobs" open and paid longer.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
fake card
()
Date: February 17, 2019 11:03AM
> if they take a really long time they can keep certain "jobs" open and paid longer
but they wont if they know they can finish early, because if they can they can steer the remainder to (other military projects)
but they wont if they know they can finish early, because if they can they can steer the remainder to (other military projects)
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
trump's screwball negotiations
()
Date: February 17, 2019 01:06PM
I remember during the 2016 campaign when Trump got up, smiled at the crowd, and asked "And who's going to pay for the wall?". And everybody chanted "Take the money away from our troops, and disaster victims!".
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Land Warfare
()
Date: February 17, 2019 01:20PM
Oh, I don't know. The F-35 program is something like $150 Billion over budget and nobody seems to care about that. Why would they care about a fraction of that for the wall? This is all political theatre and has absolutely nothing to do with money.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Oyez, oyez
()
Date: February 17, 2019 02:29PM
It’s about abuse of powers. Trump needs to be brought up short on this, and soon will be.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
name it
()
Date: February 17, 2019 03:45PM
Oyez, oyez Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It’s about abuse of powers. Trump needs to be
> brought up short on this, and soon will be.
Which power was abused?
-------------------------------------------------------
> It’s about abuse of powers. Trump needs to be
> brought up short on this, and soon will be.
Which power was abused?
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
DACA Thats Abuse Of Power
()
Date: February 17, 2019 04:55PM
Not a word from Democrats about anything Obama did or the lying liberal media
You can lie enough that fools believe you but all you get are the fools
You can lie enough that fools believe you but all you get are the fools
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Pentagoen Corruption
()
Date: February 17, 2019 05:09PM
AOC needs to start another investigation
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Oyez, oyez
()
Date: February 17, 2019 06:02PM
name it Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Which power was abused?
Read Article 1. Or you can just wait for the USSC to explain it to you and Trump at the same time.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Which power was abused?
Read Article 1. Or you can just wait for the USSC to explain it to you and Trump at the same time.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Socratic method
()
Date: February 17, 2019 06:13PM
Oyez, oyez Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> name it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Which power was abused?
>
> Read Article 1. Or you can just wait for the USSC
> to explain it to you and Trump at the same time.
Sit down, sir. If this is some sort of ferple attempt to make a power of the purse argument, you e failed miserably. You've not only failed to articulate a point, it appears you know nothing of the topic. Perhaps if you're smart enough, you might be able to find and read the National Emergencies Act. Ask mom for the AOL password.
-------------------------------------------------------
> name it Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Which power was abused?
>
> Read Article 1. Or you can just wait for the USSC
> to explain it to you and Trump at the same time.
Sit down, sir. If this is some sort of ferple attempt to make a power of the purse argument, you e failed miserably. You've not only failed to articulate a point, it appears you know nothing of the topic. Perhaps if you're smart enough, you might be able to find and read the National Emergencies Act. Ask mom for the AOL password.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Budgets 4 Trillion Some
()
Date: February 17, 2019 06:49PM
3 some trillion in actual revenue and 900 some in deficit, do the Democrats care about that hell no there welfare programs are a huge part of the deficit as lazy people on welfare don't work to pay taxes to provide revenue
When your talking trillions your talking pocket change building a Wall America needs for 8 billion. 40 billions 1 percent 8 billion I need a microscope to find that in the Federal budget and US presidents do have spending authority for National Emergencies especially when its pocket change.
When 1000 illegals a day plus cross into the USA with drugs and criminals in their midst that's a definite National Emergency
When your talking trillions your talking pocket change building a Wall America needs for 8 billion. 40 billions 1 percent 8 billion I need a microscope to find that in the Federal budget and US presidents do have spending authority for National Emergencies especially when its pocket change.
When 1000 illegals a day plus cross into the USA with drugs and criminals in their midst that's a definite National Emergency
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Lol...
()
Date: February 17, 2019 07:15PM
Socratic method Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sit down, sir. If this is some sort of ferple attempt to
> make a power of the purse argument, you e failed miserably.
> You've not only failed to articulate a point, it appears
> you know nothing of the topic. Perhaps if you're smart
> enough, you might be able to find and read the National
> Emergencies Act.a Ask mom for the AOL password.
No previous declaration under NEA has allowed the circumvention of Congress so as to expend funds that it had expressly refused to authorize or appropriate.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sit down, sir. If this is some sort of ferple attempt to
> make a power of the purse argument, you e failed miserably.
> You've not only failed to articulate a point, it appears
> you know nothing of the topic. Perhaps if you're smart
> enough, you might be able to find and read the National
> Emergencies Act.a Ask mom for the AOL password.
No previous declaration under NEA has allowed the circumvention of Congress so as to expend funds that it had expressly refused to authorize or appropriate.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
No right turn on red...
()
Date: February 17, 2019 07:29PM
^^^ It would amount to allowing statute law to be created by the Executive Branch. Not allowed in the founders’ scheme of things.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Tell Us About Gun Bans
()
Date: February 17, 2019 08:24PM
>Not allowed in the founders’ scheme of things.
Democrats allow them even though the 2nd in the Bill of Rights says "Shall Not be Infringe" .
Did you not hear,the Democrats shredded the Constitution some time ago so don't bring it up again, its mere trivia today
Democrats allow them even though the 2nd in the Bill of Rights says "Shall Not be Infringe" .
Did you not hear,the Democrats shredded the Constitution some time ago so don't bring it up again, its mere trivia today
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Come on, dummy...
()
Date: February 17, 2019 08:41PM
No individual right to keep and bear arms existed prior to 2008.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Boo fn hoo
()
Date: February 17, 2019 08:47PM
I doubt the chant as mentioned in thread 2 is accurate. Chants are short.
Actually, I dont care what pocket he steals from JUST GITTER DONE!!! including welfare, medicaid, snap and section 8, fema,...you get the point
Actually, I dont care what pocket he steals from JUST GITTER DONE!!! including welfare, medicaid, snap and section 8, fema,...you get the point
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Tell That to All Those Who Died
()
Date: February 17, 2019 09:44PM
>No individual right to keep and bear arms existed prior to 2008.
In every war since 1776 if they could speak they would not say Right On Brother . Foul words blasphemies curses and more would follow you forever as they knew. All America knew what the 2nd says and means which is
The 2nd is an individual right to keep and bear arms, the question is what is infringement, bans on firearms are absolutely one, reasonable regulations which even the founders knew are not
In every war since 1776 if they could speak they would not say Right On Brother . Foul words blasphemies curses and more would follow you forever as they knew. All America knew what the 2nd says and means which is
The 2nd is an individual right to keep and bear arms, the question is what is infringement, bans on firearms are absolutely one, reasonable regulations which even the founders knew are not
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Come on, dummy
()
Date: February 17, 2019 09:53PM
‘Individual’ is a word. So is ‘collective’. If you look at them long enough, you might notice that they are different.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
My Point Was Made
()
Date: February 17, 2019 10:09PM
By those who died defending the entire constitution and all those who lived and live by it, your unconstitutional communist point floats with you into the sewers of hell where it rots
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
The Constitution Itself
()
Date: February 17, 2019 10:25PM
Provides for a collective military force, the 2nd amendment of the Bill of Rights provides for a individual right to keep and bear arms
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Donald "Joseph Goebbels" Trump
()
Date: February 17, 2019 11:40PM
The Constitution Itself Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Provides for a collective military force, the 2nd
> amendment of the Bill of Rights provides for a
> individual right to keep and bear arms
The founding fathers wanted Mexico to pay for the 2nd amendment, But they never did. So now we're paying for it, based on leadership from Jesus. It's an emergency.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Provides for a collective military force, the 2nd
> amendment of the Bill of Rights provides for a
> individual right to keep and bear arms
The founding fathers wanted Mexico to pay for the 2nd amendment, But they never did. So now we're paying for it, based on leadership from Jesus. It's an emergency.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Come on, dopey...
()
Date: February 18, 2019 11:00AM
The Constitution Itself Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Provides for a collective military force, the 2nd
> amendment of the Bill of Rights provides for a
> individual right to keep and bear arms
There was never an individual right prior to 2008 when Scalia somehow magically found one lying in the weeds of his own confusion.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Provides for a collective military force, the 2nd
> amendment of the Bill of Rights provides for a
> individual right to keep and bear arms
There was never an individual right prior to 2008 when Scalia somehow magically found one lying in the weeds of his own confusion.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
BTW Collective Farms
()
Date: February 18, 2019 01:00PM
Failed in the Soviet Union So did communism everwhere its been forced upon people
>There was never an individual right prior to 2008 when Scalia somehow magically found one lying in the weeds of his own confusion.
The American people knew they had a individual right since 1791 to keep and bear arms
The high court refused to hear 2nd amendment cases until 2008 with the exception of Miller in 1939 where the court majority ruled against Miller because his sawed off shotgun was not a weapon designed to be used by a militia. Now how about saying the something about the AR-15 , that's 3 strikes your out
>There was never an individual right prior to 2008 when Scalia somehow magically found one lying in the weeds of his own confusion.
The American people knew they had a individual right since 1791 to keep and bear arms
The high court refused to hear 2nd amendment cases until 2008 with the exception of Miller in 1939 where the court majority ruled against Miller because his sawed off shotgun was not a weapon designed to be used by a militia. Now how about saying the something about the AR-15 , that's 3 strikes your out
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Silly goose
()
Date: February 18, 2019 01:28PM
Too stupid to bother with. Go read a book or ten and then come back. There was never an individual right prior to 2008. The original 2nd Amendment was to keep state militias (aka, slave patrols) from being disarmed by Congress. The phrase ‘keep and bear arms’ itself was military usage at the time. The phrase ‘carry weapons’ was what referred to individuals.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
you're fucking dense
()
Date: February 18, 2019 01:48PM
Silly goose Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too stupid to bother with. Go read a book or ten
> and then come back. There was never an individual
> right prior to 2008. The original 2nd Amendment
> was to keep state militias (aka, slave patrols)
> from being disarmed by Congress. The phrase
> ‘keep and bear arms’ itself was military usage
> at the time. The phrase ‘carry weapons’ was
> what referred to individuals.
The Framers believed, rightly or wrongly, that the Second Amendment was merely an affirmation of the God given right to self defense rather than the granting of a right by a government of men. Hence, it was always considered an individual right. History shows this to be true. SCOTUS simply affirmed that view. They did nothing to create a new right.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too stupid to bother with. Go read a book or ten
> and then come back. There was never an individual
> right prior to 2008. The original 2nd Amendment
> was to keep state militias (aka, slave patrols)
> from being disarmed by Congress. The phrase
> ‘keep and bear arms’ itself was military usage
> at the time. The phrase ‘carry weapons’ was
> what referred to individuals.
The Framers believed, rightly or wrongly, that the Second Amendment was merely an affirmation of the God given right to self defense rather than the granting of a right by a government of men. Hence, it was always considered an individual right. History shows this to be true. SCOTUS simply affirmed that view. They did nothing to create a new right.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Its The Slaver Goons Again
()
Date: February 18, 2019 02:08PM
Lunatics using that crazy argument about slave patrols to ban firearms there sickos. There never was a revolution either will be the next thing out of their gun grabbing communist mouths
The patriots with the founders never used their own firearms they will tell us, a huge reason the individual right was created and put where individual rights of the people are
In The Bill of Rights
The patriots with the founders never used their own firearms they will tell us, a huge reason the individual right was created and put where individual rights of the people are
In The Bill of Rights
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Silly goose.,,
()
Date: February 18, 2019 02:49PM
The founders believed as of 1787 that the promise to anti-Federalists of an eventual Bill of Rights was a necessary step in assuring the possibility of Constitutional ratification. Nine states ultimately did vote for ratification and a proposed Bill of Rights was then introduced in the 1st Congress. The bit that became the 2nd Amendment was a bone of reassurance tossed to slave-states that greatly feared the expanded powers of the new Congress to leave them unprotected in their homes. There was no intention of creating a gun-toting Wild West show
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
it's worth noting
()
Date: February 18, 2019 05:38PM
Wrong. Even our Framers from the northern colonies and eventually states ascribed to the notion that our right to bear arms was derived from our God given right to self defense. That notion is embodied in the Second Amendment. It is of little consequence that the Supreme Court merely reiterated that position in 2008.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Silly goose...
()
Date: February 18, 2019 05:54PM
If they were talking about a right to keep and bear arms, it was in a military context. Talk of such things as hunting and personal safety would have been a matter of carrying weapons.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
so very stupid of you
()
Date: February 18, 2019 06:29PM
Wrong. That's just a silly and stupid contention not born out by historical facts or customs. This novel linguistic argument only appeared in the last year or so and has been laughed at by many reputable scholars.
John Dickinson affirmed, inalienable rights such as self-defense were rights “which God gave to you and which no inferior power has a right to take away."
Take a look at Fisher Ames if you need further evidence of how wrong you are.
John Dickinson affirmed, inalienable rights such as self-defense were rights “which God gave to you and which no inferior power has a right to take away."
Take a look at Fisher Ames if you need further evidence of how wrong you are.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Silly goose...
()
Date: February 18, 2019 07:03PM
Too stupid. You are a useless drone. History teaches much, but you miss class. There never was an individual right prior to 2008. Simple fact.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
so very stupid of you
()
Date: February 18, 2019 07:32PM
Silly goose... Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too stupid. You are a useless drone. History
> teaches much, but you miss class. There never was
> an individual right prior to 2008. Simple fact.
You've been given historical evidence proving you wrong. Simply reiterating your erroneous contention in a more forceful manner without providing any facts to support it does nothing to advance your cause. If anything, it only proves how wrong you are.
The first state Declaration of Rights to use the term "bear arms" was that of Pennsylvania in 1776: "That the people have a right to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State." Another clear example disproving your ridiculous assertion.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Too stupid. You are a useless drone. History
> teaches much, but you miss class. There never was
> an individual right prior to 2008. Simple fact.
You've been given historical evidence proving you wrong. Simply reiterating your erroneous contention in a more forceful manner without providing any facts to support it does nothing to advance your cause. If anything, it only proves how wrong you are.
The first state Declaration of Rights to use the term "bear arms" was that of Pennsylvania in 1776: "That the people have a right to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State." Another clear example disproving your ridiculous assertion.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Silly goose...
()
Date: February 18, 2019 07:55PM
You’re too dumb to realize how dumb you are. More than 95% of the uses of the phrase ‘keep and bear arms’ at the time occurred in a military context. This means nothing to you because you have been trained like a seal not to let it matter to you. The actual history of the 2nd Amendment is utterly beyond your comprehension.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Sam says you're stupid
()
Date: February 18, 2019 08:32PM
That tired talking point has been debunked many times over. It's why you find yourself utterly baffled by the facts in front of you. You have no response to them.
"The said Constitution should be never construed to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams,
"The said Constitution should be never construed to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms." Samuel Adams,
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
All you fuckers
()
Date: February 18, 2019 08:36PM
How did this go from being about "Pentagon reviewing funds to shift for border wall" to a long winded, useless debate on the 2nd Amendment?
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
kooks, loons, and nutjobs
()
Date: February 19, 2019 05:57AM
All you fuckers Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How did this go from being about "Pentagon
> reviewing funds to shift for border wall" to a
> long winded, useless debate on the 2nd Amendment?
Because trumptards think America was founded by a bunch of gun-hoarding Alex Jones types, whose main goal was to ensure that the average citizen could overthrow the same government they were working so hard to set up.
-------------------------------------------------------
> How did this go from being about "Pentagon
> reviewing funds to shift for border wall" to a
> long winded, useless debate on the 2nd Amendment?
Because trumptards think America was founded by a bunch of gun-hoarding Alex Jones types, whose main goal was to ensure that the average citizen could overthrow the same government they were working so hard to set up.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Off in the weeds
()
Date: February 19, 2019 10:29AM
Phony ideas about guns and dark-skinned people are all that some 'minds' have ever been able to process.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Fuck Cleveland spam guy
()
Date: February 24, 2019 08:08AM
Fuck Cleveland spam guy
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
pravda
()
Date: February 24, 2019 08:42AM
Fuck Cleveland spam guy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fuck Cleveland spam guy
He's almost as bad as the GUN = DEATH asshole. Not quite tho.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fuck Cleveland spam guy
He's almost as bad as the GUN = DEATH asshole. Not quite tho.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Hmmm...
()
Date: February 24, 2019 08:46AM
Your ego seems to have been badly battered. Such deflation suggests that you must have suffered yet another butt-kicking in the recent past.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Only one really contributes here
()
Date: February 24, 2019 08:50AM
pravda Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fuck Cleveland spam guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fuck Cleveland spam guy
>
>
> He's almost as bad as the GUN = DEATH asshole.
> Not quite tho.
While both CSG and G=D are spammers, at least CSG's spam is grounded in more truth and facts (black magic, increasing sexual attraction, etc) than G=D. G=D's post are pure fantasy and fairytale lies.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Fuck Cleveland spam guy Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Fuck Cleveland spam guy
>
>
> He's almost as bad as the GUN = DEATH asshole.
> Not quite tho.
While both CSG and G=D are spammers, at least CSG's spam is grounded in more truth and facts (black magic, increasing sexual attraction, etc) than G=D. G=D's post are pure fantasy and fairytale lies.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Down in flames
()
Date: February 24, 2019 08:59AM
I'm surprised you still dare post at all as thoroughly humiliated as your crowd has lately been by your NRA-bashing tormenter.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Proud of your retardation
()
Date: February 24, 2019 09:08AM
Down in flames Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm surprised you still dare post at all as
> thoroughly humiliated as your crowd has lately
> been by your NRA-bashing tormenter.
I'm sure a toilet flushing surprises you. Most folks with an IQ<80 are surprised by lots of stuff.
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm surprised you still dare post at all as
> thoroughly humiliated as your crowd has lately
> been by your NRA-bashing tormenter.
I'm sure a toilet flushing surprises you. Most folks with an IQ<80 are surprised by lots of stuff.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Down in flames
()
Date: February 24, 2019 09:31AM
More like twice that. Big-time CV and the whole nine yards.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
Tired of these Fucking Illegals
()
Date: February 24, 2019 09:42AM
Build a 100 foot high wall with a foundation 20 foot down, with a 100 foot wide moat around it filled with piranha and electrified barbed wire on top. Then patrol it with predator drones armed with stinger missiles and machine guns. Kill anyone - man, woman, or child - who tries to cross. Eff em all.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
MagaMan
()
Date: February 24, 2019 01:48PM
I dont care what the wall looks like it can be steel slats,or a solid brick wall or razor wire entanglments or a mine field or a combination of all. As long as it's strong enough to deter the illegal leech. We need to stop the over 1000 per day illegal leech invasion. Each and every illegal leech costs the US taxpayer over 8000 per annum. We need to stop the bleed.
Re: PENTAGON REVIEWING FUNDS TO SHIFT FOR BORDER WALL
Posted by:
lady gaga
()
Date: February 24, 2019 04:29PM
Open borders is all part of the elitist plan of a global plutocracy. The top .001% will rule over all. It might take another 100 years, but that is their plan. Trump stands in their way. Take note of the asshole politicians who support open borders or no wall. Likewise, take note of the asshole posters on this very forum who preach the same thing. All are either useful idiots or pawns of the global elite.